Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-330 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BOARD OF' SOUTHOLD. TOWN TRUSTEES SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK WETLANDS PERMIT This Wetlands Permit No. ,,,330........... has been granted by the Town Trustees according to information furnished in Application No. ,319............. filed by Applicant ad..Dowd.;.Dowd.................................... 9 19 85.............. 19.......... A map of the proposed work will be kept on file in the Trustee Office under the application number given. Toconstruct a single family....re ............................... on pilings 30' from Orient Harbor (Gardiners Bay) . ................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................. Location of property on which work to be done .,350..Rabbit Lanet... ast„Marion; NY,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ................................................................................................................................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................. Creek, Bay or Harbor fronting property ....Orient Harbor ............................................................................................. ..............................................................................................................................................:.................. Sizeof work: Length ...,44'............ .....................:. ................................................................................ 30' Width. ............................................................................................................................. HeightAbove High Water ...........11............................................................................. DepthBelow Low Water ---------------................................................................................................. --------------- Yards to be Excavated --------------- Yardsto be Filled ................... .................................................................................... Manner in which material is to be removed or deposited ....,N/A .., . . . .. .. .. .: ................................................................................................................................................................. Intended use of property Residential ..........................................................:.............................................................. ................................................................................................................................................................. Conditions if any ......See s..tandard. . . . . ..recommen. .......................... dations.. ......... ... . . . . .. . ....................................................................... ................................................................................................................................................................. Expiration Date August. 28, 1987 if work has' not commenced,by„sa,� date................ .......................................................... ........... Number of Inspections Required ?-Trustees..are..to..be, not,ified,u.P,on,,, -wRP. ,et-.op,,� „zha..... work. - � $5.00 Paid InspectionFees ..................................................................................................................................... LiabilityPolicies in the Amount of ......................................................................................................... i The validity of this permit is or may be subject to the approval of other governmental �r municipal authorities. The Town accepts no responsibility in applying for or obtaining such approval. In the event that such approval is necessary, the holder of this permit shall not commence operations here- under until such approval has been obtained in writing. The failure to obtain such other approval when required shall subject this permit to immediate revocation by the Trustees upon receipt by the \� Trustees- of written notice from such other governmental or municipal authorities of its refusal or \� disapproval. The applicant does by the acceptance of this permit, assume all responsibility for operations under- taken pursuant to this permit, and shall take.all precautions for the prevention of injuries to persons and property resulting from such operations. By such acceptance, the applicant also agrees to indemni- fy and save harmless the Town, and its officers, agents and employees from any and all claims arising from operations under this permit and any and all acts or omissions of applicant, his agent and employees. The applicant and the owner and occupants of the premises upon which the operations authorized by this permit are being conducted, do, by the acceptance of this permit, give consent to the Town, and its officers and employees to enter upon the premises where such operations are being conducted to make such inspections as the Town may deem necessary to insure that such operations are being con- ducted in conformity with this permit. This operation will not substantially: A. Adversely affect the wetlands of the town. B. Cause damage from erosion, turbidity or siltation. C. Cause saltwater intrusion into the fresh water resources of the town. D. Adversely affect fish, shellfish or other beneficial marine organisms, aquatic wildlife and vege- tation or the natural habitat.thereof. E. Increase the danger of flood and storm-tide damage. F. Adversely affect navigation on tidal waters or the tidal flow of the tidal waters of the town. G. Change the course of any channel or the natural movement or flow of any waters. H. Weaken or undermine the lateral support of other lands in the vicinity. I. Otherwise adversely affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town. Signed .�/..J..•...ly.F... ...G ...........L7?..? President Board of Southold Town Trustees Date...............:...... ...................... ....................... . j y HENRY P. SMITH, President TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. 4 tJ� ,.ti �7 (516) 765-1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD �� ,{ - _ e�y ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 May 5, 1986 Mr. Charles Luscher Rabbit Lane Association 19 East Mall Plainview, New York 11803 Re: Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York Dear Mr. Luscher: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees at their regular meeting held on April 24, 1986 regarding the above captioned matter. Moved by Trustee Smith seconded by Trustee Bredemeyer it was RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees WAIVER the need of a Wetland Permit for Charles Luscher on behalf of the Rabbit Lane Association to re-install a 2" diameter water service to be under- ground and under the bottom Iof the lake, and to Ted Dowd for the installation of four 1" pipes underground and under the bottom Qf the lake. This waiver is given all in accordance with the "Water System Layout, " and D.E.C. Permit issued on November 22 , 1985 and subject to the Supplementary Special Conditions and Additional General Conditions of this permit. Very my yours, Kenry' . Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS: ip Attachments cc: Town Board Building Dept. Supt. of Highways Trustees Ted Dowd CAC ✓ Mr.. A.J. Moyse file w7 4 i� t ;7z, TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 February 4, 1986 Mr. Stanley A. Pauzer District Manager Soil & Water Conservationist 127 East Main Street Riverhead, New York 11901 RE: Ted Dowd Wetland Application No. 319 Dear Mr. Pauzer: Transmitted herewith is an application for a wetland permit, referenced above. Will you please assist us by making an inspection and review of the application for a recommendation to this Board? Your anticipated cooperation is greatly appreciated. We await your findings. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees / r Ilene Pfiffeowrling Clerk to Trustees HPS: ip Attachments h d TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 January 8, 1986 Mr. Ted Dowd P. 0. Box 106 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Wetland Application No. 319 Dear Mr. Dowd: Please be advised that the Board of Trustees tabled the wetland application referenced above pending comments from the Conservation Advisory Council. If you have any questions, or need additional information please do not hesitate. contacting this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling Clerk to Board HPS: ip cc: Ms. Karen Chytalo, D.E.C. Trustees file h 5 JPZz �0�t'E Ln ty r•i 1 q TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOiTTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 December 3, 1985 Mr. Ted Dowd P. 0. Box 106 Southold, New York 11971 RE: Wetland Application No. 319 Dear Mr. Dowd: At the Trustee meeting held on November 27, 1985. the Board Tabled your application pending comments from the Conservation Advisory Council. The Board' s next regular meeting will be held on December 26,-- 1985 at _-7: 30 P.M. at the Town Hall, Southold for your information, should you wish to attend. If you have any questions or concerns please do not hesitate contacting this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pffferling Secretary to Board HPS: ip cc: Trustees file n \ . t Ln TELEPHONE (516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 1197-1 Date: October 8, 1985 TO- WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Attached hereto is a Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by Ted Dowd in connection with his application for a Wetland Permit to construct a single family residence on property located at. 350 Rabbit Lane, East.. Marion, New York. Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Posted: October 8, 1985 1 � TELEPHONE (516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O.. Box 7.28 Southold, New York 11971 October 8, 1985 Mr. Martin Garrell, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Southold, - New York 11971 Dear Mr. Garrell: Transmitted herewith is application no. 319 for a wetland permit submitted by Mr. Ted Dowd. Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations. with respect to this application. - - Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees �� —- Ilene Pfifferling g Secretary to Board Attachment � G TELEPHONE (516)165-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53.095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 October 8, 1985 Mr. Charles T. Hamilton Alternate Regional Permit Administrator N.Y.S. Dept. of Environmental Conservation Building 40, SUNY - Room 219 Stony Brook, New York 11794 ." Dear. Mr. Hamilton: Enclosed is the application of Mr. Ted Dowd, in connection with his application for a wetland permit. This project is unlisted and our. initial determination of non-significance has been made and we wish to coordinate this action to conform our initial determination in our role as lead agency. May we have your view on. this matter. Written comments on this project will be received at this office until 'Oct. 28, 1985 We shall interpret your lack of response to mean there is no objection by your agency.. Very truly yours, HENRY P. SMITH, PRESIDENT BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Ilene Pfifferling Secretary to Board Attachments cc: Commissioner Williams Southold Town Building Dept. HENRY P. SMITH, Presidents ?' TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER; Vice-Pres. h PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN � BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 30, 1986 Mr. Raymond Jacobs Supt. of Highways Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Dear Ray; The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees during their regular meeting held on September 25, 1986 regarding the Bay Avenue, East Marion matter. RESOLVED that the Town Trustees APPROVE A WAIVER OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE to restore the area under the bridge on Bay Avenue, East Marion, back to its' original state and that all work is to be done by the Highway Dept. Very truly yours, Henry Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HS:ip cc: Town Board file m TELEPHONE (516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 November 21, 1986 Mr. Charles Luscher Rabbit Lane Association 19 East Mall Plainview, New York 11803 Re: .Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York Dear Mr. Luscher: Please be advised that it will be necessary to secure a permit from the Trustees for the removal of silt from under the bridge on Bay Avenue, East Marion. . The Lakeview Terrace Road Association has indicated that they would like to have this work expedited as soon as possible. (See Attached letter) . For your convenience, I have attached a wetland application to complete and return to this office. Should you have any further questions or concerns, please contact this office. . Very truly yours, •Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip Attachments �1 _::. TELEPHONE (516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 November 7, 1985 Mr. Ted Dowd P. O. Box 106 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Dowd: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees at a regular meeting held on October 30, 1985: RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of the application of Ted Dowd for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on 350 Rabbit Lane, East Marion, New York. Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Ilene Pfifferling Secretary to Board HPS: ip cc: Trustees File . • .1 �����df lyld p . HENRY P. SMITH, President TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. (516) 765-1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 October 1, 1987 Mr. Albert J. Moyse, President Rabbit Lane Association P. O. Box 754 East Marion, New York 11939 Re: Marion Lake Dear Mr. Moyse: This is to acknowledge receipt of your letter of September 29, 1987 regarding the above matter. Please be advised that a copy of this communication has been forwarded to Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways for his review. The Trustees will discuss this matter during their regular meeting to be held on October 29, 1987. We will advise you further, after that date. Should you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact this office at the telephone number listed above. Very truly yours, Henry"P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip cc: Raymond L. Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways Trustees File HENRY P. SMITH, Presidentf JOHN M. BREDEMEYER Vice-Pres. � $` r TELEPHONE PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD �. � ��, (516) 765-1892 � JR. ELLLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 August 8, 1986 Mr. Ted Dowd Box 282 Rabbit Lane East Marion, N. Y. 11939 Dear Mr. .Dowd: In regards to your letter of August 1, 1986 requesting the Trustees to determine—the necessity for Wetlands Applications prior to building of houses on Lots 036-17-10 and 036-17-20. It has been determined by the Bay Constable after a field inspection that the proposed two houses are outside of the 75' jurisdiction of the Trustees, therefore not permit is- necessary at this time. If any activity was to take place within the 75' however, a permit would then be required. Please be aware that we are making this determination only for the Trustees Office and not for any other agency which may require permits. If you have any questions please don't hesitate. to contact us at the above listed phone number. Very truly yours, Henry . Smith, President Board -of Town Trustees HPS:ao cc: Trustees File HENRY P. SMITH, President TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pros. C=) (516) 765-1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD �. JR ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 August 6, 1986 Mr. Ted Dowd BOX 282 Rabbit Lane East Marion, New York 11939 Dear Mr. Dowd: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees during their regular meeting held on July 31, 1986 regarding your wetland application no. 319. Moved by Trustee Krupski seconded by Trustee Larsen it was RESOLVED to WAIVER the need of a Wetland Permit as. requested by Ted Dowd for the clearing out of underbrush from property located on Rabbit Lane, East Marion for lots as follows: 1000-038-17-9, 1000-038-17-10, 1000-038-17-20 and 1000-038-18-8. Very truly yours, /3)j� e Henry P. ith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip cc: Trustees file �i 1 � • HENRY P. SMITH, President TELEPHONE JOHN.M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. (516) 765-1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD �y ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York .11971 July 31, 1986 S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE ENVIRONMENTAL DECLARATION NOTICE OF DETERMINATION OF NON-SIGNIFICANCE APPLICATION NO. 319 NAME: Ted Dowd This notice is issued pursuant to the provisions of Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, Notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as lead agency for the action described below has-determined :that the project will not have a significant, effect 'to the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Build a single family residence on. pilings 30 ' from Orient Harbor (Gardiner' s Bay) LOCATION OF PROJECT: East Marion, N.Y. REASONS .SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An environmental assessment form in the 'shortform has been .submitted which indicated that there would be. no adverse effect to the environment. should the project be. implemented as planned. 2. Because there has been no response in the allotted time from the Southold Town Building Dept. and the N.Y.S._ D.E.C: it is assumed that there are no- objections nor comments from those agencies. Further information can be obtained by contacting Henry P. Smith, Pres. , Board of Trustees, Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971_ or by calling (516) 765-1892. Very truly yours, F Henr P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ao CC: Bldg. Dept. C.A.C. Planning Bd. DEC - Albany DEC - Stony Brook Army Corps Aran Terchuni an, Coastal Mgmt. Town Clerks Bulletin Bd. Zoning Board Trustees File ® rlifs'v TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 July 1, 1986 Mr. Ted Dowd P. 0. BOX 106 Southold, New York 11971 Re: Wetland Application No. 319 Dear Mr. Dowd: Please be advised that the Board of Trustees took the following action during their regular meeting held on June 26, 1986 regarding the above captioned matter. RESOLVED that the Town Trustees Table the application of Ted Dowd pending comments from the Conservation Advisory Council., Very truly yours, Henry P. t th, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip cc: Trustees C.A.C. file HENRY P. SMITH, President < + TELEPHONE OHN M. BREDEMEYER Vice-Pres. c is„_ ;::;..• k, (516) 765-1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. `' ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES . TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 May 16, 1986 Mr. Charles Luscher Rabbit Lane Association 19 East Mall Plainview, New York 11803 Re: Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York Dear Mr. Luscher: Please be advised that our letter of May 5, 1986 applies to the waterlines for the above captioned project. Electrical lines are to be installed according to Public . Utility standards and specifications. The Trustees would recommend that the electrical lines be run overhead across the pond. If you have anv questions or concerns, please do not hesitate to call this office at the telephone number listed above. Very- truly.. ou s, "fYenry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS: ip Attachment cc: Trustees Building Dept. Supt. of H3'�ghways Ted Dowd(/ CAC Mr. A. J. DZoyse Town Board file HENRY P. SMITH President ' r t;,;tF4 ~ `r"- ': TELEPHONE i"1 JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. (516) 765-1892 PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD �.'`' ALBERT KRUPSKI, JR. ELLEN M. LARSEN y' I BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 September 30, 1986 Mr. Ted Dowd Box 282 Rabbit Lane East Marion, New York 11939 Dear Mr. Dowd: The following action was taken by the Board of Trustees during their regular meeting held on September 25, 1986 regarding your wetland application no. 319. WHEREAS, Ted Dowd applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated September 19, 1985 , and WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on August 28, 1986 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity_ " to be heard, and WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the Town, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that Ted Dowd BE AND HEREBY IS GRANTED PERMISSION UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF THE WETLAND ORDINANCE OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD TO: construct a single- family residence on pilings 30' from Orient Harbor, East Marion. This permit will expire on August 28, 1987 if work has not commenced by said date. There are two inspections required and the Trustees are to be notified upon the completion of the work. Prior to the issuance of said permit by the Clerk, the applicant shall file with the Clerk a certificate that he has public liability insurance policies insuring against any liability which may arise in the performance of the operations pursuant to such permit in such amount as shall be fixed by the Trustees, which said policies shall name the Town as a name insured. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. See attached recommendations. Board of Trustees Page 2. - Ted Dowd Very truly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip Attachment cc: Robert A. Greene, D.E.C. , Stony Brook Commissioner Henry G. Williams, D.E.C. , Albany Army Corps of Engineers Coastal Management Trustees file Bldg. Dept. Board of Appeals Standard measures to be taken during construction: 1. Roof run off shall be discharged into dry wells. 2. Driveways and parking areas within 75' of the wetlands shall be of porous construction. Blacktop shall not be used on this site. 3. Care shall be taken so as to preclude the entry of any construction material into adjacent waters. 4. Immediately following construction, all areas of exposed soil shall be properly protected with suitable erosion control devices/and or vegetated to prevent entry of eroded soil into nearby waters. PUBLIC HEARING IN THE MATTER OF TED DOWD NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN THAT PUBLIC HEARING WILL BE HELD BY THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AT THE SOUTHOLD TOWN HALL, MAIN ROAD, SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ON THURSDAY, AUGUST 28, 1986 on the following application for a permit under the provision of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold: 7:30 P.M. In the matter of the application of� Ted Dowd to construct a single family residence on pilings 30' from Orient Harbor. Property is located at 350 Rabbit Lane, East Marion, New York. 7:45 P.M. Trustee Bredemeyer: Is there any one to speak in favor of this application? (no comment) . Is there anyone who wishes to speak against this application? Yes. Please come forward and use the microphone. If you would also sign in so that we will have your name for the record. Clerk: There is a sign in sheet on the chair. Harriet Moor: My name is Harriet Moor I live adjacent to the property that Mr. Dowd is seeking to build a house on. I have before me a notice of disapproval dated September 18, 1985, in which he was disapproved on three counts. Trustee Larsen: Disapproved by whom? Mrs. Moor : The Town of Southold, Building Dept. one, the building exceeds the lot coverage per written by 703-232 sq. ft Article III, Section 100-31 Bulk schedule A Col building will be located in the 75'-0" set back required from Tidal Wetlands Article IX, Section 100-119-2. Now if Mr. Dowd is seeking approval of these' items this evening, and I am sure that he is, what is the point of setting up rules in your zoning book. What is the purpose of it? Trustee Larsen: Each application is a separate entity of itself. Having a permit from one agency does not relieve the applicant from the responsibility of having a permit from the other agency. However, each Board that the applicant comes before only addresses the issues pertinent to the ordinance of that Board. Okay, specifically as far as the 75' setback requirement, he would require a Wetland Permit from us in order to meet that criteria established by the Building Department. Mrs. Moor.: . He has not gotten that approval yet? Trustee Bredemeyer: This hearing is part of this process. _Trustee Larsen: You are giving us your opinion on this project. You brought to our attention that the Building Dept. has not issued a building permit at this time and you gave us the reasons. Trustee Bredemeyer: Those items are for the Zoning Board of Appeals. This Board is not the Zoning Board of Appeals. We can not act specifically on those items. We act on other items under the Town Wetland Ordinance. Mrs. Moor: Is that what this meeting is here for tonight? Trustee Bredemeyer: That is correct. Board of Trustees - Public Hearing in the matter of Ted Dowd Page 2. August 28, 1986 Mrs. Moor., Not the Zoning Law. Trustee- Larsen: No. We do not deal with that. We deal with the Wetland Ordinance. Trustee Bredemeyer: Do you have anything more to add to this application? Mrs. Moor:". No. Not as far as I can see. Trustee Bredemeyer: Anyone else here to speak against this application? Frank Heroy: My name is Frank Heroy. I'm speaking for the Lakeview Terrace Road Association which is off Bay Avenue in East Marion. The Association requests that this project not start until the silt problem under the bridge has been resolved, which was a result of the first project of Mr. Dowd. If for 60 years one could row. a boat under that bridge. Today one can not row a boat under that bridge as a result of siltation into the lake. The second thing, the Association requests that a weight limit be placed on that bridge because a collapse of that bridge into Wetlands could be fatal to a person and could have a catastrophic effect on wildlife in that area. Trustee Bredemeyer: Okay, thank you. Is there any one else who wishes to speak on behalf of this application, either for or against? Ruth Oliva, -N:F.E.C. : We oppose this application because we feel that three residences on a small piece of property is just to much. As far as the septic systems are concerned going into Lake Marion, there .is alot of development and most of the run off as it is is probably going into Lake Marion. We do not feel that the lake should be loaded any more with any more nutrient. Trustee 8redemeyer: Is there any one else who wishes to speak on this application? Dr. Martin Garrell: Jay, just for the record, I guess the comments from the Conservation Advisory Council are part of the record? Trustee Bredemeyer: If you wish to reiterate them, that would be fine. Dr. Martin Garrell: If you recall we were opposed to the project. We felt that there would be a significant impact on Lake Marion. We felt that this particular applicant should go through the full environmental hearing process and should be made to process a draft environmental impact statement trough a final impact statement. With all of the useful information that hearings bring out. We therefore felt at this time, that the application for a permit should be refused. That was all, that will be part of the record. ..Trustee Bredemeyer: Anyone else? Yes. Ted Dowd: My name is Ted Dowd. I would like to point out a few things. In reference to the first question about the bridge, the bridge was 20" deep last year, I measured it. I believe it is deeper this year. A.lot of construction work and rework has gone on. Just for the record. I believe some of you have been down there to look at ii In reference to the environmental impact statement, it was addressed thoroughly' last time. This application is for one house, not three houses on that piece of property. Does anyone have any questions? Board of Trustees - Public Hearing in the matter of Ted Dowd Page 3. - August 28, 1986 Trustee Bredemeyer: Does anyone else have any comments. (no comments.) Do any of the Trustees have any questions? (no comments.) There .not being any further comments on this application, I close the public hearing in the matter of Ted Dowd. Hearing Closed at 7:55 P.M. F D rid in� A. C= r < �vn ' � •'1;�: � Town Hall, 53095 Main Road d �� P.O. Box 1179 TELEPHONE Southold, New York 11971 (516)765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL July 28, 1986 To: Southold Town Trustees From: Southold Town CAC Re: Applications reviewed by CAC at the regular meeting held July 22, 1986 No . 398 - Harold Wilsberg Recommend disapproval - The Council would like the applicant to either resubmit or .amend the application for only a floating dock and no bulk- head. The Council recommends the floating dock instead of the bulkhead to allow for the extensive colonization of spartina which would stabilize the land and reduce the need for any bulkhead. No. 400 - Sal Caiola - Recommend disapproval Th.e Council feels it is a naural shoreline with no other bulkheads adjacent to the property and the structure could cause erosion of the adjacent beaches . The Council suggests the applicant plant natural vegetation instead. No . 402 - Gerald Rupp= Recommend disapproval -- The Council disapproves because the slope is- in good condition and is holding as is . I-f the applicant does anything further it could disturb the natural vegetation which would lead to serious erosion problems. The Council does recommend the repair of the stairs and existing bulkhead. They suggest the applicant either amend or resubmit the applicatic to do the repairs suggested and . placing a small deck at the base of the stairs but proposing no retaining walls . No. 319_ - Ted Dowd - The Council feels a full EIS is neccessary . Significant Type I action. It should be discussed publicly and allow input from interested parties at the hearing. No . 388 - Leonard Schlegal - Recommend approval with stipulations . Page 2 d 1 a 1 The- applicant must recognize the sensitivity of the area. There should be minimal clearing during construction; no lawns on the wetland side of the house (area between house and marsh) ; plant appropriate vegetation on wetlands side. of house; and insure nutrient flow (f.rom' fertilizers , etc . ) into the creek be minimal. No . 394 - Frank R. Reilly - Recommend approval with stipulations . The cabin and retaining walls are approved. The ramp and dock are de- pendent upon neighbors approval -for : access. If the path .is to cross wetland the Council does not approve . No. 403 - John Becht - Recommend approval provided the applicant follows the plans as sketched with elevation over the spartina No. 40.4 - Goldsmith' s Boat Shop - Recommend approval. No. 405 - Mark Baxter. - Recommend '_approval"with stipulations . 