Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutDBM COMPANY VAN • OV •Y ` OV�� l.' I1' LJ Ir 1. 1 I L' 'l..J 'J I�f�:`� FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President o _ T..R HONE ". ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR. Vice-President u"' ,:"� p DATE G v. ,� � (516) 765-1892 I JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III Or ` ' �` JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. .",'17 ;•Y� ;;00� HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 To: Dave Emilita From: President Frank Kujawski, Jr. Re: Scoping Meeting for DBM Co. Date: July 8, 1988 Please be advised that the Trustees staked the site to delineate the wetland line and find that there are no wetlands inside of the project premises on the site. Board of Trustees - 6/25/88 - Page 13. 6. The file to be amended to reflect "Richard Siriano and Theresa Siriano" in addition to reissuance of the permits. Vote of Board: Ayes: All. - Resolution adopted. 5. Lawrence Marks requesting to amend permit No. 2074 to replace his float dock with a dock that is 12 sq. ft. larger, Jockey Creek, Southold. Moved by Trustee Kujawski seconded by Trustee Bredemeyer it was RESOLVED to approve the request to amend the permit No. 2074 to replace a float dock with a dock 12 sq. ft. larger in Jockey Creek, Southold. Vote of Board: Ayes: All - Resolution adopted. DETERMINATIONS: In reference to D.B.M. and the Gazza matter: President Kujawski spoke to Mr. John Holzapfel, President, Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council in reference to the Conservation Advisory Council staking out the Wetlands. Mr. Holzapfel advised Mr. Kujawski that he fdlt that this job was not a job for the C.A.C. that they felt this job was the Trustees job. Mr. Kujawski advised that it was his feeling that the Trustees should not be staking areas of jurisdiction, and then acting on those applications in that jurisdiction. It is sort of a conflict of interest. You know if you stake it one way, the project doesn't fall in our jurisdiction, if you stake it the other way. . . . Mr. Holzapfel said he understood. President Kujawski said that, perhaps this could be taken back to the C.A.C. , that it was the job of the C.A.C. to advise all Town Agencies. He said that he could remember back in the 70 's that most of the C.A.C. 's time was taken up with the Planning Board. Trustee Bredemeyer advised that the we have tried to get together with the C.A.C. on a few inspections. Councilwoman Oliva advised that if there were any parcels that could be recommended to the Open Space Program that the Committee is looking for recommendations for such parcels. Approval of the Wetland Applications: 1. RUSSELL PLANITZER BY J.M.O. CONSULTING - Application No. 600 Moved by Trustee Kujawski seconded by Trustee Krupski it was RESOLVED to recess the Public Hearing in the matter of Russell Planitzer as amended, application submitted by J.M.O. Consulting, WHEREAS the D.E.C. has not commented on the amended application the hearing will be recessed until next month. Vote of Board: Ayes: All - Resolution adopted. o��FFourcD ^' Town Hall, 53095 Main Road • P.O. Box 1179 /Ol •��o Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T.TERRY FAX(516)765-1823 TOWN CLERK TELEPHONE(516)765-1801 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD State Environmental Quality Review FIND.IN'CS STATEMENT Project Number: coz-289. . Date: April 25, 1989 .Pursuant to Article' 8 (Environmental Quality ,Review Act - SEQRA) of the Environmental Conservation Law and 6. NYCRR Part. 617, the Southold Town Board, as lead agency, hereby makes the following findings: Name of Applicant : D. B.M. Co. 443 Main Street Greenport, New York 1.1944 (5:16) 477-2223 Name of Action :, : Change of Zone appli.cation..and major :subdivision for DBM 'Co. pursuant to Southold Town Alffordable Housing District Lead Agency Southold Town Board Southold Town Hall Main ' Road Southold,. New York 11971 (516)- 765-1800. SEQRA Status: Unlisted Action Description of Action Proposed change of zone from "A-R." Agricultural-Residential to "AHD" Affordable Housing District and :subdivision of land :pursuant to IIAHDII Zoning Ordinance Location : Boisseau Avenue and Tuthill Road, Southold, :Suffolk County, New York Agency ;Juri.sdictiori : Lead Agency has: jurisdiction pursuant to Southold Town Code to grant application for change of zone classification Date of Final EIS' Filded: April 13, .1989 Page 2 - D.B.M. Co. Facts and Conclusions in the EIS' Relied Upon to Support the Decision: During the review of the proposed change of zone several concerns were raised by the lead agency, its environmental consultant and members of the 'public. Three areas of primary concern can be identified from the comments made during the review process: I. The capacity of the existing road network to handle the traffic generated from the proposed project and existing traffic conditions was questioned. In' particular, the adequacy of the traffic study conducted during the winter to assess the summer time traffic conditions was challenged. However, the engineering consultants. who performed the traffic study properly Jactored into-their extensive study, conversion .factors available to them from the Suffolk-County Department .of Public Works .Traffic Engineering Division to determine traffic impacts throughout the year. The Draft Els; and the Final EIS' properly and adequately conclude that the existing road network is more than adequate to meet the existing summer time traffic demands as well as those demands created by the proposed action. 2. Protection of the ground water was raised as an area of concern. Specific mediation measures have been offered to protect the ground water :supply. These measures include covenants and restrictions to be -imposed upon lots within the proposed :subdivision restricting the applicastion of inorganic fertilizers to the property to reduce nitrogen, loading into the ground water. . This measure should also protect surface waters. Run off will be collected and returned to the ground water supply by way of catch basins and a drainage area, the design of which must be reviewed and approved by the Southold Town Planning Board :during the :subdivisloti plat approval process. 3. Protection of surface water. An interm.ittently wet area is located on a small part of the southeastern portion of the subject property. The project sponsor has offered covenants and restrictions or a scenic easement on those lots abutting this '.'vernal area intermittent" to prohibit structures and any disturbance of the natural vegetation in the .75 foot-:'buffer strip'to protect this area. Storm water run off will be recharged to the ground water by catch basins and the drainage area set aside on the :subject property. Run off will'not be discharged into surface waters. CERT j F1 C;AT j.ON..OF FIND..I N.'GS., TO*. APPROVE. . Having considered the Draft and Final EIS', and having considered the proceding written :facts and conclusions relied upon to meet the requirements of .6NYCRR 617. 