HomeMy WebLinkAboutTR-4157 V J . r'jr V=„' � , �V � ..yarN -` i -. :: � K' �\.' t•�y)., r � V F�.
:__.
r��:i.'�'�.��i.._c,.�+;"6�^
- ---- ---'-' - - --..- - - ----- - � -.. _. .. tan
1 r
...-. . j.!, Boa d ®f Southold Town Trustees
.. .a; SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK i•.: ,��. _
PERMIT NO. 4157....,. ........ DATE: April 30 1993 <
1 ISSUED TO,;:... ..............................................Ann..Posey..Fergus on .>.��
_
............... ......
` Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of - �► !�
the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the
' x State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en-
titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS
i IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS. and they
REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM
LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the
Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on ...March.••2.5•,
19..93...., and in consideration of the sum of $.......150.00 paid b
y
I
>., J.,.M...O,,... Consultant,_.on behalf of Ferguson
; of .......... N. Y. and subject to the
Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, i
of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following:
:.
to construct a single family dwelling, associated sanitary
N
system, gravel driveway, decks, with public water as per !1;
map dated March 24, 1993
all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in
the originating application. cam`
;.. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, The said Board of Trustees hiere-
by causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed, and, these presents to
a� be subscribed by a majority of the said Board as of this date.
177
0
\
C=C :. .... .................. ,.ti
!� Z. P. .�T..... /Y Y .....
O .../ '
....................................
Trustees44
'\ '-�- •Y T., �..e.,.,ram. :t '��...:dr� �.IL'..��..►e.:L�,.'�.dl�'•• r .e. t-,�.��'-��'S:v�r:r t.. � _yi ..._i=I.-t eK� ��-. ;., -
TRUSTEES g1tfrot SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT.L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry P. Smith 4;=:'a y a Town Hall
John B. Tuthill � ; ' h` 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson -s,9 , '� �� P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Y Southold, New York 11971
Southold,
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT
Permit Number: 6-4-5
Name of Applicant/Agent: J.M.O.
Name of Permittee: Ann Posey Ferguson
Address of Permittee: 181 Lewis Lane Fairhaven, NJ 07.704
Property Located: Central Ave. , Fishers Island
DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY.- to construct a single family dwelling,
associated sanitary system, gravel driveway, decks, with public
water for a variance under Town Code Section 37-13D,
insufficient setback or movable structures (deck)- within the
building hazard area. (see Attached) .
Date of permit issuance: April 30, 1993
This permit is valid fora period 'of two years from the date of
issuance.
SPECIAL CONDITIONS:
**XXX Bluff restoration through a re-vegetation agreement is
attached hereto and is a necessary special condition of this
permit.
NA A relocation agreement is attached hereto and is a
necessary special condition of this permit.
NA A maintenance agreement is attached hereto .and is a
necessary special condition of this permit.
**. The deck construction shall be open with. a wood deck
and concrete on wood piles.
The site seaward of the house shall be planted with
salt tolerant species as proposed on the March 24, 1993
l' of 3
additions to the October 4, 1990 Chandler Palmer and King
survey. This shall serve as the planting agreement for this
site.
There shall be one inspection of this site to confirm
that the construction and planting requirements have been met.
John M. Bredemeyer; III
President, Board of Trustees
JMB: jmd
cc: Building Dept.
Attachments
2 of 3
TRUSTEES SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President V, SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry P. Town Hall
Smith c4 � „�John B. Tuthill ea- v ,s,L��; �, 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson ®�;` �'
�a � �,• P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 '01 �` Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
April 30, 1993
J.M.O. Consulting
P.O. Box 447 _
Quogue, NY 11959
Re: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM #1000-6-4-5
Dear Mr. Just:
The following action was taken by the Board of. Town Trustees during
its regular meeting held on Thursday, March 25, 1993 regarding the
above matter:
WHEREAS, J.M.O. on behalf of Ann Posey Ferguson applied to the
Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the
Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated January
28, 1993 and,
WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold' Town
Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations,
and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect
to said application on Thursday, March 25, 1993 at which time all
interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and,
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation -
submitted concerning this application, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will
not affect ,the health, safety and general welfare of the people of
the town,
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT
. RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of
J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of Ann Posey .Ferguson to construct a
single family dwelling, associated sanitary system, gravel driveway,
decks, with public water as per maps dated March 24, 1993 . Located
Fishers Island.
Permit will, expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must
be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within six -months of the
date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the
Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project.
Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to
be done below Mean High Water Mark:
No Fees
Very truly yours,
John M. Bredemeyer, III
President, Board of Trustee
JMB: jd
r \
TRUSTEES O`�SV FFO(�`'pG SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President may'. y� SCOTT L.HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr.,Vice President c
Henry P. Smith Town Hall
John B. Tuthill �y 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson '�Ol ��� P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
S.E.Q.R.A.
ivEGATIVE DECLARATION
NOTICE OF NO, SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT
APPLICATION NO. 1000-6-4-6 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands
NAME: Ann Posey Ferguson Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion
DATE: March 10, 1993
RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation
Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617,
Section 617 . 10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold,
notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead
Agency for the action described below, has determined that the
project will not have a significant effect on .the environment.
Please take further notice that this declaration should not be
considered a determination made for any other department or agency
which may also have an application pending for the same or similar
project.
A planting survey shall be submitted prior to final approval.
TYPE OF ACTION: Unlisted CEA
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to construct a single
family dwelling, associated sanitary system as per enclosed plans.
LOCATION:SCTM 41000- 6:-4-6
REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION:
1 . An on site inspection has. been conducted by the Board of
Trustees.
2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the .applicant and
reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that
no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur
should the project be implemented as planned.
cc: CAC
O T-
TRUSTEES o��$UFFO(�co SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President �.�' G'L� SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President o '�
Henry R Smith 010 Town Hall
John B. Tuthill �y �� 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson �Ol �0� P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
February 15, 1993
J.M.O. Consultants
Glenn Just
P.O. Box 447
Quogue, NY 11959
RE: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM #1000-6-4-5 ( 93 . 1)
Dear Mr. Just:
An inspection was made of the above referenced. site today by
representatives of the Town Trustees and Conservation Advisory
Council. The following items should be considered in completing
your application for Town Permits:
It was found that the deck as proposed will have approximately
195 sq.ft. within the Coastal Erosion Building Hazard Area and
that the house is just beyond that area.
Since the deck is proposed within 20 feet of the point of
inflection of the bluff, the bluff setback is at variance from
the Coastal Erosion Ordinance on an average of 200. (Section
37-13D requires 25 foot setback for movable structures) Since
the property was cleared within the hazard area we would request
that restoration and planting plans for all. areas seaward of the
house be submitted as part of your application.
Fortunately, it was found that our initial concerns of a
permanent foundation existing within the hazard area were not
realized and I will be recommending approval of a variance for
an open constructed deck by the entire board of Trustees. I
believe the property is constrained .and the circumstance are
unique such that a variance is warranted.
As soon as we receive the restoration plan and written
conformation that an open constructed deck is possible, we will
conclude SEQRA and schedule a joint Wetland-Coastal Erosion
Public Hearing. I want to thank you for your cooperation in
this matter.
d
S cere,lye,
John M. Bredemeyer,III
President, Board of Trustees
JMB:jmd
cc: Bldg. Dept.v
Mr. Ferguson
Stephen Ham
TRUSTEES o��SUFFO(��D SUPERVISOR
'John M.•Bredemeyer, III, President : SCOTT L RABBIS
Albert J. Krupski,Jr.,Vice President N _
Henry E Smith Towne
John B. Tuthill y ��� 53095 Main"Road^ .
William G. Albertson O,( �`a P.O. Box'1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New:,York 11971•
Fax(516)765-1923
BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
January 11, 1993
Alfred Ferguson
181 Lewis Lane
Fairhaven, NJ 07704
RE: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM #p1.0000-6-4-5
Dear Mr. Ferguson:
The Southold Town Trustees recently received a complaint that
work proceeding on your property 6h Central. Avenue, Fishers
Island at the designated Suffolk County Tax map location of
1000-6-4-5 was taking place without the benefit of an
environmental review and possibly one or more permits which are
the responsibility of this office.
An inquiry to the Southold Town Building Department resulted in
an investigation by this office as to the conditions surrounding
the issuance of your building permit. Unfortunately it was
found that the building inspector incorrectly relied on our
letter of non-jurisdiction. of October 28, 1991 when he granted
your September 1992 building permit. The site is in fact
jurisdictional for the requirement of two permits administered.
by this office, the Towns Coastal. Erosion Hazard Area Ordinance
(Chapter 37) and the Town Wetl:and'Ordinance (Chapter 97) . These
requirements became effective after our letter of
non-jurisdiction of October 281 1991, a fact which was
overlooked by the Building*Department.
If you have not already received a stop work order from the
Building Department you can expect one shortly.
In order for this office to properly meet it's mandate you will
have to apply for the aforementioned permits. Enclosed you will
find a permit Application which includes a long environmental .
assessment form which must be completed for this project.
In addition to having your surveyor place the Coastal Erosion
Hazard Line on your licensed survey as part of your application,
we are asking your application to include detailed information
t
on your restoration And "landscape plans for all cut, filled or
de-vegetated" portions of the site as well as detailed plans
surrounding the deck which is within the building hazard area.
Your application fees will be $150.00 for the wetland permit and
$250. 00 for a variance application. under the Coastal Erosion
Hazard Ordinance for a total The of $400.00 Payable to the
Southold Town Board of Trustees. .
As our review of the Coastal Erosion- map for this site leads us
to believe that portions of the house will fall in the building
hazard area, it is possible that alterations to the structure
may be required. The fact that the Building Department has not
seen fit to put a stop work order on the entire parcel as we
requested, should not be construed as a waiver on our part of
any portion of our jurisdiction under the Town and State
Environmental Quality Review Act, Chapter 37 and 97 of the Town .
Code.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call.
Very truly yours,
John M. Bredemeyer, 'III
President, Board of Trustees
JMB:j and
encl.
cc: Harvey Arnoff
Building Dept.
J.M.O. Consulting
TRUSTEES �� t'p SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President SCOTT L. HARRIS
Jr., 1
Albert J. Krupski> Vice President
vs i ,k ,,
Henry P. Smith �,. , Town Hall
3095 Main
hn B. Tuthill 5m G. Albertson pZ)� r .t,���� EOS Box R 1179 d
William
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
TO: Curtis Horton, Senior Building Inspecrt.,or -
FROM: John Bredemeyer, President Board of sb es
DATE: December 21, 1992
RE: Ann Posey Ferguson, SCTM #6-3-5
A review of the "as-built" foundation location of the above
referenced housing start leads me to believe that a building
permit was issued without permits required by this office.
Southold Town Code Chapter 97 was amended in January 1992 to
include all "sounds" thus negating my non-jurisdiction letter to
you of October 28, 1991. Southold Town Code Chapter 37 was
adopted October 8, 1991 and ultimately signed by the
commissioner of the NYSDEC on November 4, 1991.
Since the foundation in question, is, by the surveyors own
judgement, within 44 ' (feet) of the wetlands and as the coastal
erosion "Structural Hazard Area" may lie as much as 40 ' - 50'
(feet) landward of the top of the bluff on this lot, this office
must ask that you issue a stop work order on this project such
that the required Town Tidal Wetlands and Coastal Erosion
Permits can be considered by this Board for those activities
taking place within our jurisdiction.
cc. Don Dzenkowski
cc. Town Attorney
TRUSTEES
r���
�, r..,. � SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer; III, President e. ` ; 4 ��� SCOTT L.HARRIS
Albert J. Kru ski Jr. Vice President =e
Henry P. Smith e� Town Hall
John B. Tuthill ��` �� 53095 Main Road
William G. Albertson ��'� � P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Av�
yC14
�C-0�
v fir'
/J
42
w
v� CX d 7�
��-�- '
lez/ Z-,(�
7FY - 7Y 37
yam. � S r G 6�7D
�0 553 F �'
TRUSTEES
John M.Bredemeyer,III,President co .�� SUPERVISOR
Henry P. Smith,Vice President �" a4 ,� SCOTT L.RABBIS
Albert J.Krupski,Jr. (A _
John L.Bednoski,Jr. ` '���, Town Hall
John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road
P.O.Box 1179
Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971
Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
October 28, 1991
J.M.O. Consulting
P.O. Box 447
Quogue, NY 11959
RE: Ferguson, Fishers Island
Dear Mr. Just:
Presently parcels on Long Island Sound are not within the
jurisdiction of the Town Trustees under Chapter 97.