1 . All drainage must be on property. 2 . Minimal clearing of vegetation . 3. Plant 10 ' of vegetation on wetland side of house, no lawn! No. 406 - Richard Anderson - Recommend approval. No. 407 - Arnold Blair - Recommend approval 'but keep the retaining wall in a straight line. No. 408 - The Nature Conservancy = Tabl'ed. No. 409 - Douglas Miller - Tabled. The Council is to request additional info from applicant , but, at this time does feel it will need an EIS , Type I No. 410 - Sal R. Varano - Recommend approval with stipulation. Replace bulkhead in place, do not move out as shown in plans . No. 411 John Morse - Recommend approval . No. 412 - Nicholas J . Cutron - Recommend 'dis'approval . No need for bulkhead - the slope is vegetated , there is no erosion, it is not subject to extreme storm conditions and there are no other bulkheads to either side. No. 413 Douglas Moore - Recommend *approval . No. 414 - C & L Realty - Recommend approval. RESOLUTION NO. 49 - TED DOWD AS PER INSPECTIONS OF THE LOTS FOR THE CLEARING ON THE SITE. This was for the Three lots. 1000-038-17-9 1000-038-17-10 1000-038-18-8 ' u r Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 TELEPHONE �, Southold, New York 11971 (516)765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL January 22, 1986 To: Henry Smith, Trustee President From: Linda J.-Cooper, CAC Secretary At the regular meetin_ of the CAC the following recommendations were Wetland Application No . 319, Ted Dowd - The Council will continue to Table this application until they can speak with Mr . Dowd. Wetland Application No. 333, Dr. Vincent Claps - Tabled, the Council wishes further information before making a recommend- ation. Wetland Application No . 334, John Xikis - Disapprove, the Council feels the present wall is serving its purpose, there is no need for bulkheading. Also of concern is the severe impact on the downdrift neighbors of the proposed groin. In addition, creation of additional land to an existing beach is contrary to the existing wetlands ordinance. In conclusion, the applicant should leave AS IS, the stones and screens appear quite secure. The cove is sheltered from the northwest . Wetland Application No . 337, Joseph Schoenstein - Disapprove, The Council sites four reasons for its recommendation. They are as follows : 1) Creek is about to be designated as a significant habitat . It is critical to vast freshwater wetlands and uplands as far north as Moores Woods . 2) The setback is not observed with care on the present lot . Rubble fronting on creek and banks are already a hazard. 3) The building can be sited perpendicular to current plan. 4) Town ordinances are -already in question due to expansion of facilities and previous variances . Wetland Application No. 338, Albert J . Breneisen - Disapprove. The Council recommends disapproval because the pool,-is within the 75 ' setback requirement . The }bulkhead represents a severe alteration of the shoreline contour. Without the pool the retaining wall has no function. The Council suggests an alternative by placing the pool on the north side of the house . Page 2 Wetland Application No. 335 John Newman = Table. The Council feels it must table this matter pending ZBA approval of the two -story garage . It appears two story buildings go against the deed and covenants. If ZBA does approve, then questions will be asked re: Cesspool capacity increase and loading re: Pilings If ZBA does not approve, then it is not clear if pilings are necessary . It is not clear that the garage is .not. currently safe _ simply repair the cracks in the floor. Rip rap looks Osound as is . Wetland Application No. 324 Arthur J. BuJnowski - Table - The Council reinspected the application at the request of the Town Trustees. After another inspection and being alerted that there were objections by neighbors ,. the Council decided to table the application pending a meeting of all those neighbors concerned in the surronding properties . They ;need to find a solution to best handle the problem of erosion and property loss . The Council feels .the property owners need an expert in littoral drift to advise on proper place- ment of groins. Wetland Application No. 336 Glenn F. Heidtmann - Table - The Council has tabled this application pending notice from the DEC regarding Freshwater Wetlands . 00 Town Hall S3095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 TELEPHONE Southold, New York 11971 (516)765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL November 27, 1985 To: Southold Town Trustees From: CAC Secretary, Linda .Cooper The CAC held its regular meeting, Tuesday, November 26, 1985. At that time the following recommendations were made: Wetland Application No. 310 - Neil Simon - Recommend' approval with the stipulation that the dock be shortened to keep it out of the main channel Wetland Application No. 313 - Henry P. Smith - Recommend approval Wetland Application No. 315 - North Fork Property Development - Tabled for reinspection Wetland Application No. 316 - Walter Wappus - Recommend "approval Wetland Application No. 317 - Charlie Caraftis (Mattituck Fishing Station) - Recommend approval Wetland Application No. 318 - The Beixedon Estate Property Owners , c/o John Nickles - Recommend approval Wetland Application- No. 319 - Mr. Ted Dowd = Tabled, the Counci wishes to meet with Mr. Dowd. Wetland Application No . --320 - Mattituck Park Comm. (park at Peconic Bay Blvd. ) - Recommend approval Wetland Application No . 321 - Mattituck Park Commission (Veterans Memorial -Park) - Recommend approval Wetland .Application No. 322 - Daysman Morris - Recommend approval, as long as the conditions stipulated in the DEC Permit as strictly followed Wetland Application No. 323 - The Lagoon Association c/o Robert H. Sturdy - Recommend approval Wetland Application No:.. 324 Arthur..J . _-Bujnowski -Recommend approval Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 1179 TELEPHONE Southold, New York 11971 (516)765-1801 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL November 27, 1985 Mr. Ted Dowd P. 0. Box 106 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Dowd: At the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council ' s regular meeting held November 26, 1985, the Council tabled your wetland application, which was transmitted to us by the Southold Town Trustees. for a recommendation. The Council wishes to meet with you at our next regular meeting and discuss your application. Several points need clarification. The next regular meeting of the Conservation Advisory Council will be Thursday, December 19, 1985, at 8: 00 P .M. Meetings are held at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York 11971. Please notify the secretary, Linda J. Cooper, if you are able to attend. Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Very truly yours, Martin H. Garrell, Chairman Conservation Advisory Council By Linda J . Cooper, Secretary cc: Southold Town Trustees a _ , z Lni Town Hall 53095 Main Road P.O. Box1179 TELEPHONE (516)765-1801 ,2 Southold, New York 11971 -� Z, ! r, SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL The Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council held its regular meeting on Tuesday, November 26, 1985 at 8 : 00 P. M. , at the Southold Town Hall, Main Road, Southold, New York. Present were: Martin H. Garrell - Chairman John Tuthill - Member Ralph Condit - Member John Holzapfel - Member Heather Cusack - Member Jeanne Marriner - Member Betty Wells - Member Linda J. Cooper - Secretary Also present were: Mr. Bergman Henry Smith DISCUSSIONS: Mr. Bergman (Planning Board referral - Proposed Subdivision) appeared before the Council to explain the exact location of the proposed house in relation to the slope and marsh area. At the. Council ' s request, Henry Smith was in attendance to answer the questions. raised at the previous meeting regarding his Wetland Application No . 313. Regarding the amount of dredging to take place, Mr Smith informed the Council that the application had been .amended from the original 1000 c. y. of dredging to 96 c.y. When questioned about the placement -of dredge spoils , he explained the dredge spoils would be loaded on a barge and unloaded at Goldsmiths, then trucked away. The Council also wished to know if there had been any dredging . done in the same area in the historic past . According to Mr. Smith, the County had dredged in the area up to the park at the end of Youngs Avenue. REPORTS : Heather Cusack, .the Council' s STOP representative reported the program for 1986 would begin organizing in February and start getting information out to the public with special attention being given to businesses. - Ms . Cusack also reported 'on a request received from Councilman Paul Stoutenburgh. Councilman Stoutenburgh. would like the CAC to .. Page . 2 � make up a map showing all the places in the area with drainage pipes going into creeks. It would help pinpoint sensitive areas . The Council felt that it was a worthwhile project . Council Chairman Martin Garrell will contact Paul Stoutenburgh to set up organizing and financing the project . The members of the Council thought it would be best to hire someone, possibly a college student , to do the actual leg work. Chairman Martin Garrell reported .that he is planning a joint meeting for a Saturday, sometime in January of February, between the Southold, East. Hampton, Southampton, and possibly Riverhead CACs and Conservation Boards . RECOMMENDATIONS : On a motion made by John Tuthill, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Planning Board approval of the Proposed Subdivision of Martin 'and Barbara Bergman. The Council approves with. the stipulation that care be used during excavation and that the natural vegetation be kept as a buffer between the house and marsh area to avoid run-off . Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by John Holzapfel, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the S.outhold Town Trustees 'a.pproval of the Wetland Application No. 310 submitted by En-Consultants, Inc. on behalf of Neil' Simon. . Applicant wished to construct a variable width timber walkway for house now under construction to bulkhead (_approx- imately 40' ) .where it will be continous with. a 4' wide x 20 ' long fixed elevated (min. 3. 5 ' above grade of marsh.) walk, 4 ' x 14' hinged ramp, and 6 ' x 16' float secured by two 8" diameter pilings . The Council approves with the stipulation that the dock be shortened to keep it out of the main channel. Harbor Lights Drive, Southold. Vote of Council : Ayes : All Motion carried. On a motion made by Martin H. Garrell, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to th.e Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application submitted by The Land Use Co . ,- on behalf of Henry P. Smith ( No: 313) to dredge a 96 c.y. area in Town Creek. Hobart Road, Southold. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Mart-in Garrel:l., seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to table Wetland Application No . 315 to reinspect by the Council . Vote of Council :. Ayes : All Motion Carried Page 3 On a motion made by Jeanne Marriner, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No . 316 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of Walter Wappus to reconstruct 45' of bayside timber bulkhead within 18' and reconstruct in ,kind and in place 33 ' of timber bulkhead on west side of property . Bayshore Road, Greenport . Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by- John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No . 317 submitted - Charlie Caraftis (Mattituck Fishing Station) by the North Fork Marine Construction, Inc. to construct a timber bulkhead, 106 ' long. Bulkhead will be built 18" in front of existing bulkhead. Fill will be trucked in to backfill bulkhead. Naugles Drive, Mattituck. Vote of Council : Ayes : All. Motion carried. On a motion made by made by Jeanne 'Marriner, seconded by Martin Garrell it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No . 318 submitted by The Biexedon Estate Property Owners to maintenance dredge inlet to Petty' s Pond. Approximately 6500 c. y. of spoil will be deposited on beach to westas beach nourish- ment . Ten-year maintenance dredging permit is requested. Ashamonaque Avenue, Southold Vote of Council : Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Heather Cusack it was RESOLVED to table Wetland Application No. 319 submitted by Mr. Ted Dowd. The Council wishes to meet with Mr. Dowd. Vote of Council: Ayes : All Motion carried. On a motion made by Jeanne Marriner , seconded by John Holzapfel it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No. 320 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of the Mattituck Park Commission to reconstruct a timber jetty . Peconic Bay Boulevard, Mattituck. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried . On a motion made by. Jeanne Marriner, seconded by John Holzapfel it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees at)nrovral of the Pagp 4 Wetland Application No . 321 submitted by the Land Use Company on behalf of the Mattituck Park Commission to reconstruct two timber jetties . Bay Avenue, Veterans Memorial Park, Mattituck. Vote of Council: Ayes : All Motion carried. On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Heather Cusack it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval,subject to the same stipulations as on the DEC permit , of the Wetland Application No. 322 submitted by Daysman Morris to bring in 200 c.y . of fill to be placed on lot to run grade to level of road in area 150 'x75 ' . Kerwin Boulevard, Greenport . Vote of Council : Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town trustees approval of the Wetland Application No.' 323 submitted by The Lagoon Association to replace 50' S. jetty; repair existing S. jetty, remove up to 215 ' of S . Bulkhead and grade to natural beach; extend existing jetty 75 ' shoreward in sandy beach; pass over 600 c. y. of littoral sand from S. to N. and create a deposition basin, including maintenance of deposition basin and inlet dredging. Vote of Council : Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by Jeanne Marriner it was RESOLVED to recommind to the Southold Town Trustees approval of the Wetland Application No . 324 submitted by The Land Use Company on behalf of Arthur J . Bujnowski to construct a timber jetty of approximately 35 ' in length. The compartment between the proposed structure and the one to the east shall be completely filled with clean sand. 1365 Watersedge WAy, Southold. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Tuthill it was RESOLVED to approvethe minutes of the meeting held October 22 , 1985. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. NEW BUSINESS : The next regular meeting of the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council will was scheduled _for Thursday, December 19 , 1985 at 8: 00 P.M. at. the' Southold Town Hall . Page 5 Group inspections will be made on Thursday, December 19, 1985. The group will meet ,at Southold Town Hall at 1: 00 P.M. The new applications were distributed as follows: No . 325 - Ralph Condit No. 326 - Group Inspection No . 327 - Jeanne Marriner No . 328 - Ralph Condit and Betty Wells No. 329 - John Tuthill No. 330 - Group Inspection No. 331 - Betty Wells No. 332 - Group Inspection No. 333 - John Holzapfel No. 335 - Group Inspection No . 336 - Group Inspection The Council would like it placed on the record., that due to the large amount of group inspections scheduled for this meeting, it was neccessary to schedule two days for the group inspections. On a motion made by Ralph Condit, seconded by John Holzapfel it was RESOLVED to adjourn the meeting at 9: 30 P. M. Vote of Council : Ayes : All Motion carried. Respectfully submitted, i Linda J. Cooper, Secretary �r 3 4�7 OFFICE RVISOR it T❑ Nc LD FRANCIS J.MURPHY TELEPHONE SUPERVISOR (516) 765-1800 MAIN ROAD (516) 765-1939 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 September 16, 1986 SUBJECT: Bay Avenue Project - Lakeview Terrace Road Association TO: Southold Town Board Town Clerk Highway Department Building Department Board of Trustees Mr. Frank Heroy has requested a meeting with the above departments to discuss the Rabbit Lane Project. A meeting has been scheduled for September 23 , 1986 , at 10 : 00 A.M. I would appreciate it if you could__have a representative from you department present to answer�::any questions he might have. I have attached copies of correspondence in regard to Mr. Heroy. erncis . Murphy r outhold OFFICE F`r '� E''S RERVISOR TO" N%,:9 GH L D FRANCIS J. MURPHY , TELEPHONE SUPERVISOR (516) 765-1800 MAIN ROAD (516) 765-1939 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 September 4, 1986 Lakeview Terrace Road Association P.O. Box 357 East Marion, New York 11939 Mr. Frank Heroy, Secretary Dear Mr. Heroy; We have scheduled an appointment for you as representative for the Lakeview Terrace Road Association to address the Southold Town Board on September 23 , 1986, at 10 A.M. . to discuss the problems of your association. . Please call my office at 765-1800 and confirm this at your earliest convience. We look forward to seeing you. Sincerely yours n rphy ry 's w Southold cc: Southold Town Board Building Department, Victor Lessard Highway Department, Ray Jacobs Trustees FJM:btr OFFICE ; 'R RVISOR TO N.". .0 isHOLD FRANCIS J. MURPHYcE'�Q TELEPHONE SUPERVISOR (516) 765-1800 MAIN ROAD (516) 765-1939 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 July 28 , 1986 Mr. Frank Heroy 145 Lakeview Terrace PO Box357 East Marion, NY 11939 Dear Mr. Heroy; Thank you for your letter of July 21, 1986 in regard to the Rabbit Lane Project. If you would like to meet with the entire Southold Town Board and all the Departments involved I can arrange it;.and you can speak with them about the project and your objections. Please advise me as to scheduling the meeting. SVney yours, J. Murphy or own of Southold FJM:btr OFFICE �Fk= ,Er<:S PERVISOR TO Ny U, , LD FRANCIS J.MURPHY TELEPHONE SUPERVISOR (516) 765-1800 MAIN ROAD (516) 765-1939 SOUTHOLD, L.I., N.Y. 11971 May 23, 1986 Mr. Frank Heroy 145 Lakeview Terrace PO Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 Dear Mr. H.eroy; I am in receipt of your .letter dated April 22, 1986. I have been in contact with Councilman Penny and he has assured me that he has discussed this matter with you and he knows the area and the people involved and is handling this problem. If there are any more problems or I can be of further assistance please contact my office. Sincerely your , c s rphy up v ' s r T n o outhold FJM:btr ` L TELEPHONE (516) 765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Date: October 8, 1985 TO WHOM IT MAY CONCERN: Attached hereto is a Long Environmental Assessment Form submitted by Ted Dowd in connection with his application for a Wetland Permit to construct a single family residence on property located at 350 Rabbit Lane, East. Marion, New York. Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Posted: October 8, 1985 •'s�' TOWN_0F SOUTHOLD 40 ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — PART I PROJECT INFORMATION YOT:C-c: i"r•is dac:sreht is designed to assist in 3etarmtH.rg whether �e action proposed nay have a S:aniiicant :f':c: an the !nvirrnr.ent_ Please caralzta L::e entire 3aca 4zheet. Answers :o :mesa ';uestians All be cansiaered as oar- of :.1e aoolicat'on far aoaraval and may be subjy: to ciirther vert"icat'on and public review. Provide any additional information you believe will be needed :a ctmolete PARTS 2 and 3. a: is axae=ed _nat camoietion of the EAF wiil be dependent on information currently available and :+ilT not involve new studies, rasaari or investigation. I-" inror-::::an r_ouirming such aadi:;anal +oric is_unava'.;able, • . sa indicata and specify eecz instance. 43AME -IF ?4CJEC'. ... _.... _._.... _ qa:'E 110 ACCRE-S OF ^SfYt? ('If Otr=?_rent) : ..2� _ - 'AOORrES =:JO •'?A.*E IF Apo' fC.:P1T: Strao_l w c( P.J., iScacaj. lip! .•ama BUST NESS ? O . OE:;I I u T ,.. OF 000JEC7: (9ri ,"ly describe type of ;roze= ar action) ri... r t' f�9 /i Ii •_ G F/—U i (;LEACH CGMPLETc EACi Ctl �ii0.'1 - Fndicat= 3-A. iit not 300licaole) .y' A. •Si.� T-01l •• •a....,:: :_ i. .u•.:R�r:C:•.i„•.•':.•"��ar:b:_•�•y_.:_,k. r,v..- �5''`. ri (rhysicaI a2C=.'j or over-all project, both develacet and o:ndevelcoed areas) :; ,•,;, ; !�i++•` i. Genersi Gnaractar of the land: Generaily uni.am. slope S2neraily t:neven and roiling ar_irmquiar ?r=Sent 'and -ise: Urban Industrial Ca=erc'aI SUOuroan . 2ur3T' .corssr. Agriculture . OLner 3. Tacal 3Cr-tace o.. 7roject area: AOaraXlmaL2 3cr2age: 'rasently AfLsr Comoiat'an Presently Attar Scmolecion ` MeadCw or 3rusnland n- -acres ,,D 5 aC-Ss :latar Sur'aca Area D acras 3GreS _ :ar,!3 t_md 1C'?s !C-+S ��nYonnr3 C�'1 ^C C, earn or rill; �52 ac-_s ,�2 icr-s .far-cui::ral 0 acrTs C> icres ;cads, Suildtras :'.et!bra snMat�r or and ._-er have: riaaf as :er -.r:__.e5 sur-ic:s ••"-S a ;G-:s ::-er (:nai:a:a :yae lc-'s ac-es d, Wha_ is oreccn-:nant soil type(s) on 7. a. Are :.`.e.'? 7ecmc°C :utcrr-Dings Jn ]r'ajec: s::_? Yes •10 j. .'hat is loot' :a :edr:c:c' 6. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10t V"t; 10-15: :; IS. or . greater 7. Is project contiguous ty, or contain a building or site listed on the National Register of. Historic Places? Yes V No 8. What is the depth tothe water table? fe_t 9. Go hunting or fishing opportunities presently-exist in the project area? Yeslfo 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endancered - Yes d N , according to - Identify each species 11. Are there any unique or unu[;ual land forms on the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geological formations - Yes Na. -(Describe 12. Is the project site resently used by the co=unity or neighborhood as an open space or recreation • area - Yes No. • 13. Does the present site offer or include scenic views or vistas known to be important to.the cormunity?- Yes No 74. Streams within or contiguous to project area: • - :. a. Name of stream and name of river to which it is tributary 15. Lakes, Ponds, Wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: -._...._ a. Name ; v. Size (in acres) - .16. What_i-s-t-he-doni-nan•t4an -use and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g. single family residential, R-2� and the scale df development (e.g. 2 story). "PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) - a. Total contiguous acreage owned by project sponsor 1 2 acres. b. Project acreage developed: o acres initially; V yS acres ultimately. . e. Project acreage to remain undeveloped _ a 75 . d. Length of project, in miles: (if appropriate) •--•-• e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square fco age developed acreage -, f. Nusrber of off-str=t parking spaces existing proposed ' g. Maxirrim vehicular trips generated per hour .00/S (upon completion of project) h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: - One'Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium • Initial v Ultimate f i• IE: Orientation Neighborhood-City-Regional- Estimated Employment CC=2 rc i a l Industrial j- Total height of tallest proposed structure 30 feet. 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes Yo b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes �No C. Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required Submittal Approval (Yes, No) (Type) (Date) (Date) City, Town, Village Board Mn City, Town, Villace Planning Board City, Town, Zoning Board City, County Health Department �y ems 1��.�,.-r Other local agencies err %r-s to �•/rs Other regional agencies Nz1 State Agencies X-eS Federal Agencies C. IHFONMATIGUAL DETAILS _ . . . Attach any additional information-as rrz y be-needed--tqL clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with th L` l a-e '"scuss such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: _.. _.TITLE: REPU'SENTIRG: . DATE: +,�•a 6"! i�Jn i >A -,.2. How much natural material (i..:, rock, earth, 'etc.) will be removed from the site - O tons . .a = cubic ya 3. How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, giro and covers) will'be removed fron site - •acres. 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-Important vegetation be removed by this project? Yes ✓Na S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? V­Yes No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 1.2 months, (including demolition).. .7. I.f multi-phased project: a. Total number of phases anticipated No. • -•- b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month Year (includin demolition) c. Approximate completion date final phase month _year. a. . Is phase 1 financially dependent on subsequent ptasds? Yes S. Will blasting occur during construction? Yes " No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction _ 20: after project is complete U 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project C_-) 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes LJo. If yes, explain: 12. a. -Is surface or subsurface liquid waste.dasposal involved? Yes ✓ No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sawage, industrial, etc.) e. If surface disposal name of stre_n; into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface .area of existing lakes, ponds, streams, bays or other surface waterways-be increased or decreased by proposal? Yes ✓No. - f 14. Is project or any portion of project locatDd in the 100 year flood plain? des No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of soli;*was te? ✓Yes No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? ✓ Yes No e. If yes, give name: Szo i` location d. :•lilt any wastes not go into a sewage M sposal system or into a sanitary landfill? r Yes t�, 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes 41-<,10 17. Will project routinely produce cdors (more than one hour per day)? Yes P.-'No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes No 19. Will project result in an increase in energy use? _----yes No. If yes, indicate type(s) Pwr • 20. If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity `/5 gals/minute. • 21. Total anticipated water usage ;er day __ ls/day. Z. Zoning: a. 'What is dcminant 'zoning classification of. site? "J. " fle b. Current s;ecific zoning classification of site e.- Is proposed use cznsistent with ,present zoning? d. If no, indicate desired .zoning •' #_ , •3- 145 Lakeview Terrace PO Box 357 East Maron,.. .. .,. 1.1939 July 21,- 1986' ' The Honorable Frank Murphy, Town Supervisor s; V Southold Town Hall Main Road } ' s Southold, NY 11971 ± r Dear Mr. Murphys In mid-June, I returned from an extensive automobile trip to the Rockies. Upon my return, your letter of May 23rd was awaiting me.`I put it on hold as I wanted to ascertain the sta- tus of the Bay Avenue, East Marion water pipes, electric cables, trenching project. I assume the Town now considers the project complete as the contractor seeded the area. on.Monday, .July, 14th, and the Town sweeper went through the next day, Tuesday. There is a cons' erable am.o ,nt of debris containing long sections plastic ipe, brush and materials dredged f om the.C� lake on a Town RO opposite a pumphouse.;It has bee there aM for six 6). weeks. s the Ilea -up the responsibility f the G contrac or or the own? There is a sign which says, "D MPING- $50 FI E" on the ame side o the road to the south. I found your letter to. be eonfrasing as you indicated you are in receipt of my letter of April 22nd. Councilman Penny tel- ephoned on the evening of April 29th in response to my letter of the 29th which was also addressed to you. Councilman Penny advised- me, in essence, that: 1. I should not expect any answers to the questions posed in my letters of April 22nd and 29th. 2. I should not believe what I read in the papers about the actions of the Town Board. and the quotes of elected of- ficials. (Even so, the articles in New: sday, the Traveler, and Suffolk Times have been interesting, sometimes amus- ing and even pathetic. ) 3. Inasmuch as I was not on Village water I would be so in a short time. (You indicated that Mr. Penny knew the area and the people involved. Mr. Penny did not know that we were on well water until I volunteered the information in our conversation. Protection of well water was the gist of my initial memorandum of March 1st. ) I have come to the conclusion that I never had a problem re- lating to the trenching project. The Town has very serious prob- lems. 1 of 3 I have heard that the Town Trustees are concerned with road run-off into the tidal creeks and propose to do something about it. The breeks have tidal action with the resultant flushing so that run-off does not exert its full impact. Marion Lake does not have that benefit. It is suggested that the Town Trustees inspect the run-off into Marion Lake since the trenching pro- ject for which they granted a permit. The drainage on the east side of Bay Avenue, south of Lakeview -Terrace, has now been di- verted to the bridge into the lake. This has been so only since the project. For decades, the drainage on that side of the road entered the area near the pumphouse and leached into the soil. Road run-off and silt are now- entering directly into the lake. The Town Wetlands Code says something to the effect that silta- tion is not to be the result of a project granted a permit. In a very short time siltation will clog the waterway between the two sections of the lake and canoes, rowboats, and wildlife use that waterway. When can we expect action? In addition to the scenic beauty, the lake provides recre- ational boating and freshwater fishing. Most of the fishing is done from the east side of the bridge. I suggest that the Town Trustees. visually inspect the debris which was placed in the dredged trench. The debris comes so close to the surface that the swans must climb over it rather than swim .through. The debris will be snagging fish hooks and monofilament line will be break- ing off. Monofilament line in the water is a disaster to wild- life :- muskrats, ducks, turtles, swans, geese, herons, egrets, and grebes which use theat area. I can't imagine the Code. per mitting debris to be used as a fill in a trench. A neighbor was informed that there was no way that a crane would be permitted on the bridge. Not only did the crane - cross , but it was on a transporter. There is no weight limit posted for that bridge. What is . the weight limit for the bridge? You must remember that bridge was built before the big houses on Rabbit. Lane. What was the gross weight of the pre-cut lumber and trailer which crossed the bridge to go to Huckleberry Hill? What was the gross weight of the cement trucks which poured on jobs on Rabbit Lane and- Huckleberry Hill? Should the garbage truck which is at . the end of its run cross the bridge? Should any of these trucks be permitted to cross the bridge? The EMFD has a policy of not . permitting trucks to cross the bridge. In an emergency, there is no doubt of what they would do. The FD doesn't flaunt it; others do. I suggest the Town inspect the bridge, which is about 60 years old, before there is a serious accident. A representative of the Underwriter's Office alleged that no yellow tracer .was placed in the trench with the gas main, the wire cables, and plastic water pipes between Lakeview Terrace and the waterfield. Our photo file does not indicate that it has been done. Which Town representative is responsible for inspecting the trench before it is backfilled? 