Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutCEDAR BEACH FO(, `® HENRY P. SMITH- JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III President Ln TELEPHONE John Bednoski, Jr. (516)765-1892 • ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Date: March 16, 1988 To Whom It May Concern: Attached hereto is a Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by J.M.O.. Consultants on behalf of Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. in connection with their application for a Wetland Permit to maintenance dredge an existing channel to 4' at mlw. Resultant spoil, approximately 1025 cu. yds. of clean sand shall be trucked to an upland site for disposal. Project is located at Stillwater Lake Inlet at Cedar Beach, Southold. pp c s ��, "� ohn M. Bredemeyer, III, Pres. Town Trustees Posted: March 16, 1988 FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President =2 TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President (516)765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III �y JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. �pl HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTfiOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO-SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT Date: August 25, 1988 APPLICATION NO. : 6`21 NAME: J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of th Cedar Beach Park Association This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 6171 Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency for the action described below has determined that the project will not have a significant effect' on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: To dredge a 520 ' x 12 ' area to a depth of 3 ' at MLW. Approximately 346 cu. yds. of sand is proposed to be dredged and trucked to the Town Landfill for disposal. LOCATION: 255 Lakeside Drive, Southold, New York 119,71. REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on-site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment form has been submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board. 3. The scope of the original dredging project has been reduced by the applicant. 4. The remaining dredging is for several property owners. t Board of Trustees - Assessment - Page 2. r For further information regarding this application please contact: Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees Town Hall, Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Call: ( 516) 765-1892 or 765-1932 cc: Robert A. Greene, D.E.C. , Stony Brook Commissioner Thomas C. Jorling M,* Infurna,- Army Corps of Engineers Thomas Hart, Coastal Management Conservation Advisory Council Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals Supervisor Frank Murphy Town Clerk' s Bulletin Board J.1\4.0. Consulting on behalf of the Cedar Beach Park Association Michael Corey, Senior Environmental Analyst, State of New York, Dept. of State Planning Board `1� .27)-7c / 617.21 SEAR Appendlx A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine' significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: . Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts .2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is'likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is,identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: O Part 1 O Part 2 OPart 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' n C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. • A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action Name of Lead Agency Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title.-of Responsible Officer Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead Agency . Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 1 S PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION . Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may ha.z a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the .entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considers-' as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additiona_ information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each.instance. NAME OF ACTION ! n-named' LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address,Municipality and County) Lakeside Drive Southold Suffolk NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE GlennE. Just of J.M.O. Consulting ( 516) -329-3575 ADDRESS " P.O. Box 361-N. Country Rd. CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE WadingRiver, N.Y. 11792 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE Glenn E. Just for the Cedar Beach Association, In . (516 ) 765-3856 ADDRESS ` c/o 255 Lakeside Drive CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE Southold, N.Y. 11971 DESCRIPTION OF ACTION e Applicant proposes to maintenance dredge an existing channel to 4 ' at MLW. Resultant spoil (approximately(8,-,LS c.y. of clean sand) shall 'be trucked to an upland disposal site. Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial '❑Commercial ®Residential (suburban) ORural (non-farm) OForest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: n/a acres. APPROXIMATE .ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Nor.-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Inc ludes>orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of. ECL) acres acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? sand a. Soil drainage: )OWell drained 1 00 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site OPoorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the N' Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes XDNO a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) r ' , 5:'Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slope's.:< ®0-1U% 1,00 �/, .010-15% % 015% or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes . Flo 7. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? OYes ®No 8. What is the depth of the water table? n/a (in feet) 9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? Oyes UN 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? fWes ONo' 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? OYes Flo According to ` Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e.. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) OYes Flo Describe 13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ®Yes ONo If yes, explain utilized for docking n1_pa.urp hnat-,_ 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? OYes XRNo unknown 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a: Name I;t i 1 1 wa tPr T.akp — Cprla r Rpa rh Harbor b. Size (In acres). 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? DYes ElNo a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? OYes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? OYes - MNo 19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes Flo 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or h9zardous wastes? OYes Flo B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: • acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project.acreage to remain undeveloped acres. N/A d. Length.of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces-existing ; proposed g. Maximum vehicular.trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially Ultimately i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure height; width; length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? ft. ! 00-S 2. How much natural material (i.e., rock, earth, etc.) wild be removed from the site? _ tons cub�ywds .3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? OYes ONo Pf4/A a. If yes, for what intend . purpose is the site being reclaimed? b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? OYes ONo 4.. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0 1 acres. 5. Will any-mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important.vegetation be removed by this project? OYes o 6. If single phas project: Anticipated period of construction ], months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated 1 (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 monlPh year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? OYes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes �'No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 4 ; after project is complete 0 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? ❑Yes �KNo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes No a. If yes, indicate ,type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes + 6o Type 14. Will surface area of .an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? OYes /'I qdo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? PYes. ONo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? OYes No a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid. waste facility be'used? OYes ONo c. If yes, give name ; location d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo e. If-Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? OYes *0 a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the'anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? OYes 00 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes No 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? OYes No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? OYes No / If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated water usage per_day n/a gallons/day. 24. Does project,involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes Io If Yes,._.explain / 2S. Approvals Required: Submittal Type Date City, Town, Village Board Dyes ;KN0 City, Town, Village Planning Board Dyes N�'o City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes ONo City, County Health Department Dyes RN Other Local Agencies �&s 'ONo Town Trustees (Southold) _ 11/87 Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes P No State Agencies Fxxes ,❑No N.Y.S,D.F—C, & N Y_S n 11/87 Federal Agencies U§es ONo U.S.D.O.A. . 