Asper phone conversation with you and the clerk to the Board,
the $35.00 fee will be credited to the Sam Gordan application
for the inspection.
If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to contact
this office.
Very truly yours,
John M. Bredemeyer, III
President, Board of Trustees
JMB:jmt
OF Fll(��
TRUSTEES Ok
f:y 3
John M.Bredemeyer,III,President ,-~, rya: SUPERVISOR
Henry P. Smith,Vice President !' SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J.Knrpski,Jr.
John L. Bednoski,Jr. . Town Hall
John B.Tuthill `n! ';' w 53095 Main Road
r" r P.O.Box 1179
Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971
Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOL D
COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION
TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION
TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION
Office Use'. Only:
Coastal Erosion Permit Application
Wetland Permit Application
•Trustee Lands Permit Application � Q
Grand.f ather
Completed Apps . Dclte: * '3
variance Required, JAN 81993
fA Neighbors notified Date:
RA Type ' Nllsj 1�y- � �n�
tL.Q
ord, Review-opt. mandD -e-ec. Of'f;1ce
Iiisp. comp. /date: a IS'Pi3 4.N�
SEQRA Determin. /da e: 3]1CIR3 N65 P
ti
ublic Hearing/date: _ -" �. (� 3I0-t$�i3 O{e
Findings :
Permit Vote : (YIN) :
Special Conditions: {/f� I�
V ��
( also see file) Application Fee: 7
Application Number; SCTM #1000-006-04-5
Project Name (If any) Proposed Single Family Dwelling
Date Prepared: January 18 , 1993
Applicant:
J .M. O . Consulting for Ann • Posey Ferguson "
Address : P . O . Box 447 , Quogue , NY 11959
Phone ( 516 ) 653-0607
Interest: (owner, consultant, lessee,etc. ) Consultant
Owner of Property: Ann Posey Ferguson
Address 181 Lewis Lane
Fairhaven, NJ 07704 Phone ( ) 62Z-4444
Subject Property Location: Central Avenue , Fishers Island
( Provide LILCO Pole # , Distance to cross Streets if not on
location map)
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
4
Yds. to be excavated: Approx. 250cYYds. to be filled:
7 7-
Manner in which material will be removed or deposited:
Ray loader
Width of canal, creek gr bay fronting property: n ,a
Depth at low tide: n/a Aver. rise in tide: n a
Distance to nearest channel: n/a Distance project
extends beyond similar projects in area: o '
Area zoning: R-80 Land area in acres: 0 . 77
Is project for private or busines!�' use: private
Intended use of property: Private single family residence
Describe known prior operations conducted on premises:
Building envelope previously cleared, foundation poured, connection
to public water system has been made and hay bales have been installed
Has any prior license or permit been issued to erect structures,
dredge, or deposit fill on said premises:
see enclosed
Has any license or permit ever been revoked or suspended by a
Governmental Agency: not to this date
Project Description
The project description must also include plans for reclamation
of land disturbed- during construction of.. the principle and
accessory structures and underground structures.- (i.e. , pipeline
and septic system; make additional attachments if necessary) .
Application proposes to con'str'u-ct ',a -s,inple family dwelling,
associated sanitary system,, gravel drive, decks and to hook up
public water system as per enclosed plans .
y't
Authorization (Where the applicant is not the owner)
I residing at
( Print-owner of subject property) (Mailing address-phone)
do hereby authorize to apply for
Coastal Erosion permit( s) from the Southold Town Trustees
Signature
THIS IS NOT A PERMIT
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation
Btli:ding 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356
Okla
DATE: LC�GC�t(/ /v o J �.
( '
� .�z� c_ �L-,-L..{�-. Re:
. Thomas C. Jorling
— :0 0,) 3 3�Cr)�W( '6) Commissioner
Dear,k'j /fit yc
A review has been made of your proposal to: Jll
LC
XS 4&1, < d�2j,4�,
Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation has determined that the parcel
• project is :
Greater than 300 ' from inventoried tidal wetlands.
Landward of a substantial man-made structure
greater than 100 ' in length which was constructed prior to 9 20 77.
Landward of the 10 ' above mean sea level elevation contour on a
gradual, natural slope.
Ise Landward of the topographic crest of a bluff, cliff 'or dune which is
greater than 10 ' in el"a ion aboq mean s a level..
,) 14
�.
Therefore, no permit iserequired under the Tidal Wetlands Act (Article 25
of the Environmental Conservation Law) . Please be advised, however, that /
no construction, sedimentation or . disturbance of any kind may take place
seaward of the 10 ' contour or topographic, crest without a permit. It is
your 'responsibility to ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to =.
prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance* to the
ground surface or vegetation in this area as a result of your project. 4
Such precautions may include providing adequate work area between the
10 ' contour or topographic crest and the project (i .e. a 15 ' to 20 ' wide
construction area) or erection of a temporary fence, barrier, or hay
bale berm.
Please note that any additional work, or modification to the project as
described, may require authorization by this Department. Please contact
this office if such are contemplated.
Please be further advised that this letter does not relieve you of the
responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other
agencies. r -
Very truly yours, n.
�jt / Deputy Regional Permit Administrator / "
COASTAL EROSION HAZARD AREA VARIANCE
ANN POSEY FERGUSON
Variance Application 46-4-5-93.1
J.M.O. consulting on behalf of ANN POSEY FERGUSON Structural
Hazard Are; bluff setback:
37-13-D Insufficient bluff setback for movable open constructed
deck. Structure proposed 20' to bluff where setback required is
25 '
Application History, Finding of Facts, Determination and Permit
Conditions:
HISTORY AND FINDING OF FACTS
1. Applicant submitted a joint wetland, Coastal Erosion
Variance application on January 28, 1993 in response to -a
request from the Trustee Office when it was found that
construction started in the deck area without the required
permits.
2. The Trustees concluded SEQRA with a negative declaration on
March 10, 1993 .
3 .. The wetland public hearing was held on March 25, 1993 with
no person. in opposition.
4. The Coastal Erosion Variance application was held on April
29, 1993 with no person in opposition.
DETERMINATION
The requested variance is approved for the following reasons:
1. No reasonable prudent alternative site exists for a deck on
the seaward side of this house.
2. The proposed open constructed deck is less than 200 square
feet in size and as -such is considered a minimal impact
structure which would not ordinarily require a permit if it were
a dock or access stairs in the beach area.
3.. The variance requested is .the minimum necessary to overcome
the practical difficulty of siting a deck on this lot which has
severe setback limitations.
4. The proposal is reasonably safe from flood and erasion
damage there having been no damage to .the vicinity from major
coastal storms of December 11, 19.93 and March 13 , 1993 .
5. No public funds are utilized for this project.
3of3
TRUSTEES 4�5, a SUPERVISOR
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President �� T SCOTT L. HARRIS
Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President
Henry R Smith Town Hall`
53095 Main Road
John B. Tuthill -., �y
William G. Albertson �6��V->4;�;�r„ P.O. Box 1179
Telephone (516) 765-1892 � ' Southold, New York 11971
Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
April 30, 1993
J.M.O. Consulting
P.O. Box 447
Quogue, NY 11959
Re: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM #1000-6-4-5
Dear Mr. Just:
The following action was taken by the Board of. Town Trustees during
its regular meeting held on Thursday, March 25, 1993 regarding the
above matter:
WHEREAS, J.M.O. on behalf of Ann Posey Ferguson applied to the
Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the
Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated January
28 , 1993 and;
WHEREAS said application. was referred to the Southold Town
Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations,
and,
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect
to said application on Thursday, March .25, 1993 at which time all
interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and,
WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar
with the premises in question and the surrounding. area, and, .
WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation
submitted concerning this application, and,
WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will
not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of
the town,
NOW; THEREFORE BE IT
RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees. approves the application of
J.M.O. Consulting on behalf of .Ann Posey Ferguson to construct a
single family dwelling, . associated sanitary system, gravel .driveway,
decks, with public water as per -maps dated March 24, 1993 . Located
Fishers Island.
Permit will expire two years from the. date it is signed. Fees must
be paid, if applicable, and permit issued within .six months of the
date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the
Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project.
Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to
be done below Mean High Water Mark:
No Fees
Very truly yours,
John M. Bredemeyer, III
President, Board of Trustee.
JMB: jd
-A-
J�K
4L!
T-V
MCCARTER & ENGLISH APR 2 3 1993
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FOUR GATEWAY CENTER
100 MULBERRY STREET Tg k -OIF SOUTNOLD
P.O. BOX 652
NEWARK, NJ 07101-0652
CHERRY HILL, NJ (201) 622-4444
TELEX17B 016
NEW YORK. NY
TELECOPIER(201)624-7070
BOCA RATON, FL
CABLE"McCARTER" NEWARK
WILMINGTON, DE
April 21, 1993
Re: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM�1000-6-4-5-6-4-5
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold,' New York, 11971
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
From Jill I understand we are on the agenda for the
coastal erosion public hearing for April 29, 1993 .
When I appeared on February 25, 1993 with Mr. Just, I
believe we furnished you with all the information you need. Also,
as you requested, Jim Righter, our architect, sent you the plans
for the deck area showing that foundations would not be used under
the deck and that rosa rogosa planting would be used.
Unless you have any further questions, Ann and I do not
intend to come to the April 29 meeting. If you need us to come,
or need anything further, please let us and Glenn Just know.
Many thanks.
Sincerely yo s,
Alfred F rg n
ALF/ncw
cc: Mr. Glenn Just
James V. Righter, AIA
C H A N D, "L . E R P A, , L M E R 6 K I l01'. G
-ram Architects, Engineers and Surveycr,s
March 24 , 1993 , U
TOWN WSODIL021 ,
Town, of Southold
Board Town Trustees
53095 Main Road
Town Hall D �� U
Southold, NY 11971'
MAR 2 51993 !_
ATTN: Jill Thorp
RE: ' Ferguson Vlf 9v. 49
Fishers Island, NY --r�-_a-
�._
Dear 'Ms . Thorp:
We are forwarding. the enclosed four ("4 ) prints of the captioned
project .at the request-of Glen.ri, Just . ' The plans reflect the'
additional ,plantings as requested.
Should- .you have any questions , please do not hesitate to contact
me.
Thank you
Cordially, . ll
Richard H. Strouse J
RHS:lj r. l
enc:4
110 BROADWAY .NORWICH,CT 06360 203-889-3397 FAX 203-886-7801 RICHARD H.STROUSE,P.E.,L.S. GORDON C.HYDE,A.I.A.'
James V61ney Righter
a r c h i t e c t s
i n c
L'i
2 March 1993
1Board of Town Trustees OU
Town Hall
53095 Main Rd.
P .O. Box 1179
Southold NY 11971
Attention : John Bredemeyer
Re : Ann Posey Ferguson
Fishers Island
SCTM #1000-6-4-5
Gentlemen:
As architects for Ann and Alfred Ferguson, we would. like to
confirm two statements about the house and landscape as they
relate to the Coastal Erosion Hazard zone :
1 . The deck is to be supported on widely-spaced piers .
(See attached foundation plan. ) There is to be no solid or
continuous foundation .
2 . The grounds seaward of the coastal erosion hazard line
are to be planted with rosa rugosa spaced at three feet on
center in all areas where there is no existing vegetation.
(See attached site plan. )
Very truly yours,
James V. Righter
58 Winter Street Boston • Massachusetts 02108 • telephone 617 • 451 • 5740
MCCARTER & ENGLISH D Q �]
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FOUR GATEWAY CENTER F - 4 1993
100 MULBERRY STREET
P.O. BOX 652 TOWN OF SOUTHO��
NEWARK, NJ 07101-0652
CHERRY HILL, NJ (201) 622-4444
NEW YORK, NY TELEX 178016
TELECOPIER(201)624-7070
BOCA RATON, FL
CABLE NEWARK
WILMINGTON. DE February 2, 1993
.VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Re: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM #1000-6-4-5
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York, 11971
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
We were on Fishers island last weekend, and we were, of
course, disappointed that scheduling difficulties prevented the
Trustees from making their inspection at that time.
I understand the Trustees will go to the Island on
Saturday, February 6. Unfortunately we will not be able to be
present. If you have any questions, you can always call Glenn
Just, who as you know is our representative.
Sincerely yours,
Alfred L. Ferguson
ALF/cat
cc: Glenn Just
COPY
McCARTER&ENGLISH
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FOUR GATEWAY CENTER '
100 MULBERRY STREET JAN 2 91993
P.O. BOX 652
NEWARK, N.J.07101-0652
(201) 622-4444 TO p jV OF SOUR OL
�
January 28, 1993
Re: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM `r1000-o'-4-5
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold FEDERAL EXPRESS
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York, 11971
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
This will confirm that Glenn Just has authority to
represent us with respect to the applications now pending before
the Southold Board of Town Trustees.