2 of 3 On my trip West, I spent a considerable amount of time in "missile silo" territory in northeast Colrado, southwest Nebraska, and southeast Wyoming. It is barren; it is desolate. One can still see the ruts of wagon trains. One may not see another vehicle for hours upon end with the exception of an Air Force patrol. I met a postman whose circuitous route was 93 miles long on gravel and dirt roads to deliver mail to 45 roadside boxes from which one could not see a sign of a house or barn most of the time.. As a reminder of civilization, every so often, one would see a sign: XXXXXXXX COUNTY ZONING LAWS CODES STRICTLY ENFORCED For information Call xxx xxxx I had to consult a topographical map to ascertain the state in which the county was located. Were they fooling? Thinking of the Town of Southold, I called four (4) of those numbers. I told each I was presenting a hypothetical case and to be free to stop the conversation at any time. I had a piece of property but that the water was con- taminated. I had an option to purchase another less desirable:: piece of property 1 mile away with good drinking water. One must be mindful that one may own property, but not have the water and/ or mineral rights thereto. May I trench? What are the rules and regulations? What codes apply? What permits would be needed? Who and how often are inspections .made? There are many buried natural gas lines which interconnect wellfields and buried silo sensors ; one just doesn' t use a trenching machine or a backhoe at will. In all cases , one person answered all my questions. I was not put on hold or shuffled from one department to another. That person was the spokesman and there was decisiveness. You requested that I formally sign my memorandum of March 1st to identify myself and to assure you that I was serious. I did so; I stood up to be counted. In reciprocity, I am awaiting you, the Town Supervisor, the highest elective post in the Town, for an- swers to my questions not only in this letter, but in the letters of April 22nd and 29th.. May I hear from you in the near future? I am enclosing another copy of the April 29th letter for your file. V trul7� y grnyouRhe oy c.c. Councilman George Penny Henry Po Smith, President of Town Trustees Victor Lessard, Exec. Adm. of Building Department Ray Jacobs , Superintendent of Highways Mark Middleton, Pres . of Lakeview Terrace Rd. Assoc. 145 Lakeview Terrace PO Box 357 East .Marion, NY 11939 April 29, 1986 Dear Southold Town Supervisor Frank Murphy Town Councilwoman Jean Cochran ..Justice Raymond W. Edwards Councilman George Penny IV Councilman James Schondebare Councilman Paul Stoutenberg In the absence of any response to my memorandum of March 01 , 1986 and to my letter of April 22, 1986 re: Quality of Water and the Bay Avenue - Rabbit Lane Project and the unprecedented nature of the project, I suggest that the Town Supervisor and Town Board appoint an dmp�artial in- vestigator of the situation. It is unprecedented;"that it is extremely rare for one project to involve trenching of 1200' of Town ROW on Bay Avenue to lay four (4) plastic water sup- ply pipes with an accompanying three (3) wire cable for each supply pipe and to cross a freshwater lake . Does one usual- ly permit trenching before all permits are in order? When the trenching started on Thursday, April 17th, I called the Highway Department to ascertain what was going on. I was told that the Highway Department did not issue trench- ing permits ; that was a function of the Town Clerk's Office. A call to the Town Clerk's Office indicated that the permit did not indicate what was to be trenched and that there was a bridge intervening between the. points of trenching, the wellsite on the Schimatz property and Rabbit Lane. What was approved to be trenched? Private water supplies are not usually located on Town ROW. Did not anyone say that this unusual and we should look into it? On page 3 of 4 of my memorandum of March 1st, I stated that as of the end of January 1986 there was no DEC permit on file and that Town wetlands were involved. On page 4 of 4, I asked if consideration would be given to driving pipe under under driveways and Lakeview- Terrace entrance. The purpose was to not inconvenience the residents ; it would also provide a sleeve. The project was ramrodded and no sleeves were laid. I understand that is one of several violations. In response to my memo, Mr. Lessard, Exec. Adm. of the Building Dept. , responded to Supervisor Murphy on March 7th stating that plastic pipe as a source of water supply is not permitted by law. A copy of Mr. Lessard 's memo was, routed to the Highway Department and the Trustees. That was March 7th. I received a copy through Supervisor Murphy on April 19th. 1 of 3 In the light of that information on March 7th, how could one authorize trenching with plastic pipe on April 7th? How could one authorize trenching knowing that Town wetlands were involved and there was no Town wetlands per- mit? Mr. Lessard's memorandum and mine indicated that wet- lands were involved. Was it foreordained at that point a, Town wetlands permit would be issued? I can well imagine the hullabaloo and law suits if a contractor trenched for two (2) miles and then was de- nied a permit to cross wetlands. How come this project started before a wetlands permit was issued? There would be no problem at this time if the Rabbit Lane Association had granted four (4) more hook-ups to its water system, but . . . . . . . The Rabbit Lane Association stood its ground and determined that its water supply system could serve no more houses. It would be the straw that broke the camel 's back. I feel that the nitrates and phosphates from additional houses will break the lake 's back. How much is too much? Who is going to or is in a position to take a stand? I do not live on the lake, but I visit it at. least twice a day. The lake used to, bounce back from road runoff and debris , but no more. It seems incongruous that 'the Dowd - Schimatz property on the lakeside of Rabbit Lane is filled in wetlands. Several years ago, fill was dredged from the lake with a crane and a bucket. It was legal at the time. Fill could have been: trucked in, but it was easier to rape the lake. Morally, the residents on the north lakefront thought it was wrong, but. . . The 'wellsite on the Schimatz property is on property con- siderably filled in over the past three years, possibly wet- lands has been involved. Filled in site to filled in site ! How closely has the Dowd - Schimatz property been in- spected for plants indigenous to wetlands by the DEC, the Town Trustees or the Building Department? Are there no wet- land plants within 75. of the almost completed Dowd house? I say "almost" as it is apparent it needs to be backfilled. Who makes the inspections 'and reports to whom? Verbally or in writing? Who coordinates the information? It has been alleged that "yellow markers" are missing in the trench. Wha inspected the trench before backfilling? Before backfilling a house basement, the Building Depart ' ment makes an inspection. What other violations are buried in the trench? 2 of 3 Why are four (4) plastic water supply pipes needed to supply four (4) houses with water in a trench on Town ROW, whereas the Rabbit Lane Association has been using one ( 1) pipe to supply several homes? In the light that the Rabbit Lane Association galva- nized' water supply pipe was replaced approximately four (4) years ago without a DEC permit and with severe dis- turbance to the wetlands and the lake bottom and the Rabbit Lane Association }embers have had no problem with water sup- ply, I strongly urge that the pipe remain undisturbed. In my estimation, the Bay Avenue project is ill con- cieved and there are alternatives other than disturbing the lake ; that Town, County, and State agencies and departments have not interacted with one another; and that no one person or elected/appointed body has been given the authority to approve a project of this nature. A person or a department has the authority to approve part of the project, but there is no one person or agency to determine if the parts fit together. The Suffolk Times article and local gossip are genera- ting terms associated with the project: "passing the buck" , ineptness, incompetence , arrogance, "COA" , assessing blame , lack of coordination, insensitivity, and crisis management. If this project has so many faults on land, how can it even be considered in the water? In a project of this type and scope, there must be a public hearing. Its nature will have an impact on the Town. It may be that the Public Service Commisssion and the Suffolk County Water Authority should be involved. . Sincerely yours, Frank Heroy c.c. Mr. Henry P. Smith, Pres . of Town Trustees Town Trustees Mr. Paul Ponturo, Suffolk County Health Dept. Mr. Dennis Cole , DEC Mrs . Judith Terry, Town Clerk Mr. Victor Lessard, Building Department Mr. Ray Jacobs , Highway Dept. Mr. Mark Middleton, Pres . of Lakeview Terr. Rd. Assoc. Mr. Tim Gould, Suffolk Times 3 of 3 145 Lakeview Terrace PO Box 357 East Marion NY 11939 / ,.._.:..::,.-:,x_..:._.::._._.___._.,.�.._._._...........�s April 22, 1986 Dear' Supervisor Frank Murphy Councilwoman Mrs. Jean Cochran Justice Raymond W. Edwards Councilman George Penny IV Councilman James Schondebare Councilman Paul Stoutenberg Exec. Adm. Victor Lessard, Building Dept. Supt. Ray Jacobs, Highway Department Pres. of Town Trustees, Henry P. Smith Southold Town Clerk, Judith Terry vri fTiarch 1, 1986 I submitted toa the Town Supervisor and the Town Board �. scenario based upon rumor and a few facts. The rumors became fact on Thursday mornin , April 17th. Between Thursday and Friday afternoon, four (4 pieces of plastic pipe and four (4) sets of 3 wire cable were placed in a trench on Bay Avenue in East Marion. The trench was dug between the four (4) well connections on the Schimatz- Schmidt property south to Lakeview Terrace and backfilled. The Town Clerk's Office, not the Highway Department as I had originally presumed, has issued a permit for Gary Tabor to dig a trench on the east side of Bay Avenue in the ROW from the Schimatz - Schmidt property south to Rabbit Lane, a distance of approximately 1200 feet. A trench is then planned to run 150 to 390 feet east on Rabbit Lane to specified pieces of property. It is a run of approximately a of a mile from a good quality water source to property which has had salt water intrusion for at least forty (40) years. That is my primary concern. In the Board's presentation of the Master Plan, it was pointed out that five (5) acre zoning was necessary south of Route 25 in Orient to prevent or to decelerate salt water intrusion to the property. Are you being consistent and fair if you permit the. . propos-d I m le water ipe run and you did not present it as an alternative to five (5 acre zoning? Are you not encouraging people to purchase property on the east - west center line of the North Fork for the water rights to be sold or leased rather than home development? You will be encouraging a hodge podge of small and large, individual and community water systems, hopping ovet' one another always inland to secure a source of clean water. A' chaotic situation is arising in the immediate future. I resented my going to the Supervisor's Office on Friday afternoon, April 18th, to sign my March 1, 1986 memorandum to indicate that it was my memo and I was serious. My name and ad- dress -were thereon and could have been checked by a telephone call. I felt insulted and I am even more serious about the me- chanics of the situation. i From telephone conversations on Thursday and Friday of. the week past with the Town Clerk's Office, I ascertained that the trenching permit did. not specify what was to be placed in the trench and how. It was suggested that I call the Highway De- partment to obtain the answers, but I had called the Highway De- partment earlierto be informed that only the Clerk's Office is- sues trenching permits. It was interesting to note when I asked that there was no notation that a bridge on Bay Avenue. over Marion Lake might cause a problem. What data are required on a trenching permit? In my memorandum of March 1st, I indicated that no DEC application was on file as of the end of January and that Town wetlands are involved. The DEC permit is in the name of the Rab- bit Lane Association, the trenching permit - Gary Tabor, the Town wetlands permit application - Gary Tabor, and the Board of Health. permit - Schimatz or Dowd or ?. It is confusing. In Mr. Lessard's memo of March 7th, he stated that plastic pipe was not permitted by law. 1. Why was the contractor not informed that a Town wet lands permit was needed in addition to the trench- ing permit? 2. Did the Town know or care that a DEC permit was issued? 3. If the March 7th Mr. Lessard memo stated that plas- tic pipe was not legal, why was not th-e contractor informed? (When I questioned this on A ril 21st, it was for the first time. It is legal. 4. I am still waiting to hear if a performance bond and proof of liability insurance are required? 5. If plastic pipe and electric cable are to be placed in the same trench -near a gas main, what are the Town specifications? 6. Who is the engineer or electrician or plumber of record? 7. Why aren't sleeves necessary around buried pipes and wires under driveways and roads? I believe Southold is the only town exception on LI. 8. Why was it a surprise for a Town representative to discover not one (1) , but four (4) buried plastic pipes and four sets of cables? :u 9. Do the plastic pipe and cable meet Town specifi- cations for burial? 10. Were the plastic pipes and cables trenched and buried to the satisfaction and requirements of the Town? 11. Will there be room in the ROW in the future to run individual water lines and cable from each house on Rabbit Lane, Lakeview Terrace, Cozee Cove, and all other housesto a water field north of all the houses on and adjacent to Bay Avenue? Will Gardiners Bay Estate be next? I, am still concerned with the water connection boxes pro- truding above ground, not all, but some, on the east ROW south of the bridge. Liability insurance is a growing problem. I am concerned with a wetlands application even being con- sidered at this time as muskrat houses are in the north bank of the Lake near the bridge; it is breeding season. There is also a mallard hen nesting in the same area to the east. The swan has been sitting on her nest on the east side of the lake since Palm Sunday. With an incubation period of 36 or so days, the cygnets are due this month. There should be no activity to frighten the cygnets, the ducklings, and the muskrat young. Evidently, it is relatively easy to obtain a trenching per- mit compared to my ordeal and thoroughness when I applied for a six (6) foot fence permit. Does the Town intend to grant permission to anyone who has salt water intrinsion or to subdivide a plot so there are no fresh water privileges as on Rabbit Lane to hook up to an inland wellpoint as long as one can trench on Town ROW or private land? Since my memorandum of March 1st took seven (7) weeks, forty seven (47) days to receive a copy of Mr. Lessard's memo from the Supervisor, may I expect a prompt reply to this letter? S n ere y, �:�A� Frank Heroy c.c. Mrs. Ruth Oliva, Town Water Committee - Mark Middleton, President of Lakeview Terrace Road Association TEL. 765-1802 S�FFOLI��� TOWN OF SOUTHOLD • 0� OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR "r( P.O. BOX 728 i` LP A TOWN HALL ► t. f ! SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 ' 14AR 7 March 7 , 1985 TO: Supervisor Francis Murphy �� FROM: Exec . Admin . Victor Lessard SUBJECT : Frank Heroy memorandum In the general text of this letter and ref- erence to green scum ( algae ) forming etc . , I don ' t believe the township has a department within it ' s framework that could determine the causes for such a condition . As for new construction on Rabbit Lane , I am very well aware of the frail water table in that area. What the public must realize is that if all necessary permits ( including the Health Dept. , the controlling factor where water is involved ) are ob- tained ; then we are reduced to zoning and construc- tion control only. I will try and address his listed concerns and hope they will be of some help to you . 1 . Four years ago ( before my time ) Rabbit Lane Association replaced galvanized piping with plastic . -I would have to assume it was pre- existing to be there in the first- place . As to replacing, I am sure the Town Board (who had that responsibility at that time ) was never made aware that such a thing was hap- - pening. The second thing that crosses my mind , is , if this plastic pipe is being used as a source .of water supply then , as of this date , ,it is not permitted by law . 2 . Concrete water connection boxes in the towns R . O . W. have to be cleared by the Highway Sup- ervisor. As to liability , the Town Attorney is the best source for determination . 3 . Again trenching across town roads require Town Highway approval Supervisor Francis Murphy March 7 , 1986 Page 2 4 . Not answerable . 5 . If there is a present violation existing in the wetland area then action is re- quired by Town Trustees . VL :hdv ':'•� ��' g. w F "h► Town Hall, 53095 Main Road `� ,�"'�.°► `,�� P.O. Box 1179 Southold, New York 11971 JUDITH T. TERRY TELEPHONE Town CLERK (516)765-1801 REGISTRAR OF VITAL STATISTICS OFFICE OF THE TOWN CLERK TOWN OF SOUTHOLD -._-.--, September 29, 1987 Mr. Francis A. Heroy 145 Lakeview Terrace P. O. Box 357 East Marion,. New York. 11939 Dear Mr. Heroy: Superintendent of Highways Raymond Jacobs transmitted your letter of September 28, 1987 to me for response. In' answer to your request for the latest engineering report on Bay Avenue, East Marion bridge, the same is enclosed herewith. The cost for this ' record is seventy-five' cents ($. 75) , which .you may transmit to this office at your earliest convenience. n answer to your request for repai r'records to this 'bridge for the past '30 years, neither Mr. Jadobs' office, nor this office has any records to this effect, therefore are unable to produce same. Very truly yours, -Judith T. Terry Southold Town Clerk Enclosures cc: Supt. of Hwys. Jacobs SEP 2 9198T SOUTHOLD T011 ! I NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION ^`1r � --�—tii;j NUMBER EFpE. VE 6ATO .� ..,-85-0615 Novemher,..22nd., ..1985 ,.CILITY!PROGRAM NUMBER(s) PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(s) Region One Under the Environmental Conservation Law December 31st, 1986 ❑Article 15, Title 5: ❑Article 17, Titles 7, 8: SPDES ❑Article 27, Title 7: Protection of Water ❑Article 19: Solid Waste Management ❑Article 15, Title 15: Air Pollution Control ❑Article 27, Title 9: Water Supply ❑Article 23, Title 27: Hazardous ❑Article 15, Title 15: Mined Land Waste Management Water Transport Reclamation ❑Article 34: - ❑Article 15, Title 15: YNArticle 24: Coastal Long Island Wells Freshwater Wetlands Erosion Management ❑Article 15, Title 27: []Article 25: ❑Article 36: Wild, Scenic Tidal Wetlands Floodplain Management and Recreational Rivers ❑Articles 1, 3, 37; 6NYCRR 380: ❑6NYCRR 608: N—New, R—Renewal, M—Modification Radiation Control Water Quality Certification C—Construction, O—Operation, (If Applicable) F PERMIT ISSUED TO Rabbit Lane Association ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE 19 East Mall, Plainview, New York 11803 AGENT FOR PERMITTEE!CONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER Charles Luscher (516) 643-5800 NAME AND ADDRESSOF FACILITY(If different from Permittee) N/A LOCATION OF PROJECT COUNTY TOWN!CITY!VILLAGE UTM COORDINATES Marion Lake - - Suffolk Southold DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT/FACILITY Re-install 2" diameter water service to be underground and under the bottom of the lake, as per the plans submitted. GENERAL CONDITIONS By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations and the conditions specified herein or attached hereto. 1. The permittee shall file in the office of the appropriate regional permit administrator,or other office designated in the special conditions,a notice of intention to commence work at least 48 hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify him/her promptly in writing of the completion of the work. .2. The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation which may order the work suspended if the public interest so requires. 3. The permittee has accepted expressly,by the execution of the application,the full legal responsibility for all damages,direct or indirect.of whatever nature,and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and has agreed to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions,damages and costs of every name and descrip- tion resulting from the said project. 4. The Department reserves the right to modify,suspend or revoke this permit at any time after due notice, and, if requested, hold a hearing when: a) the scope of the project is exceeded or a violation of any condition of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinent regulations are found;or b) the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevent facts;or c) newly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was issued. 5. The permittee is responsible for keeping the permit active by submitting a renewal application,including any forms,fees or supplemental information which may be required by the Department, no later than 30 days(180 days for SPDES or Solid or Hazarduous Waste Management permits)prior to the expiration date. 6. This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work or as authorizing the impairment of any rights, title or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. 7. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits• approvals, lands,easements and rights-of way which may be required for this project. 8. Issuance of this permit by the Department does not,unless expressly provided for,modify,supersede or rescind an order on consent or determination by the Commissioner issued heretofore by the Department or any of the terms. conditions, or requirements contained in such order or determination. 9 Anv modification of this permit granted by the Department must be in writing and attached hereto. PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESS Bldg. 40, SU':�'Y, Room 219 November 22nd, 1985 Charles T. Hamilton Stonv Brook New York 11794 AUTHORIZED�S/IGlNATU5E X ,4 �^ —L�Tr ,� I Page 1 of (5) ,cAL CONDITIONS FOR ARTICLES 15 (Title 5), 24, 25, 34 and 36 o cure operations by the State of New York require an al- 14 Any material dredged in the prosecution of the work heref permitted a in the position of the structure or work herein authorized,or shall be removed evenly,without leaving large refuse piles,ridges across n the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a it shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of a waterway. the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural 15. If any material is to be deposited or dumped under this permit,either resources of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to in the waterway or on shore above high-water mark,it shall be deposited remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused or dumped at the locality shown on the drawing hereto attached,and, thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or if so prescribed thereon, within or behind a good and substantial revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other bulkhead or bulkheads, such as will prevent escape of the material modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com- into the waterway. pleted, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such 16. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental herein authorized. Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted 17 If granted under Articles 24 or 25, and if upon the expiration or re- structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigable vocation of this permit,modification of the wetland hereby authorized and flood capacity of the watercourse.No claim shall be made against has not been completed, the applicant shall,without expense to the the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the 11. That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and New York on account of any such removal or alteration. no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 18 If granted under Article 36, this permit does not signify in any wa} r 12. That if the display of lights and signals on any work hereby authorized that the project will be free from flooding. is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may 19 All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformanCE be prescribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as par maintained. of the permit application. 13. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, Such approved plans were prepared by solvents, lubricants,epoxy coatings,paints,concrete,leachate or any on other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Supplementary Special Conditions . . . (A) through (J) , attached; Additional General Conditions . . . 20) All sections of old iron pipe shall be removed and disposed of at an acceptable upland site. 21) All disturbed areas shall be immediately seeded with wild millet. 22) The re-installation of the pipe under the bottom of the lake shall cause as i little disturbance to the bottom as possible. I cc: Louise Harrison, F&W : I DEC PERMIT NUMBER 10-s5-0615 PROGRAM FACILITY NUMBER I Page 2 of 5 Re;lOn One N I w r xx;3. !hU rUIXIVeS to r"LlUIrk: UIV ')4 IL. 'U. Ir. the ever, !:;.it any 0i th, W, pr-:C,o:tlU!1.; or th,- !k,riher i.,oannc'nt o% pt:rilicallion 1J lbe y,i-,-!J of the wells E.Lcu!2 4.--ii nolnw :11t,11 lids SOUI(.,. should culld;lions ;tl, imiicatL 1 nesiv lur sj(.Ii tf-e shall install an additioii,-.: Ol t Z�.k as ni.iy be directed by the Dupartrn-.lia. s1hail t i4. (,ronling (,! ihis perni!l by the D(fparlm-,ml is made ;ubj,..CI o; the ;�.adv t.-quire an additional permit, or '::bleb a r,t,. UQLT Q. of ;n} appr,jval !)-,, thv (Delaware) iSusqavharj.i.i) i%',;vLr Ea'-ill 21. Hle %val(t :;::poly ;;o;l Jci shallHislailid r; mac be iequirud under the !)rovi:,ions of the z r L; ..--, . )U I C tilt ser of a r! i I i rea-�cn!i it y reti u i (-r 111 M DOC t. C OR n.-- sys(V I ii. III is obligatiol; :lail bo included as a LOV10nant ill ,I' • inti:v idual inctu. , shall 5e providud it) measure all %-,atpr YLp;)IIN! veying "acl. lot to the our,-haser and s-;th covenant ::hall f r od ,ideal --',�:7V;CV from this SYSI(Mi. Nlaslff I it e F er m i I te,� to pr(iv i(I e a c o-i nu c I i ci it to th i, wa I t:r S>St e rzi wh i -is -quirod by vaLli purcha,ei. %Un,; :11-1:1 1,L' itlSta it.t! in --nar(r.: of supply to me, Ure all %%,i[L!r it lu lill, -2. Provisiow. shall he made to provide an advirluale it. these resident:; v�huse veli syslvms lire x1l... ii,ii-im,mi pret,,orc- oi 20 pounds per squafe inch :;Ilall be filillol'blL'i the JVVQlU0L Cu: pt-T, X iendered nun-productive by the U.1e of Well!; -d In ill ti:,wt.. An auxiliiry.sciurLt� Of power shall be lee. l.i,ci 1(, a�.sure cwilkiw.-d )i.eration oi die water -;upply during Ilt-riods ..j t-1,i lric,il I?o%-.vr iailtlre. F-1 '13 Provisions shall be ;,lad,: to mmmnze vrc ion during Inn: LUII N, tion of the project and to prf:v(?ii, incr-2a..ed sL-di:.iV:il,iIion it; xiy I j; ,Harm s:vili h a:1 1)t! i3i"OVidt'd Vith JUlOMaIiC signaling body on or adjacent to the prujL:ct. ItI.- %%!lit.h wi!; 11 t--it 1:rinlary �cpurcU LllUipMent nla'fUnLtiolls. 24. WatL-r exec; for milli.., if di:chary(-d to l,eU -/ the terilar-: ;vs*Itnil shall "!Q Ful0inillud to and approved b tiblic Survice Cutimlihsion p7i(w ;o the %-.ater supply system in oust have a chlorine residial not excuedingO.05rig/I a'point u!if-c h.1. rVice. xx Xx18. 1,:oihing contained ht-vin shall be held to authorize the p�-!rmittee EC25. Upon cr;nipioti:m of the,on,tft.lCtion autnor,,,ed by this Permit. and-it(.t niencomeni of the tokilli;-,t tlpp!:vs of:,.iivr f,nni r1w soured-.) ()awhi.h.7ed all l. (11.,irlijulk, Water in ml other di-,trict or s(!rv:%:e area which has :lot .i,ruad� apl.ru%od by I!!(- Department or it_ predecessors Without hay- Isfuli;t.icilities tn(!;c.j:(-,f in me. IN U111W:(?�,dry to the future ollvrantw i,! syslem h.ill I)v perri.mon0v disr-orint-cled;Iiproirur),the pipng plugitud,and am.%-. ii.i; ruc e,.cd i further pv.1;nil trust I lie Denartment. so disconnect(xf(oi;pe,l anti scaled, all in marillUl .actory to the New Noik I Derri,,rolivrit ol f looltil.The tal.dines thus abandoned shall not agnn be u�vcl irw i,.., Since the area to tw scrve:l by the facilities permitted herein lies wain`,zipply purposes wilhow i iur:hcr Pornin(rum the Deparlineni of Envim,W:.- the M0 year flood plain and ar agreed he since The pt.-rmittee has agr d to Cor.wo.atinn. ;.arncipd:e in the Federal Flood l;isurance Program, all construction irvialed to ;!it-.; permil and all new construction in the area to be served runilik- with all construction standards v.-hich rn.ay be developed in implemunling the program. NOTE: The following additional conditions are applicable to this permit: 26. Approval is hereby given for the maintenance and continued operation of the water supp system now is existence. Water from this system may only be supplied to existing sharehold as shown on "Water System Layout," dated April lst, 1985, forming a part of this applicatio Any future additions or modifications to the system require a further permit from the Depar ment. 27. The Department of Environmental Conservation reserves the right to reconsider this approval at any time; and after due notice and hearing, at that time to continue, rescind, modify this decision in such a manner as may be found to be just and equitable. cc: Doug Picha, NYSDEC Paul Pontoro, SCHD Alternate—R=eg 1-o-nn--a-1 Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 'ADDRESS 11794 Stony Brook, New York Charles T. Hamilton N. l: 7585 ll _- -_ _10-85-0615 y � UNCE.$ ]JE r.vnulN.w:` i':',L Cti,J: tFV., li(:N 1_A,- A ICLE 15, HTLC- 17 ;WMF.% C I,SLJD T., Rabbit Lane Association 19 East Mall, Plainview, New York 11803 East Marion, Town of Southold, New York '1 (1;Ii�rl;l•: oi: PK,. 