11/87 C. Zoning and Planning Information 1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes 0 If Yes, indicate decision required: /\ ❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan ❑newlrevision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other N/A 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? K 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? ❑Yes ONo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a 'A mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a 'A mile? Dyes ONo 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes ONo 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Dyes ONo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ONo 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? T❑Yes 0,No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffid -❑Yes ONo D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Sponsor Glen E. Just of J.M. O. Consulting Date 11/12/87 Signature ��• ��' Title _Pr _Sid n r If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment. Part 2--PROJECT MAPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected'to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation !n Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds.any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, chece column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1. Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will coptinue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ El Yes El No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary.landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)❑NO OYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No i 6 • - I . 1 2 3 IMPACT ON WATER Small to Potential Can Impact Be 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No protected stream. - ' ' • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body , of water? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to natural conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ' ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage -facilities. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns,- or surface water runoff? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action,would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes" []No 7 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes. El No IMPACT ON AIR' 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No refuse per hour. • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • El El ❑Yes ❑No Other impacts: IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York,or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9.. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No :. migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than. 10 acres . ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural' El El ❑Yes ❑No land (includes cropland, hayfields,.pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.) 8 1 -2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of,agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. 0. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ El ❑Yes ❑No lagd management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines,'outlet ditches, strip cropping); or cteate a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No ,i IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ • El ❑Yes ❑No i or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether j man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NOS DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site.listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ El Yes El No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ Q ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON-OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES • The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.- ❑ ❑ ..