9, this 'Statement of Findings certifies that: 1.. The requirements of .6NYCRR Part 617 have been met; 2. Consistent with the social, economic and other essential considerations from among the reasonable. alternatives:thereto, the. action approved is one which minimizes or avoids adverse environmental effects to the. maximum extent practicable; including the effects disclosed in the. environmental -impact statement; and �t Page 3 - D.B.M. Co. 3. Consistent with social, economic and other essential considerations, to the maximum extent practicable, adverse environmental effects revealed in the environ- mental impact statement process will be minimized or avoided by incorporating as conditions to the decision those mitigative measures which are identified as practicable. Southold Town Board Name of Agency Judith T. Terry S' ature of Responsible Wficial Name of Responsible Officia Southold Town Clerk April 25, 1989 Title of Responsible Official Date Southold Town Hall, Main Road,. Southold, New York 11971 Address of Agency A copy of this Findings Statement Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, Albany. Department of Environmental Conservation, Stony Brook Suffolk County Department of Health Services Suffolk County Department of Planning D.B.M. Co. Southold Town Board Southold Town Building Department . Southold Town Planning Board Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Southold Town Trustees✓ Village of Greenpor..t NYS Legislative Commission on Water Resource Needs of Long Island RECEOED BY SOU 0 TO M PLANNING 60AR0 L G �`' 1 '9 FRANK A. AWSKI KU R. President J J d =>. "�1a DATE TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President (516)765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III ✓., ` , JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH - y BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 21, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski, Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - DBM Company 1000-55-6-15.1 i Dear Mr. Orlowski: - Please be advised that on June 16, 1988 the Board of Town Trustees conducted a field inspection of the above referenced property. The Wetland Line was delineated on the parcel during this inspection. The stakes were placed landward of the tree line. For your information, the Conservation Advisory Council was present during this staking. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip cc: D.E.C. , Stony Brook, Paul Corrella William D. Moore, Esq. Richard Israel C.A.C. file RECEIVED BY FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President <'r n � ':i:• SOUTHGLD 10r"JiV PLANNING BOARD 4' TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President `:: �`' t ';' "' '`"' �1 hh' '� V UN � (516)765-1892 � �.: Cis JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III O, �:� << JOHN L. BEDNOSKI,JR. DArE HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 13, 1988 Mr. Paul Corella New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, S.U.N.Y Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: D.B.M. Company - 1000 055-06-15.1 Dear Mr. Corello: Please find enclosed a request by William D. Moore, Attorney on behalf of the D.B.M. Company for a delineation of wetlands on the subject property. Also enclosed is a map and a letter of authorization from the property owner. Will you kindly notify this office after the property has been staked by your department. past.Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, as in the i # Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip Attachments CC: Planning Board William D. Moore, Esq. -on behalf of DBM Company Richard Israel New York State Depart rn. , of Environmental Conservatie�,_ Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11794 07 Thomas C. Jorling. Commissioner � /�'�a.5-r �C•'-.;r Aa c:i"S Tn response to your request of ()A,/"'jVC-4"A) I recently visited the property tax map number iaou css-v6 - �s j. I marked the boundary ies of the we s) by attaching orange plastic flagging tape to the vegetation. Any clearing, filling, excavation, or construction within 100 feet .of- the wetland(-s) . will ,require a permit from the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation. Should you apply for such 'a permit, your site plan must show the flagged wetland boundary(ies) as located by a licensed surveyor. In addition, it must show the distances between the wetland(s) and any proposed structures, driveways, septic systems or areas of clearing, filling or excavation. Additional comments: Sv/L ✓r1,6 y iyzv 5 7 sJcc�tJ Ali o J�d If you have any questions, I can be reached at (516) 751-7900, ext. 374. S rely, Cie ; Sovy%�a�d v�uA�-� �pw,v �usTc�s • � l�G� ��2(.-(� �L�— � .14.12.6 12187i-9c ---- . 617.21 S EO R Appendix E State Environmental Quality Review POSITIVE DECLARATION ' Notice of Intent to Prepare a Draft EIS Determination of Significance D Project Number June 9 1988 I � ate � This notice is issued pursuant to Part 617 of the implementing reoulations pertaining to Article 8 (State Environmental Quality Review Act) of the Environmental Conservation Law. The Southold Town Board , as lead- agency, has determined that the proposed action described below may have a significant effect on the environment and that a Draft Environmental Impact Statement will be prepared. Name of Action: Change of Zone Application for D.B.M. Company SEAR Status: Type I Unlisted D Description of Action: Proposed change of zone from "A-R" , Agricultural - Residential to "AHD" Affordable Housing District,, and subdivision of land pursuant to "AHDII zoning district. I • I Location: (Include street address and the name of the municipality/county.A location map of appropriate scale is also recommended..) Located at Boisseau Avenue and Tuthill Road, Southold. See attached location map. SEOR Positive Declaration Page 2 Reasons Supporting This Determination: I .. See Parts II and III attached I i For Further Information: Contact Person: Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Address: Town Hall 53095 Main Road, Southold, NY 11971 Telephone Number: 516/765-1801 A Copy of this Notice Sent to: Commissioner, Department of Environmental Conservation, 50 Wolf Road, Albany, New York 12233-OD01 Appropriate Regional Office of the Department of Environmental Conservation - Stony Brook, N.Y. Office of the Chief Executive Officer of the political subdivision in which the action will be principally located. i Applicant (if any) i Other involved agencies (if any) i Southold Town Board ' Southold Town Building Department Southold Town Planning Board Suffolk County Department of Planning Town Clerk's Bulletin Board Southold.'Town Trustees Suffolk County Department of Health Services Village of Greenport i C 1 • � N 1 ry Y£NK-colt p Q. o o SITE OQV O N G J I I LOCATION MAP SCALE 1" = 600' I 1 ;1 06-2 (2.A7)-7c SEOR � 617.21 Appendix A State Environmental Duality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting - the question of-significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly,comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- ' large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced. Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified ac notentia!lY-large, then fart 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the impact is actually important. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: ❑ Part 1 [ Part 2 ( Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by tl;e lead agency that: ❑ A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. B. Although the project-could have-'a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.' K) C The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. A Conditioned negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Change of Zone for -D.B.M. Company Narnt- or Action Town Board of Town of Southold —...---- Nano- w I ear! A►—nc% _F_ Murphy _— -- — Supervisor Francis J. I'Irnl U, \t.l' ..r.^.�, r �•'..�tv rl�l!1•i•( rr. I r•a?i: ��;;, .�, I I'.�r t r R'r,.(i: r.� I,Ir. )�.,�,•� Signatury of n;h(cr in Lead Agent% Signature of Flfvp?.�.rer(If clote'rent iron; responsible officer) --- - - -- --- -- �----- .. - [)nit Part Z ROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR; ' GNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer,;.should be gu ded`by the question:-Have my responses and determinations been reasonablef The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. • Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact. b. 'Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of,the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided,check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in Part 3.. 