1!1:.:. Existing water supply facility serving a small cooperative (Homeowners' Association) of approximately- 30- homes,._located.._along_-_Bay Avenue and-Rabbit...Lane.,. in...East Marion, New York. Water for this system is obtained from two wells each with a pumping capacity_.of..26_.gallons.._per minute.. C!)-%•'.lL:NlTY NAG1E (City, Tuwn, Village)-- ------- TOWN — — - _�--T Southold East- Marion----..-- ---------- --T- c+ '1 1 Ct) !!!UNIT'Y ;:U. 1 DAht 1\10. PERMIT ISSUE DATE Suffolk _— -_ ---- —_1— - -- November 22nd, 1 GENERA! CrNDITIGNS 1. Prior to staring wort; on any construction authorizedherein,dt:tailed •1. The Department reserves the right to reconsider 1!tis pen:!! at ;,:-;Is of thy' str!:C:uses {rr(r 1o_.ed to be built alit specificationsr lof such time and after due notice and hearing at that time to cul:iinui•, rescir :,hall 11w.e !teen subr;il!ed to:: u a{l;ro:+'d by the Department. Then.:- modify this permit in such a manner as may be found li be just ai%, t:uch cwlsfrur.l.iun %vc;-k _Iia!i be entirely ro!apleled ;n full accord- t'quitahle. a1:tU with the p:dnS and sprcihc.,:iir�n-t rrhici: llavv been so iul;nlitled and S. Grar,ling of this {;omit does not relizve the a;;pliranl (lathe r•sp of oblainkig an, Olf,ar permrs�ion, consent or ;prroval which !)^parh::'F:I r,i•serve the r;',hl to rru'ind 11,;s pent);' nr to lac be required. A!,.I io V,'1 .1CM11 It I:41V (11'c•m Stl:idbli- ,iid pro ,I- If 11,1! 1':orl s .;:Ilh,)r;led G. As a condition of tile issuance of t11!s perimi, the lippiicani !:r ,(,NS:n;,ted !xrein are not ;n!!iatUd L•y N/A (Existing accepted expressly, by the execut::)a of the apulicatir,::, the full I - -----s"tenry 1••spr.lsibility foi all u.!,nji ._. c!irr.•:t or indirect, of .vhatevel tat::nt, ., by whoa;,ever scifered, drtS!11g CUI 01 :he i.rojec; described Lerein -rci 1„wIwr L .,rA ',f tL:' L•nvin•nmenlal Ccnservalio,-, LanN furbids Oi, agree) to indemnify and save haniii,•ss the S!"le !ia:n txi!s, act- :acra;ion c,f any u, G:esd v,vir s until• as consaucl:d. they have peen damah.es and cost- oi every name a.^.;i de::Cripticn re-::jt,,i:ii, ;rom tale .lt;pro•ved by the t)eu rh;t=:nt. Such final approval will be given ,,Illy or, rriljrC:. ..r;Ile:I request. ,.: 1.(-nerzil, such app,ova! %01 rot he •aver. u:tLl all pro- ::a afP.c^.!Iles quality of the water and safety of the works have bean 7. fly acceptance of this permit 'lv: pe.-alit'«e awee:. that !t:e per:,. +... .;!!!•:d %•rill: :n full. t.0'l:;l1FV1lt u;wn 6tricl CU.1I!'II::nCe '.Viol tile' :,at-Clal cond::1u!1, fo!lol, am.a:mavr.�w:ae__a,ema®:s�assn.,.n.a. �mm�a:riaxr_.r�.-:r.t..� NOTE: Only those special conGitiorls fulluwing which have been marled ,k;,apply. -:'ECIAI_ CON1D!TIJN5 li. All land within--. feet of any well shall be protected x5 i 11. Defure any water from the wells) may be used for any pur{ anti c:oni.olh:d ;n ore-er to prevent pol!Ltiun of the groune or groundwater aiCer prolonged pumping tes-s), the applicant shall have cawcJ a sa. im direct u,.nl•;:-:::a of I!l: Iznd ur by the ic,iiiisiiion of pro;:active ease- of fire hater front e ll to be cui!ected and anal;z d, shain have sal::, v.enls or omer appropriate mea.::tres• the results of Euch dialyses to the De.parimeni and ~hall have advised by the Department either lbat the water is of a sat!-.factory : X�{j 9. This area shall further be prat+toted iron pollution by surface Lary quality or that certain specified treatment or purification them, eriginating outside thereof by tile construction of suitabie diver- necessary. In this last cese s;:ch water shail be used only after ;;:!I ..,on ditches ur c:r,hankmcn!:; and the dvvelupme.n.t of the wcter r.•:u: es pliance wit!: all +able requirements of the Department. ::d!I !le so carried tut that :here shall b'' 10 0D.-0rtunity for :]ol!u:ion _ the sours c•% 12. `,ot!ling contair.ec in this permit end :lppru•r al snail rle, :tth orize the app!ir:aet to sell ur::iStribile via;.. it:r,; ;h XX W. !re :.hy•-I( :I ptim!.111:g far,:ir.ies and ,:unl:—.; .., cli. be protectud of supply for any purpose unless -uch water ;hall fir:l 1;,v;e nst dr:':.ly • or !o,;:pering e::her by a i•ice c ether suitzb!o er,clo,'_re treated aid purified by ;?isin;ectl..n (and filtration) in a mann.•;r sat;: !!:vir m.lnnet c! cc:'.,ruiln!;I .and lnstall,ttinn. tuly to :he Det'_rialent. (SEE FLVE(SE SIDE) HENRY P. SMITH, President _ TELEPHONE JOHN M. BREDEMEYER, Vice-Pres. C= PHILLIP J. GOUBEAUD ® (516)765-1892 JR ELLEN M. LARSEN BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 July 25, 1986 Mr. Charles Luscher Rabbit Lane Association 19 East Mall Plainview, New York 11803 Re: Bay Avenue, East Marion, New York Dear Mr. Luscher: It- has been brought to our attention that there is some debris in the lake by the bridge on Bay Avenue. Please have this area cleaned up at the earliest possible date. If you have any questions regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call this office at the telephone number listed above. Very tr ly yours, Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees HPS:ip cc: Mr. Frank Heroy Town Board Victor Lessard, Admin. , Building Dept. Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent of Highways Ted Dowd Garry Tabor Trustees file 1� RESOLUTION - October 30, 1985 RESOLVED that the Southold Town Trustees declare itself lead agency in regard to the State Environmental Quality Review Act in the matter of -the application of Mr. Ted Dowd for a Wetland Permit on certain property located on 350 Rabbit Lane, East Marion, New York. 77 145 Lakeview Terrace PO Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 September 28t 1987 Mr. Ray Jacobs , Superintendent Town of Southold Highway Department _ Peconic Lane Peconc, NY 11958 Dear Mr. Jacobs : Pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act, I request access to copies of: 1 . the latest engineering report on the Bay Avenue ,, East Marion bridge. 2. repair records to same for the PRst 30 years. If there are any fees for searching or copying the records and these exceed 120, please inform me before filing the request. If fees are 20 or less, I agree to remit. If you are unable to file this request within the pre- scribed time provided by statutee notify me of the reasons and advise me when I may expect the information. If you '`dehy this request, please cite the specific exemption and notify me of the appeals procedure, including time limitations.:." If you have any questions, I can be.. reached at 477 1925. Sincerely, . jem Francis A. Heroy WO SEp29031 aUv • 4 ljpRR'4I.,`�K. LWianbLGilbccth q 00 F.A.Heroy K use 145 Lakeview Terrace P. O. Box 357 ==-,,{. ��/� '—E East Marion,NY 11939 USA, 40c « 1 P 686 165 356 1 `, L . Mr. Ray Jacobs, Superintendent Town of Southold highway Department USASc Peconic Zane Peconic, NY 11958 f - REQUEST 1 r I®NEY B. BOWHE & SON Sidney B.Bowne,P.E.,L.S. Roland Anders (1922-1959) v�t4 / � Rogrr L Cocchi Chester C Kelsey, P.E.,L.S. 45 Manor Road Francis J.Lynch Alexandre W.Mercil,P.E. Philip Schlotzhauer Robert A. Stan!cn.P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Joseph F.Strgman Robert W.Brown.L.S. 516 724-0611 Paul F.Slovens Zabdiel A. Blackman,P.E.,L.S. ( ) Will T.Slyne --- Richard B Wehrr George A Style,P.E. Jerry D.Almont,P.E. George L.Fagan,Jr.,Ph.D.,P.E. Frank Capobianco,C.E. Thomas R.Pynchon,L.S. September 29, 1987 Ray Jacobs, Supt. of Highways TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Re: Bay Avenue Bridge, East Marion, Town of Southold, New York (SBB No. 87051) Dear Sir: As we discussed today, our report of 6/18/87 represents several alternatives 'for reconstruction of the Bay Avenue Bridge. In addition to these 2 alternatives several of these alternatives were explored and were found to be unsatisfactory and only short term type solutions. The recommendation of Alternate "C-2" is a long term solution to the problem and most economically founded. One of the major considerations atfecting this projects costs are poor soil conditions in the area of the bridge foundations and must be taken into consideration during all alternative evaluations. Very truly yours, SIDNEY B* BOWN & SON / CONSU /fING1,---E G1NE-EM/ ROBERT W. BROWN, L.S. RWB:clg cc: Ray Dean (SBB) Encl . Letter dated 6/18/87rin MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN • NEW YORK CITY • CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/H SIDNEY B. BOfWNE & SON S,dney B.Bowne.P.E..L.S. �it4uteFird Roland Antlers (1922-1959) Frank C&Dobianco Rooer Chester C Kelsey. P.E..L.S. 45 Manor Road Franc L Coccn Alexandre W.Mercil,P.E. PhiliFrancis J Lynch otzhRuer Robert A.Stanton,P.E. Smithtown, N.Y. 11787 Jose F.Sleammn Robert W.Brown,L.S. (516) 724-061 1 Joseph F.Spns n Zabdiel A.Blackman,P.E., L.S. Pau,F.Stevens Wllham T.Sty ne Richard B Weber George A.Style, P.E. Jerry D.Almont.P.E. George L.Fagan,Jr., Ph.D.,P.E. Thomas R.Pynchon.L.S. June 18, 1987 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, New York 11958 Attention: Ray Jacobs, Supt. of Highways Re: Bay Avenue Bridge, East Marion, Town of Southold, New York (SBB NO. 87051) Dear Sir: As requested, we have reviewed the Bay Avenue Bridge and report our findings as follows: A. Introduction r 1. In December, 1986, the bridge was inspected, measured and photographed. 2. Test borings were made and soil samples obtained. 3. Overall maps were .were consulted regarding hydraulic considera- tions. 4. This report summarizes our -initial findings and recommenda- tions. B. Findings 1. The bridge is narrow by today's standards. Roadway of 18'+ would be approximately 24' if constructed today with additional width to provide for pedestrian access. MINEOLA • SMITHTOWN NEW YORK C" ' w CLEARWATER An Equal Opportunity Employer M/F/H 2. The abutments are badly cracked due to settlement and froft action and their performance is questionable. They appear to have been repaired several times in the past. 3. Fortunately, the watersheds contributing to each side of the bridge are about equal so that scour does not pose a signifi- cant problem. 4. The water main on the side of the bridge needs to be replaced and supported properly. s 5. The bottom of the bridge deck requires extensive repair and the ' d bridge railings should be replaced. " C. Alternatives ° 1. One alternative would be to construct a new bridge with improv- Y ed geometry. This would involve closing the crossing" to B. traffic for a period of at least four months and possibly B longer. For budgeting purposes this alternative would cost o about $300,000. The expected life of such a structure, with W n reasonable maintenance, should be over 50 years. e 2. Alternatively, the' existing bridge could. be repaired and rehabilitated by transfering the abutment road to a new support & system and restoring the superstructure. This alternate would S be designed so that it could be used for later replacement of the bridge deck with one of greater capacity.. Such a solution , " would cost about $170,000 for budgeting purposes. This alter- native could keep the bridge in service except when work was actually in progress. This solution would not improve bridge geometry at this time but could extend the bridge life by approximately twenty years and longer if it is 'decided to replace the bridge deck. SBB No. 87051 ' 2. C;73 �_ D. Proposal Based on our discussions, we propose that the best interests of the Town are served by implementation of Alternative "C2" which is based on reconstruction of the bridge. As per your instructions we will prepare preliminary designs for your review and approval. Upon your approval, we will prepare contract documents so that the Town may receive bids on this s improvement. d We look forward to— discussing this matter with you at your n e convenience. Y Very truly yours, a. ' SIV B.)BOWNE & S CONSU G ENGINEER e ROBERT W. BROWN, L.S. n e AWM/RWB:clg U Encl. (Photographs 1 thru 11) s o n SBB NO. 87051 f gV. 34, 1 ' r 1 r ��15'�a.�l �zw�✓,/C{-f�yr�1/a j��t'1 �(\ ,y``�`; ,n`, �`Iti`F�•i. I T ice' i6�'y� �x.(`il•rT ` ` . _t MN .� f!'Sl +.._tiyl r£ a"�' of e�f "4• .cam y - �y�+K:-7=w.'*�• l _ # G•.;:✓"' fZa..;S;i �!y-tea•'�'R C'�w: 1 Y.r'.'cF""�'1�'•�f••.d 'kr'� � I`^-P.a•.,Y:x-J�.'.�°ti"���� � t !. y!tir•� 3vlti� �` ��.}�'���s• r,;ra.`'�'•1._ -_a"=;�_. �\."3•^T,L,�:rr��._.a,i..• -����Y;�i�t'1.� �•" y„t u. s"� 'ry• ••mac. .r� �,�, \t ,1 . •. 1 .-� rlw+� �� r `V ,k sl-'3. �4iI•' �', b J '�r.k, r 4 ,� r 1 I. •?�.. 4� J i �, '1�t'�'' '� _�•Xe�t•!l�•~`�1.'�I��I +_ •A r- fai. ,t.r. :Tt1 Y ,*� •( i'<• '�' `" F '.` 1 -ti'.1� ./1 •c f;3�. ry-• ""lr. is h,�•�i:r ap:.�rrEs�, ��tlkl �'' /'x�, wr,,^'y'"`� s� � i ,.={ram �.�. ♦.•41•.��.�, $•.' ��s4¢`t •..r ��i r.�;.,�. "y Ir��o+`:+-_ ��f6-5.��II��;"..2``'eci ����� � �-�„��� .:v- � � ;5"J:� �'It' �„t^ti Y� !!�I � •�M y'.L►,. .t. R�•y I\ f��f�. '.�,• t��` j• r/ f i'lf.:;'"T.3. � _ r.t^ p�. r ` :ri S'�i+$84,I �tr C4.fi`�-Fwrx'p . `.��' .l+.y;r !r w• .'jC ••�.�•- y. {_+ ,:3 ttf-i..r� y / .i�. •. ^f�: '-`� �5 tr�!'• R* �' f a l i" 3 t• r f R{ - �'' I i ,•r.rr � , ."4�, �•t< .�4rx.� a Xr at� ^�! + .1���:� 1 ,a'1:�' A•�. � 1 � �� ' !1 :!� r� _• T�. .!,•.t' r)- t`ra m+ t t\I t • . 1 ri- r 'a,'• / c !! r �.TN �'!•:.l` ,p•. �•, t.: t f 'Y`L a _ I 1N T„ a 1 �= ` K.lc eta-��-.• r a.� � 1 `s ` rxl:1.'•/f;T{' tf. .'a \ ' � z .�• j aa��+�li .. (wd'-.i 7 :1. r�'� �F rr h• r .� :rT �•�•' ;' ! . ,S e •� x • •• �•!.. , ;1 i•i'J�"t'{rZ�� � ( `� ^� - i c-' � 4. i'>�}� 7;'c ..r �.-.•, i �' t1i'..•: � i.. T s. a .ril ('C�•• ♦\. .�•f 11}{y`� re 5•e t ;`h � ^� t s: r i Y' ti„•i R, - � t + . � t �� •'. '�j .j'•• � I .ku'y't•-{.t�' /'A,�fS, \j:��r.•tr•(-I�" "?'r,r t r a:r�Rp�!.� Y •{'y• r 2• a »1.` �S+ti ..• .r• t*�rt• �•'�� � `riJ�M' Gt••'�Y .t y 17t. ire s♦ itr. �_ ?'= _tea �: +'�� �vr Fflsrr ♦•C.. :j• 4• T :y !. I.i f t ~tit. / . Y>� r.�` � 4 '. •.`. �. '• wf- J►... •.. sr• \f�.ft�l. 1 aM ` > r r 1 ' f•! ' f ) F.w••:►^ y4 ♦ .(� 11..,� { --. �� ,� 4••'�•GR.. .2 tii �i}h r•.� �! •; f ..`•.�►I�i. r... �� F,. i. �i .f f't t.. , ,� w ! �'y,LM+(•.Y{:.a_. A{/7• + ra +/ ..'M�~-�'•!•c.r*I ''•trot'^. + �3 1 •41 r - 5 F ..* .�� sr. R, f ,� z . ,6 s + : < r . , •l {'TNIMBI -I.:•'- tG �a;,•i - '� .Y„ .Y"! '"'�.;. w/.n.' Vie{ i �•ff 4:ai)Ir�a rN.�:t++ram � yt: + .,.as^♦r .e 7 y. ,-��{ ^`• '�1t'>'�er�Kt��.i•wrt;�r.J�•MI�f� . T .T, r t i•M ;7•� - r.. j. •.t: I .t. •..•r• • , L �! +:, c. e..t h -4' .Y •� fG -r. i� j: f•"-`:•tt^.•t1 +..r. -.ram a . .t �. M• ir� _a' t ti•�tr�,i. j.".�0 4� �� .' 1 .t a�t�;y.►... ..*:4f �� .:�I i:ea. .u•<t`* ., � t+.; } r1 I fit`✓r r'tk J :� - t Z y •i `�w i �:1!}>:..••;:.7•:I,R:� y..., �`IP.rJ F:;, �?t+r �{, r Ar." ,;r.� .tom. �(• r.�.: tK e•�'7 � }.• Yam.+ F.yry .a. v. nr. ' r, * .`.tr! t� ;r �a. ti R�•"+y'� 'i , �+�� ti+`" t�t' �il tK an.." 1y�++,jj,, .y ' � 55�'j ty j , t��.,`}f+��" •f,iw'f.,t<.«w� i 3"' +;.?. *�" la'ti ��,4,`� �' s/;,i[-t'1.� - F6 � w'±�tom Y. _ �,' 'ry�^Z;� �,;� A;.e.�,�'�';���(�''��+?•w�_-L I ow!- at' , 'SaY�S� c.•�tie " � � ° �t� f��r�rra h} � ,►L a,; �r LYet r .^�k^'F .y"k'rea`°�L"=��'�•�-f'''"'i'��-�a`?p ►'►'•'/t'�+ �+� •nc'. .�rd ,_�r.-"[;��.t�•f'Y i%P �.ys,yy"..,. fir:r'S�•t,.t2 ,kr.,,,,,e _;"�wt�q-3f �n0.. � �_ {, � t{/ 1 "� s ...'�..�R:i��i.M��s '• ��' + 4t :r` `�-.:'S_ v w "'✓' �,1� �N3'j` •��{^j1�Q"i#tr �,t�� '+x a ..rt�' '� ytisxs i C'.�`�I_e. �.,.s-+4.+�`.����"•�S'�' 'a > �' �f=,3 -,'R -71 ,� ...�•.-.'t>r,��,-` �,i'�'�r}h '`'` '• y� T�� �ttFr;,ib.., r•c •,- ..;Isr�'�'7 �-,; .� �/� W r N,� C� a W� ! •�.S . 1M1 4•�r��s�r,y•a���� r ar+t +F +w ,D>: rr .V: � '� tt, K;� w� Z;tt � 04 +t* �}`�yv�, � vY'�•w�`s-. -. j. `x`t lY t YGR~�� sis� s `1 -+ 1 t 1 '„ ti - pW�„ �7 t'1ii• t,i( , 4 ,'. ��� ���c`"K'x+ r� � a ��F•a ,rti R•��j'�, y. 1 F 1 � /:`a y� 1_�`af: �' h r� i+!'�1�'�i�'� S y Srt i-• ,+d,• k3 ';. "'R ice.. y�,�'1 e-:57�' •1 *err 1 �" �'?./•••o s r•e,k,,.��-3r•�' i t '�C''f•'4� �taf`�^ys7-��`� low i� !- w �r�i t r •-}Lf-; g t',y'a + F ,q` •s# 11 'w• ' F Ni-�.::��_ r ;tt" • - �_, _ r c - 1 �'� 7i + �'• �✓'F;�1. ,A" .t �t4S ..� ��Ir.t,'t'-` _ +r,. _ •�5�/�P> 1.,- f�- I •. �,�+ t '. .'7, ,S x�tA,-y 1 (c. ,w�,;` �� �� ,r•+� ..-���•f�l-''T �}`� "' - •,� k •'r`� �""`'�w."•,by ya`�>� � �i ter- S7 ..c" .+w�4-' 3- +��..`'r�:-{`..ts., "`z �.'��fi� "'-1 a;g�'j.,4'..�5'� .��J g "L .r \ ,�i" ��;�4�i`?c.a."�•�.�a`f5 �.�y�,%✓.' f rM'�, *;�,6�F + ,H `,�, jw.r.4. 'o-!x=T'..� {�.�.'�rs,i -*, yy '}f,' „i.x��• s'"a'.. ri i =-�, •} `sae. �€+.. .,r yLy .�•t ty, .r' .i fi r. <i f.. :'Z j -e•r 711 .:..-� �_�.���. 3;c.a.Xt `s"r�i".;f' F- t- - �'Y� _ L�t� y'•:"S 9"�.• �`1 r�• i- a 's. t. �, ���:� _ ,s ar'a fC;,. r►_yca=+;Ai1�+3, ..ii!�.. .. '�,. _ -':i a � :} 's�>t s.� �`'_3�-.�' :.tiff ,rs 3. =�"ia��e '•.yam N. i. �: � Y.:�.. �"� �.,,,.r �., r F . ,,. "�'/w+•v :mot '� _'tea. _.-`,�9.NK .w. �a� �-��v .,?+c•,,. s t�"�..,•. =a�'�',�'�g{�a4'�' ��,�. a ,�"�i.�q„ti" ��'�'1:� �2C• t+Z:'��;:• ''" .�•t r h _1 '.'Y'; �.. tQ.,.j; - .fix`F .:'!` 'fi};;.�-f.,<f'�t, .+ ?x':-��h •ti+t� � j .��..�'yvS.`,t..�ti>•..�„ �Y: i.... �5; n�'F. .i.} 4. .,L.. "F`Yf� }� ."'S'•" J�1t��'n�'S��Ry..� � L'�2^. T r�µ �`^.�, i�,� r�Tl i•M 1� ♦� F` t �t II Y � ♦• �r � `3; '.tF -ri, ,`.0 / i 1 ��'. { .Ff,�� � '� h >.�"*i ,^Aa � .r:�F�f '�•r>1c��'., ��lY.��,�t�:.�. • a *i ik •O. 0 � A• R•r"a� ' 'i f 1 YE;;Yt r,wtY Y h .✓� y�r�rs^`��'�'�'�;> � ��^�"�-r �t ..,e. /� �s.. 3• !!iK l v'�tLr�"C�* : 3,ti Tt ,i +*''�s 1�' ,� � t / '* rF -�• d �.���w,�� i�' �'1F�i9r� s � ��'�f�"` r Sr.'aE L �iM�' �•iy-+C''� ."2y°k j.t*r,r�.7 ,�rt�..*'-•'. dk- L,:r�i3i,r•..3i• :r., y�t '+' ::r:A 'rjY tZ fjs 1 �:-,i�a' 'r�`d ,r t.rc fix } Ys.� T,, :1'�.Q� . '�-r iX at�BR r S�,y. 4af.f-F `� •� �y Y� 3i�••-'b"r�.r�Ir '�'r�r�� -r � �'j w�C t - -, d. �r.L � f ri r'rc r!'`� ° x+s+ � .c r; +.•" w w y.Y�as .s,_ . .+ yx�.( 1�'� •_t{ �t ►. ,�'3 11 r•• I' is Fry`e3 ru.< ,Z�j !l • "'• � '`- s!• ;{ �-+'. iI r °, t4 I }`.".t -.tl`S �r w ,� / r a `r..s�r�i•.+�� •ra 1 r' F- `� 4 e•.' s t 4e. _ N' �'•.�. 1 u. � •• .'t•* !"*C-iyr-, i ka-.�:. '4'"", L•J ./ <,�r�».CC .•'a , �`` ! '�`. ,j i i �r,- !'`;.. ! rrJy. . ,�y��- �a:4*+t a. �,.. ,,,•.�� � .� .. ���a�s �.y*• f �Y 'y 4: r" ��ra° °t�r+ 4 v�I d.� �, i•� �/' rlyfi V.bi� er 1:' , �i, 1 x r.r ti ,�';t ��.sF A •lJ F t�;� / �` �� Fyn �:, �..� '. •� A �•�.� ~ 4 ° i �'"' t:� t ,r/ .f yrLl't ��-., to +y�� •:tom"t.'4 sy .�t •+ ;r.f. S�,.: ,�' 'Y t ?.' 1 P �D { J .' d'. 4 s{'� tk �' +.•� k .., •}R� ;r; y,'r.t'�' } # S r :a , •j /Y �„M.�•r t r 5{ 'L+e+ ..`t '�h�.'M1 Zi.• `�•..`_+ I^. a 1 ��,.� s � `tn. ,� ! 7(,VA• • tlSi��.�,t < .+ '+'S .Si. t` f•. ,r t r tih tit•; (�, �.K. ++� '`� n • at�x. SA Fa t s4 .t r« 3 .rl»,+ r 5 L^•., .� o f. t S'. I I%k- � 1 � y .4 ( , t YS ( He's y(� R t 7 .�#.� �' +: 4 � �. �C .�4{r: r•• Z ��s. _s� r.:r ; �+, � ry,'s-:t+-ra .�'y'"c+ �y r=k'a �,rt'.� 4 ': fs, ?;,'� M.S'u�" 7 i. -�~ �� •'i:. i ,pia• t -1��a��..� l fir.. -b. +� f,'�•eki F ,q, t^'"' f .rc�-"�"r ��''' ...1•,1ai Y d'� bd - �' �r.. { •�u.Rkd� •_s. _�,. !":,tf •v. t. rrV i ,„y'1 x.gg''f:;'r., ,yf,.,y..,,,;;• rs•, ?; F„ '«�' .;,���� -+'.�t '_'�!� LP1 >w:';�F' ,r�i:;`f�,rrv-`..F`rr 1� �-. ,�t.H ;�..° �- .':v '.�i{�'- :x, y C. (I :v=fa # Y, ._.,� ��+.'"S` i� +�, �; ,rjd it�:�'A `��+'�>fi . � .r �-L�yYrr�1'x'��.�r,r� � k^t '� 3•- _ ,) 11,�,y{. �. �k ti:'f.' 4 �. s� a - v,. �f - � r. :�t. � '}. t �i _.w.r�t .v,Y ,� t •i sT' _ r .r �n.g. •s T � � -,:- ,,.. k..,;..-.:'.y r�.-^ti. v'y,?` 'lt�.,•k� P '^'c ( aG7t` C�`�, t .-. ",�.i.r" f 'rY9"a. - ,,,t, �xi'� t � � .;%!p .,,,Sr7 .�l..s,''` j Yt•"',. " •L *„.^ '�'Fe?X„vv^by` S �A f �' rt, a,s4 {r �• 'Yyi 54 t :-^d 't't = ^ 'o' {i. is^._ �. i /`P 4� F YS #F� • r � y,,� �, .' �' y ''�.q� <�•�S` - '�>' -, "'` :^t�;-+."mot ', r "' r'ti^^,-Y`k 7 �'s"rs `4" ; i •. r' �ti. •4,1 i F7v1ar.'4 'm.rY, •r-1 "4w�, w+'/� t R- ,,'`" ra S.S,.. 5�Yr•r ?'i.. ,,r3. ;`?,,v,•..tms �„ �'t '�" w' ,,c '4. :- ^s} _.x r ;c+'.r ��c�.Sy w•.� +, �-. N^: 1' �` � r i�, ,r"� at r ;1:." r&•'..+: p+.°Y s.' i M1'i`q' ... e' ?. `r'•- -s •xr{ "'r v ,..�y, .�• =:�'•s`1.•. y " f F _ +h{' 'S•Yk ..t.P �3; J,i"Fr:�;.s' K�n�::;,c ' •yi#. ++_, ^� x.';b '=g4a''4 i �`s' ».f,'F. .'r .s. '4' S i` .y Sr'9• ;,.. yks.l. % rr.• �..f�' r,y gr',+yea,4 - 1L.•` r^ -�. .4 'ai ,•r Jt' '' S. �_:Y+'� ,p �x i�� ...'SSi �{ ]�- � a r j .,-.'� v.S x+.. ig� .�.•:x t �''A'-�h z-�'?�:',c rs�f,.cS�« i• i'^ ~ '�,, "'a�*ws r "" .g-�' ,�rs�?-+ r•i i "++�-r kK..I� e` „ t- i� � iiY;`Tc" • rf i .�J +�w;s�;�. t��� ��;�-'��,'°"a�'•' ,e'�-.'i.'� f•Fe• r+' �r-:�R �Zvi+ 'fix ' x'4�..r ,,��`+�"�'� <+ �q�hSl��'••,�t_^"���1;�-r f' a'te..�.'��a�"Ar"S gip"" ��.::?�;'uw4"`7, t�_.Ts��."�i't� `"�.+�r �a�' -�• '� Iz,• —". � 'v�^... �,:.tac.- 1..y-' �i' a�w`s- „'fi*..iw�r'-7 i:�'�t:L r 4'`�. -',r.:�7?�r�•,r<;y'"r.• a r. •' ri..-t`-���w[ �� x x'�'.� �7. .� k'pi,. r 'r;;r 3-. .:3 - x.,,.pK `k• �• �? �'y.•r,. .t��-y:.t..,k',�+r l ',-,y r,{i ,-:err t dry.. '{r �'t 1:S��» .y,. ..t � '� r:y .� .,ya. �. .4 � fix ,I •�w tF- si+�1�' .�;':c �. 1 ,,,'• r•.;< � �° c • ''�'r'";a M r' �"t' �'• -� ��'4 i -n i •_{rc t yl fS�-, �i 'S °-,-ta 4 ,�....� + �a€*s` y "`'.•..k?'c3 4. Rx� � � 1'.,e, `' r 'c i Fr s ti + :)i .�i��"" ►•^'Y �1 -.�., ,.• s "�6 „se„Y Y :jj,N�, t**.a-S�i-�i'•}" _'£ g�. ��_ar`"�rt asy �t�'"y p" .yj- ` � � 2 ��'�rr.S �- {1 k.l!' �F°. �Y'� k n-:'� ��tii_ .svyw•• �� r"". �,� �,,, � � 'i`��rs.w. .e � � •;;�„° �.�••',' t ., ,:i''C���� ,r•+ !� `�'.rr f 3 i �a �,. ,� litr '.• ti� C 'n-t �` `�' ,'s+" 4. 5,�' 1y.■ .F,3i •;3 •y "• J !s7`` 1.1..• •i tea,..�. + by "'5. .wF T ak. � � � � +r °^S-� 'rf' "•. � x 7 'r• rr :..� t,_•- y.-�ik' � � to yyKk'jj3�� ,�• <wi. S-� -s �� s �, ".� y F .t•.3' � � 'r r�-•s'?i�''(�f .r. n ( # <u- t1 :° L�L� �•{j�.✓t�`� j` ��z _ � .)pr�fj f**t 4�. fa ire,_"rj�.` iiF 'x,� 'ci. _+4 1�. �.�•' •,' t,�R�[ ' i�.�. '`^ LF.iF""9¢tW-,Yfi'S` r`�'t Y.,i .d�` .• F5 i.+.x -••'4<y,:�{ J i •► .II�N' y�.i j w'� ..t.�'1• 3M' t. '.•t—�� J r f 1.. .ri�.'� `o �-l{ tiy�,;.. f N' F ..t o•.T^..�. A 11 F. '•ti.. 3v�1 _" r .Ir yr-t3' t. .`'tt ,1 7 i► -'rkkr•:. 1..�,. s G _ _ - x, 'xt�r ���'•^tr,:.;;,` a?h• a rrS. ;i�' r �} .__tea r r..,..�. �. -3. �• � fir.. y,�'� ��.�• a .r. 'Y r f :;_.;� ,+^yr •.{��('�" ..4•t s it_w �7. 1,•: '; h? �3 +". i( �.Y ;,f:.,� r (,j rw;.• .�x$�= h$�• y �, � �� ..Li-� s �.ii=,,,,,., j. '.� e''� � r a�. '1>' ""'!< �r� � `�'��'r x,_ - aF{• z,7 ([[ y� '.�}ri y u,6�*•.•3=, .y i'�Y' -.-t'y �_ `-0's a--... �.-'� �i „S 'y'r' .iS c�it f !-.�•+ '2'j�+' f•. r f .s?l7 k. y,. x r „1� r kL _.g.{�.. .•i'�%'.s",s',a. "�'d �.- '� 'i^ ate. .+- 3�r i`3t `� Y .. •� Tom„' "' `. ,C ;a �� r'�p ' � �Sr -„' � `1 tom. .-,�.�. a.. .�.;':��, �.0_ � � ":e, '�i•-,�s _rr '.:�s r• "(�,..#_'� •-•L. t' ��,ry}( N c •i t,Yt [''f�'i^ ) �t`J f-9 t y,,, l �. '•M..�i•. '��s"�.za,v .s'..Y�'# �Y [" -a" ,c- t '3 ,��•'•- r Ix,�.-".`rn `►y �{5>.n.7 a1�:C? J'�}ri f=.:�f r.•..bx, :'.I, s: ear'°L:•.•.;``•:ir•. a :x..r *�g -i�1 '�.. 7� .7 t j+ x"s•..:�.'�Y�� :. .r'�cy..la�•F1: 1�'@1T75 �' +� x" �,� i'��.�1 �,t•�'l .•"mod f 'i� ,.�^�w... .k. '� a- a {,-, d•[a"�'4:,i, r,y,�� �� f'R'= ay„V.i�i ,'� ! ?t✓. +�7 - ..s Z.µ -�,. �,�� � a SF`�' � tr #""` s+.• ' �" ,y.� r• :�` j''• r��,. 'f �,.�;'�n'Z�IF.�:.:vi:J'� .',h: .:Asyrr=s nn� �}, �1 k��r� � * "�y Na�'�aat �y���'�)��f•T . a � ,�9, n►�$y. r � , '�•Es i'�z -; ' i�S' �l t h'I •`i '�'� - K . e r�rt Tag-'r; ' �t�.. ++: ,...k'•+..,.'a. ,a,�,e ��xt Yt• r ��{�:� a � a< *� .eri Jam!•-" rrr�F•����ryai���� � lrk*y-i=°{�"' r<i �y t. .,•w�,.e:r;;£ r �v`f�..�'$-�.�. , i•..1'i �� c..�f y r.'.,�, �w" � �+� 3, 4 •�— � :air h.T,r #8 •eA'� +i�i,,,fA•r '1�1 r � s .a�,.�r�r�•.t�r.��,�1"t-'�.�{�Z'��x'�t-y3'ly�� -' 4 w..�^.•F h P'k Y��tg 7"" .; ' wT �' •�1{ {'�?'�. . _'°'�".t' :...{ k•t••4w rid ` Via- •w '<S r `� ' F r '�+1• S A'�{'�.4 irk-"\.- £ .�i•'t� f •.t�•xa 4. � F y.e:*S'�, _ >* ��' (� � `t .N„-•y r 'A.+ « . •'•`'� jy"�;i 4 J s z<f i �-� ....!. .k,•F iu+. "``•s� , x�in "5�ar" `�,A*•.. r vp �z i {r'Y'l'{ Y"«"E•��"y`'7�,., � ar.„,. slp, ',r£y", •':.- g_j 1 {{(j err 5 L.r S.. j-,•r..`Z 'yd��"' .F`.�sS,"�� ��� Y'tk�r.�r`(tf� r �..;1� �"�"•rr n�'w • Cz • / -Ragit _fang oAiodation. 01 f `r z / P. 0. Box 754 East Marion, L. I. , New York 11939 July 1.2, 1987 Fir. Ray Jac•.)bs Superintenden , Department of T.ighway s TU n of 'Southold Southold, :Neva York Dear- Sir-- ' _%he Rabb_it Lane Assoc•iail on of East Far3on reru C-S t"I" 'Your coo-peration i.r_ er! offor t to corx=,3c r, ai: unsightly aLnd, it rainy weathev,. a Poo-71 drainage con- dition Ln f.'ront of the homes of Association members Oil Ba.y verme f ro-m ',he bridge over r%Rr.io,L� eke to bi t Larie Garay T a r)o?=, of orient, entre:+-iched tna el ec G�-ia water and ater Conduits along Bay Z3vGnue foj- Une S1oU:��S bcin ; execued by Tied Dowd on Rabbit pane$ °i1-aose conduits were placed on the east side of the road arid, after- em- plscm-ment, .'he tr. enoh -vas filled with clir•i,. We feat that the proper procedure would have been to macadami.z,c the ` surgace of the .filled. trench. With appropriate grading, puddl a gag could be elin�'n.ated or rni n'al;ed du--:J ng rainy weather. On the whole, the work of k r. ',Tabor appears to JS have been slipshod all. along Bay. Avenue :which, in addition to the condition cited above, has caused narrowizirt of :she l8ke beneath the bridge, lbank you for your consideration in th is-ratter. Very truly yours, ALB • m J Ma' 'E es3, ant ✓cc do Mr Henry P' Smi•th Fres:id en is Lakeview Terrace Road Association P.O. Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 September 29, 1986 Dear Town Supervisor Frank Murphy Councilwoman Jean Cochran Councilman Raymond W. Edwards Councilman George Penny IV, Jr. Councilman Paul Stoutenberg Town Clerk Judith Terry Admin. Exec. of Building Dept. , Victor Lessard upt. of Highways, Ray Jacobs Pres . of Town Trustees , Henry P. Smith Town Attorney, Robert Tasker Thank you for the opportunity to discuss the Bay Avenue- Rabbit Lane project and problems on Tuesday, September 23rd. The Association members accept our mutual agreements : 1. The silt shall be removed from under and near the bridge. 2. The drainage slope on the east side of Bay Avenue south of Lakeview Terrace and to the bridge shall be corrected. 3. The trenched area on the east side of Bay Avenue shall be sodded to deter further siltation of the lake and to restore the area to its original condition. 4. The weight limit of the bridge shall be posted at 8 tons and shall be enforced. Mr. Jacobs and I made an on-site tour on Friday morning, September 26th. Of paramount concern is the severe damage to the southwest underpinning of the bridge. The consensus among the membership is that the points agreed upon should be carried out in a matter of days, not weeks or months. Please remember there has been dawdling, waffling, alibis , and excuses for the past two months . Your anticipated cooperation is deeply appreciated. V er truly yours , Frank Heroy, Sec ary cc Councilman James Schondebare Members of the Ags6ciation i i 1 i BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES _ 6 TOWN Or SOU HOLD Q 31 J(1 53095 Blain Road Phoue 765-1892 Southold, N. Y. 11971 Date- .RECEIVED OF / J t .c �. d _ Dollars S � �c� For BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Cash ❑ Check /Y? 0 � ..;:� ; FORM NO.3 �i��/✓- : , 7'1-u 5�1 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD BUILDING DEPARTMENT TOWN CLERK'S OFFICE SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 1 NOTICE OF DISAPPROVAL �. . . . . ��. . . . . .. 19 Date . . . . . . . To .!c-j;J . . .�U W l . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. .o. . <.<o . . -. ... y�. . . . PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that your application dated . . . . -C '�/ ` � . .�a., 19 ./�5~ for permit to C�lk1� v ?. . ONc�. t`/7 . . . . . . . . .�. ✓4=�.�i!ccC . . . . . . at Location of Property . . -1. . . . . . . . . . . . . ��. . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . �/ . . . . . House No. Street Hamlet County Tax Map No. 1000 Section . . (51 . . . . . . . . Block . . . . . . . . . . Lot 414f�� . . . . . . . . Subdivision . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Filed Map No. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Lot No. . ....' . . . . . . . . . . . is returned herewith and disapproved on the following groundsVl''OS.�; ''. . . 4U�;/✓1.� -. .q �!.% . . . . . . . . P...,. . . .�_ . c {J. . . ?.` . . . 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . Qj 7. 2�1 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . y I . ./: W. . . . . . . . . . Building Inspector RV 1/80 To: Pres. Henry P. Smith RE: Wetlands Application Board of Trustees, Southold Town No. 319 Southold, NY, 11971 From: Ted Dowd pMOM Box 282 Rabbit Lane II East Marion, NY, 11939 Phone: 477 2402 Sept 27, 1986 Dear President Smith, I am writing in reference to my application for which a Public Hearing was held on August 28, 1986. My intent is to state the facts as clearly as possible and respond to Mr.. Frank Heroy's letter of Sept 3, 1986 to the Board. At :the Public Hearing Mr. Heroy was the only citizen to complain against the application. No residents from the immediate area voiced objections. The Chairman of the Conservation Advisory . Council (CAC) objected on environmental grounds. I pointed out that the environmental factors and CAC input were considered at the previous meeting where the Board voted unanimously that the application had a non-significant environmental impact. The President of the North Fork Environmental Council (NFEC) objected to building three homes on the property, and I stated that the application was for only one home. The NFEC made a lengthy input to the New York State Dept of Environmental Conservation (DEC) which was considered before granting a DEC permit. Mr. Heroy's input at the hearing was that the application shouldn't be approved until the depth around the Bay Avenue bridge was deepened to which I replied that the depth one year ago measured 20"". One week later Mr. Heroy, now representing the .Lakewood Terrace Road Association, sent his letter to the Board. It should be noted that conflict between the residents of Lakewood Terrace and Rabbit Lane has been in existence for years. The center of conflict has been obstructions to the view of Gardiners- Bay,- from Lakewood Terrace first with lights left on along Rabbit Lane at night that interfered with the view and later by trees that grew and homes that were built there.. Paragraphs one through four of Mr. Heroy's letter address silting, debris and safety at the Bay Avenue bridge. Residents who have been in the area since the 1920s remember silting to be a problem. With regard to debris, the contractor has returned to the site several times to grass, fill and cleanup the area because of heavy rains. I met with the contractor and Mr. Luscher to insure satisfaction by the Rabbit Lane Association and personally observed the contractor up to his shoulders in mud and silt at the bridge cleaning out debris. Mr. Luscher was satisfied with his. actions. In reference to safety the Superintendent of Highways had the Bay Constable check the site and was satisfied with conditions at the bridge including its safety. The Chief of the East Marion Fire Dept stated that fire vehicles observe normal weight restrictions for the bridge but all vehicles cross when required. Since no residents on the bay side of the bridge use the school system it would .seem reasonable to not have school buses cross the bridge. Paragraph five of the letter states that the use of inland wells for the home in the application was a concern' for the -future quality of the 13 wells .of the Lakewood Terrace homes. The Suffolk County Health Dept required the recent improvement in. the Rabbit Lane water system to alleviate the drain on the acquifer.