If you need anything further, please let us know.
Sincerely yo s,
r
Alfred L Ferguson /
ALF/ncw !!!
cc: Mr. Glenn Just
Jill Thorp, Secretary, Board of
,Trustees
r
MCCARTER & ENGLISH
ATTORNEYS AT LAW BAN z 19
FOUR GATEWAY CENTER
100 MULBERRY STREET 'OWN OF SOUTHOLD
P.O. BOX 652
NEWARK, NJ 07101-0652
CHERRY HILL, NJ (201) 622-4444
NEW YORK, NY TELEX 178016
TELECOPIER(201)624.7070
BOCA RATON, FL
CABLE"MCCARTE R"NEWARK
WILMINGTON. DE January 28, 1993
Re: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM #1000-6-4-5
John M. Bredemeyer, III, President
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold FEDERAL EXPRESS
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York, 11971
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
This will confirm that Glenn Just has authority to
represent us with respect to the applications now pending before
the Southold Board of Town Trustees.
If you need anything further, please let us k
Sincerely yours,
Alfred L. Ferguson
ALF/ncw
cc: Mr. Glenn Just
Jill Thorp, Secretary, Board of
Trustees
INSPECTORS
(516) 765-1802 ��0 C�
SCOTT L.HARRIS,Supervisor
VICTOR LESSARD, Principal
CURTIS HORTON, Senior y z Southold Town Hall
VINCENT R.WIECZOREK, Ordinance P.O.Box 1179,53095 Main Road
ROBERT FISHER, Assistant Fire ?' • O�� Southold, New York 11971
�,`D Fax(516) 765-1823
Building Inspectors �THOMAS FISHER Telephone (516) 765-1800
GARY FISH
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD N7
STOP WORK ORDER U V
JAN 2 0 1993
TO: ALFRED FERGUSON
181 Lewis Fairhaven, NJ 07704 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED TO SUSPEND ALL WORK ON THE' FOLLOWING:
(A) DECK AREAS BUILDING PERMIT #20981-Z
(B) ALL LANDSCAPING ON WATER SIDE. THIS INCLUDES'
GRADING. AND PLANTINGS
LOCATION: CENTRAL AVENUE, FISHERS ISLAND, N.Y.
TAX MAP. NUMBER - 1000-6-4-5
Pursuant to section 100-283 of the Code of the Town of
Southold, New York, you are notified to immediately suspend all
work and building activities until this order has been rescinded.
BASIS OF' STOP WORK ORDER:
BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD THINK YOU ARE
IN VIOLATION OF CHAPTER 97 AND CHAPTER 37 OF THE TOWN CODE.
CONDITIONS UNDER WHICH WORK MAY BE RESUMED:
APPLY AND ATTAIN A RELEASE FROM THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD
OF TRUSTEES
Failure to remedy the conditions aforesaid and to comply with
the applicable provisions of law may constitute an offense
punishable by fine or imprisonment or both.
DATED: JAN. 20, 1993 ,
CURTIS W. HORTON
SR. BUILDING INSPECTOR
cc to Trustees
MCCARTER & ENGLISH Q �]
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
FOUR GATEWAY CENTER JAN 2 0 1993
100 MULBERRY STREET
P.O. BOX 652 � ®� �a®p fi�®��
NEWARK, NJ o7IOI-oe T®N� J
5z TOWN U
CHERRY HILL, NJ (201) 622.4444
NEW YORK, NY TELEx n6oI6
TELECOPIER(201)624-7070
BOCA RATON, FL
CABLE"MCCARTER"NEWARK
WILMINGTON, DE
January 19, 1993
VIA FEDERAL EXPRESS
Re: Ann Posey Ferguson
SCTM #10, 000-6-4-5
Mr. John M. Bredemeyer, III
Town Hall
53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold, New York 11971
Dear Mr. Bredemeyer:
This will acknowledge receipt of your letter of January
11, 1993 , with enclosures.
Needless to say, my wife and I were greatly distressed
and surprised by your letter. We indeed thought we had procured
all the necessary development approvals from the Town of Southold
and the New York DEC. We had the building permit. To receive
word that we might receive a stop work order was a real shock.
As you can well appreciate, having to cease work on the property
at this point in time, in the middle of construction, will be a
great hardship, not only to us, but to the local contractor who
has to budget his time and his workers.
We naturally believe that the building permit was
properly issued, and that we are lawfully entitled to proceed
with construction.
Nevertheless, without prejudice, in a desire to
expedite things as much as possible, we have authorized our
consultant, Glenn Just, to proceed to apply for the necessary
MCCARTER & ENGLISH
Mr. John M. Bredemeyer, III
January 19, 1993
Page 2
permits. Mr. Just has ordered the survey information requested
from the engineers and it should be on your desk momentarily.
Mr. Just is completing our applications, and he will deliver them
to you. He has a letter of authorization from us to represent us
before the Town.
Mr. Stephen Ham is our attorney, and he has been
apprised of the situation, and can be of assistance if necessary.
I enclose our two checks for $250 for the CEHAO
variance, and $150 for the Wetland permit, as you requested.
We ask that you process the applications as fast as
possible, in light of the fact that we are in the middle of
construction. If our appearance is necessary before the
Trustees, or any other body, I would appreciate it being
scheduled prior to February 5, 1993 , since my wife and I have
long standing plans to be out of town from February 6 to February
18. Anything you can do to accommodate our scheduling will be
most appreciated.
I would appreciate directing copies of communications
to us with respect to the Fishers Island property to Mr. Hamm and
Mr. Just as well, so that they can be promptly advised of any
matter which arises.
In closing, I want to assure you that I and my family
have always been extraordinarily conscious of the beauty and
environmental quality of Fishers Island. My family have been
property owners on Fishers Island for more than 100 years, and it
is largely through their past efforts that the Island retains the
beauty that it has today. I made careful inquiry when I started
to consider building the house as to what permits were necessary,
what approvals must be obtained, and the like. We tried very
hard to comply with all requirements, and I thought we had done
SO. I understand that various persons have written to the Town
officials complaining about our project, saying we had not done
the proper things, etc. I personally have never received any
direct communication from anyone objecting to our project. If
anyone is making complaints about our house, they have not seen
fit to contact me, even to ask a question, or to gather
information. While I can appreciate the uncomfortable position
of the Town trustees as the recipient of complaints, I can only
point out that the person or persons who are complaining have not
even had the common courtesy to contact us, as the homeowner and
builder of the residence, to try to work out any problems.
MCCARTER & ENGLISH
Mr. John M. Bredemeyer, III
January 19, 1993
Page 3
I will of course continue to cooperate and try and.
satisfy the Trustees that what we propose is environmentally
sound in every respect, and will not in any way degrade the
environmental quality of the Island or its waters.
If you have any questions, please call.
Sincerely yo s,
Alfred L. Fergu on
ALF/V
Encs.
cc: Stephen Ham , Esq.
Glenn Just
i
FISHERS ISLAND CONSERVANCY, INC.
BOX 553
FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK 06390
January 4 , 1993
Re: Ferguson-Posey property: # 1000-006-004-05
Tyr. Curtis Horton
Building Inspector' s Office - Town of Southold ,
Town Hall, Main Road,
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Dear Mr. Horton:
In regards to your letter to me of December 15th, 1992,
I have several comments. First, your statement that the Southold
Town Coastal Erosion Hazard Act was not passed until October, 1992,
and therefore would not affect the Ferguson property listed above,
is a statement in error. As a point of fact, Southold Town passed
its Coastal Erosion Hazard Act in 1991 V ) (a copy is in front of me
as I write) and as a result it was in full force and effect
throughout the calendar year of 1992, including the month of
September when you issued the building permit for the above-named
property. In short, this Act should have been taken into account
before the permit was issued.
Secondly, no one met you on Fishers Island last fall because
you cancelled the initial meeting at the very last minute due to
adverse weather conditions. None of our group was available the second
time around because no one knew the date and time of your arrival.
To prevent such appointment mix-ups from happening in the future
we have set up a Conservancy environmental committee on Land Use
that will be available any weekday from 9-5. This Committee will
be headed by Conservancy Vice-President Cherry Rafferty, (516-788-
7427) ; and will especially include Linda Hale and Beth Stern. These
latter two are on the Island all year round and can both be reached
at Pirates Cove Marine (516-788-7528) . every business Eay from 9 to 5.
We hope your office can make a note of this and can call Beth or
Linda , in advance of your arrival. Beth and Linda are both conversant
with the regulations and are both anxious to work with either you
or your staff.
Lastly, and with regard to the Ferguson-Posey property,
all we have asked for is a proper review of the laws and regulations
affecting the property. We are assuming that the same rules I would
have to obey were I building a house on Fishers Island should apply
to others also. This would especially include the filing of the
environmental assessment "Long Form" in this case, as Fishers Island
is now officially classed as a "Critical Environmental Area" by
Suffolk County.
2 -
.K
We all look forward to working with you and your staff.
We certainly do not oppose development, provided proper procedures ,
zoning laws, and environmental safeguards are followed.
Sincerely,
J-ofin H. Thatcher Jr. L resident
cc: Conservancy Executive Board
Southold Board of Trustees
Russell Stein, Attorney at Law .
Matthew Kiernan - Southold Town Attorney
STEPHEN A. CCCK
4 EAST 95th STREET
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10128
December 21, 1992
DEC 2 8 1992
VIA FAX NO. 516-751-3839 -
SOL
IT L
Mr. Robert N. Thurber
New York State DEC
SUNY Building 40
Stony Brook, NY 11794
Re: NYS DEC Permit Application # 1-4738-00505 (Fishers Island)
Dear Mr. Thurber:
Mr. John Thatcher, President of The Fishers Island Conservancy, informed
me yesterday of the above application for a DEC permit to commence construction of
a house and septic system by the owner of wetlands property which adjoins my home
on Fishers Island. Notice of the application was contained in the NYS DEC
Environmental Bulletin dated November 4, 1992. The owner and applicant is Anthony
M. Petrilli of New London, Connecticut.
Attached is a copy of my April 15, 1992 letter and wetlands survey to
Fishers Island Development Corporation (FIDCO), with copies to your office (Mr.
Steve Sanford) and to the Southold Board of Trustees, warning of a possible future
request for development of this property. It is clear from the survey that this 1.7 acre
site is unsuitable for development by virtue of the wetlands area which bisects the
property, and I gather because subject application does not meet the 100 foot
wetlands setback requirements of the DEC (or those of the Town or FIDCO with
respect to property lines or the bordering roads).
As a primary neighbor of this shared wetlands property, I strongly protest
the proposed development of the site on the basis of the application not meeting
applicable DEC requirements. This wetlands area serves as the headwater source of
what may be the only natural stream on Fishers Island, which bisects the subject
property on its way to Barley Field Cove. In addition, the wetlands area extends west
onto my property, and I am deeply concerned that any development of the subject
property will be harmful to this area which I have tried to preserve over the past 12
years.
Mr. Robert N. Thurber December 21, 1992
This letter and the attached copy of my April 15, 1992 letter will serve as
proper timely notice of my objection to subject application. John Thatcher has
informed me that The Board of The Fishers Island Conservancy also vehemently
opposes this application and that The Board intends to voice its objection with the
appropriate authorities.
I would be happy to assist in any way possible to ensure that this issue is
given a proper hearing to allow the DEC to exercise its responsibility in reviewing and
opposing this project. Considerable time and expense have already gone into
arranging for the wetlands delineation and survey undertaken by the DEC and local
surveyors specifically in anticipation that such a development application might be
submitted to your office, which now appears to be the case.
In addition to the above mailing address, I am available to discuss this
matter by telephone at 212-916-7818 or FAX at 212-818-0233.
Many thanks in advance for your cooperation.
Sincerely,
Stephen A. Cook
Attachment
c: Mr. John Thatcher, FI Conservancy
Mr. 'Robert B. Calhoun, FIDCO
Southold Town Board of Trustees
P. S. By this letter I would appreciate your sending a copy of the site plan/DEC
application to me at the above address.
-2-
STEPHEN A. COOK
4 EAST 95th STREET
NEW YORK, N.Y. 10128
April 15, 1992
Mr. Tom Doherty
Manager
Fishers Island Development Corporation (FIDCO)
Fishers Island, NY 06390
Dear Tom:
Enclosed for your information please find a copy of a wetlands survey completed
during the past year by the N. Y. S. D. E. C. (and plotted by C, P & K)which details some
here-to-fore uncharted (to my knowledge) wetlands property on the East End of the Island.
