The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink AboutNIEBLING, LAURENCE o� red Town Hall Albert J. Krupski,President John Holzapfel, Vice President � 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson CaZ P.O. Box 1179 Southold,New York 11971 Martin H. Garrell • Peter Wenczel 'y�fj�l �a0� Telephone (516) 765-1892 . Fax (516)765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 29, 1994. Laurence & Diane Niebling 24 Margaretta Road Boonton N.J. 07005 Re: SCTM #119-1-18 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Niebling, After an on site inspection of your property, the Southold Town Trustees found that the proposed activity- is non-jurisdiction as per revised survey dated April 7, 1994 If. you have any questions, please call our office. Yours truly, �• 1 ° �- Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJR/djh cc. Bldg. Dept. The CAC recommends disapproval because the applicant has not presented a project plan. Applicant should decide and then apply for a permit. 415 Mill Creek Drive, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. RECOMMENDATION OF LETTERS OF NON-JURISDICTION NJ4 Moved by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to TABLE the request for a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction for LAURENCE NIEBLING 119-1-18 to remove dwelling and construct new dwelling, garage, deck and driveway. . Construction to be landward of the topographic crest of a bluff in excess of 10 foot contour elevation and the construction will be a distance greater than 75 feet from the water. The CAC tabled the request because it needs additional information. It is unable to determine if the wall is within the Trustees' jurisdiction. Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. NJ5 Moved by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the request for a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction for CHARLES AND PENNY BURNHAM 70-6-19 to reconstruct house, all work no closer than 90' +/- from the MHW mark of Jockey Creek. Pine Neck Road, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. NJ6 Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the request for a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction for CLAUDE SHER 87-1-21 to construct a tennis court 1480 Old Wood Path, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. NJ7 Moved by Robert Keith, seconded by Jack Hagerty, it was RESOLVED 'to recommend to the Southold Town Board of Trustees APPROVAL of the request for a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction for LEWIS EDSON 17-1-2.1 to construct a single family dwelling. Route 25, Orient Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. Page 9 I l TRUSTEES John M.Bredemeyer,III,President1r`.. F SUPERVISOR Henry P. Smith,Vice President SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J.Krupski,Jr. John L.Bednoski,Jr.. � �'�' Town Hall John B.Tuthill 53095 Main Road P.O.Box 1179 Telephone(516)765-1892 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES Southold,New York 11971 Fax(516)765-1823 TOWN OF SOUTHOLD COASTAL EROSION MANAGEMENT PERMIT APPLICATION TOWN WETLANDS PERMIT APPLICATION TRUSTEE LANDS PERMIT APPLICATION Office Use Only: Coastal Erosion Permit Application Wetland Permit Application Trustee Lands Permit Application D l9 IS V Grandfather Completed Apps. Date: .JAN 1 1 1992 Variance Required, Neighbors notified Date:SEQ .�,®�� (��RA Type ui/L f it �C6A 1 H O L 0o Review-opt. man 3_';LS'T3 e Insp. comp. /date: F-A__'11 SEQRA Determin. /date:Public Hearing/date: Findings: I IQ Permit Vote: (Y/N) : Special Conditions: ( also see file) Application Number; SCTM 4 10 0 0-119-01-18 Project Name (If any) 10200 .NASSAU POINT RD Date Prepared: 12/23/92 Applicant: LAURENCE & DIANE NIEBLING Address: 24 MARGARETTA RD BOONTON NJ 07005 8:00 AM to 5:00 PM - 2 1-256-3 Phone (.