-:, at the Rabbit Lane pumping station. Since the pumping station is adjacent to the Lakewood Terrace homes the new well-field , improves conditions for them most of all. In reference to Mr. Heroy°s claim as to addressing the impact on the area, that was done after extensive investigation by experts at DEC, several meetings at higher levels of the Health Dept and by the Board of Trustees. No other home in the entire are, including Lakewood Terrace,. has been submitted to such close scrutiny. Finally., Trustee Larsen cast a negative vote at the August 28,. 1986 hearing stating, ".. . .Only because the house was within 30• of Gardiners Bay. . . ." The applicat%on was approved at 19' from Gardiners Bay by the DEC because it was the mean distance from. the bay of other homes in the area.. The home would have -a 10' deck which places it 29• from the bay. I would be glad to place the home 301 from Gardiners Bay with a further restriction that the deck be no further than 10• in front of the home if this will satisfy Trustee Larsen. I realize the demands placed upon the Trustees and .do not wish to burden them further. If, however, there is anything to be . done to alleviate problems or clarify my-:statements I would be glad to meet with the Trustees individually or as a group at their convenience. Thank you for your time and patience. Sincerely, 2 A Lakeview Terrace Road Association P.O. Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 September 03 , 1986 Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent Southold Town Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Re : Bay Avenue Project Dear Mr. Jacobs: At the membership meeting of the Lakeview Terrace Road Association on August 31, 1986 many topics were included in the discussions, but of paramount foci were the physical condition of Bay Avenue, the siltation under the bridge, and the lack of a bridge weight limit sign. It was resolved that the following points were to be brought to your attention: 1. The east side of Bay Avenue is an eyesore for a project which started as long ago as April 17th with relatively no activity since Saturday, August 2nd. A. The drainage from Lakeview Terrace south goes onto the bridge which was not the case heretofore. Silta- tion of the lake has resulted. The contractor has ac- knowledged this bywreturning at least twice in July and August to replace washed away soil. The soil ran down the east side of the road, onto the bridge, and into the lake. The water opening under the bridge has been re- duced from 12' 62" to 6' 6" . A boat can no longer navigate under the bridge. The Association expects the right of passage to be restored. What the hurricane of 1938 did not do, man did! B. The entire project gives a slipshod appearance. C. At least one house ,water connection box and the large water connection box at the southeast corner of Rabbit Lane and Bay Avenue project above the surface of the ROW of Bay Avenue and are a hazard. D. Debris was left in the lake E. A trench was cut in the blacktop of the entrance to Lakeview Terrace. Common courtesy by the contractor would indicate patching immediately. 1 of 2 F. An inspector for the Board of Underwriters Lab in- dicated that the yellow marker or ribbon had not been buried with the electric cable in the trench. This can lead to a dangerous situation in the future as part of the run contains a gas line with the water pipes and electric cable. When may we expect the contractor to restore the ROW to its original or better condition, with the proper drainage, to remove the debris and silt from the lake, and to assure everyone all codes have been met? 2. The members of the Association are concerned with the safety of the bridge which was built over 60 years ago to serve a few cottages. Inasmkch as East Marion Fire Depart- ment Policy bans the use of the bridge by its vehicles and your .deparment has advised the Superintendent of Oyster- - . . _ - - .. ponds School District, Mr. Charles Woznick, not to use the bridge for school transportation, it is -readily apparent the bridge is unsafe for large vehicles. The .State has posted "NO TRUCKS WITH R. PERMITS" on ei- ther side of the Dam Pond and the Greenport railroad bridges. What is to prevent one of these rigs coming out the LIE onto the North Road onto Bay Avenue and across the- bridge? �d; ¢SJ, :The Association -�uVes, that the weight limit sign for the bridge be posted again and the regulation enforced. An accident on the bridge through failure of same could cause serious injuries or fatalities and would have a . catastrophic impact on the lake and wildlife. ' We know that you have conducted personal on-site inspections and._-apprec-tate it. . . .:._. Sincerely, Frank Heroy, Secretary cc: e ­Town Trustees -The Town Supervisor and Town Board Dr. Martin Garrell, CAC Mrs. Ruth Oliva, North Fork Environmental Council Mr. Walter Gaipa, Chief of EMFD Mr. Charles Woznick, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Gary Tabor, Contractor Mr. Ted Dowd Mr. Dennis Cole, DEC Mr. Norman Woodcock, President of the Association 2 of 2 Lakeview Terrace Road Association P.O. Box 357 East Marion, IVY 11939 September 03, 1986 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, NY 11971 Re : Bay Avenue Project, East Marion Ted Dowd Application Dear President Henry P. Smith Trustee John M. Bredemeyer Trustee Philip Goubeaud Trustee Albert Krupski , Jr. Trustee Ellen M. Larsen : At the Annual Meeting of the Lakeview Terrace Road Associa- tion on Sunday, August 31st, it was resolved that the following points be brought to the attention of the Board of Town Trustees in addition to the remarks made on behalf of the Association at your August 28th meeting: 1. The piers on the Bay Avenue bridge are approximately 15' 77" apart. For decades until May - June 1986, open water under the bridge has remained at approximately 12' 61" . The passageway at this date measures 6' 6" with a slope from 0 to a depth of 23 " . That is a loss of 6' 111 in width in 4 months or so. The Hurricane of 1938 did not wreak devastation of that type. Man did ! 2. The residents wish to have their right of passage and access from the east lake to the west restored. 3. Inasmuch as the President of the Trustees wrote to Mr. Luscher on July 25th, five weeks ago, relative to debris by the bridge in the lake, what has been done? 4. Inasmuch as East Marion Fire Department Policy bans the use of the bridge by its vehicles and the Highway Department has advised Oysterponds School Superintendent Charles Woznick not to use the bridge for school bus transportation, the message is loud and clear that the bridge is unsafe for large vehicles. Our Associa- tion recommends that the weight limit of the bridge be posted again and that the regulation be enforced. An accident on the bridge through failure, of same could cause serious personal injury or death and could have a disasterbus impact on the lake and wildlife. 1 of 2 5. As the proposed application of Ted Dowd is of no positive benefit to improve the environment of Rabbit Lane, Marion' Lake, or the Bay, the Association recommends that the application be denied. As the site has no potable water thereon, it must be pumped inland of the 13 wells of the Association members which is a � concern for the future quality of our water. That topic should be addressed now and not later. The building site would be a ::source of phosphates, nitrates, and pesticides for the Bay. and/or the Lake. It would have a deleterious impact on the area. How much is enough? I have been selected by the Association to conduct any on-site tours if you wish. Thank you for your anticipated close scrutiny of the situ- ation. ;S cere ely. ra� , S retary cc: Mr. Raymond Jacobs , Supt. of Highways Town Board Mr. Gary Tabor, Contractor Mr. Ted Dowd Dr. Martin Garrell, CAC Mrs. Ruth Oliva, NF Environmental Council Mr. Walter Gaipa,, Chief of EMFD Mr, Charles Woznick, Supt. of Oysterponds School District Mr. Norman Woodcock, President- Road Association i 2Of2 I� 1 To: Don Dzenkowski From: Trustee Office Re: Bay Avenue, East 'Marion Date: August 21, 1986 There has been a report that there is erosion occuring under the bridge on Bay Avenue, East Marion, due to the trench dug while installing the water lines for that area. Please make an inspection and report your findings on this matter. Thank you. Ilene Pfifferling Discussion on the red Dowd Application - July 31, iy66 The Clerk was requested to read into the record the comments from the Conservation Advisory Council. (as requested by Trustee Larsen) Clerk: Wetland Application No. 319 for Ted Dowd. The Council fees a full EIS is necessary. Significant Type I Action. It should be discussed publicly and allow input from interested parties at the hearing. Trustee Larsen: I would like to open the discussion at this time for the Board. Trustee Smith: Well we all went down there and looked at Mr. Dowds property and we agreed that we would have no jurisdiction where he was building his houses. The only jurisdiction we would have now,is where he is clearing the lot. I didn't think that anyone had any problem with the project. Trustee Bredemeyer: The C.A.C. although voiced their sentiments on this project they did not give any specific reasons more, and of course there is more public input at the Public Hearing stage. Trustee Krupski: If we don't have jurisdiction there why are we moving this? Trustee Bredemeyer: On the clearing. There is another resolution on the agenda for the clearing. Trustee Krupski: Oh! For the clearing. Trustee Bredemeyer: I would move this application having a negative. . . . Trustee Larsen: I believe I have the floor John Trustee Bredemeyer: Oh! Be my guest. I thought that we had opened this up for discussion; Be my guest! Trustee Larsen: I make a motion that the proposed application is listed as a non-significant impact, however, I think it is. a Type I Action. Clerk is there a second to that motion? Trustee Bredemeyer: Will the Clerk read back that motion? Clerk: Moved by Trustee Larsen the proposed application is a non-significant impact, but a Type I Action. Trustee Larsen: A Type I Action in that could possibly have a mitigating effect on the environment, more then a catwalk, ramp and float. Under S.E.Q.R.A. houses fall under a Type 1 Action. Trustee Smith: Mr. Dowd the application you have for the beach house, from the HWM are you sure that this is 50' back from the Deck or from'the house itself? Mr. Dowd: The deck is the furthest. Trustee Smith: How wide is the deck? Mr. Dowd: It's a 10' deck. Ted Dowd - Page 2 from the meeting of July 31, 1986 Trustee Smith: Thank you. This is in line with the others. Trustee Bredemeyer: Ellen I'm a little confused. When you say this is a Type 1 Action but you say it is not significant? Are you saying it is not significnat but that we will want some type of a draft statement anyway? Trustee Larsen: No. I'm not saying that. What I'm saying is that addressing Mr. Dowds application and the course of events to reach this point that he has addressed all of the other environmental agencies involved and has reached a conclusion to obtain these permits. And has mitigated all the possible effects on the environment, but, a house on the water within 60' is acceptable under S.E.Q.R.A. to declare a Type 1 Action. If an action is a Type 1 it does not mean that it is significant, it does'nt require a draft. Trustee Smith: Our main concern is environmental. Trustee Bredemeyer: It seems to be one of the last lots there, where houses seem to be the rule of the day there. Martin Garrell: C.A.C. : Are you aware of the C.A.C.s agonizing on that application? The proposal is really lighter then simply the one house. The overall plan is for two or three. The use of building on the wetlands on Marion Pond. Trustee Smith: Where he is building there it is more then 75' and it is not within our jurisdiction. Mr. Garrell: There has been such feeling on the part of the people of the area, and the Suffolk County Soil Conservation Service, our feeling was that we would like to see the whold proposal flushed out. That it would go through the hearing process. We would like to see what an Environmental Impact, long form environmental impact statement would look like. We felt that the project deserved a full scale look. With that reason we hoped that by being declared a Type 1 Action the parties that were involved would submit a more detailed plan that we could look at in length. Trustee Larsen: I truly simpathize with your comments, Dr. Garrell, which was the reason I asked the secretary to read your comments. I myself do not have that information, nor background to provide an assessment. I simpathize with you that the bayfront area is an environmentall sensitive area. Not only that, we are buffering on Lake Marion. I would be willing to have further indept study of an environmental impact study on the area to be done. Certainally before any conclusions were drawn before the facts are in. Only to ascertain that the Board as a whole is doing its best job to protect the environment. We all realize that it is a very long process. At this point I will withdraw my motion, thank you for your time, and move this, although I do feel that this is a Type 1 action. In hopes that the Board will realize that the ultimate hardship it does place on the applicant, but in toto the effects long term, on this area, that we all live. That all of the information is submitted and properly assessed so that we can make a thorough judgment before passing a resolution one way or the other. So I will put on the floor that this does have a possible environmental impact, and that a draft impact should be done. Ted Dowd - Page 3 from the meeting of July 31, 1986. Trustee Smith: I would like to mention that as far as the water supply it is off site. It has nothing to do with the area with the houses. Trustee Krupski: That's what I wondered, what they want addressed? I was just wondering, obviously these houses will have an impact on the environment. I would like to see something more specific that you want to know more about. I've seen Draft Impact Statements that say nothing, and they don't address the problems. Mr. Dowd: I'm a little taken back. I have talked with Dr. Garrell several times and I did come up here. I had a difficult situation. I met with one gentlemen, I prepared hand outs for them to explain the project to them. Mr. Condit seemed totally satisfied after the meeting in June. Sometime in July I called Mr. Condit to make sure that there was still no problem. By then I called Mrs. Cooper and I said if there is a problem, please call me, I will come back to the state. I have met with the D.E.C. freshwater representative and later a Saltwater representative and went over the project. Later I spoke to the Health Dept. I am a little shocked right now to hear these recommendations. It leaves me in a quandary. I went through the N.Y.S. D.E.C. three times, and the'head of the drinking water section of the Health Dept. and the waste disposal people and I thought a person from the C.A.C. who had no problem. Now I hear this? Dr. Garrell: Maybe I should be the one who is taken back by this. It is one- thing to be the Chairman, but the interim chairman never speaks for the entire council. I think I told Mr. Dowd over the telephone in a number of calls that came in at different times that it is likely that for a project of such magnitude that he would indeed have to go through a hearing process which might infact involve an environmental impact statement. I did not say anything about approval or disapproval. I'm not saying that here now. The whole thing we felt as a Council was that a project deserves better then a summary judgment. The number of houses plus the anticipated effects on Marion Pond, indeed is worth looking at in a long statement. Trustee Bredemeyer: I would like to comment on that? I think in a certain sense to say that whatever course the Board would take, would be a summary action would be understating the role of the Board. Already the role that the C.A.C. has taken and the role of the applicant. I think we all agonize through these things and I think we look at alot of these imputs very directly and we have a very capable Board, as well as the C.A.C. and I don't think we should start to discredit the work amongst ourselves, or even amongst some of the applicants that go through alot of work. I happen to hold with those that don't see much of an impact here, over and above the construction of three of four houses in the larger upland area would be. That's after I agonized over it and looked at it very hard. That's essentially my feelings. Trustee Larsen: It is the lake that I am concerned with. Meeting with someone on the site, and talking with someone on the site, and shaking hands with someone on the site if far different then having figures and facts in front of you to make a decision on. That's my feeling on this. I will let someone make a motion. My second motion was that I feel that A D.E.I.S is needed. Clerk is there a second: No comment. Ted Dowd - Page 4 from the meeting of July 31, 1986 Trustee Smith: Will someone make a motion on this application? Trustee Bredemeyer: I move that the application of Ted Dowd for property located at 350 Rabbit Lane is a Non-Significant Declaration. Trustee Goubeaud: I'll second that. Clerk: All Approved, Trustee Krupski, Aye, Trustee Larsen, Aye, Trustee Smith, Aye, Trustee Bredemeyer, Aye, Trustee Goubeaud, Aye. All Approved This resolution was declared duly adopted. R FIELD REPORT — POLICE DEPT., TOWN OF SOUTHOLD,N.Y. jCentral Complaint No. Hamlet of Occ. Sector Incident Or Crime a Grid No. Day of Occurrence Date of Occ. Time of Occ. Date of Report Thu Ill Name Complaina/ntt Victim D.O.B. ❑ M -ErF '1 �ddress Phone ,I Place of Oc urrence Time Out ' Time In ound Tour P.P.Ztionally Id By Arrest O Yes No �— Cleared w A 5 c e £ae-(vt r,a �j �3 sir' AS k o u .9 z: ed�` S r de— 'r'k 7 5-s I bu-Pfr-;e— Zoa>o:5. Gv a v 9"2fZ�a� 1 ylc�Is PDTS 2 —Continuation Report Attached? ❑ Yes B1015iRting Officer Shield No. Supervisor Form PDTS 9 i . TO: Don Dzenkowski or Kent McCarthy FROM: Trustee Office RE: Determination on the need of a Wetland Permit - Ted Dowd DATE: August 5, 1986 Please make an on site inspection for a determination on the need of a wetland permit as requested by Mr. Ted Dowd for the construction of two homes (Lots No. 036-17-20 and Lot. 036-17-10) Please report your written findings and determination regarding this matter. Thank you. Ilene PfifferMng g Clerk to Trustees ffliv�� TO: Board of Trustees ' Town of Southold .Southold, NY 11971 FROM: Ted Dowd Box 282 Rabbit Lane East Marion, NY 11939 Phone - 477 24O-2. August 1, 1986 The Southold Town Building Dep't (Mr Hindermann) has requested that I have the Board of Trustees check that the houses I intend to build on Lots 036-17-10 and 036-17-20 will be more than 75' from wetlands (Lake Marion) . Attached is the survey of the property along with house dimensions and minimum distances to Lake Marion. The house footprints have been staked on the property. I believe the Bay Constable was present at the July 31, 1986 meeting of the Trustees when the property was discussed under agenda items 9 and 49. During the discussions the point was made that the Trustees had. visited the site and had no problem with building the houses as long as they were more than. 75' from Lake Marion. Since I ' live next to the'.two .lots in question, I would be glad to meet the Constable on the property to answer-.any - questions he might have. Sincerely, r s 1 I i 4 I 00 r - i t - 036-17-20 036-17-10 - ----- T.H. f45 G� I . A b A - a i. n b I I i I RODERICK VAN TUYL, P.C. I LICENSED LAND SURVEYORS TO: Board of Trustees " Town of Southold .Southold, NY 11971 FROM: Ted Dowd Box 282 Rabbit Lane East Marion, NY 11939 Phone - 477 2402 August 1, 1986 The Southold Town Building Dep't (Mr Hindermann) has requested that I have the Board of Trustees check that the houses I intend to build on Lots 036-17-10 and' 036-17-20 will be more than 75' from wetlands (Lake Marion) . Attached is the survey of the property along with house dimensions and minimum distances to Lake Marion. The house footprints. have been staked on the property. I believe the Bay Constable was present at the July 31, 1986 meeting. of the Trustees when the property was discussed under agenda items 9 and 49. During the discussions the point was made that the Trustees had visited the site and had no .problem with building the houses as long as they were more than.. 75' from Lake Marion. Since I:..live-nekt ate the:.two'::1ots in question, I would be glad to meet the Constable on the property to answerl- any.,- questions he might have. `c TO: Board of Trustees Town of Southold Southold, NY 11971 FROM: Ted Dowd Box 282 Rabbit Lane East Marion, NY 11939 July 24, 1986 Dear Board Members, Request a waiver of the Town Wetlands Ordinance to clear out underbrush from the property associated with Wetlands Application No. 319. S ince-re-1-, � � �� �� 3, ��� � � � � G�--P- ��_: �� e d�-� /9 °`n ter- �7 . 3 � �Oi�-, . �-�=� :W YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL ERVATION NUMBER EFfi � VE AT /'•,ii .,-85-0615 Novemher..,22nd.,_.,1985 CILITY/PROGRAM NUMBER(s) PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE(s) Region One Under the Environmental Conservation Law December 31st, 1986 ❑Article 15, Title 5: ❑Article 17, Titles 7, 8: SPDES ❑Article 27, Title 7: Protection of Water ❑Article 19: Solid Waste Management ❑Article 15, Title 15: Air Pollution Control ❑Article 27, Title 9: Water Supply ❑Article 23, Title 27: Hazardous ❑Article 15, Title 15: Mined Land Waste Management Water Transport Reclamation ❑Article 34: ❑Article 15, Title 15: 3&Article 24: Coastal Long Island Wells Freshwater Wetlands Erosion Management ❑Article 15, Title 27: ❑Article 25: ❑Article 36: Wild, Scenic Tidal Wetlands Floodplain Management and Recreational Rivers []Articles 1, 3, 37; 6NYCRR 380: 116NYCRR 608: N—New, R—Renewal, M—Modification Radiation Control Water Quality Certification C—Construction, O—Operation, (If Applicable) t PERMIT ISSUED TO Rabbit Lane Association ADDRESS OF PERMITTEE 19 East Mall, Plainview, New York 11803 AGENT FOR PERMITTEEICONTACT PERSON TELEPHONE NUMBER Charles Luscher 1(516) 643-5800 NAME AND ADDRESSOF FACILITY(If different from Permittee) N/A LOCATION OF PROJECT COUNTY TOWN/CITY/VILLAGE UTM COORDINATES Marion Lake Suffolk Southold DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT/FACILITY Re-install 2" diameter water service to be underground and under the bottom of the lake, as per the plans submitted. GENERAL CONDITIONS By acceptance of this permit,the permittee agrees that the permit is contingent upon strict compliance with the ECL, all applicable regulations and the conditions specified herein or attached hereto. 1. The permittee shall file in the office of the appropriate regional permit administrator,or other office designated in the special conditions,a notice of intention to commence work at least 48 hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify himther promptly in writing of the completion of the work. 2. The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation which may order the work suspended if the public interest so requires. 3. The permittee has accepted expressly,by the execution of the application,the full legal responsibility for all damages,direct or indirect,of whatever nature,and by whomever suffered,arising out of the project described herein and has agreed to indemnify and save harmless the State from suits,actions,damages and costs of every name and descrip- tion resulting from the said project. 4. The Department reserves the right to modify, suspend or revoke this permit at any time after due notice, and, if requested, hold a hearing when: a) the scope of the project is exceeded or a violation of any condition of the permit or provisions of the ECL and pertinent regulations are found; or b) the permit was obtained by misrepresentation or failure to disclose relevent facts;or c) newly discovered information or significant physical changes are discovered since the permit was issued. 5. The permittee is responsible for keeping the permit active by submitting a renewal application,including any forms,fees or supplemental information which may be required by the Department, no later than 30 days(180 days for SPDES or Solid or Hazarduous Waste Management permits)prior to the expiration date. 6. This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant any right to trespass upon the lands or interfere with the riparian rights of others in order to perform the permitted work.or as authorizing the impairment of any rights, title or interest in real or personal property held or vested in a person not a party to the permit. 7. The permittee is responsible for obtaining any other permits, approvals, lands,easements and rights-of way which may be required for this project. 8. Issuance of this permit by the Department does not,unless expressly provided for,modify,supersede or rescind an order on consent or determination by the Commissioner issued heretofore by the Department or any of the terms,conditions,or requirements contained in such order or determination. 9 Any modification of this permit granted by the Department must be in writing and attached hereto. PERMIT ISSUANCE DATE PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR ADDRESS Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 November 22nd, 19851, Charles T. Hamilton Stony Brook New York 11794 AUTHORIZE�SI�jNATU�E (5) X AKA ., ,-� Page 1 of 1 9y ,cAL CONDITIONS F&- "RTICLES 15 (Title 5), 24, 25, 34 and 36 work herein e.r itted ' he wo P ._ in the prosecution of cure operations by the State of New York require an al 14 Any material dredged n in the position of the structure or work herein authorized, or shall be removed evenly,without leaving large refuse piles,ridges across n the opinion of the Department of Environmental Conservation the bed of a waterway or floodplain or deep holes that may have a ,t shall cause unreasonable obstruction to the free navigation of said tendency to cause damage to navigable channels or to the banks of. waters or flood flows or endanger the health, safety or welfare of a waterway. the people of the State, or cause loss or destruction of the natural 15. If any material is to be deposited or dumped under this permit,either resources of the State,the owner may be ordered by the Department to in the waterway or on shore above high-water mark,it shall be deposited remove or alter the structural work, obstructions,or hazards caused or dumped at the locality shown on the drawing hereto attached,and, thereby without expense to the State, and if, upon the expiration or if so prescribed thereon, within or behind a good and substantial revocation of this permit, the structure, fill, excavation, or other bulkhead or bulkheads, such as will prevent escape of the material modification of the watercourse hereby authorized shall not be com- into the waterway. pleted, the owners, shall, without expense to the State, and to such 16. There shall be no unreasonable interference with navigation by the work extent and in such time and manner as the Department of Environmental herein authorized. Conservation may require,remove all or any portion of the uncompleted 17. If granted under Articles 24 or 25, and if upon the expiration or re- structure or fill and restore to its former condition the navigablevocation of this permit,modification of the wetland hereby authorized and flood capacity of the watercourse.No claim shall be made against has not been completed, the applicant shall, without expense to the the State of New York on account of any such removal or alteration. State, and to such extent and in such time and manner as the 11. That the State of New York shall in no case be liable for any damage Department of Environmental Conservation may require,remove all or or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore the site by or result from future operations undertaken by the State for the to its former condition. No claim shall be made against the State of conservation or improvement of navigation,or for other purposes,and New York on account of any such removal or alteration. no claim or right to compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 18 If granted under Article 36, this permit does not signify in any way r 12. That if the display of lights and signals on any work hereby authorized that the project will be free from flooding. is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may 19 All activities authorized by this permit must be in strict conformance be prescribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be installed and with the approved plans submitted by the applicant or his agent as part maintained. of the permit application. 13. All necessary precautions shall be taken to preclude contamination Such approved plans were prepared by of any wetland or waterway by suspended solids, sediments, fuels, solvents, lubricants,epoxy coatings,paints,concrete,leachate or any on other environmentally deleterious materials associated with the project. SPECIAL CONDITIONS Supplementary Special Conditions . . . (A) through (J) , attached; Additional General Conditions . . . 20) All sections of old iron pipe shall be removed and disposed of at an acceptable upland site. 21) All disturbed areas shall be immediately seeded with wild millet. 22) The re-ilzstallation of the pipe under the bottom of the lake shall cause as i little disturbance to the bottom as possible. I i i I cc: Louise Harrison, F&W DEC PERMIT NUMBER 10-85-0615 PROGRAWFACILITY NUMBER Page 2 of 5. Region One 7585 -_10-85-0615 lit UNIPER 1:tL F:`.VIRONML":::',. CGA" t?V.' :;(,N LA" AP ICLE 15, ifTLF 1.) 1,VATF i Rabbit Lane Association 19 East Mall, Plainview, New York 11803 I()t l( g. [.); ..!tt,.I, - -------- ---'--•---------•-- East Marion, Town of Southold, New York Existing water supply facility serving a small cooperative (Homeowners' Association) .of approximately- 30..homes1-_lo cat ed.-.along--,Bay Avenue and-Rabb .t...Lane_,. in.-.East Marion, New York. Water for this system is obtained from two wells each with a pumping capacity._.of-.26__gallons_._T)er minute.. c c)r'!aL:\ITY ^:.Af,1E (City, Town, Village) — ------- T111 om— — — -- Southold ... East Marion---___-_.