From the survey, the majority of the wetlands appears to be on my property -
we're certainly aware of it from our house - usually referring to it as "the swamp". The area
also extends to (and bisects) the neighboring property which is owned by an off-Islander,
whose intentions with respect to the land are not clear to me, but both sale and/or possible
owner development have recently been rumored.
This parcel has never seemed to me to possess much residential potential (with
its nearly surrounding roadside locale and lack of views); furthermore, it would appear from
the attached survey that the wetlands location and related setback requirements would
severely limit (if not prevent) acceptable positioning of a residential dwelling on the parcel.
Given the uncertainty to me of potential actions with respect to the property
(which together with my piece might make an excellent contribution to a wetlands
organization), I thought FIDCO should be aware of the parameters surrounding it in the
event a request for some form of development approval were received.
Please let me know if you have any comments or questions.
Sincerely,
(xn
Attachment
c: Mr. Steve Sanford, N. Y. S. D. E. C.
Southold Town Board of Trustees
L-23
L- t, 15lou 5
1239-33�6-24
Qb
29B OB' 07
!� \ c�
of — - \\ ^
0
ca,
B DISTANCE
S 64!ARIN6
25*50"E 12.54
Op.20
A-12' 2A*
.CGff,A
v BAR '�"t•2G�-c-EtG F3�c,�r I(o LoT�J � \ ?
-
Oot
C) 87.80'
��
--& S 83-44'40'W'c ,-h
23 Arr
00 R;
• ,,,.5ro Al
.4L
FISHERS ISLAND CONSERVANCY, INC. D
DEC 1 6 M
BOX 553 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
FISHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK 06390
December 11 , 1992
Mr. John Bredemeyer - Chairman
Southold Town Board of Trustees
Town Hall , 11ain Road,
Southold, N.Y. 11971
Dear 11r. Bredemeyer:
This letter is written in the hopes that you or your agency
can review the building project now underway on Fishers Island
known as the Ferguson-Posey property (Lot # 1000-006-004-05) . It is
our surmise that this project may be in violation of the Southold
Coastal Erosion Hazard Act (Chapter 37 of the Town Code) with
special reference to paragraphs 11 , 12, 13 , 22, and 30 of that Chapter.
We are also very upset that the County Law creating a Critical
Environmental Area (CEA) over all of Fishers Island has so far
been ignored in that no "long form" environmental assessment form
has been filed in this case despite the relative ease (20 minutes
or so) with which it can be filled out.
It should be noted here that the Conservancy is by no means
opposed to proper building construction on Fishers Island. We feel
it essential, however, that all property owners building homes on
Fishers Island follow proper procedures and environmental regulations ,
fill out all relevant forms , and file for:all needed permits - just
as I would have to do, .were I to build a new home there. In short,
we are asking for a fair assessment of the situation, and if violations
are found, we are requesting that appropriate action be taken -
whether this means additional permitting, correcting mistakes , or
seeking a variance from an appropriate agency.
We have every confidence, lastly, that this structure will
see completion and proper use. As we have noted, we are asking a
review by your a-gency to determine if all is proceeding, according
to Southold' s own regulations . Ue feel it of extreme importance
that if violations or mistakes exist here that they be corrected.
We feel it would be a most harmful precedent if a structure were
completed and occupied without following proper procedure and
evaluations - only to be used later again and again as a precedent
for other buildings and structure which have likewise not followed
proper channels and paths . Such an occurrence would spell disaster
for Fishers Island' s conservation and environmental efforts , as -well
as promote helter-skelter development.
a'
John Bredemeyer - con' t .
It is thus certainly no sin to request a following of
proper laws and re-gulations in this case, nor is it out of place for
an environmental organization such as ours to request an evaluation
from appropriate agencies . We rely , as always , on your fairness
and knowle-e in appraising this matter. We have received more than
a feel complaints frori the public on the way this property is
bein-, developed, and a ruling by yourself or the Trustee Board
(followed by action if need be) would certainly help to clear
the air and restore needed confidence .
With Every Good Wish,
o1�-
an 11. Thatcher Jr. - sident
encls : photos of the site as it exists as of this date. (12/11/92)
MOTE - It might serve a most constructive purpose if you informed the
Southold Building Department that this letter could have been
written months abo if they had forwarded us a site plan back
in September and October when we first asked for one. Both
the Conservancy V.P . and Land Use Committee Chairman (Cherry
Rafferty) abd myself made such a request by telephone. Our
requests were ignored, despite the public nature of the
documents in question.
c
INSPECTORS SUFFO[�
(516) 7654802 O`O C�G� SCOTT L.HARRIS,Supervisor
VICTOR LESSARD,Principal
CURTIS HORTON, Senior y Southold Town Hall
VINCENT R.WIECZOREK,Ordinance p P.O.Box 1179,53095 Main Road
ROBERT FISHER,Assistant Fire Southold, New York 11971
'�Ol �,� Fax(516) 765-1823
Building Inspectors �THOMAS FISHER Telephone(516) 765-1800
GARY FISH
OFFICE OF BUILDING INSPECTOR
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
December 15, 199 �(
DEC 1 6 ON
TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
Mr. John H. Thatcher, Jr.
President Fishers Island Conservancy Inc.
Box 553
Fishers Island, N.Y. 06390
Dear Mr. Thatcher:
This letter is in regard to your letter to Mr. John
Bredemeyer about the building project of the Fergerson property,
Suffolk County Tax Map #1000-006-004-05.
The permit for the above project was approved on September
25, 1992 by myself. At the time the permit was written all
necessary papers were complete for this project including a
letter from the Town Trustees that the project was out of their
jurisdiction, and also a notice by David DeRidden that no permit
was required by D.E.C. The Coastal Erosion Act Chapter 37 was
not adopted until October 8, 1992, therefor it was not in effect
when the permit was written. Also according to 37-3 This
chapter shall not go into effect until "Twenty" calendar days
from the date of this chapter adoption.
Mr. John H. Thatcher, Jr. Page 112."
Before this permit was issued we had several calls from you
people about setbacks etc. A date was set up to meet on Fishers
Island at the firehouse, I was to bring all the necessary papers
and discuss them. I went to Fishers Island along with Tom
Fisher with all the papers, and nobody showed up. We even tried
to call to no avail.
I will gladly discuss this subject with you at my next trip
to Fishers Island.
Very truly yours,
SOUTHOLD TOWN BUILDING DEPT.
eX44�vol
Curtis W. Horton,
Senior Building Inspector
CWH:gar
cc to J. Bredermeyer, President Board. of Trustees
New York State Department environmental Conservation
Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356
DATE: G�.(C, t,�i. /.�� &
Re: Thomas C. Jorling
Commissloner
U �
Dear,&, �Gt�'-! �
v D
1 � !
A review has been made of your proposal to:
i
Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department .
of Environmental Conservation has determined that the parcel
a• project is :
Greater than 300 ' from inventoried tidal wetlands.
Landward of a substantial man-made structure
greater than 100 ' in length which was constructed prior to 9 20 77.
Landward of the 10 ' above mean sea level elevation contour on a
gradual, natural slope.
Landward of the topographic crest of a bluff, cliff 'or dune which is
greater than 10 ' in ele-va ion aboq mean s a level.. /
Therefore no ermit isOre uired under the Tidal Wetlands Act (Article 2
• P q ( t 5
of the Environmental Conservation Law) . Please be advised, however, that
no construction, sedimentation or disturbance of any kind may take place
seaward of the 10 ' contour or topographic crest without a permit. It is
your -,responsibility to ensure that all necessary precautions ate 'taken -to
prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance' to the
ground surface or vegetation in this area as a result of your project.
Such precautions may include providing adequate work area between the
10 ' contour or topographic crest and the project (i .e. a 15 ' ' to 20 ' wide
construction area) or erection of a temporary fence, barrier , or hay
bale berm.
Please note that any additional work, or modification to the project as
described, may require authorization by this Department. Please contact
this office if such are contemplated.
Please be further advised that this letter does not relieve you of the
responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other
agencies. :
Very truly yours,
yjq ;%/ Deputy Regional Permit Administrator /
12/12/�_K 19: 02 WNW PAGE 01
.r- FISHERS ISU.; �ONSERVANCY, INC.
Bo.', 553
• i
i , 1992
SoutholdMr , John Bredemever Chairmai
rd TrusLensDear MT. Bredemeyer !
Town Hall , Main Road ,
I
This letter is `a"* ic4:y_. in the ra[.opes that jiC]t..e- or your agerlty i
can Le#°T i t+ c e building 1.1'rojen now underway�y lri)��P r'�Ci/s�Ij Fishers -1 atc�.nd "
{ ,t .,p oseyP t ,)eY t.} (Lot JY F0'�0-34-fl.:^30Lt 4i5', . 1(t is
�.
a e.. 4` S -. �V � r
our surmisethatthatL`�`si project 3 Era ,J be �i1 violation ?t the xG C)t:- c..
Hazard3 �
�:i.!of s t e_ut n 7.:� f Zy3 .tom 4 1 3 y 1.e+� a f the �'i �
ode) with
i%i. are also so '-iyr up met that tie County Law creating a Critical
1'a?d .T._ s.'t x5`neTf r' 8 a !-aa:,a overll Fishers i':.'rs
_�}.'`,_x?6 aa1no d e ' that a ` Q1Z f o
r:1't ! assessment form
has Ken i 4NA ON- case despite the relative ease (20 4 '1bces
4� <'i3 ' •i t-.t.q,'J)};'}�.� e it can be X Li led i' ut`...
i t. slio :l d be its:eed here that the Conservancy is by no means I
opposedit 7 4. P-'S .z t'4s'l4 &! '-) o:" e uy a.'1'oners building homes on
y 1 follow
a .2 e s i to t a'x e� l r ".�t�.ice.tv i{n s I.
_._�-1•..�:3 i�"+.e �.e L.F F_r,}4.i�.}T I proper �Y(.f e,:.t e1�i L..::_r aid!� %1 i. a�' t Y 7 .i!•.t.. ..�t a � I
fill t,!-t. a .. vi r Cti, 1_ , Ltild fileneeded for alneedediii� ?`3F itS just
- would have 1.y'_ �to Ao were e 1 ro i?7.311_d a new !7C!np there ., In short ,
we are .a•3tt...•no forear fair ss :7uT4�;. nt t the •i�.cuat.C.�in , and .i f 'tti•'.31.��.tion.`_ ,
found.are awe requesting that Y •'t'y t'>"o p I."i a t a C.`.L... o n be taken
whether d.''_....... means additional permitting,�,?�g, �°�T_°'r'e'_°l'-ting mistakes ,. orr
seeking 6 to vaui i tge from ::.E.n a}' t"ro`mace agency.
We dt: 'T.se t35:#'r co"{�.�.Y3`; f ce, lastly, that his structure ure will
see completion �.�•.n y°I..oi'9_._ a us; . ` s e h_�V^:�+ noted , t..�e are asking a
review by your agency €.._`e 0�'—,( C`Ul :!e si if all is p��oce,�':'Cing according
a t r.: };/ 3 'y.7�• feel i t extreme Sti'SA.e importance.
to ou �!_df ; . c l?_3 s z t;[iL T )-s.i � �t �� E.:>
that if SIjol ae t 1 ons or e",t:L.:.t_k( s exist herc thatthey becorrected.
W S_ E e....... it would be c3 ; ,, eat. nnf ud, p r Y_"•C;t:�d e n.r if v s u r u c L.u r e were
e i
completed tri occupied 3 {at h ? t following proper lrJcrtlxe and
evaluations - only II to be use(. later again and f{C7a•1 jn as a precedent
for oVer buildings and strutrure which have likewise not followed
proper channels and paths . Sich an 3 _1ur e;cewould spell dissarer
i
o Fishers s..::1..nd' s cty :. , i i cion and envi"s'•'}aRbTeental efforts , as well
+rtt1`S{_yu, i5,ei.ter-uL;.cs�.6.<:'fi'Ydel eJ.t,]71T:1ent .
i
I
12/92 19: f-)2 PAGE 02
8r.edemeyer Can' t.
It is tbus certainlY 10 sin to requesc a followiag of
proper laws and, regulations it this case, nor is it auz of place for
an environmental -Ltd,I.alai zation such as ours to rvqpest an evaluation
from appropriate agencies , We rely, ai always , on your fairness
and knowlege in appraising th ,s vatter, We Nave rneeived more than
a few c0mdaiats from the pub .ic on the way this property is
being developed , and a ruling by yourself or rhe Trusree Board
(followed by action if need bQ would certainly help to clearii
the air apd restoze needed enSidence
Withv Eery Good Wish,
Kai & Tha,tcher Jr. A7.11ent.
enels : photos of che site a8 L exists as of chis date. ( 12/11/92)
MOTE it mighc ServQ a most tonstruetivie purpose if you informed the
Sourbold Building Depaltmenn that this letter could have been
wricren monchs ago if 1 hey had us a site plan back
in Sepcomber and Occobir when we first asked for one. Both
the Conservancyard Land Use Committee Chairman (Cherry
Rafferty) Ad myself made such a request by telephone. Our
requests were ignored, despite rhe public nature of the
documents in question.