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? UNO DYES' Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet. • Construction or--paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 3 feet of existing ground surface. • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No than one phase or stage. • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated floodway. ❑ �., ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts "- ❑ r ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect t.r. ...jy ur:.que or unusual land forms found on the site?(i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)&NO DYES • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No 6 IMPACT ON WATERSmall to Potential Can Impact Be � Moderate Large- Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24. 25 of the Environmental Con_ servation Law, ECL) ENNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ DYes ❑No protected stream. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo ---- • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ DYes . DNo 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ®NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ DYes []No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo 5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? ONO MYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ® DYes []No • Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑Yes DNo have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ® 0Yes No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ® ®Yes ❑No supply system. • Proposed Nction will adverse'% affect groundwater. ❑ ® ®Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be convey.-r!off the site to facilities which presently. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes 12No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. Septage Sludge • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ El Yes El No day. • Proposed ".ction will likely c:.us • siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No existing body of water tc, tt a Pxtc•-.t that there will be an ob\Jous visual contrast .o naturai conditions • Proposed,Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ® ®Yes ❑No and.lor sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses %%hich may ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and or storage facilities. • Other impacts__- — ❑ D DYes ❑No 6 Will proposed action alter drainage COW or patterns, or surface ►vatPr runoffs LINO KYLS Exe*iples trat would apply to column / • Prct��•;cd Action would change flood waver flows D r r'1'es []No - - 7 1 2 3 Small to Potentipl Can Impact Be - Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: Drainage plans to be ap rnvAri ❑ Dyes ❑No by the Planning Board IMPACT ON AIR - 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? ONO 62YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No hour. • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No refuse per hour. • Ernission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No to industrial use. • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No development within existing industrial areas. • Other impacts: Construction impact mitigation ® ❑ ❑Yes El No measures are to he a}=rnvarl b17 Planning Rd. IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS 8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. • Removs' of any portion of a critical or significant Wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No than for mpactlturaldpnsubstantiated answer on • Other impacts:_ ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Part I. 9 Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? MNO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ [Dyes ❑No migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species • Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important vegetation ;. F IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES 10 wd[ the Prope svd Action afft•ct agricultural land resources? ENO EYES Examples that would apid� to column 2 • The proposed action would Bever. cross or limit access to agricultural [$ ❑ [rles No land (includes cropland, hayfields. pasture, vineNard, orchard, etc.) 8 _.. Small to Potential Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of ❑ ❑ DYes ❑No agricultural land. • The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres ® ❑ ❑Yes ❑No of agricultural land or, if .located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes DNo land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? CRNO OYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ DYes DNo or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether man-made or natural. • Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ [--]Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No screening of scenic views known to be important to the area. • Other impacts. ❑ D- ❑Yes DNo IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ONO ZIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Acti6n occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ DYes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ `'ies ❑No project site. • Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ DYes DNo archaeological sites on the N1 S Site Inventory. . • Other impacts Requires competent authority 0 D DYes DNo review_ IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13 Will Proposed A, tion affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open sj)a(es or rerreational opportunities? Examples that „ou!d apple to column 2 '.ENO OYES • the permanent foreclo>ure of a future recreational opportunity ❑ ❑ DYes DNo • A major reduction.of zn open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ CYes ❑No- Other impacts ❑ ❑ DYes DNo 9 IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION Small to Potential Can Impact Be 14. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By ONO KIYES Impact Impact Project Change Examples that would apply to column 2 • Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ' ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: Increased traffic_ and turnii4g El ❑ El Yes R]No movements on Boi ggPaU ��An„o IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or energy supply? ONO BIYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of 7 ❑ ❑Yes ❑No any form of energy in the municipality. • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy �• ❑ ❑Yes ®No transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or.vibration as a result, of the Proposed Action? ONO NYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No facility. • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. • Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No noise screen. • Other impacts: Construction impact mititgation [ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No measures to be approved by P1 nnni ng Rnarrd IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 17 Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? I3NO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No substances(i e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. • Proposed Action may result in the burial.of "hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ 1:11'es []No form (i e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc ) • Storage facilities for one mllllOn or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No gas or other flammable liquids • Proposed action may result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous waste • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 10 1 . 