----- I i[i: tilt FIA CO3MMUNITY ND.T I DAM NO. PERMIT ISSUE DATE Suffolk_ --- _--- _--- — i— -_----� November 22nd, 19E GENERA! CONDITIONS 1. Prior to staring wurl; on any construction auihorizedherein,detailed 1. The Department reserves the right to reconsider t.Il•I- pe, r.^ r.. at a r {,.ar15 of th!' sL"!ciures I1ru;;osr.d to I)e built ai,J sped f,c,:t ions, for such time and after due notice and hearing at that tinie• to [.o:;tlnue, rescind . :,hall 11,:re teen Sabi;il!ed to and ap:;ror('d by the Department. Ther::- incdify this permit in such a manner as may be ieund to be just au(•r t:uch co'lstrt:clion wwk shall be L-mirely rompleled in foil accord- equitable. aI:re with the p:dnS and spr•lific.ctiells ,yiuci: have beef :;o suhniiUed and ;.,�..•_L, S. Granting of this permit does not tell^ve the a;;plirara L:fthi: r^_pn, of ubtainiog any othL:r nrrrr[ssiori, consent of sp;;roval which r,',. be required. tiro. D parh),'!a re';urvt the r);ht to n'scind t,;:s panto: ,r to tale , .Alt'vr•I dulti„ It 1:.1v uccm swiahlo aiid pro -r if Il,c works ;all:iorited 6• As a condition of the issuance of this permit, the at)nllcanl h. it'! to:,sin),;eel !,ervin ire not ini!iateel i)y NIA (Existing accepted expressly, by the execution of the apulicati(,, the full le;, i-;spn.i ihilit>• ioi all uataa{, (!i;e:t or indirect, of hz lev:=r cature, -,-. +. hy' who!".:Ver st:lfered, arising out of the Lroiec; described kcrein -nd is .5. ii'CI,(:" 1_ .�L9 e IhY I:n s until, a ConSL•rva(,o,; t_.lK forbids S the agreed to indemnify and S ve har!111+:ss the Sate fiom nC,[s, act:o❑ cucra:ion of any of ides_ v.yr:-s until, as ccns,cuctsd• they have teen y damages and costs jai :!yery name and de::criplien rer::,;;ii!;{ iron; the oppro•.ed by the :)e!:arh)tenl. SuJ; final apprnvai will lie given linty or. ri!tcii rer,uest. L': general, Such apprnvai %01 rot he :liver un[tl all pro- :Uir� aftcctin}; qt•eli[y of the water and safety of the work;; have begin 7. By acceptance of t:tis permit the peratitte agree:. Owlt`•te peer. i r(:, ,lid trill: in full. +:uc•.fngent upon ;;riot ._onwiiance ,.,,h the -,::r•cial coiidi,i+m, f[)Ilu.,i!: NOTE: Only those special conditions iullow,ng which have been marked apply. SPECIAL CONDITI:)NS ti. Ail land within--. feet of any well shall be protected xx� 11. Before any water from the well(s) may be used for any !)urpos and controlled in 11rder to prevent pollution of the-ground or groundwater after prolonged pumping testis}, the appiicar,t shall have caus,-J a sa.,lr. by direct o:vnL•rr}::a of Ih- !and ur by tfte acquisition of protective ease- of the water from each to be cu:lected and anal;zed, shah have subriii:t, i,rents or other appropriate mea::ire°:. the results of such analyses to the Department and ,hall have b advised by the Department either that the water is of a sati:-.factory "!r Xxi 9• This area shall further be prof+_c(ed from pollution by surface Lary quality or that certain specified treatment or uri(icatio!: the waters originating outside thereof by the construction of suitable divor- necessary. In this last case s::ci; water shall be used only after Lull mu. s+on ditches or embank!nenis and trie [ -velopment of the water :;:,uices pliance with all :.+lhe requirements of the Department. hall be so carried .it that there shall be no opportunity for pollution +•r,terirg the v;au_r sources. El 12. Nothing contained in this permit ,_nd ;ippru;al snarl .;_ het^ authorize the app!irant to su;:piy, seii ur:iistribule t\s;;: :r:r,.i !h,:; _;our xx !d. 'lilt :ity is al pur,.;ing fac i!ities and cunlro'.:; ::.`l;.li.be protected of supply.for any purpose uniess all _cc!) water shall li:s1 L',!c^ I;;' ,i!.:!inst drisa)! or :ainpering either by a fonce of otl;er suitable encloil_re treated and purified by ilisimeclicn (an(,' filtration) in a mann..r sa'isf h)• t!:e!r mannL•r ,s! cp:+;,t url,va and installation. tuiy to the De{arlment. (SEE REVEt:SE SIDE) -�PrCl L 171U�- xx 13. the C,(!par!n;,-f:I re,&rves to require We lak;:;!; of fu.,1wr U. 11'. the ever:; any 01 th, 1 W ary pri.-C a!I I w!.; or IN: further i re at me n I o puril ication J the yi.�td of the wells <:Lcu!J fail below :1111it this -;our(t. Should colld;llurls in. ji:t.,i-e indicate a neilo fur such tee .,hall install an addition,:!.veil ! or IzAe as may he directed by lr�e Deparlr.11r1;1.1_ t P I C t v r I W e shall require an additional pernut, tor %vhi�h a 11lis I)efnl!l 1)) the I)(_,par(m,2nI is made <ubj,,cl the r.-.ade. :w of Iny approval by the (Dulaware) iSusqut,fiar,:ia),Rivef BJ,, ; "',L "!"fl,N..I;I(it may be lequirud under the wovi:,ions of the (D(-11V,-,nr 21. the water supply .cil �ies shall Histail"d er of a rot.idi rua,_cnably equi 'or 11, [)J I C ri'l Is a cot :1 .11 K I v r B., ,:I po c I. r�� a c 0 iln.!- SYSieff). This obligatioi: ,nail be included as a covenant i,,' a I... . .1r,tj idua I i:;ctu,s sha I I bu :)rovidud to measureeasuru all '.cater FLJ);)lied veyiro: ,act lot to the otirchasc-r anJ s-;(Ii covenant :hall fi,,., k- r L r 11.1:vijual -Qceivin�, .;�:­.v;ce from this system. Hasler Ii)eFermiltue to provide a co-inection to the w,lt!,r system V.hi!1l I.,i p: Dater J('L,U;rVd by VIL11 :11,1;1 he ijl�t,ilhq! )[I all -.0-Jr(V':� Of Supply to Ma!'Gre all to III(.. sy,;tcill. 22. llrovisioii,; shall he fliatIL to provido au i:durftldle of v... it those residents whose priv.,t, %,,eli %-.-.:ter systems are, I XxIb. A nm-inl-;ni %%.;ter pressure oi 20 pounds per square inch shall he I I. iencered nun-productive b)' the USC of file wells Jevt!lop(,d bs t!lt: pet,,_ at dil timeb. An auxiliary source of power sha'11 he tee. ;:!w.,,k;l it, a-:sure COnliMM'd ii.eration of :he water supply during pLiriods .,I iric,il power failkirL'. 1- 23. Provisions shall he madtr to mixitiiio vresion during In(: LU111,ijig lion of the project and to prt,-vell, iticcea:IP(l in 17. '.A; alarni :.)';:Vm !,lld:l 1)fr provided with dUI0MatiC signaling body oil or adjacent to the prujuCt. rep.,!; .-Jivn 1;riniary �w!rce vq�iipnwnt mz1functions. 24. Water used for oisinfec!ing midi.., if di!charvt-d to a'ea I%Ir-,,1::; to.' t,!!I, alarm o"Stitnrl shall ',!v submilled to card approved by the L_! must have a chlorine residial not exceeding0.05 mg/1 V point wd—ch LJI)li( Service Cuinnnissior, prior io pl.(iing the vafer supply system in 91;25. Upon cr;nip4-I;:)n of the-on,irUctiov authori/ed by this Permit. XX18. Nothing contained herein shall be field to authorize file p.-!rmittee nierwoment of the taking f upp:ivs of w,iti-r imni It)('SOUTLCk)'0 dU!h1,riZVC1 -11i It. disirlbUtO WDIC!" to 111( other district or service area which has not . . . .ilirea(k bt-un apI;ru%vd by III,- Department or its predecessors without hav- lshnglacili:ivs tnd;cxv,f in misapplit'.11ion do unnecessary to the future operantjot,f?,­ ii,j; it-ceivt-d a further per;nill from. file Department. system be permanently disconnectedfliprefrori,the pit.Ang pluggi.-cl,and arlv so disconnected ano bealed,all in manner to the New'rork Department or Fleapit.*rhe ia(,lines thus ahandonvd shall not again be used tor Since the area to be served by the facilities permitted herein lies water'ZI)ply purposes witlmta d lur;her Pi,rniit from the Dep.irtnieni of wilhi it the 100 year flucid plain and since the porinitice has agreed to Corisvrvation. participate in the Federal Flood Insurance Program, all construction related to this pernii! and all new construction in the area to be served mw,t cornpl-,. with all construction standards v,,hich nnay be developed in implementing the program. NOTE: The following additional conditions are applicable to this permit: 26. Approval is he'reby given for the maintenance and continued operation of the water suppl} system now is existence. Water from this system may only be supplied to existing shareholder as shown on "Water System Layout," dated April 1st, 1985, forming .a part of this application. Any future additions or modifications to the system require a further permit from the Depart- ment. 27. The Department of Environmental Conservation reserves the right to reconsider this approval at any time; and after due notice and hearing, at that time to continue, rescind, of modify this decision in such a manner as may be found to be just and equitable. cc: Doug Picha, NYSDEC Paul Pontoro, SCHD Alternate Reg 1-o—n—a 1 Bldg. 40, SUNY, Room 219 PER.'-flT ADMlNl_-)TRAr0 ti ADDRESS Stony Brook, New York 11794 Charles T. Hamilton P v lit P H o v.S� DETAIL No ScA CE ( 2�F""' 1 Y214 oM ee Pam 4 i. . NCA as � -5 5 c�rfT r 2�I , • � _ _ � -rG SYSTiN f , r,9 00 �A H� Rif B• 1 V.. Ir 119 s P—u b Lct n a OL tit/u�or a ysf�d�, La, f d I /pit .'� 145 Lakeview Terrace PO Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 April 29, 1986 Dear Southold Town Supervisor Frank Murphy Town Councilwoman Jean Cochran Justice Raymond W. Edwards Councilman George Penny IV Councilman James Schondebare Councilman Paul Stoutenberg In the absence of any response to my memorandum of March 01, 1986 and to my letter of April 22, 1986 re : Quality of Water and the Bay Avenue - Rabbit Lane Project and the unprecedented nature of the project, I suggest that the Town Supervisor and Town Board appoint an impartial in- vestigator of the situation. It is unprecedentednthat it is extremely rare for one project to involve trenching of 1200' of Town ROW on Bay Avenue to lay four (4) plastic water sup- ply pipes with an accompanying three (3) wire cable for each supply pipe and to cross a freshwater lake . Does one usual- ly permit trenching before all permits are in order? When the trenching started on Thursday, April 17th, I called the Highway Department to ascertain what was going on. I was told that the Highway Department did not issue trench- ing permits ; that was a function of the Town Clerk's Office. A call to the Town Clerk's Office indicated that the permit did not indicate what was to be trenched and that there was a bridge intervening between the points of trenching, the wellsite on the Schimatz property and Rabbit Lane. What was approved to be trenched? Private water supplies are not usually located on Town ROW. Did not anyone say that this unusual and we should look into it? On page 3 of 4 of my memorandum of March 1st, I stated that as of the end of January 1986 there was no DEC permit on file and that Town wetlands were involved. On page 4 of 4, I asked if consideration would be given to driving pipe under under driveways and Lakeview Terrace entrance. The purpose was to not inconvenience the residents; it would also provide a sleeve . The project was ramrodded and no sleeves were laid. I understand that is one of several violations. In response to my memo, Mr. Lessard, Exec. Adm. of the Building Dept. , responded to Supervisor Murphy on March 7th stating that plastic pipe as a source of water supply is not permitted by law. A copy of Mr. Lessard's memo was routed to the Highway Department and the Trustees. That was March 7th. I received a copy through Supervisor Murphy on April 19th. .1 of 3 i In the light of that information on March t 7 h, how could one authorize trenching with plastic pipe on April 7th? How could one authorize trenching knowing that Town wetlands were involved and there was no Town wetlands per- mit? Mr. Lessard's memorandum and mine indicated that wet- lands were involved. Was it foreordained at that point a Town wetlands permit would be issued? I can well imagine the hullabaloo and law suits J_f a contractor trenched for two (2) miles and then was de- nied a permit to cross wetlands. How come this project started before a wetlands permit was issued? There would be no problem at this time if the Rabbit - Lane Association had granted four (4) more hook-ups to its water system, but . . . . . . . The Rabbit Lane Association stood its ground and determined that its water supply system could serve no more houses. It would be the straw that broke the camel 's back. I feel that the nitrates and phosphates from additional houses will break the lake 's back. How much is too much? Who is going to or is in a position to take a stand? I do not live on the lake', but I visit it at least twice a day. The lake used to- bounce back from road runoff and debris , but no more. It seems incongruous that -the Dowd - Schimatz property on the lakeside of Rabbit Lane is filled in wetlands. Several years ago, fill was dredged from the lake with a crane and a bucket. It was legal at the time. Fill could have been: trucked in, but it was easier to rape the lake. Morally, the residents on the north lakefront thought it was wrong, but. . . The wellsite on the Schimatz property CO is on property con- siderably filled in over the past three years, possibly wet- lands has been involved. Filled in site to filled in site : How closely has the Dowd - Schimatz property been in- spected for plants indigenous to wetlands by the DEC, the Town Trustees or the Building Department? Are there no wet- land plants within 75' of the almost completed Dowd house? I say. "almost" as it is apparent it needs to be backfilled. Who makes the inspections and reports to whom? Verbally or in writing? Who coordinates the information? It has been alleged that "yellow markers" are missing in the trench. Wha inspected the trench before backfilling? Before backfilling a house basement, the Building Depart - ' ment makes an inspection. What other violations are buried in the trench? 2 of 3 Why are four (4) plastic water supply pipes needed to supply four (4) houses with water in a trench on Town ROW, whereas the Rabbit Lane Association has been using one ( 1) pipe to supply several homes? In the light that the Rabbit Lane Association galva- nized water supply pipe was replaced approximately four (4) years ago without a DEC permit and with severe dis- turbance to the wetlands and the lake bottom and the Rabbit Lane Association members have had no problem with water sup- ply, I strongly urge that the pipe remain undisturbed. In my estimation, the Bay Avenue project is ill con- cieved and there are alternatives other than disturbing the lake ; that Town, County, and State agencies and departments have not interacted with one another= and that-no one person or elected/appointed body has been given the authority to approve a project of this nature. A person or a department has the authority to approve part of the project; but there is no one person or agency to determine if the parts fit together. The Suffolk Times article and local gossip are genera- ting terms associated with the project: "passing the buck" , ineptness, incompetence , arrogance, "COA" , assessing blame, lack of coordination, insensitivity, and crisis management. If this project has so many faults on land, how can it even be considered in the water? In a project of this type and scope, there must be a public hearing. Its nature will have an impact on the Town. It may be that the Public Service Commisssion and the Suffolk County Water Authority should be involved. Sincerely yours, -I-t17 r Frank Heroy c.c.zMr. Henry P. Smith, Pres. of Town Trustees Town Trustees Mr. Paul Ponturo, Suffolk County Health Dept. Mr. Dennis Cole, DEC Mrs . Judith Terry, Town Clerk Mr. Victor Lessard, Building Department Mr. Ray Jacobs , Highway Dept. Mr. Mark Middleton, Pres . of Lakeview Terr. Rd. Assoc. Mr. Tim Gould, Suffolk Times 3of3 MEMO FOR THE FILE: RE: Work on Bay Avenue, Orient DATE: April 21, 1986 FROM: Ilene Pfifferling, Clerk to Trustees Please be advised that Mr. Frank Heroy has been into the office . today regarding the work being done on Bay Ave. , Orient. Mr. Gary Tabor is the contractor on the job. He has his permit to do the work on Bay Ave. , however, the road continues to the bridge, and they do not have a wetland permit for this work. Mr. Heroy is quite concerned because the well site. is on the Schmietz property. Mr. Heroy .is quite concerned because he has not recieved a reply from the Trusees regarding this matter. I have advised Mr. Heroy that Mr. Gary Tabor has come into this office today, and I gave him a wetland application to complete and submit. Mr. Heroy wanted to know if this would require a Public Hearing? I advised him that if Mr. Tabor submitted the application and it went through the process, yes a public hearing would be held. Mr. Heroy thought that there should be some communication on the work to be done, such as the Highway Dept. and what information is on the permit for this work. I advised that I was not familiar with the policy of other Depts. and sugguested that he call those offices. -7 -7 l�ra� To: Southold Town Supervisor, Mr. Frank Murphy - Councilwoman, Mrs . Jean Cochran Councilman, Mr. George Penny III Councilman, Mr. James Schondebare Councilman, Mr. Paul Stoutenberg From: Frank Heroy, 145 Lakeview Terrace , East Marion, NY 11939 Date : March 01 , 1986 Subjects : Informational Meeting and Concern for Quality Water This memorandum has been written several times , but never mailed. After reading the February 6th issue of The Suffolk Times relative to the "potential catastrophe" of the Greenport water sy- stem; the February 20 th issue of Newsd,�y - water woes- widespread nitrate and pesticide pollution problems , including the North Fork; and the announcement by the New York State Conservationist that its May - June issue will be devoted exclusively to one subject: WATER,._ I feel so strongly that I can now no longer be silent or wait for something to happen. Since the time I flew combat until my retire- ment as a principal, I have believed in and tried to practice an- ticapatory vigilance . The time has come in East Marion. On January 29th, I attended the Oysterponds Town Board Meeting re : the proposed Master Plan. I arrived at the meeting 30 minutes early so that I could study the map beforehand. Unfortunately, the map was posted only a few minutes before the start of the meeting. A poor start for me . During the meeting, concern was expressed about the unfairness of the proposed five (5) acre zoning in Orient, east of Tabor Road and south of Route 25. The expressions on your faces told me that it was here we go again. It was new to me . I anticipated that a view of the area under discussion would be pro- jected on 'a screen:- overhead projection, slides , or TV monitor. there was nothing. Ruth Oliva did volunteer the information that she thought the .fear of salt water intrusion was the reason. She also mentioned the fear of salt water intrusion in her area. A representative of the League of Women Voters expressed con- o6rfi '•about a proposed article and amendments and the reinsertion of:-Article 22 relative to the protection of the natural resources , including water. I had no idea in the world what she was proposing. Why couldn't the articles and amendments have been projected on a screen? Inasmuch as the Board did not _ participate , I left. the meeting perplexed as to what specific information I gained and what were the truths , lies , and distortions . Instead of the proposed Master Plan making things clearer and simpler, I still visualize layer upon layer of bureaucratic departments and agencies , each giving its understanding and interpretation of the Master Plan. It will be one big game in devising plans to circumvent the Master Plan unless one big foot comes down hard. No! Expressing my feelings about the meeting is not the primary purpose of this memo. About 25 years ago , I started writing to the 1 Of 4 State Senator representing the North Fork and to the Town Super- visor expressing my concern for the maintenance of the quality of the North Fork drinking water. My family summered out here in our cottage and we were then living in Hicksville which was. experiencing difficulties with nitrates in the deep wells . Hicksville, at one time, was a farming community much like the North Fork. I was look- ing at the North Fork where fertilizers and pesticides were being used in farming, as in Hicksville , in a area of shallow wells with no deep aquifier. There was no solution. Homes started to replace farms and the maintenance� of lush lawns has continued to contribute nitrates, phosphates , and pesticides to the shallow aquifier. I still have concerns , but apparently solutions are to be lost in the passage of time : - the slow action and even inaction of town, county, and state governmental departments and agencies , and the poor communication, understandings, planning, and interaction among the same. A glance at the Traveler snd the Suffolk Times indicate to me that you are involved with the Master Plan, the airport, the wineries , ELI Hospital (not yet) , solid waste management, Lilco, methane- generation of electricity, the Peconic Civic Center, the dog pound, and low cost housing along with many other matters . You have tremendous responsibilities and involvement.: I;.: :-ddn't•:!envy you, but I do appreciate you. At most meetings ( town, Bd. of Ed. , water, etc. ) , I hear the comments from the audience that we don' t want to be like Nassau. We in the audience should look around and see how we are contributing to that goal; I see slippage . As a result of rumors in our particular area in East Marion, I conceptualize possible relief to the Orient farmers who may be impacted by the proposed five (5) acre zoning. I don't like the idea If one considers Bay Avenue to run north and south and Rabbit' Lane , east and west, I shall describe the circumstandes . A glance at the attached map or. sketch will orient you. A newly constructed , substantial house stands between Rabbit Lane and the south shore of Marion Lake East. Marion Lake con- sists of 26 acres ; it is not small. It is rumored three (3) more houses will be built for speculation. There is no shallow well source of water in the area as salt water intrusion was noted 40 years ago. The older homes on Rabbit Lane obtain their water through a seasonal, communal water system from a primp approximately 45 ' northeast of the bridge which connects the two parts of the lake . The pump is located on or near a "nitrate hot spot" as indicated on the' Town water map. The plots on Rabbit Lane probably average 5 ' above sea level . It is a low lying area. In severe storms , water from the Bay enters the Lake over some of this property and Bay Avenue itself. Cess- pools are below the level of the Lake . In my judgment, nitrates and phosphates from the waste products of the Rabbit Lane homes are contributing to the deterioration and eutrophication of the Lake more so than the other homes surrounding the Lake as they are 2 of 4 at an elevation of 20' or so. Do these nitrates and phosphates enter the aquifier in the general area? Do they remain in the Lake or do they contaminate the Bay? For the first time in many years of observation, I have seen green scum forming, even under the ice, on both sides of the bridge this early in the year. The bake is fragile. To the north on the east side of Bay Avenue, approximately 35 ' north of the Scmidt - Schimatz garage , one can see well casing, newly installed, projecting above the ground. The rumor is that the new house(s ) and a pump at the casing are to be connected by a pipe . There is a hitch in that the Town bridge between the casing and the house (s ) . By land, it would be a run of approximately 1200' south on Bay Avenue from the pump to Rabbit Lane and then 150 ' and more east on Rabbit Lane to the house(s) . A strong rumor says that the pipi will run down Bay Avenue to the vicinity of the bridge and then will be trenched across the Lake to the houses , a shortcut. (See map. ) I am particularly concerned because of the brazen, roughshod acts of four (4) years ago when the Rabbit Lane Association re- placed its aging, underground galvanized piping with plastic: 1 . Did the DEC or the Town approve the laying of pipe , not trenched , on the lake bottom approximately 25 ' east of the bridge? The DEC officer did not think so as we stood in the bulldozed area of the pumphouse into the phragmites and water. It is wetlands and not a snapping turtle has - climbed the banks since to lay her eggs . 2. Did the Town approve' of the concrete boxes for house water connections which protrude above ground level in the Town right of way on the east side of Bay Avenue and south of the bridge? If someone trips on the box,' who is liable? i' 3. Did and does the Town approve the work where a pipe was trenched across the foot of Bay Avenue , south of Rabbit Lane - Huckleberry Hill? 4. In the matter of communication, why didn't the State Police question the DEC or the Town Police question the Town :High- way about the project as all pass the area on a regular basis? In the present, in granting the building permit for the new house on Rabbit Lane , plot # 1000 - 31 - 17- 9, recorded to Carol Dowd , did the Building Department ascertain the source of drinking water and determine all permits were in order? As the end of January 1986, the DEC did not have an application on file to permit trenching or the laying of pipe in any part of Marion Lake . Town wetlands are involved. _)__of 4 Does one make formal application to the Town Highway Depart- ment to trench and to lay pipe either on Town road or ROW? Must one post a performance bond and show proof of liability insurance before starting a project? Is consideration given to residents along the ROW by driving pipe under driveways and roads instead of the attitude of trenching when one wants to do so and then filling in at some indefinite time in the future in a sloppy manner? It does seem ludricous that the Town and its departments would grant someone permission to build a house on a plot with salt water intrusion, to connect to a water source at a considerable distance so that nitrate contaminated water may be avoided , to con- tribute nitrates and phosphates into the lake and aauifier which many other homes are using, and to pump water from an inland po- sition which will hasten salt water intrusion into areas south of the well. Does the scenario include the possibility of all Rabbit Lane homes joining the system? Will the Town Board condone , foster, or encourage the practice of establishing a bodge - podge of small and large, independent water systems hopping over one another always inland for a source of good water? If so, why can't the proposed five (5) acre zoning in Orient be reduced to Two (2 ) with a covenant that the water source be north of Route 25? If density is related to water supply, I think that we are saturated in this area. I look to the Town Board to protect the quality of my drinking water, whatever it is , and my enjoyment of the wildlife on, in, and above Marion Lake . Sincerely, Francis A. Heroy Enc. Sketch of a section of East Marion u. c. Robert Tasker, Esq . - Southold 'town Attorney Carol Dowd , 201 - 13th St. East, Tierra Verde , Florida 33715 Mr. Charles Hamilton, DEC, Regional Alternate Permit Administrator Mr. Victor Lessard , Town Building Department Mr. Ray Jacobs , Supt. of Highway Dept. ✓Mr, Henry P. Smith, Pres . of Town Trustees Mr. '.-ark Middleton, Pres . of Lakeview Terrace Road Association 4 of '4 a ate-- - /1i1�1i�<��tl �1.20D �I�AGB�T IA,�E �., �11440�v M, �o ;�fcL coi'1C- M6hr Mom' Pu�rP �a a14W I*U-f- AI64vs� , 1 1 C C/.. Page 3 OLD BUSINESS: Jeanne Marriner suggested, at 'some time, someone should contact an attorney (possibly retired or someone from out of town) to aid in drawing up changes to the Town Ordinances . These changes then could be presented to the Town Board for approval. Some of the issues she feels should be addressed are lawn sprinkling and its effects with saltwater intrusion, and changes along those lines . Martin Garrell stated Councilman Paul Stoutenburgh would like the CAC to send a letter to the Town Board regarding the sensitivity of the Sebastian Cove area. Jeanne Marriner will draft the letter. NEW BUSINESS : Jeanne Marriner attended a meeting with the Shelter Island CAC, Shelter Island Supervisor, .Dave Newton and Ruth Oliva concernig ground water and waste disposal . This group is planning a media blitz to educate the public and if the program - _ is successful they may need Southold CAC ' s help in the future. WETLAND APPLICATIONS RECOMMENDATIONS Wetland Application No. 319 of Ted Dowd is still tabled. A letter was sent to Mr. Dowd requesting his presence at a future meeting to ;.answer questions concerning his application . Wetland Application No . 