FISHERS ISLAND CONSERVANCY, INC.
BOX, 553
MHERS ISLAND, NEW YORK 06390
1992
Decoviber XI
Mr . John Bredem(�yer - Chai-rma i
Southold Town j.>oard of. Trust: �s
Town Hall , 14ain, Road,
Southold, N.Y . 11973,
Dear 14,17, 'Bredemeyer:
TMs letter is written 'J'n the 'Ropes t1iat you or your agency
-j uncJv.q,!jy oil Fishers Island
can review tlne bubuilding, proi..._ :lox e
known as the Ferc,uson-NseV -c—Loperty (1.ot fj- 1000-006-004-05) . It is
42
our --ur�,jse r1l-&at this project njay be in violation of the Southold
Coastal Erosion Hazard Act (C:-iapter 37 of the To-om Code) with
snecial refererice to oar agran .is 11 , 12 ,13 , 22 , and 30 of- that Chapter.
Lng a Critical
Wie are also very upset that. .,L-'ie County Law creati � I -
11 of —' shers Island ha,s so far
Env.-ILrorm-,ental Aroa (O.EA) over a ri L ent farm
been j.,-q),ored in tl at —3 '110-.n,.7 foj-,-�I" environmental a ssessTt),
has L.c en f i 1 "c irl t1ii case dv3pite they relative ease (20 lilinutOs
or so) xi th ',7 ich it can be f illed 01it.lt- slhould be noted here t1-Lat the Conser&vanc,-,r is by no -means I
opposed to proper buildino, ccastructio-a on Fishers tsland. We feel.
it assential. Jjotjp-vor, tilat all pro-,perty otiners
ujlcji,.ag b.o-jae- on
Vj,9her:; lslankd fol' ox.-,7 proper procedures ;-),I-ld envirorimeatal regulations 1.
L ;
fill out P L_11 rc-1 evant forms , and file for all needed pe-i-mats - juSt
as I would have to do, were I to build a ne-,,,7 hon e the .�r e. In s1-10 r tP
we are. ask:L-4-iz 111:01:- a fair as S'r - L' if Violations ;
sc-s ilerit or the situatioTi, and
are found, we are requesting that
-, L'
appIropr, iate acmion, be taken
�rhether his neans add3tionqj penjittij correct] ;:17 sta
kes , or seelking a variance from in arpropriat,,:! agency.
We have every confidence, lastly, that t1jis structure will
see co-,.�pletion and proper usf . As -wo have noted, 1-,je are asking, a
L)
revie-w by YOUr ageacy to date nnina if all is proceeding accord]Lug
to Souttlo')A' S o m regulation,� . WP- feel i-t of extreme importance
that if violations or mi8talkEs exist here that t1ley be corrected.
ful precedent if a structure �--Yere
We feel it vro-o-ld be a most Procedure and
compler,ed and occup4etl withott following proper
evaluations - only to be usec later again d nrecedeTat.an again as a ,
for other buildings and smic cure which have lj.lre�qise- not followed
proper ch-amicAs and paths . & 61 an occurrence would spell disaster
-L and enviro-nin-ental efforts , as well
for Fishers Island' s conse vE tio-L
as promote~ hc:�Jter-skelter deielopme-rit.
John Br°edemeyer It
r
is thus certainiy is sin to request a follm�ing of
Proper iaa s and regulations J J. case, is :it oul, of place for
an e1nvironmer'itai organ ation such a- ours to re. nest an evaluation
from. appropriate h ,enci.es . Re rely, as always , o your fairnessand kno wl ege_ in appraising th _s natter. We have received more than C
a few complaints from the pu'u '_i.c pan the way this property is
being developed, and � ruling by yourself or the Trustee Board.
'Nfol1ou?ed try action if need b,,) would certainly help to' clear i!
the air and restore needed co ifidence
With Zvery Good Wish,
zn 11. Thatcher Jr. i- . s 'a.d en t
ends : photos of the si..tc as :,t exists as of this date. (12/1 /92)
I
;NOTE e It might serve a r°.:�Vt Eons true-i%rcppose if y_b,u informed he,
j
S utbol.d BujUding Depai tment that t;.zis letter could have been �
Written months ago if k hey had forwarded ias a site plan back
in Sept'eMber and Oci=o€ 4x when we .first asked fox' one. Both
the. Conservancy V.P . aid Land Use Comm- ittee Chairman (Cherry
Rafferty) abd i yself M, de such ra request by telephone.. Our
requests ;:gore ignored, despite the public nature of the
doc,ur16nts in question.
I'
I
i
i
i
i
i
i
i
7z-
fi
17
IT IT
A-
New York State Department " Environmental Conservation �
Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook,, _-_w York 11790-2356
C �C.• � ��'L�.4,L���7i�% DATE:
Re: Thomas C. Jorlin
L is .,.yl C 9
0,,j 3��I� ( -p Commissioner
'�`� C-'(v��c-Z--w•G-•,mot / 9"
DearL� G� '-c
A review has been made of your proposal to:
G1!i9/�_�-��L.�-fi��-tf' ,�EL- �B .r�)(� �!(.,.GAG S E/iz•U l G�L.�--P� ,. .,i�.�2�. i�C�
��LeL�. C7�t�rLGt� ;f[- •�2 G CLx ---
Based on the information you have submitted, the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation has determined that the parcel
XAf project is :
Greater than 300 ' from inventoried tidal wetlands. .
Landward of a substantial man-made structure
greater than 100 ' in length which was constructed prior to 9 20 77.
Landward of the 10 ' above mean sea level elevation contour on a
gradual, natural slope.
Landward of the topographic crest of a bluff, cliff 'or dune which is
greater than 10 ' in eleva ion bov .mean s a level..
Therefore Uno ermit isOre uired under the Tidal Wetlands Act A 2 :
p q W t (Article 5 /
of the Environmental Conservation Law) . Please be advised, however, that
no construction, sedimentation or disturbance of any kind may take place '?
seaward of the 10 ' contour or topographic. crest without a permit. It is
your responsibility to ensure that all necessary precautions are taken to
prevent any sedimentation or other alteration or disturbance' to the
ground surface or vegetation in this- area as a result of your project. 4.
Such precautions may include providing adequate work area between the
10 ' contour or topographic crest and the project (i.e. a 15 ' - to 20 ' wide
construction area) or erection of a temporary fence, barrier , or hay
bale berm. �I
Please note that any additional work, or modification to the project as
described, may require authorization by this Department. Please contact
this office if such are contemplated.
Please be further advised that this letter does not relieve you of the
responsibility of obtaining any necessary permits or approvals from other
agencies.
Very truly yours, r,
4CIAiI�Oe
y1� / Deputy Regional Permit Administrator /
FOR ADJOINING AREA SEE MAP NO.
49 50
Ip 52 53 54 55
E Seale In Feet(AWoxknete)
NEW[ONDON 0 sooD eaoo twoo
MYSTIC TOWN
SUfFOLK T ,rue
CO.' / r ���� SOUTHOLD TOWN Seale In Ktwrnetm(Aoprowmte)
NORTH DUMPLING '
0 1 2
11 1\\r
••I'•r•^ ••', LRLATIMER REEF '•••\••
�E DSOUTH DUMPLING •\
•-i Q FI S H E R S I S L A ND SO U N D
FLAT HUMMOCK
-ILACla Point
%Hill
Brooks Potn!
`— CHOCOMOUNT 'k
S t COVE F9 Eoq I
WICOPESSET
wks Nesf NPl9ry 9A r� N't\n� Is
?0 a,\J'•'v �`/7� Point � � m aHo�. lay East Pt.
6y
L F.ISNE)5 9n
N ISLAI o
D Upr�
o
R,4,n pRBDF a,rt�w Ne N, .C.G.C.
W Y. E 1 d d Trrnrwe Pond LN at,,pG q
t ;•+`,` S`Iy", / Pend ar Po,d D! N my-P� 0 WRECK IS. N
\ L
C3 C� 0 co
• yea\. Ir( Brir4vurd O .�t^'n
�
Air Q�°L t /[D-lPGA B L 0 C K I S L A N D S 0 U N D
M'eEACN ' 5PeE4
U.S.NAVY \
Wilderness Point
o Ia
Mkt
52 53 54 55
G A R D I N E R S
T
{
IUl 1`Y PAfi B A Y
LIONHEAD p
;1'�I.. re o �• � �I HL
S P01N+
KING :f
LN 0 G,
.Frf+,`Iy IOUADRAR1a� o \'^/ aOV�
"� °i?i•�•1 HILL o� PCa
BF i• HEDGES t 0 0`_``- /// Q6, o S•
Lafargeso> s v o��.:
Landin �� 3 I R kip'
m v � QP f.
n rT p/ \� T C•� MMY M DE DR a 9a O1
QgTy\ s 6 tu CAMP BLUE BAY
� m
SA�& r IANIDS \ASSAU SCOUTS. INC.
COUNCIL OF
s B GIRL
i. ABt o 4
008 sy Yn� � a t fACp TOWN PARK MAIDSTONE
,/� I Pq ►NE PARKo`�4
j.M.O.
N--°������NU��N�U�~~~~.°~~~~ ~.~~i
box. 447
Q0OqWE, N.Y. 11959
������ ����������
�~ ~�v ~~~ ~ ~^�~^~
'
September 18, 1991
'
Ms. Jill Thorpe
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold , NY 11971 SEP 2 0 1991r
Re: Ferguson Waiver Request,
Fishers Island
DeFar Jill : `
As a follow up to our telephone conversation earlier
today, I am enclosing a check for the waiver fee which you
had requested .
'
' Sincerely, - `
blenn E. Just
GEJ :dt
Enc .
.'
. ,
N--° ~ `
J.M.O. �A���NU��N���
� ",� =' ~°=-"~-~~° ~..=i
�o. box 447
QUOqU&, N.Y. 11959 '
������ ���~������� '
�~ ~�V �~ ~ ~^�~'~
[N OF SOUTHOLDI
`
August 29, 1991
Mr. John M. Bredemeyer, III , President
Board of Town Trustees
Town of Southold
Town Hall , 53095 Main Road
P.O. Box 1179
Southold , NY 11971
Re: Property of Ann Posey Ferguson
S.C.T.M.No. 1000-006-04-005.000
Central Avenue, Fishers Island
Dear Mr, Bredemeyer:
At the present time on behalf of Ann Posey Ferguson , we
e seeking approval for the construction of a single family
ar decking and driveway at the above noted site. I
residence' ec had previously visited the site with Trustee Tuthill during
one of his inspection trips to the island . At that time
t the Trustees had
there was some question on whether or no on Fishers
jurisdiction over the site since it is located
Island Sound . ' i w we have enclosed copies
For your and the Board s rev e ies oƒ
of the survey of the property, location maps, cop
previous approvals-
As
of the Board of
As always, should you or any rning this
Trustees have any comment or questions concei at any time
matter, please feel free to contact this office .
Sincerely,
{` ^
Glenn E. Just
GEJ :dt
Enc .
_
h
I
_r -.-_.-.+=�'L. _...- �_._-.._--�_...,...-_ .�_.•.V._a'rea.—._u._ --, �e�.. _�.ry..._ua. .: _� _
- - - - - - PE S T wlco !.�
.I 9 H E R S - -I -� L ----A N D
East Pt.
• /9 7 10
neq °
\ /I( Pnrtd
PVIIVTH' /HOUSE S ❑ 1
NORTH DUMPLING 10 12 Iludl
(LIGHTHOUSE) \ 6 Pon ❑
PINE IS. 0 11 �14 1
� fl
Brooks Pt. EAST HARBOR o +
G S.90 Ft. °
Q
Hungry
SOUTH � FLAT HAMMOCK ❑/ ❑ / ❑ ❑ ❑Pt• 17 15 y 5
DUMPLING
N Clay Pt. ❑° 1 16 G O ° ~Q WRECK I.