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ❑NO ®YES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The permanent' population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ... ❑ El Yes []No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ® ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services [2 ❑ ❑Yes El No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. IN ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ®NO OYES as of 5/31/88 If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3 Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: 1 Briefly describe the impact. 2 Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3 Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider. • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value • Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact (Continue on attachments) 11 Part III D.B.M. Change of Zone Impact on Water The proposal may have an impact on groundwater since it requires a source of water that does not have approval to serve the proposed action. Unless the Village of Greenport grants approval for water hook-up, the proposed action will allow residential uses in an area without water and sewer services. If the Village will require a well on site, its zone of concentration will be impacted by half acre lots. However, should public water serve the proposed development, no significant impact on groundwater is anticipated. Approval by Suffolk County Department of Health Services and by the Village of Greenport of connection to the Greenport Water Supply System should precede approval of the subdivision by the Southold Planning Board. The drainage plan must also be approved by the Planning Board and Superintendent of Highways. Impact on Agricultural Land Resources The proposed action will affect agricultural and land resources since it will irreversibly covert more than 10 acres of agricultural land. Impact on Transportation There will be a moderate impact to transportation since there will be increased traffic with 55 dwelling units. Impact on Energy The proposed action will require the extension of an energy supply system to serve more than 50 single family residences. Impact on Air During construction, adverse air quality impacts are possible. The use of standard dust control and vehicular emissions control measures will eliminate air quality impacts. Mist. control measures shall be approved by the Planning Bo `d. Noise Impacts During construction, adverse noise impacts are possible. Scheduling construction during normal working hours and buffering existing dwellings with landscaping and earth berms will mitigate against any significant adverse impacts. Impact on Growth and Character of Community or Neighborhood The proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. The proposal will also create a demand for additional community services as well as set an important precedent for future projects. The proposed action .would have a small impact on the community's goals, however, it does fit in with the criteria of the adopted affordable housing district. Archaeological Impacts Assessment by a competent authority is required. Rare, Threatened or Endangered Species Impacts Assessment by a competent authority is required. FRANK A. KUJAWSKI JR., President Wxx = ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President ¢� #}ter s TELEPHONE W < �� (516) 765-1892 cF JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III JOHN L. BEDNOSKI,JR. HENRY P. SMITH i BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 21, 1988 Mr. Bennett Orlowski,. Jr. Chairman Southold Town Planning Board Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, New York 11971 Re: Proposed Major Subdivision - DBM Company 1000-55-6-15.1 Dear Mr. Orlowski: Please be advised that on June 16, 1988 the Board of Town Trustees conducted a field inspection of the above referenced property. The Wetland Line was delineated on the parcel during this inspection. The stakes were placed landward of the tree line. For your information, the Conservation Advisory Council was present during this staking. Very truly yours, Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip cc: D.E.C. , Stony Brook, Paul Corrella William D. Moore, Esq. Richard Israel C.A.C. file FRANK A. KUJAWSKI, JR., President TELEPHONE ALBERT J. KRUPSKI, JR., Vice-President (516) 765-1892 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, III . .., JOHN L. BEDNOSKI, JR. HENRY P. SMITH BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 June 13 , 1988 Mr. Paul Corella New York State D.E.C. Bldg. 40, S.U.N.Y Stony Brook, New York 11794 Re: D.B.M. Company - 1000 055-06-15. 1 Dear Mr. Corello: Please find enclosed a request by William D. Moore, Attorney on behalf of the D.B.M. Company for a delineation of wetlands on the subject property. Also enclosed is a map and a letter of. authorization from the property owner. Will you kindly notify this office after the property has been staked by your department. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter, as in the past. Very truly yours, ` Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. President Board of Town Trustees FAK:ip Attachments cc: Planning Board William D. Moore, Esq. on behalf of DBM Company Richard Israel �a0.,✓'G 0� �'�lt��� 1'�`15�2es Co C� led" CL C. WILLIAM D. MOORE PATRICIA C. MOORE MOORE & MOORE __......,.._.: ATTORNEYS AT LAW _ - SUITE 3 CLAUSE COMMONS MAIN ROAD P.O. Box 23 MATTITUCK, NEW YORK 1 1952 (516)298-5674 April 24, 1988 Southold Town Trustees Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Re: DBM Co./ Boisseau Ave:, Dear Town Trustees: An application for a major subdivision of property owned by DBM Co. located on Boisseau Avenue has been submitted to the Planning Board. At the request of the Planning Board we hereby request that the Town Trustees and the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation conduct a field inspection to determine the boundary of the wetland area located on the subject property. It is our understanding that you will arrange the scheduling of the inspection with the DEC at a time convenient for you. Please keep us notified of the date and time. If you have any questions, or if there is any information which I can provide to you, please do not hesitate to contact me. Very truly yours, dipam Moore WDM:er DocId: 042488. 4 i Frank A. Ku aJr. ,j wski, President HENRY P. SMITH, � OHN M. BREDEMEYER III : � t TELEPHONE J ` J`` (516) 765-1892 John Bednoski, Jr. �g '' `" � _ ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR, Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 To: John Holzapfel, Chairman Conservation Advisory Council From: Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , President - Re: Planning Board referrals. Date: April 29, 1988 Please find attached maps for two subdivisions as referred from the Planning Board for DBM Company and Joseph Gazza. May we have your comments and recommendations regarding these matters? V�� Frank A. Kujawski, Jr. , Pres. '� ; r �x � HENRY P. SMITH71, JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, .IIIT� t `� TELEPHONE John Bednoski, Jr. t, (516) 765-1892 ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. , Vice-President BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 TO: Valerie Scopaz, Town Planner FROM: Town Trustees DATE: April 28, 1988 ,�✓ As per your request, please be advised of the Trustees findings regarding the following applications: FRANKLINVILLE HOMES - 1000-125-2-2. 2 - Trustees found no evidence of wetlands - no jurisdiction. STYPE BROTHERS AGENCY - Trustees determined they have no jurisdiction. THORTON SMITH - 1000-121-1-1-,p/019 - The Trustees found a pond on the site. There is to be no grading on the top of the slope to the pond. DBM COMPANY - 1000-55-6-15. 