333 of Dr. Vincent Claps remains tabled until a letter by John Holzapfel is sent and action is taken b r y.'the applicant . On a motion made by Martin Garrell, seconded by Ralph Condit it was RESOLVED to table Wetland Application No. 335 of John J. Newman to drive pilings to shore up existing garage and second story to be added. The Council feels it must table this matter pending approval of the two story garage. It appears two story buildings go against the deed and covenants. If the garage receives approval then questions will be asked re: Cesspool capacity and loading increase re: Pilings If the second story of the garage is not approved, then it is not clear if pilings are necessary. It is not clear that the garage is not currently safe - simply repair the cracks in the floor. Rip rap looks sound as is . Vote of Council: Ayes : Martin Garrell Ralph Condit Heather Cusack John Holzapfel Abstain: Jeanne Marriner Motion carried. United States Soil r� Department of Conservation 127 East Main Street Agriculture Service Riverhead, New York 11901 February 14, 1986 Mr. Stanley A. Pauzer, District Manager Suffolk County Soil & Water Conservation District 127 East Main Street Riverhead, New York 11901 Dear Stan: I have reviewed the application and inspected the site owned by Ted Dowd, as re- quested. There is some confusion on the application as to exactly what the appli- cant is proposing. On the Town Trustees permit form the applicant is requesting a permit to build two single family residences on pilings, 30 feet from Orient Harbor,.. (Gardiners Bay). On the Town of Southold Environmental Assessment Form the appli- cant' s description of the project is to build a single family residence on pilings, 30 feet from Orient Harbor (Gardiners Bay) . The New York State Department of En- vironmental Conservation Permit describes the project as follows: Construct a single family dwelling on south side of Rabbit Lane approximately 19 feet landward of Orient Harbor (Gardiners Bay). Install sanitary system for this lot on appli- cant's property on the north side of Rabbit Lane, approximately 150 feet landward of mean high water and 125 feet of Lake Marion. Construct the single family dwell- ings with decks on the north side of Rabbit Lane approximately 50 feet south of Marion Lake. Sanitary systems for three northerly lots will be located between houses and Rabbit Lane approximately 125 feet south of Marion Lake and 150 feet landward of mean high water. The attached survey shows four lots owned bil the applicant, thus I- assumed that the D.E.C. permit project description was accurate. All of my comments are based upon this assumption. The lot bearing Suffolk County tax map designation 31 - 17 - 9 has a newly constructed home on it. The septic system had not been installed, the date of my visit Feb- ruary 6, 1986. The Soil Survey of Suffolk County identifies the soil on these parcels as being Fill Land Dredged Material (Fd) . A copy of the soil map and description is included for your review. An onsite investigation verified this fact. The water table was found to be at a depth of 3.5 feet below the surface within the area of the proposed septic systems. The project is located within the 100-year flood plan boundary as indicated on the Flood Insurance Rate Map for the Town of Southold. There is the potential of com- plete flooding of the land area causing the systems to fail and discharge into Lake Marion and Orient Harbor. OThe Soil Conservation Service SCS-AS-1 is an agency of the 10-79 Department of Agriculture Mr. Stanley A. Pauzer - 2 - February 14, 1986 The proposed septic systems may have an impact due to the high water table con- dition. The sandy nature of the soil material will allow the effluent to move rapidly into the groundwater and then laterally into either Marion Lake or Orient Harbor. Table One of the Nonpoint Source Management Handbook developed under the direction of the Long Island Regional Planning Board identifies the most significant known contaminants associated with on-site systems and the resulting surface water problems. The proposed development area is located within Hydrogeologic Zone IV as identified in the Long Island Comprehensive Waste Treatment Plan. The zones are land areas that recharge either deep aquifers or shallow aquifers and/or discharge zones. Article 6 of the Suffolk County Sanitary Code, Realty Subdivisions and Developments states that the minimum lot requirement for new homes with septic systems for all areas outside Hydrogeologic Zones III and VI is 20,000 square feet. In this pro- ject, the applicant proposes to install two septic systems on lot 10 which is 17,478 square feet in size, and one septic system each on lots 9 and 20 which are 19,430 square feet and 18,656 square feet in size respectively. If you have any questions or I may be of further assistance, please feel free to call on me. Sincerely, Allan S. Connell, District Conservationist Attachments l� COUNTY OF SUFFOLK '' '= [ED- D uJ PETER F.COHALAN f SUFFOLK COUNTY EXECUTIVE SOIL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT STANLEY A. PAUZER DISTRICT MANAGER February 14, 1986 Mr. Henry P. Smith, President Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 Dear Mr. Smith: I am forwarding to you a report on the "Ted Dowd Wetland Application No. 319," as you requested. This report was prepared by Allan Connell of the U.S.D.A. Soil Conservation Service and it raises many questions. If you desire any fur- ther information, please contact me. Very truly yours, r, Stanley A. Pauzer, District Manager 127 EAST MAIN STREET RIVERHEAD.NEW YORK 1 1901 (51 6)727-231 5 CC: C,4f_` 1 'ONE B4 � : ZONE B ' ZONE C . . F n t P ' Po ZONE B ZONE B ZONE B _ p ZONE B CEMETERY O AVENUE ' r � _ AVENUE BAY s x. r ZONE B �t5 LANE N ZONE C r ZONE B ZONE B ?O SYLVAN D R I E ZONE B ORCHARD ROAD .5 A RM13 > q: O'er KNOLL 'ANT O CIRCLE 0 F> a O ZONE B $ �" .aZ4. E "k O w t` r Y O Z CEDAR O LANEO)� F GILLETTEg * GILLETTE77, _ MIOLAN'D r c :PLACE- 0 . O. - MANOR KEY TO MAP 500-Year Flood Boundary r ZONE B s 100-Year Flood Boundary - _ 3• Ae ( �ON� l1 Zone Designations*With Date of Identification e.g.,12/2/74 100-Year Flood Boundary 500-Year Flood Boundary. t` ) I I Base Flood Elevation Line 513 With Elevation In Feet** Base Flood Elevation in Feet (EL 987) Where Uniform Within Zone** Elevation Reference Mark RM7X Zone D Boundary l I River`Mile •M1.5 **Referenced to the National Geodetic Vertical Datum of 1929 *EXPLANATION OF ZONE DESIGNATIONS r ZONE EXPLANATION # A Areas of 100-year flood; base flood-.elevations and 4 flood hazard factors not determined. I AO Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths } are between one (1) and three(3)feet;average depths of inundation are shown, but no flood hazard factors' are determined. AH Areas of 100-year shallow flooding where depths are between one (1) and. three (3) feet; base flood elevations are shown, but no flood hazard.factors j are determined. Al-A30 Areas of 100-year flood; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. A99 Areas of 100-year flood to be protected by flood protection system under construction; base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. B Areas between limits of the 100-year flood and 500- year flood;or certain areas subject to 100-year flood- ing with average depths less than one(1)foot or where the contributing drainage area is less than one square mile;or areas protected by levees from the base flood. (Medium shading) C Areas of minimal flooding.(No shading) D Areas of undetermined, but possible, flood hazards._ V Areas of .100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors not determined. VI-V30 Areas of 100-year coastal flood with velocity (wave action);base flood elevations and flood hazard factors determined. NOTES TO USER Certsin areas not in the special flood hazard areas(zones A and V) may be protected by flood control structures. This map is for flood insurance purposes only;it does not neces- sarily show all areas subject to flooding in the community or all planimetric features outside special flood hazard areas. For adjoining map panels, see separately printed Index To Map Panels. Coastal base flood elevations shown on this map include the effects of wave action. Coastal base flood elevations apply only landward of the shoreline shown on this map. FILL LAND DREDGED MATERIAL Fill land, dredged material (Fd), is made up of areas that have been filled with material from hydraulic or mechanical dredging operations. These operations are used mainly to widen or deepen boat channels in salt water; however, some dredged material has been obtained from new channels cut into tidal marshes. Most of the dredged material is pumped onto tidal marshes. Smaller amounts are placed on beaches and dunes and on nearby mineral soils in a few places. The practice generally is to dike an area by using onsite material. The dredgings are then pumped into the diked area and allowed to settle. Excess water drains back into the bay. After the water drains off, heterogeneous deposits of sand, gravel and sea shells remain. In many places a dark-gray silty mud remains. Pro- tective dunes have been built with clean sand and gravel dredgings in some places, and in such places a few naturally formed dunes are included in mapping. Fill land, dredged material, is not suited to farming. Areas are satisfactory for building sites where the fill is adequate and if the highly compressible organic layers in the tidal marshes are removed prior to filling. Areas where the fill is placed on marshes containing thick organic layers are likely to be unstable and need onsite investigation before building on them. Droughtiness, low fertility and high salt content severely limit the establishment of lawns and other landscape plantings. Cesspools do not function properly where the ground water is at a shallow depth. Capability unit not assigned; woodland suitability group not assigned. TABLE 1 U Impacts of Pollutants From On-Site Systems Upon Surface Waters and Groundwater CONSTITUTENT PROBLEM Groundwater(Drinking Water) Surface Water 1. Nitrate-Nitrogen High concentrations of nitrate have been known to High concentrations of nitrate- produce a bitter taste.Water containing nitrogen nitrogen may be a problem in as NO3 in excess of 45 ppm has been reported to marine waters. cause methemoglobinemia in infants. 2. High Phosphate NONE Eutrophication may result if there is Concentrations sufficient concentration of phosphorus in fresh surface waters from sources such as on-site systems and fertilizers, 3. Lead,Tin, Iron,Copper, These constituents are toxic in excessive Zinc, Manganese concentrations 4. Chloride, Sulfate These constituents can present health hazards to some individuals ranging from laxative effects to aggravated cardiovascular or renal disease, if con- centrations exceed recommended limits. 5. Foaming Agent A nonbiological detergent constituent and an in- Causes foaming in surface waters. dicator of contamination. Appearance and taste of the water may be unacceptable. 6. Biochemical Oxygen , In extremely localized situations, ex- Demand cessive BOD in septic fluid discharged to surface water can deplete dissolved oxygen supplies necessary to aquatic life. 7. Chemical Oxygen Same as above Demand S.Sodium Impacts freshwater species 9.Synthetic organic chemicals, in- These constituents found principally in cesspool cluding 1.1.1 tricholoethane, additives are suspected carcinogens. tetrachloroethylene, tri- chloroethylene and chloroform (halogenated hydrocarbons) 10. Bacteria and Viruses associated Some private wells may contain significant Failing systems may contribute to with the presence of fecal amounts of pathogens high total coliform counts. coliform Bacteria'and virus may cause disease in humans. Problems in- clude gastro-intestinal illnesses and rashes. The blank areas in the above table indicate a lack of identification of a problem-constituent interface. Items 3,4, and 9 have not been identified as having an impact upon surface waters and items 6 and 7 do not affect groundwater. 4 1'4-12-4(3/82) - �� NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL'CONSERVATION l i ` NOTICE OF COMPLETE APPI,CATION Applicant: "'a�l� O;dD I I r I nr,, 2 a ' 12 1 �..g�} ; A ! ULU 7 3 201Address: 13ti S East - - - TU ierra Verde, _F•icrida 33715 Permits applied for and application number(s)': 1Q-84-135a T, Tidal wetl3nds and Freshwater.,Wetlands Project description and location..Town/City-of Southold County of. Su.f_folk. . Construct 'a sir_ le .f . g family dwelling on south side of .Rabbit Lane approximately .19' landward 'of mean high water .. (Gardiners Bay) .. .In' tal-I sanitary system for this,lot on' applicant's property. .on .the north side of. Rabbit Lane, approximately. 150' landward. of. .mean liigh .water .and 125° south'.of Lake -Marion. Construct three, single family dwellings. with decks- on north* side of :Rabbit Lane,- approx. 50' south of Marian Lake. San;Lary systems for three northerly, lots will be located between houses and Rabbit Lane, approximately 1251.. souti of .Marion Lake'and 1301 landward of. mean. high .hater. Approximately.500 cubic yard3. of clean fill will. be trucked .in for the sanitary systems and to .be nlac d within 15` of the base .of ,three houses on the northerly lots . .Project is located on. the north .and south• sides of Rabbit Lane, Marion Lake d** SEQR UEURrCi NATION:.(check appropriate box) **Gardiners Bay, East .Marion ❑ SEQR-1 Project is not subject to SEQR.because it is an exempt, excluded or a Type II action. ❑ SEQR-2 Project is a Type I action; it has been determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. A Negative Declaration has been prepared and is on file.. D6EQR-3 Project is an unlisted action; it has been determined that the project will not have a significant'effect on the environment. ❑ SEQR-4 A draft environmental impact statement has been prepared on this project and is on file. ❑ SEQR-5 .A final environmental impact statement has been prepared on this project and is on file SEQR LEAD AGENCY New fork State Dept. of Environmental Conservation 'AVAILABILI FOR. PUBLIC COMMENT: Applications may be reviewed at'the address listed below. Comments on the project must be submitted to the Contact Person indicated below by no later than 1/1 9S CONTACT PERSON: Ms. Karen Chytalo (NYS DEC) Bldg. 4J , SUNY . Stony Brook, N. Y. 11794 751-7900 TO THE APPLICANT: 1 . THIS IS NOT A PERMIT 2. This is to advise you that your application is complete and a review has commenced.Additional information may be requested from you at a future date, if deemed necessary, in order to reach a decision on your application. 3. Your project is classified MAJOR.Accordingly,a decision will be made within 90 days of the date of this Notice. If a public hearing is necessary,you will be notified within 60 days and the hearing will commence within 90 days of the date of this notice. If a hearing is held,the final decision will be made within 60 days after the hearing is completed. 4. Publication of this Notice in a newspaper is: Ik required ❑ not required If required, please consult the accompanying transmittal letter for further instructions. CC: Chief Executive Officer Supervisor of Town Environmental Notice Bulletin, Room 509, 50 Wolf Road,Albany, N.Y. 12233-0001 File —Trustee3, USFiiv fi CHiEF EXECUTIVE OFFICFR - - DEPTH BELOW LOW WATER �1 YARDS TO BE EXCAVATED C� YARDS TO BE FILLED O WIDTH OF CANAL , CREEK OR BAY FRONTING PROPERTY 0 UA DEPTH AT LOW- TIDE io FN W A 7-FR AVERAGE RISE IN TIDE--- DISTANCE TO THE NEAREST CHANNEL-----Q----FT. DISTANCE PROJECT EXTENDS BEYOND SIMILAR PROJECTS IN THE . AREA O -----FT. is THIS FOR PRIVATE OR BUSINESS USE?__pr y y z��------------------------- AREA ZONING MANNER IN WHICH MATERIAL WILL BE REMOVED OR DEPOSITED ---- INTENDED USE OF PROP ERT Y --------------------------------- DESCRIBE ANY KNOWN PRIOR OPERATIONS CONDUCTED ON THE PREMISE—No2�------- ---------------------------------------------------------------------- AND WHETHER ANY PRIOR LICENSE OR PERMITS HAVE BEEN ISSUED TO ERRECT STRUCTURES OR TO DREDGE OR DEPOSIT FILL ON SAID PREMISES AND WHETHER ANY PERMITS OR LICENSES WERE EVER SUSPENDED OR REVOKED BY A GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY ---------------- DESCRIBE FULLY THE REHABILITATION AND PROPOSED CONDITION OF THE PREMISES AFTER THE WORK IS COMPLETED INCLUDE AN ADDITIONAL SURVEY OF THE PROJECT SITE IF NECESSARY--���— a4���_ -------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------------------------------ WRITTEN CONSENT OF THE OWNER OF THE PROPERTY, IF NOT THE SAME AS THE- APPLICANT. ----------------- -------- ------------------------------------------------------- TELEPHONE (516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD Town Hall, 53095 Main Road P.O. Box 728 Southold, New York 11971 APPLICATION IS HEREBY MADE TO THE TOWN TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, SUFFOLK COUNTY, NEW YORK FOR THE ISSUANCE OF A PERMIT PURSUANT TO THE LAWS, ORDINANCES AND REGULATIONS GOVERNING THE COASTAL AND INTERIOR WETLANDS, FLOOD PLAINS AND DRAINAGE AREAS OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD, AND THE ISSUANCE OF. PERMITS PURSUANT TO CHAPTER 32 OF THE CODES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. APPL I CAT I ON NO. _3 I ------DATE OF APPLICATION 7G S 2 5'?.v • IDENTITY OF APPLICANT_--- —�� �I ----_-----PHONE NO ADDRESS OF APPLICANT ----- 56 ri Tin'o /d �y /�97f TAX MAP NO. AGENT / PHONE NO. PERMIT REQUESTED TO—&i Ld a_y /�-- s. . /�G j/�Ch �e dh i 1, LOCATION OF PROPERTY FOR WHICH PERMIT WANTED 3 5 D HOME ADDRESS OF PERMIT APPLICANT IF DIFFERENT FROM AFORESAID LOCATION CREEK, BAY OR HARBOR FRONTING PROPERTY. Dr-ies, a �a1^ S 1 ZE OF PROPOSED WORK / 3 ?O � LENGTH ------Z�-1....------------------------------------------------- WIDTH 3 0 HEIGHT ABOVE 'HIGH WATER 1� PART II Environmental Assessment (To be completed by Agency) A. Does action exceed any Type I threshold in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.12? If yes,coordinate the review process and use the FULL/LONG FORM EAF. ❑ Yes ❑ No B. Will action receive coordinated review as provided for Unlisted Actions in 6 NYCRR, Part 617.71 If No,a negative declaration may be super by another involved action. ❑ Yes ❑ No C. Could action result in ANY adverse effects on,to,or arising from the following:(Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality,surface or groundwater quality or quantity,noise levels,existing traffic patterns,solid waste production or disposal,potential for erosion, drainage or flooding problems?Explain briefly: C2. Historic,archeological,visual or aesthetic,or other natural or cultural resources;agricultural districts;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: C3. Vegetation or fauna, movement of fish or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species? Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or intensity of use of land or other natural resources? Explain briefly. d C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action? Explain briefly. C6. Secondary, cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-C6? Explain briefly. C7. A change in use of either quantity or type of energy? Explain briefly. PART III Determination of Significance (To be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS:. For each adverse effect identified above, determine whether it is substantial, large, important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its(a)setting(i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c)duration;(d)irreversibility;(e)geographic scope; and(f)magnitude. If necessary, add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain Sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL/LONG FORM EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. ❑ .Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide here, and on attachments as necessary, the reasons supportng this determination: Agency Name Agency Preparer's Name Preparer's Signature,,Title Date BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES. TOWN- ..OF- .SOUTHOLD SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM • Project Information (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) • 1. Applicantisponsor 2. Project Name / r_d LVK J/ii le- �"Z ryiil /2;,, to C-E 3. Project location: 1 A�Municipality z County S u � 4. Is proposed action: EJNew ❑ Expansion ❑ Modification/alteration • 5. Describe project briefly: f 130-r U r Hry T7s.r, ,ly P` dPivl.e� 6. Precise location(road intersections,prominent landmarks,etc.or provide map) 3 So /7�z��i L 2g e S'gG tG�.2 n ' 7. Amount of land affected: Initially a lia acres Ultimately 12 acres 8. Will proposed action comply with existing zoning or other existing land use restrictions? CR Yes ❑ No If No,describe briefly 9. What is present land use in vicinity of project? ICJ Residential ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Agriculture, ❑ Parkland/open space ❑ Other Describe: $rn ql� F"z�„ly IReSr d �hc�s 10. Does action involve a permit/approval,or funding,now or ultimately, from any other governmental agency(Federal,state or local)? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, list agency(s)and permit/approvals Ny 17EC Pe n>>f. Nr Ib-gy -1355 11. Does any aspect of the action have a currently valid permit or approval? ® Yes ❑ No If yes, list agency name and permit/approval type Y. 12. As result of proposed action will existing permit/approval require modification? ❑ Yes Z No CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE 15 TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant/sponsor name: rV D o w C Date: Signature: COUNTY OF SUFFOLK ) STATE OF NEW YORK ' ) SS: BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND SAYS THAT HE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS., AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF , THAT THE WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER' SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT, IF GRANTED. ._•__�_. S I_GNURE OF APPLICANT' SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS (per DAY OF , 19 LINDA J.COOPER NOTARY PUBLIC,State of New York No.4822563,Suffolk County Terst as March 30, 19 NOTAR PUBLIC EXAMINED APPROVED "WETLANDS" PERMIT (CHAPTER 97) APPROVED "BOAT, DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) DISAPPROVED "WETLANDS PERMIT"CHAPTER 97) DISAPPROVED "BOATS, DOCKS, WHARVES" PERMIT (CHAPTER 32) CONDITIONS, IF ANY EXAMINING BODY SIGNATURE OF CHAIRMAN COMPUTATION OF FEES Approved 2/27/85 To: Board of Town Trustees Town Hall a Southold, NY 11971 �3 0 -7 � September 23, 1985 From: Ted Dowd Box 106 Southold, NY 11971 765 2494 Dear Board Members, Attachment One is the application to construct a single family waterfront home on Rabbit Lane in East Marion. The home is to be built on pilings to preserve the natural environment.,-bf the beach area although the majority of the waterfront homes in the area have been built using bulkheads and jetties. In addition there are several other factors you might consider in your deliberations. 1. The process for obtaining a New York State DEC permit began in October 1984 and took considerable time due to survey, inspection and administrative requirements. The final DEC permit is located at Attachment Two. 2 . A vacant land certificate of occupancy is located at Attachment Three. 3. The survey at Attachment Four reveals that the proposed home conforms to those homes located in the area. A new home is under construction closeby and has received the necessary approvals to construct. Sincerer, 6. Approximate percentace of proposed project site with slopes: 0-10% ✓Z; 10-15" :; 15: or • greater 7. Is project contiguous t or contain a.building or""site listed on the National Register of- Historic Places? Yes r�No S. .What is the depth to the water table? 9. Do hunting or fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Yes " `No 10. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or' :.end3neared - Yes t/ tlo, according to - Identify each species 11. .Are there any unique or u�uai land forms an the project site? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, other geologic formaticns - Yes No. -(Describe __......... 12. . Is the project site presently used.by the M=unity or neighborhood area - Yes No. as an open space or recreation . . _ .13. .Does the present site offer or include scenic views or.vistas known to be important to.the^eoaunity Yes i-No =a_ T4. Streams within or contiguous to project area: • - • . a. Names of stream and name of river to which it is tributary. 15. Lakes, Ponds, 'Wetland areas within or centiguous to project area: a. Name b. Size (in acres) 16. What_is-t-he-donfaan4a and zoning classification within a 1/4 mile radius of the project (e.g single family residential, 11-4 and the scale of development (e.g. 2 story). .. 8. PROJECT DESCRIPTIOfI •. v •1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in 'dimensions as appropriate) - a. Total contiguous acreage owned by.project sponsor 1 2 acres. b. Project acreage developed: o acres initially; n of acres ultimately. e. Project acreage to remain.undeveloped _ - d. Length of project, in miles: (if approp-riate) •--•-• e. If project is an expansion of existing, indicate percent of expansion proposed: building square fc age developed acreage - w..._.... " f. Nu-her of off-str_et parking spaces existing proposed , F g. Naxirm=i.vehicular trips generated per hour ,Ool (upon completion of project) .t h. If. residential: Nurber and type of housing units: - One'Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium • Initial r� Ultinate / Orientation NeiShhoriood-City-Regional Estimated Employment Cear.;e rci a l . Industrial J• Total .height'of tallest proposed Structur ''''"''• _ e 3v feet. '.•..�_��r. TO M OF S OUTHOLD i ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — PART I PROJECT INFORMATION s doc:--merit s designed to as-list. in deter=Ining anecer --!%e action propased Tay have a 'argnlriCant 1n the envircnment_ Please car.:olata no ?ntire 3at1 4zhe_C.' nrtSaPrS t0 these ;ue5tions iiil be cnnsiaersf of ,: as par: of Vie aooiication for approval and may be suoj___�.-- to ri.irther ve•••i,'icltiort and Public review. Provide :any adaitiortal information you believe will be needed :a ccirolzte ?ARTS 2 ana 3. �a •:;:`:. ;:': :::<<' .- i: is _xce::_d teas ccmoletipn oir the EAF will be dependerrc'-3n insarnratiam currently available' and +i11 not 'nvolve new Studies, rasearz or investigation. I. infor•-amort repuir-Tng such aadi:ional Cori: is_unava'.abl:. --•: ;^ria tndicata and sae=i:y zeta instancz. +ItA VS IF p40JEC': r r, 9A"E :;IO .4CCR_TS OF ^,'+rNER (Ti' 01-:e.ont) - s, A001ES3 a710 :IX E OF Apo;TCAMT: 3Creet; (Staca)-77 l.ial Q. by :44 ' ,. ;,.:..: •.,,,--__...:. �", .7�:S= �:.�:-tom..-::,..��'•" :•' '- ";. : . .. '. ;.. , . .. .•O.. .. -<::: - : :. _. 9£ 3►.r?r IF 000;E.- (Briefly describe type of project ar action) �. (PLZ;SZ CCiMPLEic EACH �t1E��►Ja - :ndiclt_ a.A. ti< not apolicapla) ;r �.:: wA. PT;0? ;ait". _ . (ih;:siC11 a2C:.�� or ove'nil Project. both develoce- and undevelcoed area ;-i;'•s�s;� z�: i"a'�?ii+% '' �••... . " '• i. Garter_1 c:�arac=_r of the land: Generaily'unifar.; 'v slaae 52neraily uneven and rolling ar_irr'sgutat. 'Jr-sent 'and lse: Urban Industriai Co=erc:ai SUDurpan Rurai' �are5t ' - Agriculture Or-ner J. 7pt11 acreage a. zroject area: •.2cr_s. Approximate acreage: Presently After Completion Presently Af t_r CcmPleti ,vesdcw or 3rusnland _2L cres .OS _cres Yat=r Sur!aca :.ra D ac-:s O acr !_-.Zs .,nv_-_ at_d ;^cx, - • ear:a or fi11; 52 =c:-'!s ,ci_�icr Aar:cul::rsl O scr®s O ^rea ;cads. '301dir.?s :'.esl:rc '-r-s,Nat2r or art .--er.'nvea ric!: SS•:er 3Cr type) _-•L_:c-es O acr is ore,=*nant soil •ype(s) on ora;xs .;::=: 5a- , J� 3. a. Are :.`.er> bear-:cz :uc:ro:Pings cn :nja== s:::? des ✓ -io �. that is tact ; n _ -_ 3W13 - •- . ._i: ._._..-___ _ " ... 'r+�% • v•y'T.�;i-«..ti��.y��!•SY„!�f_ � .�.ti_ 26. Approvals: a. Is any Federal permit required? Yes b. Does project involve State or Federal funding or financing? Yes �No - C• Local and Regional approvals: Approval Required '"`'''' " Submittal Approvz (Yes, PIo) (Type) (Date) (Date' City, Town, Village Board ^,n" City, Town, Village Planning Board ;. J 0 -City, Town, Zoning Board - Jre5 Kir,:a City, County Health Department �� R-e,4,.t _ Other local agencies ;"r,;s te_e 1 Other regional agencies State Agencies y esNy Oc=c o s Federal Agencies Lv� C. INFO;LwATIGR.IL DETAILS - . '... Attach any additional information.as irayl_he..needed-tp clarify your project. If there are or may be an3 adverse impacts associated with .th `scus.s such impacts and the measures which can be taken to mitigate or avoid them \f . ' PREPARER'S SIGNATURE: TITLE: • , . . ... REPRESMUNG: _ ` DATc 5l1 �� ,.2. Now much natural mat_riai (i.e. rack, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site - O tans . - N •� : O cubic 3. Now many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site - �_aeres. 4. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or 'other locally-important vegetation be removed by thi project,? Yes ✓Na S. Are there any plans for re-vegetation to replace that removed during construction? V--Yes g p p of construction 'months, (including demolition).. 6. If single hale project: Anticipated period ,. ~- - 7. I.f multi-phased project: ,a. Total number of phases anticipated No. - - -•= b. Anticipated date of ment phase ] month -____wear (inc]ud .. demolition) e. Approximate completion date final phase month _year. d. Is phase I financially dependent an subsequent phases? Yes _ S. Will blasting occur during constriction? Yes 9.' Humber of jobs generated: during construction ,��: after project is complete U 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project f7 - 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? Yes LNo. 'If yes. explain. 12. a. --Is surface or subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? Yes ✓ No. b. If yes, indicate type of waste (sayrage, industrial, etc.) e. If surface disposal name of stream into which effluent will be discharged 13. Will surface area of existing lakes, ponds, screens, bays or other surface waterways`be increased o: decreased by proposal? Yes.- ✓No. - 14. Is project or any portion or project located in the 100 year flood plain? des No 15. a. Does project involve disposal of solid waste? ✓Yes No b. If yes, will an existing solid waste disposal facility be used? ✓ Yes No C. If yes, give name: S co EJ c S,r��,., . ; location d. :•till any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or.. into a sanitary landfill? ,r Yes 16. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? Yes �40 17. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? Yes r✓No 18. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambience noise levels? Yes f✓ No 19. 'dill project result in an increase in energy.use? ✓Yes No. If yes, indicate type(s) 20. If water supply is from wells indicate pumping capacity `f 5 gals/minute. 21. Total anticipated water usage ;er day __ /�. 9als/day. - 22. Zoning: a. What is dcminant 'Zoning class ificsticn:of site? _ i�er.l :<� � / 5,, le "C; b. Current s;ecific zoning classification of site e.- Is proposed use consistert Frith ,jresent zoning d. If no, indicata desired zoning „!;ALL TO fUIE,lIIAL l,Hfl �:;i%n�i �c• !0DERATE LARGE. REDUCED 24.. , 1;tP CT Tl'I'?CT PROJECT CHAMME _ Construction in a designated floodway. Other impacts: :0 YES 2.. WILL THERE BE AN, EFFECT TO ANY UNIQUE OR UtUSUAL LAND F11R1•1S �� POUND` 011 THE SITE? (i.e. cliffs, dunes, geological forma- tions etc.) _ Specific land forms: IMPACT 0'4 WATER NO YES 3. WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY WATER BODY OESiGfATr0 AS PROTECTED? (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Envirr��� ...0 0 onmental Conservation Law, E.C.L.) Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a protected stream. Construction in a designate; freshwater or tidal wetland. r Other impacts: T--' 4, WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY NON-PROTECTED EXISTING OR NEW NO YES BODY OF WATER? ............................................0 O Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 A lop increase or decrease in the surface area of any body ”- of water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. Construction of a body.of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. Other impacts: 1%U YES S. WILL PROJECT AFFECT SURFACE OR GROUNDWATER QUALITY? 00 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 Project will require a discharge permit. Project requires use of a source of water that does not have.. approval to serve proposed project. Project requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity. Construction or operation causing any contamination of a public water supply system- Project will adversely •affect groundwater: — Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to. facilit.irs. which presently do not exist or have inadequate'capacity. Project...requiring a facility that would use water in ____ excess of 20,000 gallons per day. _ Project will likely cause siltation or other discharge _---- into an existing body of water to the eztent.that viere -ill-he an obvious visual contrast to natural Conditions. TOWN OF S OUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — PART II PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE General Inforration (Read Carefully) - In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my decisions and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. - Identifying tnat an effect will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any laree effect must be evaluated in FART; 3 to determine significance. By .identifying an effect in colu,�,n 2 simply asks that it. be looked a(further. - The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by sho,.