1
j ° ❑ ❑ ❑ CHOCOMOUPlT ° �� ❑ O1/HOUS
Cal
O E b BeQ�b° 4
Et.140 Ft.+i ❑ C��J
o ° FISHERS ISLAND
O
❑ •COUNTRY CLUB
North +El.70 Ft. ❑ ;� Barley
Hill ❑ ° ° ° Field Cote;•
❑ ❑ Q ❑ I a cot °J �o�`�ht e� •,'
c
❑ 1 ° �11d°poa3 ° ❑� �Gb°rya.
----- - - — - -- ---- o ' - f ... - - -- ° O Perches. - -- T P�dT e ° _ _. _ --- - — ----- -------- --
Pond FLAT -
\ Qu'ket Beach 1 , PLAINS
/ °
° ° ' ❑ y °° Hawks Nest ❑ Barlom
Point
Pond oC6 Y 7
a ❑ p110d Island Pond 60
a ° VEST HARBOR E1�p41A�j °
u a SHERS O O fib
❑° ❑ - ISLAND oe ° o lox
Stony O IIAY HARBOR❑c CLUBTho` c Brick Yard
Beach - `4 CLti BP. .O O��i.
BAY o E1.96 FG+• v❑ °
O
BAlZBt7lt p o ao ° p CLAY -
,_ --�
. - 00 a-
o a. ❑.4 .� co°e Cobe,
-� - ITS
._... 4 SCALE MILE
9 t _ _.. . ._ e _.
l: \ 0- -- C!t - 10 15 20 25 - S. M
- S OF S
a s Pm id nce MASS.
AYIIIARBOR j-
U.
GOLF'CLUB
- - Hartford
COAsr �. o o° o° °. 16. EIIODE
ccARL a'a�� d? on --- ° �S ..5 2 l_ _-._..__. ��.\ o- CONNECTICUT
°° 'E.4TR _ n t— FISHERS ISLAND
1-11
O O TNERTAE-_,�.r - ---- =� - O _. - -- -
---' -
_ USN:. Q
ISLAND..
•. ',c. ._.: ...::: Beach / Norwich
h
SUFFOLK COUNTY N.Y.
eipport
_, . - - -
�ty' New
ELUAIen Wilderness ssPt London
AIRIORT -Saybrooko LEGEND
E
8o� oa
Watch HiII
Alt-weather roads FISHERS 1.
f' - Dirt roads
Y
- loe4 itoniBLOCK L.
- _ _
-Race Pt. V i, . -Sornd _.
't r So,uld GULL B
Orie��GARDINERS I '\
_ --�ti� :-^- - - - -- _ $CAL a YARDS Sotu or Montauk Pt.
E
1.onc Its ma
o ANT! OCEAN
N.Y:
_'- -
p1t:Olt
r _
r .:.r >r. -...—._' ..._. ._ -.....__ _.,,,,•P,; -•�•----u�•'••".,,..-��'��. .�....�i.r»ems...-. ..- _ �fit.Y S.-'wc,:�:�_._•'apt-M.'a� :•N'i<'f".,-._._ - u-�ae."piFS- - vj:�.: - -
Tt.1Ys+t:- - .Tii". - 'v+,a+ _r._'.!•+. 7i6=', '1_ __ _ _,. - .. - - �. .'4.'q"„'.' ,!A'•"•...; ��.;'L{yt� �-...—"--•x�-zi br: _.�:x::...
6Lt, '_.�- ;:.3�?S,F. ..s. _.- .:- T -_..r_.:_.. .;,' - `.-.-r'�"'�Al.. %.�[.'L�'�'-' ._ - S!?:�.'!tR.6'+-^ ._ _. .. _ .__t --.•,.�...�...vaxn... _'_ � _ _ _--
- .s-..:.,.s.-_ `:.i:-, _ ....� � .`'7'n-- �^.,, ..n_..-':T: .. ... _ .r.. — -., ._ sr�. �.a^:5rt,:. .'i+dr�Lrzi:P:_�.Y. ... •'�]'•5��
5i:�.... •- ^:.:, :.:::�.......+a.�. ...+ems- ...•,�„- —-.- 5•�.,.,••
w .t _
,
4
An,.�. • �..t�SZ Al S L. " U s o-,,
� ts
IK-
t- - � ti � _ - - - �, � - - \ ✓ ram - ,
"'" �� f'aGRED GOI.1G PIE1Z P,_
rA,,o :lit__-'ta PIER
C'p'PJ
o � 1 i.
�9 d � Z
I AILFZS I b
FDN.
W/kLL _ .7
_Yw7.5FATM1 �
nQ wtF�p- -9 I O7
I
-
-= I — -- — m
CIO
II I I n
bo
1 _ �3 axTos ram`— -
,, -(-3 �x log 1
ttxtz I I -
I, IS -
I- �
AC C-E 5 5 \
—�I 7 y z
14-16-2 (2/91)-7c .
617.21 S EQ R
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project
or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent-
ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine
significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental
analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting
the question of significance.
The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination
process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible enough to allow introduction of information to fit a project
or action.
Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts:
Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project
data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides
guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially-
large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate whether or not the
impact is actually important.
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project: W Part 1 Part 2 ?In Part 3
Upon review of the information recorded on this_EA,F. (Parts 1. and,2,and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting
information, and considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the
lead agency that:
OX A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not
have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant
effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required,
therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
❑ C. The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact
on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared.
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions
Name of Action
Name of Lead Agency
Print nnype Nam f Responsible Officer in Lead Agency Title of Responsible Officer
l�
ignature of Resp nsible Officer in Lead Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer)
Date
1
PART 1—PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect
on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be.considered
as part of the application for approval and maybe subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional
information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve
new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify
each instance.
NAME OF ACTION
Proposed single family a
LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Central Avenue Fishers Island , Su'ffolk
NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE
J.M. O. Consulting for Ann Posp3Z Fer ( 516) 6 -
0607
ADDRESS
P. O. Box 447
CITY/PO STATE ZIP CODE
Quogue idY _
NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE
Anne Posey Ferguson (201) 622-4444
ADDRESS
181 .Lewis Lane
CITY/P-O STATE ZIP CODE
Fairhaven Ni 107740
DESCRIPTION OF ACTION
Application proposes to construct a single farirly dwelling,
associated sanitary system, gravel drive, decks and to hook up
public water system as per enclosed plans .
Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. Site Description
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1. Present land use: ❑Urban ❑Industrial ❑Commercial RResidential (suburban) RRural (non-farm)
[I Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other
2. Total acreage of project area: 0 . 77 acres.
APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION
Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) 0 . 67 acres 0 . 57 acres
Forested fb acres 0 acres
Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.) 0 acres 0. acres
Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) 0 . 10 acres 0 . 10 acres
Water Surface Area 0 acres m acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) 0 acres acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces 0 acres 0 , 091 acres
Other (In icate type) 0 : acres 0 , 009 acres
3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? MFC—Mmatauk -fine sandy loam
a. Soil drainage: ®Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained % of site
❑Poorly drained % of site
b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS
Land Classification System? 0 acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370).
4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site? ❑Yes RNo
a. What is depth to bedrock? Approx. 600 ` (in feet)
2
5. Approximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes: K]0-10% 90 % Ell 0-15% %
015% or greater 10 %
6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National
Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes gNo
7. 'Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ❑No
8. What is the depth of the water table?, 16 (in feet)
9. Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? R)Yes ❑No
10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area? Eyes []No
11. Does project site _contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
❑Yes K]No According to self
Identify each species
1.2. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations)
®Yes ❑No Describe Bank
13. Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
[]Yes C3No If yes, explain
14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community?
❑Yes ❑No unknown
15. Streams within or contiguous to.project area: n/a
a. Name of Stream.and name of River to which it is tributary n/a
16. Lakes, ponds, wetland areas within or contiguous to project area:
a. Name Fishers Island Sound b.' Size�(In acres)
17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? K]Yes ❑No
a) If Yes, does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? Yes ❑No
b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? WYes ❑No
18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA,
Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes K7No
19. Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8
of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ®Yes ❑No
20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? ❑Yes : IRNo
B. Project Description
1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate)
a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 0. 77 acres.
b. Project acreage to be developed: 0. 10 acres initially; 0 . 10 acres ultimately.
c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped 0 • b 7 acres.
d. Length of project, in miles: nfa (If appropriate)
e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed 0 %;
f. Number of,off=street.parking spaces existing 0 proposed 0L .
g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour 1 (upon completion of project)?
h. If residential: Number and type of housing units:
One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium
Initially One
Ultimately One
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 33 ' height; 29 width; 137 ' length.
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is? 137 ft.
3
2. How much natural material (i.e., rock; earth, etc.) will be removed from the site? 2C�0 tons/cubic yards
3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ❑Yes ❑No lJN/A
a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?
b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes []No
c. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? . ❑Yes ❑No
4.- How many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? 0. 10 acres.
5. Will any mature forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
❑Yes MNo
6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 10 months, (including demolition).
7. If multi-phased:
a. Total number of phases anticipated n/a (number).
b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 n/a month n/a year, (including demolition).
c. Approximate completion date of final phase. n/a month.- n/a year.
d. Is.phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ❑No n/a
8. Will blasting occur during construction? ❑Yes {7No
9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 15 after project is complete
10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 0
11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? WYes ❑No If yes, explain
Tie into piiblic water main
12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? []Yes ®No
a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount
b. Name of water body into which effluent will be discharged
13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ®Yes ❑No Type sewagp
14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes :R]No
Explain
15. Is project-or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? X❑Yes ❑No
16. Will the project generate solid waste? X❑Yes ❑No
a. If yes, what is the amount per month : 0 . 35 tons
b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? klYes ❑No
Fishers Island Transfer ftion
c. If yes, give name ocatio
St n
d. Will any wastes not go into a sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? ❑Yes ]]No
e. If Yes, explain
17. Will the project involve the disposal of-solid waste? X❑Yes ❑No
a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? 0 . 35 tons/month.
b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? n/a years.
18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes ONO
19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? ❑Yes i:]No
20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes ENo
21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? klYes ❑No
If yes , indicate type(s) Electric and hpatinp; f„el
22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity n/a gallons/minute.
23. Total anticipated water usage per day 300 gallons/day.
24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? El Yes ONo
If Yes, explain
4
i.
25. Approvals Required: Submittal
Type Date
City, Town, Village Board ®Yes ❑No Trustees , Wetlands & C .E 1 /93
City, Town, Village Planning Board ❑Yes ®No
City, Town Zoning Board ❑Yes gNo
City, County Health Department 2Yes ❑No S .F.D. Enclosed
Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ®No
Other Regional Agencies ❑Yes qNo
State Agencies J7Yes ❑No N.Y. S .D.E. 0 Tidal Wetlands EnaIog&7
Federal Agencies ❑Yes K]NO
C. Zoning and Planning Information
1 . Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? ❑Yes f]No
If Yes, indicate decision required:
❑zoning amendment ❑zoning variance ❑special use permit ❑subdivision ❑site plan
❑new/revision of master plan ❑resource management plan ❑other R-80
2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? One single family residence
3. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
n/a
4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? One single far,i ly residence
5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?_
6. Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? CRYes ❑No
7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a '/ mile radius of proposed action?
R-80
8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/a mile? A�]Yes ❑No
9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? n/a
a. What is the minimum lot size proposed?
10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? ❑Yes RlNo
11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police,
fire protection)? ❑Yes ONo
a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? ❑Yes ❑No
12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? ❑Yes ERNo
a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? ❑Yes ❑No
D. Informational Details
Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse
impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or
avoid them.
E. Verification
I certify that the ' formation provided above is true to the best of my knowledge.
Applicant/Sponsor Na Glhnn E. Aust as agent Date January 18 , 1993
Signature lell Title Pres . , J.M. O. Consulting
If the action is in the Coastal and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding
with this assessment.
5
Part 2—PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
• In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
• Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant.
Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply
asks that it be looked at further.
• The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and
for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate
for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
• The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and
have been offered as guidance.They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
• The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
• In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
a. Answer each of the 19 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the
impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold
is lower than example, check column 1.
d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in. column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This
must be explained in Part 3.
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By.
IMPACT ON LAND Impact Impact Project Change
1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project spite?
�61 ONO YES
Examples that would apply-to column 2
• Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed
10%.
• Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet.
• Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. ❑ 0 El Yes' ❑No
• Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
3 feet of existing ground surface.
• Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
than one phase or stage.
• Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year.
• Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Construction in a designated floodway. //V 9' ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Ot er impacts Ce-M 741— C,52y C1 a`,, NO2--1-LW P� ❑ El Yes ❑No
2. Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, et DYES
• Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
6
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large Mitigated By
3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change
(Under Articles 15,24, 25 of the Environmental Conser ation Law, ECL)
O ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Developable area of site contains a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
protected stream.
• Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existi or new body
of water? VO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
• Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
5. Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater
quality or quantity? O ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
• Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
gallons per minute pumping capacity.
• Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
supply system.
• Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ Dyes El No
do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
• Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
day.
• Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual
contrast to natural conditions.
�i • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
products greater than 1,100 gallons.
• Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
and/or sewer services.
• Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage
facilities.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface
water runoff? ONO )OES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
7
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. �X ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action is, incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
IMPACT ON AIR
7. Will proposed action affect air quality? �O OYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action'will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
hour.
• Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
refuse per hour.
• Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the amount of land committed ❑ ❑ ❑Yes []No
to industrial use.
• Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
development within existing industrial areas.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered
species?' -SNO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site.
• Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
than for agricultural purposes.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
9. Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or
non-endangered species? ENO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑ ❑ DYes ❑No
migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
• Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other.locally important
vegetation.
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
ENO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard, etc.)
8
1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
Moderate Large Mitigated By
Impact Impact Project Change
• Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of . ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
agricultural land.
• The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10-acres ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultutal District, more
than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
• The proposed action would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches,
strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm
field to drain poorly due to increased runoff)
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? -NNO ❑YES
(If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21,
Appendix B.)
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether
man-made or natural.
• Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce their
enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
• Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
screening of scenic views known to be important to the area.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre-
historic or paleontological importance? -NN0 ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action occurring wholly or.partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register
of historic places.
• Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
project site.
• Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or
future open spaces or recreational opportunities?
Examples that would apply to column 2 NO ❑YES
• The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No
• A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
9
" IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION 1 2 3
Small to Potential Can Impact Be
14. Will there.'be an,effect to existing transportation systems? Moderate Large Mitigated By
`ENO ❑YES Impact Impact Project Change
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
• Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
IMPACT ON ENERGY
15. Will proposed action affect the community's sources of fuel or
energy supply? kNO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of ❑ ❑ _ ❑Yes El No
any form of energy in the municipality.
• Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
transmission or supply system to serve more than 50 single or two family
residences or to serve a major commercial or industrial use.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS
16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibra ion as a result
of the Proposed Action? ., NO DYES
Examples that.wouid apply to column 2
• Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
facility.
• Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day). ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Proposed-Action will 'ptoduce operating noise exceeding the local ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
ambient noise levels-for noise`outside of structures.
• Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
noise screen.
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
17. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
NNNO DYES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation,etc.)in the event of
accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level
discharge or emission.
Proposed Action may result in the burial of"hazardous wastes" in any ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating,
infectious, etc.)
• Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
gas or other flammable liquids.
• Proposed action may. result in the excavation or other disturbance ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El NO
within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous
waste.
• Other impacts: . ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
10
1 2 3
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small to Potential Can Impact Be
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By
18. Will proposed action affect the character of the exis 'ng community? Impact Impact Project Change
NO ❑YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
• The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
• The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of this project.
• Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
• Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No
• Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
or areas of historic importance to the community.
• Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
(e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
• Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future projects. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No
• Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No
• Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes El No
19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to
potential adverse environmental impacts? ❑NO -�fYES
d�UI �2CIi'G � r'rniI'sl6uJ�G�/n� r.��T�Cw� S' F-d
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or
If You Cannot Determine the Magnitude of Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Part 3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(sj may be
mitigated.
Instructions
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2: NO
1 . Briefly describe the impact.
2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s).
3. 'Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
• The probability of the impact occurring
• The duration of the impact
o Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
• Whether the impact can or will be controlled
• The regional consequence of the impact
• Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
• Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
(Continue on attachments)
IJ
11
-a4
I
WEST HARBOR
o
9
3p`S I% it
LIMITS OF TIDAL WETLA�S HIGH WATER
I L
PROPERTY LINE
RVE
LI E—
' E OF S OPE03 �299.OG'
T� _f _ \
--
=
10
c� p
IL
pj
�N�I \ R
\ \ NOTE:
�Qco
FOUNDATION LOOATED O1
\ O
3053T 31°5330 E \\
s i 6663 \21.p4 _ \
FpGE
�8
. `CE OF pgVfiME/V \ \
/►, p�1 T
I �`TN 5226.24
A VENUE
� `0 E 326.93
! FOUN AT
ANN F05EN�
20 10 0 20
_ .._ ... ---T �,�NTRAL
f.
�ISN �2
s
iS
�U T z
4
Ne
� S Q
fb �, C
7 3
Z O
4 O
!c
7
LD
V-1
PROPERTY LINE
i
O
,G Ge
�I ORE LINE
V
0 200 100 0 200
44• \ � ice' f _...___ , g 8
38' q TEST HOLE DATA NOTES:
/ �Sa —I-oTd.} 1 b RE A NOT To � Rio "
� _may, / / / / S � ��.. o•�� �� � �\ BE DISrURBEp 2/28/91 1. COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM
U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY TRIANGULATION
STATION "PROS"'
// '� �� / oP -\0 FENCE 0„ - 10>, TOPSOIL
/ �j o� E� ��' y�o �- �— - �! 10" - 26" ORANGE, BROWN SANDY 2. SITE iS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHO _D, COUNTY OF
-c�� �P�h 4 \ LOAM, SUBSOIL SUFFOLK, TAX MAP 1000, SECTION 006, BLOCK 4,
o� P�� '� \ 26" -106" MED COARSE COMPACT TILL LOT 5
w
,J O F P Q� p E C-K I �� O Y /
/ / A� V Se;- I 106"/ -- 17' FINE SANDa�AIN -few►.dv~fi�- 1 ,� 3. SITE IS TO BE SERVICE BY MUNICiP:.L WATER
AND ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL_ SYSTEM IN
O WATER AT 16
I, 1/2" COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND
DECK ° REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
PROPOSED DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
RESIDENCE
FIRST FLOOR
4. SITE IS IN R-80 ZONE
Ann Ferguson
6 8'-6" 5. OWNER: 181 Lewis Lane
\ Fairhaven, NJ 07704
KNOCKOUT INLET AND
_ �L° \ w• \� / OULET OPENINGS
(201)(322-44441
`C. � DSED� DRIVt � FUTURE �� RIBS INSIDE-,-��
�� // w i eR�P �5 STONE) -`� IEXPANSION Q 6. BASE FOR LEVELS NGVD
�� �' / Q� � ►� �� - - `� / N 7. -----16 ---- ._... ..XISTING CONTOURS
1000 GAL,
SEPTIC TANK 8. 4�OSED CONTOURS
Q ! y 53' 3d -,—1Z1. oil' Cu,�� J
vC� ;' ��� \� — \ ` / CAST 9. 16.8 PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS
�� CONCRETE COVERS
U 52Z1c.Z4
•(/� �0 h \ q.��ji
�� \ 10. 19+0 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS
�j OP � zo.a �fl� o>- � Q��c11c-SIT ) \ ���/ PLAN
e c�.
LOCKING CASTING CHIMNEY AND MANHOLE
TO GRADE COVER AT GRADE
FINISHED GRADE
CHIMNEY 30"
a 4 x 4 12.6/12.6 GA. WIRE MESH 6' 24" DIA. COVER
x 12" 6 x 6 6/6 GA. WIRE MESH ]—
\✓ 1-�Uuur�J�' 1ac+.1�uM�1.1T r4 y,: .• .•..•.• .•
I —! a o a co L— in n ❑ o
y/ - - •. ? 7 o n ❑ o o CD ❑ ❑ a (4)-8" DIA. KNOCKOUTS
INLET 3" VENT-- - �4. 3• VENT-� t OUTLET
�Q `• LIQUID LEVEL_ a s o 0 0 0 ❑ ❑ n
r �.0 Q J �`� // � �/� \\ 10 CONTINUOUS H3EALOT 1 4 OUTLET l� � a a a o 0 0 ❑ ❑ e K
�/ s BAFFLE a ❑ a o 0 0 ❑ ❑ o
� 46
O�j/V 4S SCHEDULE #40 PHALT S LIED wtTH �I
I 1 8 PVC � o a a o c� o o ❑ o
INLET BAFFLE 60' GAS a
/y H O M Qf� J 1 4-
DEFLECTOR =Oa DIA
4" I s'-e" SPECIFICATIONS
I CROSS SECTION CONCRETE MINIMUM STRENGTH-5,000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS
5„ �� !✓ice,-1 r �ln���� STEEL REINFORCEMENT-ASTM-A-615-68, GRADE 60, 1" MINIMUM. COVER
DESIGN LOADING-STANDARD UNITS: AASHO-HS20-44
1000 GALLON MANUFACTURED BY: ROTONDO & SONS, INC.
2 COMPARTMENT
HEAVY DUTY CESSPOOL
CROSS SECTION
SEPTIC
TO GAIN K NOT TO SCALE
,
r.
PP1 eee-T9 CC- 1
S�aS�OF NEB j��
e0
9�K a 20 to o w
NO.ti 05'�6� 4`� JCJS•l..E' 1•• m Z.o'
�pAofESSION,A ►ao�C-� , P�_L "'C� �- V_ »
ace
1-IO�uJ IG4--li, cOU�1�L`l"l LU-T"
I am familiar with the standards for approval Cz--roes d, 19�
and construction of subsurface sewage disposal ,5 JuL-Y 19 1�91 -
systems for single family residence and will �7vsio, is ' -
abide by the conditions set forth therein and ,wc��sT 2C f9�1 �1
dim, ti t15 }.
on the permit to construct. pp��..��
ADDITIONS 4IZEVI5I0N5 SEPT IG, 1992 � 319M
APPLICANT
S1 TE'
6 z 3 g
c _ R
� s 0
z
� 4 O s Q
�- 01O
1 7
\-1 1
V
lzw too 0 200
\ ' --- --
Jt/
31991
�k�� �,aD / 4 �� "J/ //- 38 Toy d •cam6 AREA 8 N O T T D / TEST HOLE DATA 0 S: TOWN OF SOUTHOLD
0.-J1 B E
- ti_,� - o
' � \ DISTURBED {� 2/28;91 i. COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM
U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVFY TRIANGULATION
STATION )R O S
FENCE ------- 0" -- 10" TOPSOIL
j /�� �'• //// % ape �oE� \a� y�° \ - / 2. SITE iS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHC .. C �'
'I I, 10" — 26" ORANGE BROWN SANDY' OUN Y OF
LOAM, SUBSOIL SUFF01_K, TAX IMAP 1000, SECTIC , C06, BLOCK 4,
26" —106" MED/COARSE COMPACT TILL LOT 5
pECK \ ��� � O 106,�
- 17' FINE SAND
/ AIN 3. SITE IS TO BE SERVICE BY 1�1U" :" �''.E WATT:R
-6 1 AVD ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAi_ .` YSTEM Ili
i DECK \ WATER AT i 6 2"
/ COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND
REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
DEPARTfAENT OF HEALTH
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE \ 0
/ FIRST FLOCIR \ '3R, 4. SITE IS IN R-8C ZONE
5. OWNER; Ann Ferguson
1181 Lewis Lane
KNOCKOUT INLET AND
�� - \ w• \\ �� / __ \ _ OULET OPENINGS � Fairhaven, i�,; " ?0�
lid, �—�_�- (.201)622--4444
ORI V,, � FUTURE / RIBS INSIDE7-- �I
STONE) - I EXPANSION a
6. BASE FOF? LEVELS NGVD
7. ---- ----...- `�6 ----_ _ _ r:?;ISTING CONTOURS
1000 GAL. ��\ \` / c�Eu - � D �8 j l 8 -
POSED CONTOURS
SEPTIC TANK --
0�1
3y 55' 50" f�_7 QeP 1Z1. oil'
v X� \\ \ / -- cnsT 9. 16.E _ PROPOSED INVER I ELEVATIONS
0
�� r ij /• �. / �/ CONCRETE COVERS _O
+ V; ?�v V c1) SP r F VATICNS
rIALk-,u1 -T- / ��Zi PLAN
�� v L�� z 1 z,.3 .3
~` 1/O ti� TOCKING GR DE CASTING
\ _ -- FINISHED GRAGL
4HxM 4E12.6/12.6 GA. WIRE MESH X 12 r 6 x 6 6/6 GA. WIRE MESH
a; r
LIQUID LEVEL- `'�� ---_
INLET 3^ vENT 3" vEn?-f
_—_ �P OUTLET 5 24" DIA COVER
t ----
f� n \ In n CONTINUOUS HOT,' BAFFLE r I
I v� ASPHALT SEAL-.(' 1 4" OUTLET I' n -
d / LINED WITH �—
1 l A t 8` PVC �' a c ❑ _, v n c ❑ a
( � ,( !� � - �--4' SCHEDU'LE 40 � L
- (4) 8" DIA KNOCKOU`;:
/\� 7 � O"'k OHL� c� \ INLET BAFFLE # \ I DEFiECTORJ R' �I �I �o ❑ ❑ o c� o c ❑ oR'
t
i 1{{ I o ❑ a n o 0 o n o 1
5—8" o ❑ o 0 0 0 0 0
I- --- - - ----- - - -{ I— 3'
o ❑ ❑ r❑ o n c c o
4
_ CROSS SECTION - -----"--- --
' 8'-0" DIAJ
/ ' /
1000 GALLON
2 COMPARTMENT DRY WELL
SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
i
US O�
Ct:UTP�L_ JA.vt oot-
f-t la-(t�� I SL.A 00 , "t-VJ
20 10 o W
J C> , f�t-.IaCz7 11�C
/S�pZE Ov NEW Y�9� ! "1 Dt✓uJ 1 L t--S, Goal►J c L'T l C.-U"'T
G�PPD H.Sr
� r s� 1 am familiar with ,he standards for approval
'e and construction of subsurface sewage disposal
� systems for single family residence ar.d u�Y I9, V9� I t 'will �� Islo,�
< abide by the conditions set forth therein and
n Ftis� No t1o59�� � on the permit to constracl.
s� \
�p
.4PP;.ICA.� i
-i 72,
I
4
s
i
S _
z
-
4
F
5 �
y z� r
? 4
7
'D
O `J PROPERTY LINE
O
e4 �J
SNORE LI K
/� N E
✓
777= �\ DISTURBED AREA BETWEEN HOUSE AND
CLEARING LIMITS. TO BE PLANTED VITH
/�/_lsl►� \. �� -� "ROSA RUGOSA" (3' 0/C) AND AMERICAN
DISTURBED AREA BETWEEN HOUSE AND / ��":� _
i 8 BEACH GRASS((o" 0/C).