❑Yes ❑No • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 9 ` 1 2 3 IMPACT"ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be s 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO DYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of El El ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy El ❑ ❑Yes. ❑No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No . A NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ El El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No noise screen. • Other impacts: El ❑ El Yes ❑No . I IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH f 17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Y,es ❑No I substances(i.e.oil, pesticides:chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level ` discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc.) • Storage facilities for one million or,more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids. • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste. • Other impacts: El ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 1 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this protect. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures El El ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes -❑No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 19. Is there, -or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO DYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact,or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified..in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability'of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be,controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Continue on attachments) . t r COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ) SS: 7su-S-t— r BE i NG DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE. ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS , AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. In completing this application I hereby authorize the Trustees agent or representativ.e to enter onto my property to inspect tie premises in `conjunction with review p'fY, is pp ication. SI URE OF A CANT CHARLES W: BOWMAN NOTARY PUBLIC, Slate of t4ew York SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS No. 4668958, Suffolk County c'c� No. Expires, G�cft-30�19'{a�j DAY OF Cx �� , 1 9 r-� 6C 'OE q)IDW 110jidx3 1141lHI M 1193 J itlunoD 1IolInS '8S6899Y TN M,oA M.rJ Jo otots 'DI19111 ,41J'�lf� NOTARY PUBLIC N`d'IlAO9 ./A S114yo EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED BOAT, DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT" (CHAPTER• 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS ,-DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 le•Icl \\\ , b OQk 1 4 sournoLD O .......... C 00 Phi t ••\ ]•roN/[w e -- Of OAR / �f - rt., ^.\ • WO 1]rj I _1, y �PKESIOE i•• •a •OR �b it _- �t • •• b r - U • n rrfb) b f 1.4.1.1 /T TOWN CEDAR O - z Vof 3 0P a P'.s ...:' ` r• r 1._ TOWN OF SOUTHOLD br PO]NT t .. • SOUTFIDLD . \ z z.o•ILI .I r] „ WEST. i, z• C za o LAKE41 r• w. ` do SOU.10.D •� 1•.I I ..� + o rz W..a. O I lo,. PoT,v oy T' so 1 •^ RO xe .� I W. , Y rr 'ae W / xSl •,, • 1�.� I I a. c. 1 tl ] t• r OR. rr. (]a'1 D 1.4 1 • I I• I I] I .9 ,y..._ . jam... HOG ...1-_"-... NECK BA Y ' uE uc.].o.laa ••••Legend r••r aT..E © •COUNTY OF SUFFOLK T � SOI •.OIUEL WIEe.a•. •�.r LYLrr G..•L+ -� (..Pn.n Lr -.(.-_ Mr`r P..0 Lr_-n.-_ W..+Lr... ILI .....t.a•rla -D__L— T L. __-- ...P..;.rL+ _-•_-- ... P..,.IL-_-. -- PrD�.+ ,] _�^••��+ �_ ==9 Real Property Tax Service Agency .ILucE o• [rJr..](y+r YLi...+Lr Lr ----- ralY L+ �__-- LM,P.r _-.L_-_ •�L w. �} krr Pam•+ V'. -� KLLr wr[Ll CDUDI C•Dler •.aL.•M,Pwr]I.r.. •.L.� •la1 L+� -�-� P.L P.wN— --.•_-- P..r e., xl D.r•'. 1].I• 1 MfTt.CT M. Riverhead,L.1.,N•rr York " as c,�Lhvir4. t.�E P! Gtea -: s r r 9 x Q• ,}- GOLDSMITH S'f' Q�] Budd .` CoINLET PARK ' ✓ 1 I r"ris d yn>xt. a (COUNTY , U T H O L +AAv r' `i.•. it dO Cf} r ° f vA 4 O^^ca,w -9 �` j yjµ� �•_: fg rt9ir cT � o O ( < XQ Landing o P< n°• °� MAIN 1, ,Ahf S 0 U T H p P E C O N I C LSLPEt B A Y L0I4G 1 QGIENy�Np xns dZ £ BfP - E +''�•'.' 11958 o Nr•L.r ti •Qa : O ��q :::�.� :_ T■ , `OI= GREAT HOG t .•v� LA a /e 3 �tP hOq NECK ," q _ r r PIp RR W E` ?q o S " Ip/•J t 4 v yet Q Th qS,, �x /^. P � iO•' `"-���° �B AONN�Ey: � a-TEB i 4rq 4 X• p A°,q .Ap SE ' f�^/7hY S j!���� - q�f �lrnO34r J�I0. q as ° q 3Q ao Bay 3 B A YW I E W P i EAST NOrAN NFCN CC• 'q J CUTCHOGUE Corey v /////(���\\\ • r P T,S�� • Z wf O \ 7 ✓ter �•C`ED A a\� CEDAR H 0 G N E C K 4 � A �b�� P� r ;h m � BA Y enr Ax / ^. �❑¢ ` . °.x 3 u°9 ti�4 f ' Cedar Beach Ci Point is Er..>v° T gt°Go �L •"t. Coue �^��'`a�$ Xaywater w•rf 0 1Y A `y T w"f LITTLE / •sh Pt qN N:" f of ��'°if9 HOG J(a0 Q�O� °r< NECK °�°NENMA CN H°r3fshof a� A° / 1 S%p.