1 - Trustees are to contact the C.A.C. after it is staked for inspection. COVE BEACH ESTATES - 1000-22-3-18. 3 - New access appears to be far enough away from the wetlands. JOSEPH GAZZA - 1000-22-3- ( 19-22) 35-5-1.2 - Trustees will refer this matte.= the C.A.C. for recommendations. Ll TO< z.O ::�OUH ru Southold, N.Y. 11971 Y (516) 765-1938 04/21/88 ; Environmental Analysis Unit - DEC, Building 40, Room 219 SUNY Stony Brook, NY 11794 RE: Proposed Major Subdivision of DBM Company SCTM #1000-55-6-15. 1 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find, a completed Long Environmental Assessment Form and a copy of the map of the DBM Company located at Boisseau Avenue in Southold. This project is unlisted and an initial determination of nonsignificance has been made. We wish to coordinate this action to confirm our initial determination. May we have your views on this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until May 20, 1988. We shall interpret lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act, and our agency will assume the status of Lead agency.. Very truly yours, . BENNETT ORLOWSKI ,JR.' x CHAIRMAN Enc: cc: Department of Health Services Board of- Trustees r �frr _. T0.1 VN OF. SOUTHOLD EAF ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT -PART I _ Project information NOTICE: This document i� des�cned to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significan effect on the env Ircnmont. Please complete the entire Data Sheet. Answers to these questions will be cor.sid- as part of the a-Pplication for approval and may be subject to*further verification and Public review. Provide any.additiona1 information you:believe will be needed,to como.lete PARTS 2 and,3. it is expectea that ccq•oieticn of the EAF will be ependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies; research or investigation. If- information requiring such additional work is unavailable. so indicate and specify each instance., ;LANE OF PROJECT: NAME ANO ADDRESS OF OWNER (If Different) { ' Subdivision for•. DBM .CO•... . Name . ADDRESS ANO.NANE OF APPLICANT: Street; DBMtCO. Z � 5tate Zip!, C/O William D. . Moore, Esq. BUSINIESS PHONE: (Street) Suite 3 Clause Commons Ma titu-ck, NV tare 119.52 'p OESCRIPTIC`I OF PROJECT- •(Briefly describe type of project or action) D4a—jar• c Lib rlj, ri ci nn (PLEASE COMPLETE EACH QUESTION - Indicate N.A. if not applicable). A.. SITE DESCRIPTION (Physical setting of overall project,. both develoned and undevelobe'dareas) 1. General character of the land: Generally .uniform slope X Generally uneven .and•rollino or irregular 2: Present land use: Urban Industrial Commercial Suburban _ Rural X rarest Agriculture. , Other - 3. Total acreage of Project area: 3 7+acres. Aoproximate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently After Complet Meadow or Brushland acres acres plater Surface Area acres ___ ac Forested . _ acres __acres Unvegetated (rock; earth or fill) acres —ac Aaricultural - acres acres —-- Roads, buildinns 'letland (Freshwater or and other paved Tidal as ner Articles surfaces acres 'a, or r.C.L.) ——acres acres -- —_ac Other (indicate type) acres" ac 4• •Irat Is ^ edominar.t soil t_ipe(s) on nrolect site? test hole data 5. i '•re ;nere lvdroCK outcro7oinas on nrniPct sit4? --_ YPs X _ yC ---.-_— --— t 4�a: :s de:)tn to bedrock? ) d. 6 . Approxinate percentage of proposed project r site with slopes• 0-105. ': 1�-15� or y,. • greate Y• X, .15 7. ' Is Project contiguous to, or contain a bu Places? Yes ilding or site listed on- the National Register of Historic` .. ?. Y No B. What is the depth to the_:;water table? 2QapprOX.." _ f e 9.: _Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes No. 10. . Does project's•ite. contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or. endangered -Yes 'X .lo, according.to - Identify each species. il. Are there any unique format Yesor #nusual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes.—other geological ions - No. (Describe 12. Is the project site presently-used by,the communit area Yes X. , No. y or neighborhood as an open space.or recreation .13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or .vistas known to be; important to the community? Yes , X No 14. Streams within or'contiguous ,to project area: a. Name of stream and name of .river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds. Netland areas iritliin or. contiguous to project area: _ - a., Name b. .Size (in acres) ON.. Ep � �97�. ` J_ /iJ i�U r1?0&W T-2j 16. What is the dominant land-use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radios of the proaa'ect single family residential,--R-2) and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). AgrlCUltUral7Resident. single 'family residences on lots lessthan one acre B. PROJECT DESCRIPTION I. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions-as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project-sponsor `{ acres. b. .Project acreage developed: acres initially; = — acres ultimately . c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped © U►i LESS C_L_.J 5-TiF En d. Length of-project, i'n mi.les: (if appropriate) e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square foot- age developed acreage f. -Humber of pff-strEet parking spaces existing proposed ' rr E sT. • g. Maximum vehicular trios generated per hour 0 (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initial g Ultimate x- i If Orientation -"eignbornood-City-Regional Estimated Emoloyment Com.ercial Industrial j. Total heignt of tallest nronosed structure _3S -feet. 9100 2...How much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - tons r for construction of proposed roads cubic yards. /9 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - acres. `4. . Will any mature forest over100 years old) or other locally-important veaetation be removed by this project? Yes No 5. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to -replace that removed during construction? Yes X- No 6. If single Phase project: Anticipated period of construction Z months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased Project: a. Total number of phases anticipated No. b. Anticipated date of commencement phase month year (including demolition) — c. Approximate completion date final phase month _year. d. Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent Phases? Yes No X 8. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction/a- after project is.complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes X No. If yes, explain: 12. a. Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? X Yes No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) residential sewage c. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be dischargedn on e 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes -X--NO. 14. Is project or any portion of project located in the 100 year flood plain? Yes X No 15. .a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? X Yes No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? Yes X Alo c. If yes, give name: location indiv system d. llill any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? Yes _ No 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes X _No 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour Per day)? Yes X No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes X No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? X Yes No. If yes, indicate type(s) single family residential usage 20. If water suooly is from wells indicate oumoing capacity gals/minute. • 21. Total anticipated water usage per day _ ___aals/day. typical for single family res. 22. Zoning: a` What is dominant zoning classification of site?A_Agricultu_ral/Residential same b. Current specific zoning classification of site c. '.s or000sed use co^sisten- -aiih Present zoning? d. If no, indicate desired zorinq 26. ' Approvals: a. . Is any Federal permit required? Yes No b: . Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? _ Yes. _X No" c. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes. No) (Type) (Date) (Date) water -agreement City, Town, Village Board y City, Town, Village Planning Board _y— Subdtv. _p r o V--- --- City, Town, Zoning Board city, County Health Department _ _ s �}Ax . Other local agencies Other regional agencies State Agencies Federal Agencies -C. INFORMATIONAL DETAILS Attach any additional information as may be needed to,clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with the proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid hem. PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: REPRESENTING: self DATE- -4- 6 ce EAF 'ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT. - PART II. Project Impacts and Their Magnitude General I'n fin r-,3ti,a, RF d Carefully) In completing trc form the reviewer•should be guided by.the question: Have my decisions and determinat' been reas_cr,zo,e; The reviewer is not expected to be 'an expert environmental analyst. Identifying that ar effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is, also necessaril 5ionif:ca.nt. Ary largo effect must.be evaluated in PART'3 to determine significance.. . By ident..fying ar.eriect in col mn 2 ,simply asks that it be looked at further. _ - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of effects and wherever possible the t Of magnituae that would trigger a response in column 2:, The examples are generally applicable throughou State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresh may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as, 9 They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per .question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully). . a., Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. . Answer Yes if there will be any effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a ouestion then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potent' size of the impact. .if impact threshold.equals or exceeds any exampie provided,.check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, .check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impact then consider the impact as notentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If- a potentially large impact or effect can be reduced by a change. in the, project to a less than larc magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates- that such a reduction is. not possible. SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY. IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHA IMPACT ON LAND 140 YES WILL THERE 9E AY EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL CHANGE TO O O PROJECT SITE? Examples that Would .ADDly to Column 2 Any constru:tian on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise ner 100 foot of lenat^), or where the general slooes in the project area exceed 10.. Construction on Land where the depth to the water table is less than 3 feet. ronstruction of naved narking area fnr l,71 or more vehicles. Construction on 13rd where bedrock is exposed or qenerally wltnin 3 feet of existing ground surface. Ccns:ruct­,n tr.a• will continue for more than 1 wear or involve ro-e Char, ,)re ^Lase or stage. Escavz!»n far mining purposes that would re^+ove pore than 1 ,00C tons cf rattiral n;terial (i.e. rock or soil) per year. __ Ccnstructilor .of any new sanitary landfill. C!!ALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IVACT BE . - OERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE Construction in a designated floodway: Other impacts: 2._ WILL THERE BE A4 EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE"OR°UNUSUAL LA.NO' FnRMS �Q YES ' FOUND O THE SITE? (i•,e. cliffi, dun Lions." etc.) es- geological forma OO e Specific land.forms: IMPACT 04 WATER' 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT, - NnYS : P DESIGNATED AS ,,,,... O PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15. 24. 25 of the Envir onmental Conservation Law; E.C.L.) ' Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 _;Dredgino more than 100 'cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.. Other impacts: 4. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTING OR NFW NO YES BODY OF HATER? ..::.......... Exaoles that Would Apply to Column 2 00 A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of. water or.more'than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body of water that exceeds10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: S. YILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE. OR GROU!1D��ATER nnALITY? YES Exar•oles that Pould Apply to Column 2 O Prnject will require a discharge permit. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have aporoval to serve proposed project. Project requires water supply from wells with greater than �5 gallons per minute Pumping capacity. Construction or ooeration causing any contamination Of a public water s1hply system. Project will adversely affect groundwater. 1.1;a'd effluent will be conveyed off the' site to facilities which presently do not exist or have . inaeequate capacity. Project requiring a facility that would use water in excess of 21,000 gallons per day. Prd,ect will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an existing tzcy of water to the extent that there will ce an �,ovious visual contrast to natural conditions. •� • 1. 2. 3. "ALL TV POTE4TIAL CATI IMPACT BE *7DEPATE LARGE REDUCED Cy IMPACT I"PACT PROJECT CHANG I)thpr Imoacts.. 6. 411-1. PR)JCCT ALTER DRAINAGE FLl", PATTV'15 OR SURFACE !LATER 'i0 YES RUNOFF? ................................................. Examnle that ':ould Apply to Column 2 O O Project would impede flood water flows. Pro.iect.is likely to.cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainaae patterns. Other impacts: IHP4CT IN AIR 7. DILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY?................. NO YES ..........o Fxamoles that Would Apply to Column 2 — Project will induce 1,900 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. — Project emission rate of all contaminants will excped 5 lbs. Der hour or a heat source rroducing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. Other impacts: Ipao rT n4 P V1Tc A041 avT�a� S .40 YES 8. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OP, ENDANGERED SPECIES? O O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 - Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over-or near site or found on the Site. — Remval of any portion of a critical or sianifieant wild- life N biL7e. Aonlication of Pesticide or herbicide over more than t,licv a year other ttian for acjr:cultural purp0ces. • — Ot),r impacts: 9. HILL PROJECT SUBSTANTIALLY AFFECT NON-THREATENED OR NO YES E`19A:i,VRE7 SPECIES? .......................................0 O E:aTolo that Would Apply to Column 2 — rrol^ct would substantially interfere with an,, resident or migratory fish or wildlife species. Project requires the removal. of nore than In acres of nature (crest (over lOn years in ane) or other locally important vegetation_ " CTEIITIAL 1 `C1;PA "AL c L T� . .° , C.1' CT n' ODERATE LARGE REDUCED nY IuPACT C'r•ACT PROJECT CH411,E 01 "ISt"t orS'%'RCE. . 10. uILL THE vvnJFCT AFrECT VIE;rS,.11ISTAS ^'t THE VISUAL "In C?