�O1 )316-5486 +6r�e... Interest: (owner, consultant,lessee,etc. ) OWNER Owner of Property: SAME AS ABOVE Address " Phone ( ) Subject Property Location: 10020 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 (Provide LILCO Pole #, Distance to cross Streets if not on location map) THIS IS NOT A PERMIT Yds. to be excavated: Yds. to be f i lled: 80 CU YARDS , Manner in which material will be removed or deposited: EARTH! MOVING EQUIPMENT-BUCKET LOADER Width of canal, creek or bay fronting property: 100'FT Depth at low tide: Aver. rise in tide: 2 FT Distance to nearest channel: Distance project extends beyond similar projects in area: NONE Area zoning: Land area in acres: 1 Is project for private or business use: PRIVATE Intended use of property: PRIVATE Describe known prior operations conducted on premises: NONE Has any prior license or permit been issued to erect structures, dredge, or deposit fill on said premises: NONE Has any license or permit ever been revoked or suspended by a Governmental Agency: NONE Project Description The project description must also include plans for reclamation of land disturbed during construction of the principle and accessory structures and underground structures. (i.e. , pipeline and septic system; make additional attachments if necessary) . r; CONSTRUCT A 3-1/2 FT HIGH BULKHEAD AT THE TOE OF THE BANK TO PREVENT ERROSION DURING PERIODS OF STORM TIDES. LAND DISTURBED DURING 1�;\\ CONSTRUCTION WILL BE RECLAIMED WITH THE PLANTING OF NATIVE VEGETATION. e��(es try�1 50 VT(_C- ie. SEA GRASS, RAGUSA ROSE,, SHORE JUNIPER CS1w. ct 2 w^ l isl ! ms}s�r°rrff+r�$a?rt�r"u A h ri za rr--pft (Where the applicant is not the owner) I residing at (Print-owner of subject property) (Mailing address-phone) do hereby authorize to apply for Coa tal Ero�sio e mit( s) from the Southold Town Trustees Signature THIS IS NOT A PERMIT TRUSTEES ," s ;, SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ' SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President ��, r`� Town Hall HenryR Smith ,�. «�F ;'° John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road-a!-p'��4 ®� William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892, Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD 30 year Maintenance Agreement Erosion Protection Structures Chapter 37 Southold Town Code Southold Trustees as Administrator I (we) LAURENCE & DIANE NIEBLING type or print name(s) the owners of .record of property at: 100�0 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 (type or print street address) SCTM #1000-119-01-18 in applying for a Coastal Erosion permit for an Erosion Protection Structure do hereby agree to a 30 year maintenance program for a structure commonly known as a BULKHEAD of 100 as shown on the attached feet of length licensed survey of the as-built structure. It is my/our understanding that we are to maintain this structure with materials designed to endure 30. years and or equivalent to the original approved structure and that for any maintenance which involves more than 5% in length of this structure we are to give prior written notice to the administrator,. waiting for their approval in all but true emergency situation' s which would seriously endanger life, property. and important coastal natural resource features such as bluffs or wetlands. We further understand that failure to maintain the structure could result in a requirement to post a bond and or have the repairs ordered as a lien against the property upon a finding by the Trustees that said lack of maintenance would risk life, property or important natural resources features includi g protec e rare or threatened animals and plants. f otarized Sig re of owner of record //41 S ' RINT_TO � E '� E THIS DAY OF 92 C2_1V1_ _.,19 2� _ Oar- � 800M Wf4 11,-R, v Alafi 1� i�d EXPTO R � 2 1€"" Please submit three copies of a licensed land survey made within one year of the original construction. This maintenance agreement shall only be valid upon the final approval of the administrator. Subsequent owners may apply to the Southold Town Trustees to re-authorize this maintenance agreement. County of Suffolk ) State of New York ) LAURENCE NIEBLING BEING DULY SWORN DEPOSES AND AFFIRMS THAT HE/SHE IS THE APPLICANT FOR THE ABOVE DESCRIBED PERMITS) AND THAT ALL STATEMENTS CONTAINED HEREIN