� CPv '=f=fp�16 I1I///n^JJ11I1I - CPP91hGI�ENIP`M�TEXx /O� 'HOGUEf 9°o �\ I -NASSAU S ?BOR � oRD g � POINT l/J Wunneweta EAST CE°e Pond K yq oL JESSUP NECK F l 40 1 I- 1 ©1983 Hapslrorn Map Company,Ina, FOR ADJOINING AREA SEE MAP NO. 24 f - r r i r� "`��70 CEDAR ` EDA�a G CEDAR ��YY1 JM�r B£AC COUN EAR a l: PARK POINT DRIVE �„F '� r.: S / Lo - T`� UnS Cedar Beach Point Suffolk County X\ C1� Hagstrom Map 23 r 0-LPA- V r o (T® O L�iIVE 0 SCALE 0 50 100 y c ►� c '� HEFT ) . OF 4 J.MO. CONSULT ING- A DING 'R I VER, N.Y SECTI N VIEW SCALE 1' 10r 0 5 10 60� 20' --- --20�--- - -- 20` May EX15T i j,5-- - TT _4rr 2 AREA TO 13E DREDGED � SHEET 20F4 J.M.O. CONSULTING WADING RIVER, N.Y. A i Applicant proposes to maintenance dredge an existing channel to 4' at MLW. Resultant spoil, approximately 10ZL5 c.y. of clean sand shall be trucked to an upland site for disposal . Proposed project site is located at• "Stillwater Lake Inlet" at Cedar Beach, Southold, Town of Southold, County of Suffolk, New York. Applicant: Cedar Beach Park Association, Inc. Purpose: Maintenance Dredging Datum: Mean Low Water Locus: Longitude 72'024 ' /Latitude 4? 02 ' 11/10/87 ' SHEETS OF4 J.M.O. -CONSULTING~WA DING R I VER, N.Y, NAMES AND ADDRESSES OF PROPERTY OWNERS ADJACENT TO PROPOSED PROJECT SITE 1 . ) Ernest Poppas, Cedar Point Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 2. ) Fred Adler, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 3. ) Alexander Williams III , 160 Henry Street, Brooklyn, N.Y. 11201 4. ) George DeLisle, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 5. ) - Albert Profy, 255 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 6. ) Albert Murray, 345 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 7 . ) Fred Adler, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 8 . ) John Lee, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 9. ) James Schill, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 10. ) James Schill , Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 11 . ) Louis Weiss , Seawood Drive , Southold, N.Y. 11971 12. ) Roger Cornell, Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 134 Ernest Schneider, 915 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971' 14. ) Ernest Schneider, 915 Lakeside Drive, Southold, N.Y. 11971 15. ) Fred Adler, Lakeside Drive, Southold; N.Y. 11971 SHEET OF J.M.O. CONSULTING-WADING R I VER, N.Y. SOUTHOLD L.I. NEW YORK.11 , 971 Box 394 Southold, New York April 3, 1982 Mr. Frank Murphy, Councilman Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Murphy: I� has come to my attention that you have been instrumental in reaching an agreement with Mr. Guldi of the County Board of Works to open up the mouth of Cedar Beach Inlet. On behalf of the residents of Cedar Beach Park I want to express our sincerest appreciation for your personal efforts. We are fully aware of the fact that it is too expensive to dredge this inlet annually, and for this reason we strongly urge that the Council throw its full support behind our efforts to have a pair of jetties built to create a short protected channel at the mouth of the inlet. The proposal for jetties always creates a storm of controversy. Opposition is sometimes justified, and sometimes it is arbitrary, emotional and unreasonable. Each case must be separately evaluated. We maintain that opposition .to jetties at this location is without any merit. All the beach to the east is open wetlandssand all the beach to the west is already protected by ten privately owned groins. The study in progress by the College Marine Center already verifies that the litoral flow alternates both east and west at the mouth. A channel protected by ,betties both on the east and west would be scoured twice daily by the tidal flow. f `s :t _z_ Cedar Beach Park Association Mr. Guldi, principal engineer of the Suffolk County Division of Waterways supports us in our request, but stresses that the proposal must originate at the town level. Your help would be greatly appreciated. Sincerely yours, %LG��fZ- ni�Q-LLGG� Frank P. Francia, P.E. Chairman Waterways Committee Cedar Beach Park Association FPF:rf C.C. Mr. Guldi Mr. Pell Mr. Stoutenberg Suffolk County Community College # EL�ELLEp�f EASTERN CAMPUS (51 6) 369-2600 a SPEONK RIVERHEAD ROAD, RIVERHEAD, NEW YORK 1 1901 March 19, 1982 Paul Stoutenburgh, President Southold Town Board of Trustees Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Dear Paul: At the Marine Science Center located at Cedar Beach in Southold, our students, from time to time, have projects involving various animals and ,plants that are grown on the' banks and in the- "canals" surrounding our building. We would appreciate knowing if the Town Trustees would have any objections to our erecting a sign asking people not to dig or take plants and animals from these areas. Very truly yours, Walter L. Smith, Professor Marine Technology WLS/dk CC: Dean David Cox SELDEN CAMPUS COLLEGE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICES WESTERN CAMPUS 533 College Road 533 College Road Crooked Hill Road Selden, N.Y. 1 1764 Selden, N.Y. 1 1784 Brentwood,N.Y. 11717 L5163 233-51 74 L51 6]233-5174 L5167 34B-4546 - r 2850 Cedar Beach Rd Southold,NY, 11971 February 17, 1982 Mr William Pell Southold Town Supervisor Town Hall Southold,NY, 11971 Dear Mr Pell : Enclosed is a copy of Mr. Guldis' answer to my letter of January 6 , 1982 , concerning the. Cedar Beach Inlet, of which you have a copy . It has always been one of our concerns that the county will not dredge the inlet on an annual basis as is required and that without stabilization it will remain unnavigable and possibly close . While we are waiting for a decision to be made as to whether or not to request the county to stabilize the inlet, we would greatly appreciate your requesting the county to keep it open in the. meantime by dredging. Thank you very much. V�y tr ou , Bob GRo- azzaly Y _ cc : MR PAUL S OUTENBERG ,¢w u �1 V T MR GREGORY BLASS J `,�� MR JOHN GULDI �� COUNTY OF SUFFOL K PETER F.COHALAN SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE R. BARNEY A.EVANS.P.E..L.S. .M.KAMMERER.P.E..L.S. CHIEF DEPUTY COMMISSIONER COMMISSIONER DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS January 8, 1982 Mr. Robert Gazza 2850 Cedar Beach Road Southold, New York 11971 Ref: Cedar Beach Inlet Southold, New York Dear Bob: I am in receipt of your letter of January 6, 1982 in regards ��.o the severe shoaling of the Cedar Beach Inlet. As you know, we have discussed this problem many times and I pointed out to you that this is one of many inlets that either needs yearly dredging or the construction of a jetty (s) to stabilize the inlet. The County last year turned down our request for a larger County dredge which would have given us the capability of keeping up with these yearly maintenance requirements. Under the present system of utilizing private contractors , we do not have the funds or administrative capability to perform all the required yearly maintenance dredging. The only alternative would be to stabilize these inlets with jetties . In order for us to undertake either a maintenance dredging project or the construction of jetties, the request must come from your local town officials, through your local legislator. If he is willing to sponsor the project, then funding can be requested through this department. YAPHANK AVENUE YAPHANK.N.Y.1 1980 _ 61 6-924-4300 c Page 2 January 8, 1982 Mr. Robert Gazza 2850 Cedar Beach Road Southold, New York 11971 Ref: Cedar Beach Inlet Southold, New York Accordingly, I would suggest you contact the above mentioned people. If you have any further question on this matter, please feel free to contact me accordingly. Very truly yours , ohn R. Guldi, P.E. ,L.S. Principal Engineer Division of Waterways For: R. M. Kammerer Commissioner RMK:JRG: ty - - - • 4 .. i 1 y January :6, 1982 s .Department of Public Works y t Waterways Division Yt { --Yaphank Avenue u Yaphank, NY.. - r Attn. Mr: John .Guldi RE. Cedar Beach Inlet : .Southold NY �� Dear John; . : This fall John Gormely and I. discussed the study being presently done by the Marine Sciences Extension s with Prof.. Chuck McCarthy. A Chuck assured us that although he 'is personally opposed to a betty at Cedar Beach and would prefer to k see,-limited boat traffic within the harbor so as not to ' interfere with .his activities, that the study would be an impartial one. Chuck said he would forward the data . collected to you without his opinions so that you could -. use it to make your own decisions as to inlet stabilization through ,jetty placement etc . He expected to 'get the final results to you sometime ' . this winter. We will check with him again in a week. or two. Unfortunately, in the meantime, the shoal formation from the west has almost completely closed the inlet . At .. low tide yesterday the only portion of the inlet still under water was less than 15 feet in width. One good storm would probably close it . Last years ' excellent dredging job has been completely " wiped out and if the inlet is not dredged as soon as possible it may close completely. It is certainly impossible to Y navigate in its present condition and anyone who tries wiJll be taking. a risk. Thank you for your cooperation. Ver , truly yours, ob Gazz � cc : Mr. William Pell t. Southold Town Board X- 7 Southold Town Trustees Mr. Greg Blass Prof. Chuck McCarthy Mr.- John Gormely .S l � -u_� MIN t � '�•��y�s��M�F19'+hL ��L �,,v.