+A.RACTER OF THE NFIGHBORa17t+JD 011'COuu'r!1ITY? Examples that irould Apply to Column 2 O An incnmraCible visual affect caused by the introOuctinn of new materials, colors and/or forms in-contrast to the surroundinv landscape: A•oroject easrlli.visible,-.not easily screened,Uiat is Obviously different from others around it. _ 'Project will res'ult�.in the elirnination or major screening of scenic views or vistas knot-in to be important to the area. Other impacts:. _ IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES 11. WILL PROJECT I1;PACT ANY SITE OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC. NO YES PP.E-1.IST:1pIC nP. PALE011TOG.CA.L II'POPTA9CE? „O O Examples that would Aoolv to'Coluri 2 Protect occurino wholly or partially-within or contiguous to any facility or site listed on the National Reoister of historic places. Any imoact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project site. Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE E P.ECREATTOII 12. WILL THE.PRnJECT AFFECT THE OUANTITY OR (DUALITY OF EXISTING NO YES OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTU.'IITIES?...... Examples that Would Aopl.v to Column 2 O O The permanent- foreclosure of a future recreational 0000rtunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the comm-unity. Other imoacts: IuonrT nN T°.ANSPOPTAT1nV 13. :'ILL THERE EE A'l EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPORTATION No YES Exarrolps that mould Annly to Column 2 00 Alteration of present patterns of movement of People and/or goods. Protect sill result in severe traffic problems. rather lr--acts: SMALL Tn PnTENT1AL CAN IMPACT CE I.-ODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY IMPACT I11PACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON ENERGY 14. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL OR NO YES ENERGY SUPPLY?" ............:,:.................................. Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 �O Project causing qreater than 5% increase in any form of energy used in municipality. _ Project requiring the creation or"extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single- or'two family residences. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTI011ABLE ODORS. NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL DISTURBANCE AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJECT?Exam .oles that Would Aooly to Column 2 ...0 O Blasting within 1.500 feet of a hospital; school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Project will produce ooerating noise exceedinn the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. _ Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. Other impacts: IMPACT OM HEALTH b HAZARnS 16. UILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? NO YFS Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 O 0 Project will cause a risk of exrilosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals. radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or uoset conditions, or there will he a chronic loll level discharge or emission. Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" (i.?. toxic, pnisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc , includinn wastes that are solid, semi-solid, liquid or contain gases. ) Storaae facilities for one million or more gallons of liouified natural gas or other liouids. Other ir..oacts: ,n. SMALL ri POTENTIAL CA APAZ r BE MODERATE LARGE REDUCED BY " I1:PACT Il1PACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON GRO'.rTH AND CHARACTFR OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGNRrlRunn 17. WiLL PROJECT AFFECT THE CHAPACTER nF THE EXISTING N0" _ YES COMMUNITT? Examole that Would Apoly to Column 2 00. The population of the City, Town or Village in which the project -is located is likely to arow by more than 5% of resident human population.- The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- ting services will increase by more than 5: per year as a result of this project. — Will.1nvolve any permanent facility of a non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime-agricultural lands "from cultivation. The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities. structures or areas of historic importance to the community. Development will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set.an important precedent for future projects. Project will relocate 15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Other imoacts: NO YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERNING THE PROJECT? .......0 0 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 Either government or citizens of adjacent cormunities have expressed opposition or rejected the pro-iect or have not been contacted. Objections to the Project from within the community, IF ANY ACTION IN PART 2 IS IDENTIFIED AS A POTENTIAL LARGE IMPACT OR iF YOU CANNOT DETERMINE THE MAGNITUDE OF IMPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COMPLETED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINATION PART I PART II PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF (Parts 1, 2 and 3) and considerinq both the magnitude and importance of each irpact, it is reasonably determined that: PREPARE A ilErATIVE DECLARATION A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, 1s one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. 0 B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be. a significant effect in this case PREPARE A NEG5TiVE DECLARATION because the nitigatrbn measures described in PART 3 have been 0 included as part of the nroposed project. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse impacts PREPARE POSITIVE DECLARATION PROCEED WITH EIS that cannot be reduced and may cause significant damage to the environment. O Date 5lanature of RasponslDle urricrai +n dead Agencv Signature or Prenarer (if different from responsible orricer) Print or type nare of respdnsioie official in Lead Agencv. EAF EUV I RONMENTAL ASSESS►MIT - PART III EVALUATTOC! OF THE I�PORTA4CE OF IMPACTS INFORMATI03 ..._- -- Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered *to be potentially.larae.. The amount of writino necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? ILL INSTRUCTIONS f Complete the followinq, foreach impact or.effect identified in Column 2 o' Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (.if apolicable) how the impact- might be mitigated or reduced to. a less than large impact by a pro- ,)ect:change. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable- to conclude that this impact is important to the minicipality (city, town or village). in which the project is located. To answer the question of: importance, consider: The probability of the impact or effect occurring The duration of the impact or effect Its irreversibility. including permanently lost resources or values Whether the impact or effect can be controlled - The regional consequence of the impact or effect - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals Whether known objections to the prnject apply to this impact or effect. DETER?JINATION.OF SIGNIFICANCE An action is considered to be significant if: One (or more) imoact is determined to-both larne-and its (their) consequence, based on'the review above, is important. 'PAPT III STATE11ENT$ (Continue on !Attachments, as needed) . 7 ,� P S L� k0 L 4, Y Southold, N.Y. 11971 (516) 765-1938 March 31, 1988 William D. Moore, Esq. suite 3-Clause Commons Main Road Mattituck, NY 11952 RE: Proposed major subdivision of DBM Company SCTM # 1000-55-6-15.1 Dear Mr. Moore: The following information will assist you in resolving the right-of-way situation with the Wheeler' s. The final maps should include the Wheeler's property and should show 40 ' of road frontage on the proposed road. After the road is constructed and your client is ready to be .released from his performance bond, the Wheeler' s. property deed should be revised as follows: 1. to include the 40' of road frontage 2. to eliminate the right-of-way access over your client' s property. These changes should be effective the day the Town Board releases the bond and accepts dedication of Tuthill Road (south) . On another note, please stake wetlands line in field for the benefit of the Trustees Board. Also, submit two maps showing wetlands line. Note whether line is a Trustees line or a DEC line. The drainage plan should be revised to eliminate the recharge basin. The use of swaled roads and leaching basins is a preferred method of handling the stormwater runoff. Si cerely, 4 Valerie Sco az Town Planner cc: Planning Board James A. Schondebare Robert. H. Berntsson TrAees Board j t /� S 9 C &.E5 No.7 r CO ebTA..0+57 Qj- (0 TO,- 16.615 .13 60 YENNIECOTT DRIVE EX I ST. CONC.CURB IV E X IS T.Cow.cuRs PROPOSED SUBDIVISION S1'rA 0�.