►ing types of effects and wherever possible the thresho' of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any scecific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be more appropriate for a Potential Large Impact rating. - Each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples have been offered as guidanc. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. - The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. INSTRUCTIONS (Read Carefully) a. Answer each of the 18 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any effect. b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. C. If answering Yes to a question then check the a:orcoriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is loner than examo]e, check column 1_ d. If reviewer has doubt about the size of the impac-!-- ucons ider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially farce impact or effect can be reduced by a change in the project to a Tess than large magnitude, place a Yes in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. i. 2. 3. SMALL TO POTENTIAL CAN IMPACT BE MODEPATE LARGE -REDUCED BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJE CH CT ANGE IMPACT ON LAND ". .. NO YES WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT AS A RESULT OF A PHYSICAL C Gc TO 00 PROJECT SITE? Examoles that :Mould Apply to Column 2 Any construction on slopes of 15S or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed 10: Construction an Land where the depth to the water tabla'is less than 3 feet. Construction of caved parking area for 1,0003 or ..-cr- vehicles. Construction on ]and :There bedrock is exposed or generally witnin 3 feet of existing ground surface. _ Construction that -dill continue for more than 1 year or involve more than one pnase or stage. Excavation for mining purposes that would remove -ore than 1 ,000 tons of natural material (i.e. rock or sail) per year. Construction of any new sanitary landfill. "ALL TO POTEilTIAL CAN I.!?ACT .BE • .ODERATE LARGE REDUCED 'BY.. IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT C4_gNn_T IMPACT ON VISUAL RESOURCE 10.. WILL THE.PROJECT AFFECT VIEUIS, VISTAS OR rr1E VISUAL NO YES CHARACTER OF THE NEIGHBORPOOD OR CO""+UNITY? .............. 00 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 An incompatible visual affect caused by the introduction of new materials, colors and/or forms in contrast to the surrounding landscape. _ A project easily visible, not easily screened,that is obviously different from others around it. _ Project will result in the elimination or major screening of scenic views or vistas known to be Important to the area. Other impacts: IMPACT ON HISTORIC RESOURCES 11. WILt PROJECT 114PACT ANY SITE�OR STRUCTURE OF HISTORIC, NO YES j PRE-HISTORIC OR PALEONTOGICAL IMPORTANCE? .................0 f"� Examoles_-that Would Apply to Column 2 \� _ Project occurinq wholly or partially within or contiguous to any facility or site listed on the-National Register of historic places. Any impact to an archeological site or fossil bed located within the project--site. i Other impacts: IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE b RECR_ATTON, 12. WILL THE PROJECT AFFECT THE QUANTITY OR QUALITY OF_EXISTING NO YES OR FUTURE OPEN SPACES OR RECREATIONAL OPPORTUNITIES?...... 00 Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. A major reduction of an open space important to the community. Other impacts IMPACT rI TRANSPORTATT0.4 13. WILL THERE BE AN EFFECT TO EXISTING TRANSPOP.';ATIO; NO YES SYSTEl11S? ............................................... 00 Ex amoles that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Alteratidit of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. `. Project will result in severe traffic problems. Other ir..pacts: <1MAll TO POTE,`ITIAL CAII IMPACT SE •MOCERATE LARGE REDUCED GY 4 . IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE Other Impacts: 6. WILL PROJECT ALTER ORAI`IAGE FLOV. 'PATTERNS OR SURFACE IIATER `O YES RUNOFF? ... ...... ..............................00 Example that !-;ould Apply to Column 2 Project would impede flood water flows. _ ' — Project is likely to cause substantial erosion. Project is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. Other impacts: IMPACT ON AIR NO YES 7. WILL PROJECT AFFECT AIR QUALITY?............................0 0 Examples that Would Apply to Column 2 ; _ Project will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trios in any given hour. Project will result in the incineration of mare than 1 ton. ,= of refuse per hour. Project emission rate of all contaminants will exceed 5 ' lbs. per hour or a heat source producing more than 10 . million BTU's per hour. Other impacts: INTACT O"M PLA;ITS AMO a;jTVALS .10 YES - 8. 'WILL PROJECT AFFECT ANY THREATENED OR E!"IDAINGERED SPECIES: O O : Examples that !•:cull Apply to Colurm, 2 Reduction of one or nor- species listed on the ;;ew York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. _ Removal of any portion or a critical,. br significant wild- life habitat. Application of Pesticide or herbicide over more than twica a year other titan for agrit-a:tural puracsas. Ot.�er impacts: 9. WILL PROJECT 'u1,S1X11 TALLY AFFECT 1:0;1-TXgEAT_:icc7 ;R 10 YES ENCA;;GcREJ SPM=S? . ......................................0 0 Exar..pla_ that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Project would substantially interfere with any resident 1 or migratory fish or wildlife species. _ Prnject recuires the removal of more than 10 aces of mature forest (ever 100 years in ace) or at^er locally i=portant vegecat?on. _-7_ SMALL TO POTS:{TIrt CANi;!PACT'C=" MODERATE LARGE REOUCEO BY IMPACT IMPACT PROJECT CHANGE IMPACT ON ENERGY 14. WILL PROJECT AFFECT THE COMiMUNITIES SOURCES OF FUEL 01R NO YES ENERGY SUPPLY? ...........................................0 0 Examales that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Project causing greater than 51. increase in any form of energy used in municipality. _ Project requiring the creation or extension of an energy • transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family residences. Other impacts: IMPACT ON NOISE 15. WILL THERE BE OBJECTIONABLE OOORS,-NOISE, GLARE, VIBRATION NO YES or ELECTRICAL 0ISTUR2ANCc AS A RESULT OF THIS PROJW.1 . Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 . •..O O _ Blasting within 1,500 fleet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). Project will produce operating noise exczedina the local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures. , Project will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. _. Other impacts: IMPACT OM HEALTH A HAZARDS NO YES 16. HILL PROJECT AFFECT PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY? .............0 O - Exzmoles that 'Mould Apply to Column 2 Project will cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there will be a chronic low level discharge or emission. _ Project that will result in the burial of "hazardous wastes" ` O.e. toxic. poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, infectious, etc. , including wastes that are solid, sami-solid. liquid or contain gases.) Storace facilities for ene million or rare gallons of liquified natural gas or other liquids. Other impacts: ii,PACT pp:CT PROJECT C�:.;i�G"c I IMPACT U"t SR'):!TH AND CgARACTFR OF COt;;„'NrTY OR 17. WILL PROJECT AFFECT'THE CHARACTER nF THE EXISTING NO YES CO.,1+UNITY? ..... ............................. ........^ O Examole that Would Apply to Column 2 v _ The population of the City, Town or Village in which the project is located is likely to grow by more than 5. of resident human population. The municipal budgets for capital expenditures or opera- ting services wi11 increase by more than SA per year as a result of this project. Will involve any permanent facility of a.non-agricultural use in an agricultural district or remove prime agricultural lands from cultivation. _ The project will replace or eliminate existing facilities, strictures or areas of historic importance to the co=unity. Development will induce an influx of a particular age group with special needs. Project will set an important precedent for future projects. _ Project will relocate'15 or more employees in one or more businesses. Other impacts: J• ` NO YES 18. IS THERE PUBLIC CONTROVERSY CONCERCiRNG THE PROJECT? .......0 0 - Examoles that Would Apply to Column 2 _ Either government -or citizens of adjacent communities have expressed opposition or rejected the project or have not been contacted. Objections to the project from within the community. IF ANY ACTION. IN PART Z. IS IOEtiTII'IED AS A POTENTiAL.LARGE IMPACT OR IF YOU C;NN= OETER•fINE THE MAGNMOE OF ItIPACT, PROCEED TO PART 3. PORTIONS OF EAF COIMPLcTED FOR THIS PROJECT: DETERMINIATION - PART I PART II PART 3 Upon review of the information recorded an this EAF (Parts 1, Z and 3) and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined that: PREPARE A NEF.ATIVE DECLARATION A. The project will result in no major impacts and, therefore, is one which may not cause significant damage to the environment. • B. Althcugh the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect, in this case PREPARE A NECIATIVE DECLARATIONi tecause the mitigaticn measures describea in PART 3 have been _ O incl-uced as part of the Proposed Project. C. The project will result in one or more major adverse impacts PREPARE POSITIVE OECL.ARATION PROCEED I,!1; that cannot he reduced and may cause significant danaae to the environment. Data Signature of Responsiole Official in L_ Agency Signature of Preparer (if different from re5ponsibla officer) - rent or type name of responsible offic in Lead Agency Y� V. TOWN OF SOUTHOLD ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT — PART III EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS I!1FOIRMATION Part 3 is prepared if one or more impact or effect is considered to be potentially large. The amount of writing necessary to answer Part 3 may be determined by answering the question: In briefly 1 , completing the instructions below have I placed in this record sufficient information to indicate the reasonableness of my decisions? _ INSTRUCTIONS Complete the following for each impact or effect identified in•Column 2 of Part 2: 1. Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe (if applicable) how the impact might be mitigated or reduced to a Tess than large impact by a pro- ject change. 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is imoortant to the minicipality (city, town or village) in which the project is located. To.answer the question of importance, consider: The probability of the impact or effect.accurring - The durationof the impact or effect - Its irreversibility, including permanently losz resources or values - Whether the impact or effect can be controlled ' - The regional consequence of the impact or effect - Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • - Whether known.objections to the project apply to this impact or effect. DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFIC„ICE ' An action is considered to be significant if: One (or more) impact is deterr•:ined to both large and its (their) consequence, based on the review above, is imoortant. PART III STATEMENTS a (Continue on Attachments, as needed) .� NEW YORK STATE DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 10-84-1355 PERMIT UNDER THE ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION LAW ® ARTICLE 15,(Protection of Water) ARTICLE 25,(Tidal Wetlands) ARTICLE 34,(Freshwater Wetlands) ARTICLE 36,(Construction in Flood Hazard Areas) PERMIT ISSUED TO ' Ted Dowd ADDRESS OF PERMITTE � r Tierra Verde, Florida 33715 LOCATION OF PROJECT(Section ol stream, tidal wetland,dam, building)Ndr lh aA Sou sides O -Rabbit Lane, Marion Lake and Cardiners Bay, East Marion. DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT Construct a single family dwelling on south side of Rabbit Lane approximately landward or mean high wa er ar Hers ay - -, Install sanitary system for this lot on applicant' s property on the north side of Rabbit Lane, approximate: 1501 landward of mean h11`gH water and 1,2b, south of La a Marlon. Construct t rr single family dwellings with decks on north side of Rabbit Lane *** (cont. on COMMUNITY NAME(City,Town, Village) TOWNback) East Marion Southold COUNTY FIA COMMU IT NO. DAM NO. PERMIT EXPIRATION DATE Suffolk 6/30/87 GENERAL CONDITIONS 1. The permittee shall file In the office of the appropriate Regional 8. That the State of New York shall In no case be liable for any damagt Permit Administrator, a notice of Intention to commence work at least 46 or injury to the structure or work herein authorized which may be caused by o hours in advance of the time of commencement and shall also notify him result from future operations undertaken by the State for the conservation o promptly in writing of the completion of the work. Improvement of navigation, or.for other purposes, and no claim or right t: compensation shall accrue from any such damage. 2. The permitted work shall be subject to inspection by an authorized representative of the Department of Environmental Conservation who may 9. That if the display of lights and signals on any work hereby authorize order the work suspended if the public interest so requires. is not otherwise provided for by law, such lights and signals as may be pre 3. As a condition of the issuance of this permit, the applicant has ac- scribed by the United States Coast Guard shall be Installed and maintainer cepted expressly, Uy the execution of the application, the full legal respon- by and at the expense of the owner. sibility for all damages, direct or Indirect, of whatever nature, and by whom- 10. All work carried out under this permit shall be performed in actor ever suffered, arising out of the project described herein and has agreed to dance with established engineering practice and in a workmanlike manner. Indemnify and save harmless the State from suits, actions, damages and costs of every name and description resulting from the said project. ec If granted under Articles y and the Department reserves the righ r to reconsider this approval at any time and after due notice and hearing l, 4. Any material dredged in tits prosecution of the work herein permitted continue, rescind or modify this permit In such a manner as may be found t, shall be removed evenly, without leaving Wie refuse piles, ridges across the be just and'equitable. If upon the expiration or revocation of this permit, th bed of the waterway or flood plain of deep holes that may have a tendency to modification of the wetland hereby authorized has not been completed, III cause Injury to navigable channels or to the banks of the waterway. applicanl shall, without expense to the State, and to such extent and in suc S. Any material to be deposited or Ilufiped under this permit, either I�t time and manner as the Department of Environmental Conservation may requirt remove all or any portion of the uncompleted structure or the waterway or on shore above hi It-walet mark,shall be deposited or dlhnpNl) at the locality shown on the draoing hetolo attached, and, If so west: Ibvil Yur to Its former tin iccUnt uot condition. lie claim shall be made against the State of Ne+ fill and restore th of ar<.y Bulb r rmoval or alteration. thereon, within or behind a good add subalantlal bulkhest) or bulkheads, lul h as will prevent escape of the mate#141 into the waterway. 11 This permit shall not be construed as conveying to the applicant an right to trespass upon the larefs or interfere with the riparian rights of other: 6. There shall be-no unreasonable Inlerference with navigation bir the to perform the permilled worts or as authorizing the impairment of any rights work herein authorized. title or Interest in real or personal property held or vested In a person not . 7. That if future operations by the State of New York require an alteratlon party to the permit. In the position of the structure or work hetein authorized, or If, In the opinion 13, The permitter 'is responsible for obtaining any other permits, aF of the Department of Environmental Conservation It shall cause unreasonable provals, ,.:,ids, easements and rights-of-way which may be required for thi obstruction to the free navigation of said waters or flood.flows or endanger _ project. the health, safety or welfare of the people of the State,or loss or destruction of the natural resources of the Stale,the owner may be ordered by the Depart. 14. If granted under Article 36, this permit Is granted solely on the basi meet to:remove or alter the structural work, obstructions, or hazards caused of the requirements of Article 36 of the Environmental Conservation Law an thereby without expense to the Stale;and If, upon the expiration or revocalun Part 500 of 6 NYCRR(Construction in Flood Plain Areas having Special Floo of this permit, the structure, fill, excavailon, or other modification of like Hazards — Building Permits) and in no way signifies that the project will t: watercourse hereby authorized.shall not be completed, the owners shall, free from flooding. without expense to the State, and to such extent and in such time and manner 15. By: acceptance of this permit the permittee agrees that the peen as the Department of Environmental Conservation may require, remove all or is contingent upon strict compliance with the special conditions on 41 any portion of the uncompleted structure or fill and restore to Its former reverse side. condition the navigable and flood capacity of the watercourse. No claim shall be made against the State of New.York on account of:any such removal or alteration. 95.20-4(9/75) (SEE REVERSE SIDE) `` - p Tc �t :� i DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT (wont. ) approximately 50' south of Marion Lake. Sanitary systems for three northerly lots will be located between houses and Rabbit Lane approximately 125 ' south o Marion Lake and 150' landward of mean high water. Approximately 500 cubic yards of clean fill will be trucked in for the sanitary systems and are . to be placed within 15' of the base of three houses on the northerly lots. SPECIAL CONDITIONS 1. There shall be no disturbance to the vegetation or topography within 35 ' of Marion Lake. 2. For the three houses on Marion Lake, not more than twenty percent (20%) of the lot area can be co- mered by impervious surfaces. 3. All. construction .must meet local and Federal flood plain ordinances. SPECIAL CONDITIONS A THROUGH J ATTACKED. - SPECIAL CONDITION X ATTACHED. PERMIT ISSUE DATE PERMIT ADMINISTRATOR ADDKESS 2/19/8 5 rAvid DeRidder�Q n/ � /.� B1dg.40,6uny,StonyBrook,NY 11794 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR rn P.O. BOX 728 Ul ® TOWN HALL SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY No. Z13895 . . October Date . . 3 . .. .19.95 This CERTIFIES that the Lot . .. .V.egnt Location of Property .. .350. . Rabbit. Lane.. .. .. .... :.z. House. Street HAMIVt County Tax Map #, Section. .. 031. . . . .. . • Block. . ...18. . . .. . . .. Lot. .008. .. .. .... Subdivision.. . . .. X.. . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . .Filed Map #. .. .. . .. ... Lot #. . . .. .. . . . conforms substantially to the applicable provisions of the Zoning Code of the Town of Southold. The premises are located in the A- Residential-- Agricultural Zoned District and may be used for such uses as are presently authorized by the Zoning Code in such district subject to, however, . all of the requirements of the Zoning Code. The certificate is issued to . .. . . SCHIMATZ , . JACK. . . .. . . . . . . . (owner, lresse&-or-tre4}a+A) of the aforesaid lot. . . .Y. . . . . . •1. . . . • . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . Building Inspector Rev 11/85. , Lakeview Terrace Road Association P.O. Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 V-rOWN a September 03, 1986 Board of Town Trustees _ 4 Ig$6 sTown of Southold sLTown HallySouthold, NY 119'71O� SaUT SOLD Re: Bay Avenue Project, East Marion Ted Dowd Application Dear President Henry P. Smith Trustee John M. Bredemeyer Trustee Philip Goubeaud Trustee Albert Krupski, Jr. Trustee Ellen M. Larsen : At the Annual Meeting of the Lakeview Terrace. Road Associa- tion on Sunday, August 31st, it was resolved that the following points be brought to the attention of the Board of Town Trustees in addition to the remarks made on behalf of the Association at your August 28th meeting: 1. The piers on the Bay Avenue bridge are approximately 15' 7z" apart. For decades until May - June 1986, open water under the bridge has remained at approximately 12' 62" . The passageway at this date measures 6' 6" with a slope from 0 to a depth of 23" . That is a loss of 6' 1 " in width in 4 months or so. The Hurricane of 1938 did not wreak devastation of that type. Man did ! 2. The residents wish to have their right of passage and access from the east lake to the west restored. 3. Inasmuch as the President of the Truste'es- wrote to Mr. Luscher on July 25th, five weeks ago, relative to debris by the bridge in the lake, what has been done? 4. Inasmuch as East Marion Fire Department Policy bans the use of the bridge by its vehicles and the Highway Department has advised Oysterponds School Superintendent Charles Woznick not to use the bridge for school bus transportation, the message is loud and clear that the bridge is unsafe for large vehicles. Our Associa- tion recommends that the weight limit of the bridge be posted again and that the regulation be enforced. An accident on the bridge through failure, of same could cause serious personal injury or death and could have a disasterbus impact on the lake and wildlife. 1 of 2 P 5. As the proposed application of Ted Dowd is of no positive benefit to improve the environment of Rabbit Lane, Marion Lake, or the Bay, the Association recommends that the application be denied. As the site has no potable water thereon, it must be pumped inland of the 13 wells of the Association members which is a concern for the future quality of our water. That topic should be addressed now and not later. The building site would be a--source of phosphates, nitrates, and pesticides for the Bay and/or the Lake'. It would have a deleterious impact on the area. How much is enough? I have been selected by the Association to conduct any on-site tours if you wish. Thank you for your anticipated close scrutiny of the situ- ation. ere y/ eroy, cretary cc: Mr. Raymond. Jacgbs Supt. of Highways vtown Board I ;& dZ Mr. Gary Tabor, Contractor Mr. Ted Dowd Dr, Martin Garrell, CAC Mrs. Ruth Oliva, NF Environmental Council Mr. Walter Gaipa, Chief of EMFD Mr. Charles Woznick, Supt. of Oysterponds School District Mr. Norman Woodcock, President- Road Association 2 Of 2 a Of ip, Al tY ��,-- Copies L',.C. -- � q_ I-ak�view Terrace Road Associatio 5 f 9% File .O. Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 September 03, 1986 Mr. Raymond Jacobs, Superintendent Southold Town Highway Department Peconic Lane Peconic, NY 11958 Re : Bay Avenue Project Dear Mr. Jacobs: At the membership meetin of the Lakeview Terrace Road Association on August 31, 1989 many topics were included in the discussions , but of paramount foci were the physical condition of Bay Avenue, the siltation under the bridge, and the lack of a bridge weight limit sign. It was resolved that the following points were to be brought to your attention: 1 .• The east side of Bay Avenue is an eyesore for a project which started as long ago as April 17th with relatively no activity since Saturday, August 2nd. A. The drainage from Lakeview Terrace south goes onto the bridge which was not the case heretofore. Silta- tion of the lake has resulted. The contractor has ac- knowledged this by ,returning at least twice in July and August to replace washed away soil. The soil ran down the east side of the road, onto the bridge, and into the lake. The water opening under the bridge has been re- duced from 12' 62' ' to 6' 611 . A boat can no longer navigate under the bridge. The Association expects the right of passage to be restored. What the hurricane of 1938 did not do, man did! B. The entire project gives a slipshod appearance. C. At least one house water connection box and the large water connection box at the southeast corner of Rabbit Lane and Bay Avenue project above the surface of the ROW of Bay Avenue and are a hazard. D. Debris was left in the lake E. A trench was cut in the blacktop of the entrance to Lakeview Terrace. Common courtesy by the contractor would indicate patching immediately. 1 of 2 F. An inspector for the Board of Underwriters Lab in- dicated that the yellow marker or ribbon had not been buried with the electric cable in the trench. This can lead to a dangerous situation in the future as, part of the run contains a gas line with the water pipes and electric cable. When may we expect the contractor to restore the ROW to its original or better condition, with the proper drainage, to remove the debris and silt from the lake, and to assure everyone all codes have been met? 2. The members of the Association are concerned with the safety of the bridge which was built over 60 years ago to serve a' few cottages. Inasmmch as East Marion Fire Depart- ment Policy bans the use of the bridge by its vehicles and your deparment has advised the Superintendent of Oyster- ponds School District, Mr. Charles Woznick, not to use the bridge for school transportation, it is readily apparent the bridge is unsafe for large vehicles. The State has posted "NO TRUCKS WITH R PERMITS" on ei- ther side of the Dam Pond and the Greenport railroad =. bridges. What is to prevent one of these rigs coming out the LIE onto the North Road onto Bay Avenue and across the bri dge? re4 vas-ts The Association- s- that the weight limit sign for the bridge be posted again and the regulation enforced. An accident on the bridge through failure of same could cause serious injuries or fatalities and would have a catastrophic impact on the lake and wildlife. We know that you have conducted personal on-site inspections and appreciate 'it. Si cerely, Frank Heroy, Secr ary ces The Town Trustees ✓The Town Supervisor and Town Board 6 CvPlGS Dr. Martin -Garrell, CAC Mrs. Ruth Oliva, North Fork Environmental Council Mr. Walter !Gaipa, Chief of EMFD Mr. Charles Woznick, Superintendent of Schools Mr. Gary Tabor, Contractor Mr. Ted Dowd Mr. Dennis Cole, DEC Mr. Norman ,Woodcock, President of the Association 2 of 2 145 Lakeview Terrace �n- PO Box 357 East Marion, NY 11939 August 01, 1986. Mr, Frank Murphy, Supervisor Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Murphy: Thank you for your letter of July 28, 1986. I accept with pleasure your invitation for me to meet with the- entire South---- - old Town. Board and all the Departments involved in the Rabbit Lane-Bay Avenue project. In' deference to my health, I respectfully request that the meeting not be scheduled before 9e00 AM. As to the date, any day with four or five days notice would be convenient for me. I await word as to the date, time , and place of the meet- ing. Sin,cereZye O)w� J"'�'/�_ Frank Heroy iF G. � a N abLT!t _f0_12£ J 110CtOt ton P. O. Box 754 East Marion, L. 1. , New York 11939 September 29, 1987 Board of Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall Southold, N Y 11971 Attention; Mr. Henry P Smith President Gentlemen; I would like to call your attention to a rapidly worsening situation regarding Marion Lake at East Marion. During 1985 a contractor, Gary Tabor of Orient, dug a trench on the east side of Bay Avenue to bury water con- duits and electrical wires leading to new construction on Rabbit Lane. During the time the trench was open we experienced exceptionally heavy rainfall which washed thesoil from the trench down to the bridge where it subsequently washed into the channel beneath the bridge. This channel ,joins the two bodies of water forming Marion Lake. There was no effort on the part of Mr. Tabor to correct the problem and this condition is now deterio- rating to a point where the closing of the channel under the bridge appears imminent. The channel formerly measured approximately 121 feet prior to Mr. Tabor' s work. It is now approximately 4� feet and narrowing. The soil that washed down resulted in phragmites taking root at the north side of the channel. As The phragmites grew, additional soil accumulated around the roots. The soil and the phragmites are literally feeding on each other and the channel is closing. At the present rate the channel will probably close by the summer of 1988. I feel this problem deserves your immediate attention as the proliferation of phragmites seems to foretell the death of a beautiful natural resource. I will remain at 120 Rabbit Lane until the end of October and would welcome an opportunity to meet with you or a representative in an effort to solve the problem. Very ours, 4 0 SE Tel #477 0582 P esident 2a � P MFJ^J� y 2 ' � .. , '1 . • _ . g� ', .,r'� . . _ a God� toc AN 1 t.A/Cj ,� Pvl� P NovsC Dr TAIL • No SGA �E K./ jl _ g w.T. S' � p !' • S _ a OF i A lD Z sY IF."o L!R 7,-;; R,sS1DEP'4'. E 0;i' CONFor-,, o +!C'a RUs 0 F I -'E. Sa °°_i=Oi_< T!� Sc."?'J! T_S. i. P t n I r,. r 4 SUFFOLK C�OUN T DE.P cif- HEA.L'i f! NY SERV1C, ES - FO R APPRC.-AL UF- ; �3i® 3O° :a.OL 46—�91"� �j�► 20° i C10rlS :RUC i 0 N GIN LY K S. FIEF. f 10.. APPF€ ()VED: . i i -SUFFOL-K CO. TAX MAP DESIGNATION: 036-17-20 DIS T. SECT. BLOCK PCt_- 036-17-10 T.H. h O�P4'NER5 ADDRESS: -- - _ I °" GREED: L. P. TEST HOLE - `ISTAMp s ' -i . I a: •� I --.�.— -�'�Lib�j SfiJS.2 .v::.%a a -:u w C 7X-T a .li.a..: �� � :: - _ j-' i - -, � `- --- �.. - iy ,i I I .J ... • I i +^axrr�r�f5 s�3s`£".d.,uL:�:"iY 1��-S+.�v ��rY.t�.%` V'tit2�7FY)7n', 'v SMAL VALL W1 iA C.'.,>n^'•rab;"x'.1:;:b? LKW—CAT£ Vr-XY,t ViALL 4 i ('Wz no Y+.-if".E Win; Fla wtiom yoi ;%tiv>? I. XIWITUVON MIMI 6latllrwL jrcwc oa am RODERlCK VAN TUYL, P.C. LICENSED LAND SUF'VEYORS �l�vcx-f-ions refer fo rrrean sea level.' � GRFENP(JRT NEV) 'aORK 11J f^,- C'`—:ems v0. -I EAL.T H r_k', o STATEMENT OFINTENT j ?IHE V,'A T ER SUPPLY AND SEWAGE i,:)15P 05, L_ � I c N,FIDR TO ;It E r-,""?ARCF 41t T 1-:r- 2 S U F FOL.i: 1. DF.r`i 'tt . NEA!-.T.-:' s E-_." !?Cc._. -- - -- ...... - SU :FOLK -OUF\I T 'r DEFT. CE i `AL`: DER JiCES - F OR AP P ROV L C,j C _)NSTRUC T ION ONLY D A T E: r -- 'UF=FC,,LK CO. TAX NiAP DESIGNATION: ~� I I i DEST, SECT. BL' PCL. Q�11itilEc�J .�,G'DRESS. , � A --- — — . L. TEST NQLE STA>`I!` - I ^ _ HDL!5� _TR}a 4.5fe-��ZSi:VL�'t ons 1 r i t S M Jai./UAL S:iALL!•�.5f �t;C'�.E�yiht`:.`<;,'r r Jam)N,A VALID 72,UE CO r, j - }• r R� M.���S - I j i. RiL:S ECAF_ u9 Fz" ;i Y s tits 71i L6 G I ?� S .� zss �,:Fa mo;'1 91!1 �mwy, -- -- `� -Y� :.-a�'>}�aPa•',',� '?T AL At .:a P'r S'US--,( ti;„�bY I •__-._—.________ 1 _ _ t - I r�i " Or rs i ,v L.i>y (f•>;£ SEAL _---� RODERICK VAN TUYL, P.C. LICENSED LANCE SURVEYORS -- Elevof- ons refer fo m orn iea level. GREENF'OF'T ^yE'''� YOR.