� h �i ,p .IPoj' l 5 t r 3 1 + 1 :Y _ .q I _;�;�Ik1P;,¢t�{ .1•"ry i ) 7 � + �' ;t� i"'r�:YX xYt417. ,.;t"r LK5vk�.;�tL r� k r`� s,vr - ik2•, ti'j, ? r' - SOUTHOLD,L.I.,NEW YORK Box 1522 Southold, N.Y. 11971 November 2, 1981 Board of Appeals Town Hall Southold, New York 11971 Gentlemen: I am President of the Cedar Beach Park Association com- posed of approximately fifty property owners in the area known as Cedar Beach along the roads and tributaries of Cedar Point Drive East and Cedar Point Drive West. Our comments concern the application of Ronald Roberts for a building permit on the south side of Cedar Point Drive East. It has never been the policy of our Association to oppose residential construction just to maintain a selfish status quo, and that is not our policy now. We do, however, know by actual living experience that this area has an extremely fragile environment. It is, therefore, impera- tive that this building permit be examined not only from the point of view of flood damage, but from all established norms of health and environmental standards. We look to the various Town Administrators to carefully evaluate the health implications 'of this application, and be sure to make prudent decisions to protect the living standards of the existing residents. Respectfully ,yours, CEDAR PEACH PARK ASSOCIATION, INC. RF:LC Lee Conte, President C.C. Town Council Board of Trustees D.E.C. . Dear Mrs. Hataier, September 13,1981 This is the first report' on Mr.- 1]aa--__?vav^o!s "Marina". At the present time there are three boats there that have been there all week._ 1. The owners boat NY 6076 .DF 2. Ed-Mar 111 on bow and 593781 -on the superstructure. 3. The third boat has no 'name or numbers visible along either side. I don't. think that is legal to "begin with. I will give you a _weekly report as long as there boats there ether thaii the owner-s. - - . Thank you. -4^ej Bernard Robins 734 6381 . I a Ya:3L,.3 r 1 YU I813 3__ _ v. .,::� ;,c::r....:,.:.. .3.. i, :' 'i11:k. ti. .w� rYy F_ :���Z- ..AS it 1 F .1. ;eX�r,Ti �+��,W,{')�9Y>S1.k�/}r':v.:! '�! �h:: x ,::;;ley:.tf..4:.�':',Y..�t,'� i..7�+t�s<jti. ��'(it,i�":..ffy*1,'�2�(n.'W+�""�IiWiy.!v� .a1�:Y�.C'�o5w+c�. — c.t.. � .. - .. .. t - mt'_.a ,:,fu �.-wrex+s%w„^� a�;M1'.o�':'�..in s..-. COUNTY OF SUFFOLK COUNTY LEGISLATURE GREGORY J.BLASS P.O.BOX 9 t I LEGISLATOR,FIRST DISTRICT 1 1 WEST SECOND STREETRIVERHEAD.NEW YORK 11901 CHAIRMAN: (516)727-7200 LEGISLATIVE/PERSONNEL COMMITTEE MEMBER: HEALTH COMMITTEE HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE EDUCATION&YOUTH COMMITTEE PUBLIC WORKS COMMITTEE SAFE DRINKING WATER COMMITTEE December 17, 1980 Southold Town Trustees 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Attention: Anna Hataier, Chairperson Dear Ms. Hataier: Attached is a letter with petition from R. & H. Gazza in Cedar Beach. The letter and petition seek approval and construction of a jetty at Cedar Beach. Your comments on their request, and the issues therein listed, would be most appreciated. Very t my yours, 9 Gregory J. lass Legislator ' GJB/mjk _ r R. & D. Gazza 2350 Cedar Beach Road Southold, New York 11971 November 23 , 1930 �eTilliam Pell Southold Town Supervisor 'fo•,;n 71a11 Southold, New �or'•� 11971 Dear :4r. Pell : Attached is a petition re.�uestin5: the construction of a lietty at Cedar Beach Inlet to :prevent the constant ,shoalinc- at the mouth whic i makes the inlet both unnavi Fable and hazardous . �Je feel t -e construction of suc : a ,jetty would be both economically and environmentally beneficial. It :gas been indicated to us that if the Torn so requested, the County' Department of Public Works would probably; fund the project , as this would be cheaper than constantly Bred inF;. Unfortunately, the recent dred�inc; has almost been neTated , as a shoal formed .`.'rom the ,,,rest side has blocked half of the mouth. We would like to see the inlet stabilized for the follov;inc: environmental reasons : 1 . Eli.-minati on of the necessity .Cr , fre,quent dred;ing . operations !could eliminate any possibility of disturbing t1)e tern co.''_'-)`iy . 2 . The inlet is not bein`, flushed sufficiently ;with fresh .'rater and could easily be closed off by one storm which could be disastrous to the abundance of marine life found wit'ain the harbor. e d0 not belisV? there ,lOuld be any effect upon the Count;,r Park beach to the east , as the s fin d movl.n� from viest to east .winds up in the inlet cha:ine.1 . The only way t::is sand could rove across t'_ze channel to the Count; Park beach would be if the channel were first filled and closed Mr. �Iil.liaan Pall November 23, 1980 ( 2 ) off, which could be disastrous as rlentioned above . We also feel the present situation is unfair to the inlet waterfront owners who paid elevated prices for their homes so they could use their boats and enjoy the benefits of waterfront living. , These people have not been able to use their boats for the past two years and also fear that this situation may cause land values to diminish. 