%7 "FRANCIS O'MALLEY" U1'rIL.P LE 15'b Z 5E61N NF-W 6dilk-Eb LFA6HINO POOL (TYP) Subdivis:on - "Map of Yennecott Park 45,0f,18"C.M.P e Orpooy. Suffolk Ccunty File No. 5187 (0 n/f 81;� D.onald Tuthill LOT LCT T ASPHALT r i 1_0 LOT. LOT 13v 53 52 LOT LOT 5 G I SITE 49 48 47 11 0 XIcTIM6 RIGHT OF WAY L ENT i'0' 011E.�. 2 44 3 ENCROACHM N.8 UTILITY LE ..ENcROACHN iENT I FRAME BLDGS 0 n/f Richard Ek n/f Loureen Wheeler Mary Wheeler 4 1 00�?1 59.F ............. ru -22.6 ..... ...... MAP LOCATION 200.02� n/f . ....... -59'0d'E. LU SCALE 1 600 Riobert Goldsmith 6TA.4-89' 'T r__-18-23 n/f X Franc,, ... 23.4 4-10001 :,7.F a Patricia LLJ O'M a I I e y ...... c2 TA. ....... .... < . .... ... TO. n/f 0- 0 _jN Chester Finne ...... 0 CD C\j ISO,or 18;,C M-P eg 0500 0 2� .......... 4 000 F (v .. ........ ...... -U4 M.H.A n/f UR Robert Toplin S.8702!I' 40 E. 20000 ....... . ..... 572..59' C)- ............. A 0 31"E. 1\1 -,3 AC f M88-56' .7 A6T ZI I .. ........ 0 n C\4 z 4-0000t 4j.F La ... ........ (P Ta SITE DATA .......... ... . .... 0 ............ J,ohn I TOTAL AREA 37. 762 ACRES . ........ Simcik MH. 5 x 2 1.6 2 ZONING USE DISTRICT: "A" RESIDENTIAL - AGRICULTURAL .. ........ (4 .. ................... ...... . 3_ TOTAL NO. OF LOTS= 16 19 400001 eo-F 4000 t2.F 4. TOTAL LENGTH 1800 L.F TRIBUTAP-Y AREA '\No 3 ... ....... ........ ^F-E A\NO 5 00,0 F 18" m P IF?0.3 00% TRIBUTA ....... .. . .......... n/f Li ........ 40000 (D-17 Willii0m Moffet Jr. LJ . ..... co"TA. If-*) 315'OF M.P e 0.4 AC-T. EI-76 f. x 20.3 184Z 35'OF Is" Cli I.E.z 15.37 14 C'm P LO 0 4�8 CD m 0 % 0 A V n/f -,IE 17.4 8 250, Mairgaret 40000 c7.17 18-7?_ Krjjkowski NO. 23 40,Ofr 18"O.m.p e 0.300 TC,. la&Z 43000+5.F 5TA� 11-41 4r"ONr­&UR 13 t�TA.15-87 1.E. I Z.7 1,155.16 70-ZO.73 Z8,OF 181,C m P ev O�6,00 00 I.E.=17.31 N 87021 x 22.4 w 000 t e-7.F 0 ------24 - ............ /f 40000 b.F 0 In 0 n of- Risshad 5 J_jdith F' 4 00',0 0 t.Lj IV n/f Owadally 0 Co Walter a Susan ......... x Stype 0 CIJ -2 4 N.89054'IC"W PIPE 0.61'w.0,27'S. FND. x n/f 0 Carl 8 Anthony Coclan a -,AnoV�er ICO PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP C. x 28.9 PREPARED FOR If 20.7 2.0.6 Co M CIANY DBM 00 ................ 950-r. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SOUTHOLD TE!5T HOLE TOVIN SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK PLANNINGBOARD NOTES. PARK BROWIV -0 (ze-6)e 1. MONUMENT 0 2. a PIPE E5ROwfj 6ILTY 21.5 It 0 LOAM 0 et .(OL 3.n STAKE OF NEi, Z.2, Y TAX MAP DIST. 1000 SECT.055 D W. 5 ELEVATIONS AND CONTOURS SHOWN HEREON ARE REFERENCED PALe:DROWM TO M.S.L. (N.G.V.D. - 1929) 4f o ^WTHORIZED ALTERA41014 OR AUDIIK)a (0 THIS SURVEY 15 A YICFLATION OF 0- 4569 SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE EDUCATION LAW. COPIFS OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARING LAIVC) riff LA�4n SU"YFYOR'S INYED SEAL OR "et IV'-OSSD SEAL SHALL NOT BE C ONMERED '0 OF A YALM TRUE COPY tN*t:AT1D HEREON SHALE RUN )12!' TO THE FOR WHOM THE SuRVE1 A',*0,.' H�S BL�HALF TO 1W AGENCY ANt AND iNST1 DATE MAR. 24, 1988 YOUNG 13YOUNG A 01 f SCALE : I " = 100' 400 OSTRANDER AVE., RIVERHEAD,N.Y. lubdlvison - Of Ty,r NO. : 87-1741 ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. P.E. a L.S. LIC. NO. 12845 HOWARD W.YOUNG,N.Y.S. L.S. LIC NO.45893 ti F. 50007 SHEE*r I OF 2 1G.20 PI =2000 PI=18.20 P1-21.30 PI=18.60 PI=21g0 VGG='O.1(o VGG=+013 VGG=-0.13 VGG=0.12 VGG=-O.f2 AGT.=1,T84 AGT= 18.33 AGT= Z 1.17 AGT- 18.72 AGT=21.78 EXISTING GRADE ;1.550% +1.3zo% J_ 135'OF W'C.M.P. a 0.480 315' OF is" G M.P � 0.480 11. M.H. D 180 OF 18" G-M f? 0300• 180' OF 18"IG.M.P @0300• 200' OF 18"G.M.P 0.300 % I.E. = lea.GG -7 140' OF 18" 0300•06 PROP05ED GRADE G. a, n1o. t M.H. A B G. . NO. 7 T. G. . 18.Z8 I M.H 5 T. !. . I8. G,Z (Y !. E.= 14. 81 . E=14.27 1.1-. = 13.T5 IAE.=�3.13 1. E. - 15. 37 I.E.= 13.G0 G. b. NO I T. G. N 18.23 T.G. = 18. G Z T-G. =Ilo.88 1. E. 14. 48 I.E. = 15. 15,IZ.71 v I.E.=13.33 Ll W Z LEAGHIKOG POOL (TYP) HP LP l HR LP UJ HIP y 19.89 18.31 z 1.14 18.70 Z 1.180 F a a Q a. �9 0 00 000 O _. N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N N 0 O O O In 0 if1 0 O O 0 (i in 6 0 lt1 O O O �! (n 0 ID O O (N N O In p O O U) O N O O O O (n O a In O O O En ul O >n r O _ N O (cl O N r ao 0 N to O r O _ N O _ N N r O Ejl O En ►� O O N In O + t t + + } + + T + + t t T 4 4 4 + '* t t + + t T + + } t + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + + O O O - _ - N N N N dl v It 0 in Ul aD Q- 0' o O O _ _ _ _ _ N N R1 (!T In v v a In PROFILE , ROADWAY 5GALE PI=20.70 Z 4.70 NORIZ� I = 5 AGT-208�o VERT f��= 10�' to' HIGH CHAIN LINK `�fCEL MESH FENCE +1.g32 % -O. 00°/° EXISTING GRADE -- - - DRAINAGE CRITERIA 135'OF18"G M.P @ 0.480°i PROPOSED GRADE G.B. NO. 7 &8 G.B. NO. � G B. NO. 3 T.G. = 18•!oZ Recharge Bd-oin T. G = ZO. 73 V =ARG I.E.= 1271 A- TRIBUTARY AREA HEADWALL I. E? 17, 48 G.B. NO. 4 I. - R=2" RAINFALL -0.17 3&0' 01, z4" 6.G. G.M.P o. I.E.- 11.0 473 °i Z G=GOEFF. OR RUNOFF =0-qO T.E = 17. 31 GONG.APRON 2 y 1.E.= 7. 85000 .F x 0.17 x O.cf 0 . 13000 G.F 50T. EL=10.5 W 13000 G.F _ 68.4Z 6.F/6.F = 111.0 L.F > USE (2) -10'-0" PIA.x 10'-0" DEEP L.P.5 W/CONG. SLAB FIRST L.FR TO HAVE C.I. FRAME & COVER RE6HAR6E BASIN Z _- LP W V = ARG 20.61 A= TRIBUTARY AREA d 2 i RAINFALL G= GOEFFORLRU OFF =0,25 > > 764080 5.17 x 067 x 0.25 = 131333 6F ,n 1* \q T (o \y r I TOTAL REQUIRED AREA = 131000 6.17 d- ap r co Q. N lV N (V N En 1} 1* I TOTAL PROVIDED AREA = 134000 G.F N N N N N N N N t J N N N N N N O � NOTE NI N N ALL GONSTRUGTION TO BE IN AGGORDAKICE I WITH TOWN OF SOUTHOLP H16HWAY 5PEGIFIGATIONS. 0 % � N O O to r• O E(1 0 0 O O � ( + + + ITO + + + + t + + + + + + 0 In N i .s r r m co . PROFILE' STORM 5EWE R PROFILE ROADWAY 56ALE HORIZ: 1" = 50' 5GALE vEtzT : f"= Io' IeEBAR5 G.I. FRAME & GRATE NORIZ: 1 = 50 " TO EXTEND 2' A APPROVED BY THE PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION MAP ACH DE 5 h OF INLET 5 TOWN OF 0UTHOLD Z.. 14" VERT: 1'�= lO E 51 PAVEMENT URFAGE R=1" ASPHALT WEA12ING ' ; `' FINISHED GRADE SURFACE PREPARED FOR w; in DBM COMPANY AT S 0 U T H 0 L Dso ANTHOLD TO NING BOARD ° : �'� �'~ �� " •• • • � -• TOWN 0 F SOUTHOLD �PPAofW-�`L� ��` YO 7 SUFFOLK COUNTY N.Y r A%Awl ORILW ALTOtAlION UR AUDIIIV l0 THIS SURVEY IS A VIOLATION OF SECTION 7209 OF THE NEW YORK STATE �.1 w' k' .�y fy .. 1�' 45 f S ATtON LAW. ,- . i '�:i• 4."=}. fl* '�;s.^ dye' � V "RFD h n.. T>e• COPIES OF THIS SURVEY MAP NOT BEARIN f1 THE LAND SURVEYOR'S INKED SEAL OR ��>yD S�l�'` sMBUSSED SERE SHALL NOT BE CONSIDERS: TYPICAL GATGH BASINL 'M BE A VALID TRUE COPY TYPICAL ClG UR6 DETAIL 34JARANTEES INDICATED HEREON SHALL RUn U DNLY TO THE PERSON FOR WHOM THE SURD IS PREPARED, AND ON HIS 81HALF TO THE r fITLE COMPANY, GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY AN! .ENDING INSTITUTION LISTED HER€ON, AND i0 THE ASSIGNEES OF THE LENDING INSTI-" "UT.ION. GUARANTEES ARE NOT Ti Am5'r--TAABLE � "ntr=..«�^•� ;� +-"��'�"` DATE: MAR. 24,1988 DUNG a YOUNG NO. 87- 1741 400 OSTRANDER AVE., RIVERHEAD, N.Y. ADDIn�Nnl ". ALDEN W. YOUNG, N.Y.S. P.E.a L.S.LIC.NO. 12845 HOWARD W.YOUNG, N.Y.S. L.S. LIC.NO.45893 M F SHEET 2 OF 2 50007