CLEARING LIMITS TO BE PLANTED WITH �/ �j U / LA 44 � 8
"ROSA RUGOSA' (3'0/C) AND, "AMEKICAN � TEST HOLE DATA NOTES:
�� �y mac- �� 38 Lamb �\ l AREAL NOT To io
BEACH G2,455 (�„ o/c) o� / o•�� }i_�cei 8E DISTURBED -
/ / / —`` 2/28/91 1. COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM
j// U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY TRIANGULATION
� 0" - 10" TOPSOIL STATION "PROS"
�o� fENCe
-� \ 10" - 26" ORANGE, BROWN SANDY 2. SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHO'D, COUNTY OF
aow�OE P�`' ti y LOAM, SUBSOIL SUFFOLK, TAX MAP 1000, SECTION 006, BLOCK 4,
J 26 -106 MED/COARSE COMPACT TILL LOT 5 i
F O P 106 -- 17 FINE SAND
\ 3. SITE IS TO BE SERVICE BY MUNICIPLE WATER .
�.0 \ AIN \� -: AND ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IN
ry /� / / j o'y h'�� �P�y DEC RE UIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
WATER AT i 6 1/2" COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
PROPOSED
RESIDENCE
� _ 4. SITE IS IN R-80 ZONE
FIRST FLOOR \ 3S \
5. OWNER: Ann Ferguson
a'-s" 181 Lewis Lane
KNOCKOUT INLET AND
NJ 07704
� / / \ Fairhaven,
OULET OPENINGS �201)622-4444
RIBS INSIDE F 7
\yo••� \\ S� � DRI �/F�� FUTURE 6. BASE FOR LEVELS NGVD
Q�OPU p STONE) EXPANSION
// f
�gHE I9•o-f- -
6 \ \ ►-/ / �+ �, - �+ 7.-----16 ---------EXISTING CONTOURS
x \\
8, F' ?::.POSED CONTOURS
rl
SEPTIC TANK
'S SW 53• `j0' 17-1. 0'�•
. / 9. 16.8 PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS
CAST
CONCRETE COVERS
` 10. 19+0 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIONS
A .
CP \ w.4
2,.3 LOCKING CASTING CHIMNEY AND MANHOLE O L� TO GRADE COVER AT GRADE
FINISHED GRADE
D 4 x 4—CHIMNEY
M E1 30"
2.6/12.6 GA. WIRE MESH 6" 24" DIA. COVER
a X 12 6 x 6 6/6 GA. WIRE MESH ,
/ - - — —
IouuµEs��T �4"
cz)
13
INLET
3 VENT—/ � 3 VEN� t r a o D o n O D o a
" T { (4)`gs DIA. KNOCKOUTS
of EL p — (OUTLET
LIQUID LEV
�Qw N UOUS HOT 1 4 OUTLET 1 0 o D o 0 o D 0 a`
ALT
4. �Y��1) �� ABAFFLE
SSPH SEAL LINED WITH 0 o D o 0 0 o a o
`�'j 1 8 PVC t7 ' 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0
ULE
�Q�f l l !� j !� INLET B D FLE40 60' GAS 4" 8-0" DIA
O'_`�aJ OH��c> \ 1 DEFLECTOR
4" �3" SPECIFICATIONS
CONCRETE MINIMUM STRENGTH-5,000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS
1 CROSS SECTION -
5��� STEEL REINFORCEMENT-ASTM-A-615-68, GRADE 60, 1" MINIMUM COVER
� G F cad rcr� DESIGN LOADING-STANDARD UNITS: AASHO-HS20-44
1000 GALLON
MANUFACTURED BY: ROTONDO & SONS, INC. .
2 COMPARTMENT HEAVY DUTY CESSPOOL
SEPTIC TANK CROSS SECTION
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE
<�/ a
MAR 2 51993
->�0�9H 0F SOUTHOLD
F>WFeZT9 OF-
S�oEOFNo,y0
\G�PRD H.8T, 20 10 0 ZO
I o r} 9I : G►--1.6-►-a O l E P�-L 1�,>r Q- �- V_I"C3
' r � ��i's` ;.a 1 .�0l✓uJ 1 G l—�, Gd LJ uJ E G`r'1 UJ"T' '•
F�s�®p SF No. I am familiar with the standards for approval
RofE 101up� and construction of subsurface sewage disposal
J U L Y 19 1351
systems for' single family residence and will
abide by the conditions set forth therein and Avczus� 2c",, 1991
� on the permit to construct.
ADDITIONS 4 IREV1510N5 SEPT
Goerre_c__
APPLICANT �:zosio.J ; zzJ �3
ADDITIONS: MAPCH 24, 1993
4
k
•
4 ` 7 � •
i � l
' � tii •V
(
,
4
y
'„r,�;�.�,•.: �.�: try •��,�r_:�1., �(,
B plo'�glFt C H. f
- 11
Aj
• � , j ,. ,.�,----•' •->...,r..�....,>,. �-.-t!err,;�- U y- /
p,..••-"" � �`"'' (fly�, - a L:I�JV-'I r t/Flr>n IS
� ti � °+•.,,,wry.;,5 l ''�11� - �
.)f. oa c__. �`�.� %::�:f}'!�111
K
I �
a�
fi T C
1 r Ac T �P IF?,n Fi ri
i P
r" :r�t��l � lnAco,
r o / ely I
rlL7
~ Ps IN,P DI
...
AL
1
3
r r�
�YY
fI'
RHL-'C UCi;F=lNe;:;C) /
o I
N K e,eL P.G
f ✓f
ti
• i 3
PLA►VT I PJ 6 P1_AN
N 0 R..A P-5.. rQ_ I
a Y'
� P
C , S Tr✓ L I AJ Ca
..,,was...�wm,.e..m...,...w.n.....aww..k..,.n...-»,.......
sy �es
�S
2
67 3
! 4
� s Q
3
2 4
77
S D
s, PROPERTY LINE
o
I� I-I N�
--------------------------
L O G.d.-r I OU I-U P
r � 7 L 200 too O zoo
— — — —_---- - --------
UN
S �
AREA N07' T TEST HOLE DATA NOTES:
o
0.1-i /_ �ce�5 \ \ BE IDISTURSED o
2/28/91 1. COORDINATE DISTANCES ARE MEASURED FROM
U.S. COAST AND GEODETIC SURVEY. TRIANGULATION -
0" — 10" TOPSOIL STATION "PROS"
P / 0 FENCE n
��/ 51//// / �� o� 0�� " y��� \ ,I J� I/ 10" — 26" ORANGE, BROWN SANDY 2. SITE IS IN THE TOWN OF SOUTHO''.D, COUNTY OF
\���R V� LOAM, SUBSOIL SUFFOLK, TAX MAP 1000, , SECTION 006, BLOCK 4,
PEE y�P�� VEC-K l\ �� .1 Q 26" —106" MED/COARSE COMPACT TILL LOT 5
106" -- 17' FINE SAND/ ,�A,rt 3. SITE IS TO BE SERVICE BY MUNICIP�..L WATER .
WATER AT i 6 1 AND ON SITE SEWAGE DISPOSAL SYSTEM IN
2
�P� oecK — \ O / COMPLIANCE WITH THE STANDARDS AND
yaS \ \ REQUIREMENTS OF THE SUFFOLK COUNTY
�e<6_,as' /ji PROPOSED \ ° J DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH
REST DENCE
FIRST FLOOR \ '38 4. SITE IS IN R-80 ZONE
\� ,/ �•,9� dam'''"" / EL�v 2t.o \ � � ��
5. OWNER: Ann Ferguson
181 Lewis Lane
_ z>
KNOCKOUT INLET AND
�� \ w• \\� ems` OULET OPENINGS Fairhaven, NJ u%704
(201)622--4444
--L
' DRIVt FFUTURE RIBS INSIDE .
/ OP O 6. BASE FOR LEVELS NGVD
x_\\ / / w Q R JyH�p STONE) 19.0 _ EX PANS 1 N / / O+ E&
� 7.------16 -------- . XISTING CONTOURS
1000 GAL. `___/ n•wc�i��` / _
P:>r
SEPTIC TANK s o� 8. POSED CONTOURS
C r` r'
�O CAST 9• 16.8 PROPOSED INVERT ELEVATIONS
Ll S2Zc2 o_ L4 / CONCRETE COVERS
ID. 19+0 PROPOSED SPOT ELEVATIDNIS
�hj� ���� �� w.4 Ec>ce o� I �Q � T ) �ri PLAN
LOCKING CASTING CHIMNEY AND MANHOLE
COVER AT GRADE
FINISHED GRADE
4) \ CHIMNEY 30"
4 x 4 12.6/12.6 GA. WIRE MESH 6" 24" DIA. COVER
NouuNr __ 1�x1uM���� d Q 12" 6 x 6 6/6 GA. WIRE MESH
a ❑ ❑ o o 0 o a
3" VENT--� _I ii 3' VENT•-� a ❑ a CMn n n a a
(4)-8" DIA. KNOCKOUTS
\ INLET _ • TOUTLET
� LIQUID LEVE�- c❑ a s ❑ o 0 0 ❑ ❑ a
�J� / / / 1 4' OUTLET i❑ C
O J / } \ in CONTINUOUS HOT o a ❑ o n o a ❑ a
k / f`-1 L s I BAFFLE o ❑ ❑ 0 0 0 ❑ o 0
` 1 t / t n ASPHALT SEAL LINED WITH
0" S f- OA L� J \ IN SCHEDULE /J40 t/e' PVC I II
vD/ INLET BAFFLE 60' GAS �,� � 4"-� Fes- 8'—O" DIA
.1 DEFLECTOR
/ f
.•. �.,ter--.—•.��.•.. ..—T -
(�. -3" SPECIFICATIONS
4"
CROSS SECTION CONCRETE MINIMUM STRENGTH-5,000 P.S.I. AT 28 DAYS
STEEL REINFORCEMENT—ASTM—A-615-68, GRADE 60, 1" MINIMUM COVER
DESIGN LOADING—STANDARD UNITS: AASHO—HS20-44
1000 GALLON MANUFACTURED BY: ROTONDO & SON S, {4 .Pdc6w��l�f
J� 2 COMPARTMENT HEAVY DUTY CESSP00 " ST^o
SEPTIC TANK CROSS_SECTION
1. 1r
NOT TO SCALE NOT TO SCALE a 1'
A
tiS N o
FecFeZT9 OF-
1.�,.�F��Br',g �� Q•o � p
I am familiar with the standards for approval
and construction of subsurface sewage disposal ,L=,�rT,�,n J U L Y 19 1551
systems for single family residence and will �2��«�o.�s
abide by the conditions set forth therein and l�v ,US 2c� 1991
„oLA
on the permit to construct. `�
ADDITIONS ; RCVI51ON5 SEPT. Ili, 1992
APPLICA.N