'He have confidence that ,you will give our request serious consideration, as you have always done in the past te any assistance you can rive us in and greatly apprecia this matter. Thanc you, G Attach--ant A P E T I T I 0 N 30 October 1980 The honorable William R. loll, Supervisor Town Hall, Pain Road, Southold .y. 11971 1Jear Sir:` We the urdersigned, petition the Town of Southold for construction of a breakwater / seawall at Cedar Beach Inlet, Great HOF yeck in the Town of Southold. Situated in a region of swift tidal current and a strong ,hest to East littoral drift, the inlet has been subject to shoaling. paving recently been dredged, it is our belief-that a breakwater or seawall would now stabilize the inlet, thus saving considerable cost in the long term and assuring continued access for navigation. we would appreciate your positive consideration of this petition. thank you ADDRESS �1 U. Z66- -- 97-2 'TITION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF .A BREAlrVATE SEA VALL AT CEDAR BEACH 14A3E A�DRLC'S TET ETMONF Iz A � y / �;1�. /; VI✓� �"tl ✓�.E :(. i.�•,��' /1 U l FETI'TICIv.'r OR COS STRUCTICIT OF .A BREz'-K'IATER/SRkWAI L• AT CEDAR BEACH 11AIM E. 7 ADDRESS TEI.EPRCu.^_, I �)�✓� �*.77 i ^��_�f;i,r i"i l_!';�, 1 � �.G'i'�../'. �.. r; �{!.i Z �;, o ' •. ;'% a- �� ��Jam/ T� --•- �% �'y�. �.�'/..'-;!�,.�'-•'_ � S. J cam,/G�l.�-c-r� � .;�"�.�� R. & D. Gazza 2850 Cedar Beach Road Southold, New York , 11971 November 23 `'1980 . William Pell Southold Town Supervisor Town Hall Southold,. New York 11971 Dear Mr. Pell: Attached is a petition requesting the construction of a jetty at Cedar Beach Inlet to r � y prevent the constant shoaling at the mouth which makes the inlet both unnavi- gable and hazardous . i We feel the construction of such a ,jetty would be both economically and environmentally beneficial. It has been indicated to us that if the Town so requested, the County Department of Public Works would probably fund the project, as this would be cheaper than constantly dredging. Unfortunately, the recent dredging has almost been negated, as a shoal formed from the' west side has blocked half of the mouth. We would like to see the inlet stabilized for the r following environmental reasons : 1. Elimination of the necessity for frequent dredging; operations would eliminate any possibility of disturbing; the tern colony . i 2 . The inlet is not being flushed sufficiently with fresh water and could easily be closed off by one storm which could be disastrous to the abundance of marine life found within the harbor. i 4e `' believe t i ere i A effect the 1 1_ do not 1_ tivo�,ld b.. any e��ect upon County Part: beach to the east , as the sand moving; from west to east- winds up in the inlet channel . she only way I this sand could move across the channel to the County Park` beach would be if the channel were first filled and closed J • Y 2 � - - I off, which could be disastrous as mentioned above . f We also feel the present situation is unfair to the inlet waterfront owners who paid elevated prices for their homes so they could use their boats and enjoy the benefits of waterfront living. These People have not been able to y. use their boats for the past two years and also fear that this situation may cause land values to diminish. We have confidence that ,you will give our request serious consideration, as you have always done in the past and greatly appreciate any assistance you can give us in this matter. Thank ou ,� , I Attachment I g PETITION } 30 October 1980 The Honorable William R. Pell, Supervisor Town ball, Main Road, Southold N.Y. 11971 Dear. Sirs a - We ,the undersi d, . , peti ti on the;.flown of Southold for constructi gne , on i of' , breakwater t seawall at Cedar 13each Inlet, Great Hog Neck in the,. 'Down of Southold. Situated, in a region of swift tidal current end' a strong West to East littoral drift, the inlet has been subject to shoaling. Having recently been dredged', -it is our belief that a breakwater or seawall would now, stabilize the inlet; thus saving considerable cost in the long tom,and assuring continued access for navigation. we would appreciate your positive consideration of this petition. i thank you l 4 HhM ADDRESS TF'LEPRO*'F j l n f Go 7GIs - l -< 'r PETITION FOR CONSTRUCTION.. OF._A BREAKWATER/SEAWALL AT .CEDAR BEACH NAME,•- ADDRESS TELEPHONE 4 All �3 7 Zoo.. r v A ,:--,H,i1 r -.A PETITION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF A BRE YWATER/SEAWAI.L AT CEDAR BEACH Nm , ADDRESS TELEPHONE - u C L -v--cL, (`�;=�''�ir�ti,_�,�.�., d'� f•:�x 1 i-3 i ;;;l:r' . ,..� .�c- ��<.. -71 � . . z Q� (, r: J 6 -71 76 3 r � II Al a :t �