ARE TRUE TO THE BEST OF HIS/HER KNOWLEDGE AND BELIEF, AND THAT WORK WILL BE DONE IN THE MANNER SET FORTH IN THIS APPLICATION AND AS MAY BE APPROVED BY THE SOUTHOLD TOWN BOARD OF TRUSTEES. THE APPLICANT AGREES TO HOLD THE TOWN OF SOUTHOLD AND THE TOWN TRUSTEES HARMLESS AND FREE FROM ANY AND ALL DAMAGES AND CLAIMS ARISING UNDER OR 'BY VIRTUE OF SAID PERMIT(S) , IF GRANTED. IN COMPLETING THIS APPLICATION, I HEREBY AUTHORIZE THE TRUSTEES, THEIR AGENT(s) OR REPRESENTATIVE(s) , TO ENTER ONTO MY PROPERTY TO INSPECT THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH REVIEW OF THIS APPLICATION. SIGNATURE SWORN TO BEFORE ME THIS 3 1 DAY OF 19 `12� t I'liiliffl/!//l NOTAri FU�LIC my mb-foa mm.m. ufllfii. 23, Imo Suggested space for location Map THIS IS NOT A PERMIT f �1861 I I Hdd 7ffa: � L . April 8, '1994 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Main Street Southold, New York 11971 RE: Suffolk County Tax Map Number 1000-119-01-18 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, New York Dear Sir or Madam: This is a request for a Letter of Non-Jurisdiction for the above referenced property based on the finding that the construction will be landward of the topographic crest of a bluff in excess of 10 foot contour elevation and the construction will be a distance greater than 75 feet from the water. Authorization has been granted to Bates & Booher by the Owner to submit this request. This request is being made for removal of the existing two story dwelling and construction of a new two story, single- family dwelling with garage, deck and driveway. A location map showing the site is enclosed. The owner of the property is Laurence Niebling, who resides at 24 Margaretta Road, Boonton, New Jersey 07005, phone (201)316-5486. If further information is needed, please notify Bates & Booher, Box 510, Sag Harbor, New York 11963 , phone (516)725- 0229, as we are the contact for Mr. Niebling. S'n rely, Harry Bat s Bates & B her Architects Enclosures Two surveys Location Map of Site Architects Box 510 Main Street Sag Harbor, NY 11963-0024 (516) 725-0229 d ovl CeA�e<- (ire& }ed l.0 CCr 3/ F Tie �o i 3" X (o', C 6" ,( 6" Top G-04-4-om s��v1�2s'S w � � bA+-4- ' f3 locks ( to'' xb" X14' a+ eac1h Ja , %n1-. O (-�re� e�4 I. 5 CCA 2'` X/Z" Cop +H—Aber' ( 4req-teal -to )-o CcR) 2 .Xt2.` c "'l —r 0 {.._0. t.l r K C F a e 1002-0 'Po'i v►+- Rc� ' w� C-k0cJ LAd: c e n er- r\e o� V \:,v� ? v 03 1000 - 119 - 01 - I S 1 M +' a� O a! 1 Jn i _ - ' � 1'L ►"!'� S' -----cis—1'r. -"Z[! --ai.2- ! I Scc, le� 'lto = 1 �► 'o 106 135 � 1-4octs� L a a1r1 A4 Set -� -- -- - a _ h a� c - tea E 54m et - e -73 0001, �t 37' >— IF 3 G� clar„ TrtetArol /. o cc,4 o s Scale .og = I ' ra egYlyd 2-. I� 9 og (�S p P � r - -`Gv•��`_�4 f lacks �� _G"X4' N_ to n ;PAt' S � 4 1 o � - �s F£ �., *'g• 0./1 f 0.-t*w �. 00 pp, 70 u rr Par / FND / NON / � F O.Ew LOT 86 CONC. / N PAT/O CONC. BLOCK ryV He rAVI Ns WALL O.sw / OO � urtr �b rac CO LOT 85 AREA = 40,686.74sq.ft. (0.934acres) TO TE LM ( PORCH / OVER 0 V PLArFUH„// LOT 84 lk o a FND °" Z MON !!OOD �P N ENCLOSED Sr£P!4 CK /v PORCH WOOD 4 CONC. DECK �� PA rJO 1.�'S FJ8N -10 WSrE s SURVEY OF o� \BN? ti L O T 85 wo MAP OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SEC TION B O NA SAU POINT CLUB R OPER TIES INC. FILED OCT. 4, 1919 FILE 40. 745 A T NA SSA U POINT ��- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOL K COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 119 - 01 - 18 Scale 1" = 40' March 20, 1989 CERTIFIED TO- TITLE USA INSURANCE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK LAURENCE NIEBLING DIANE NIEBLING �� LAND SG A. Prepued in accordance with the minimum 0 standards for title surveys as established b the L.I.A.C.S. and approved and adopted for such use b The New York State Land N Title Asaociat/on. w_ .� S. L/C. NO. 49668 E S. P.C. f(516) R P. O. BO MAIN ROAD Cnl/TLJnt n A/ V Ila71 v s 0 0FC.11 *9 OIw f / ��oO OO ' o u ra s / FND MON • F O.P'N LOT 86 CONC. CONC. BLOCK Jw a j MALL / Ural ' hb Lots GJ LOT e5 / AREA = 40,686.74sq.ft. (0.934acres) TO TIE LME L PORCH / R10o PLA rFURAll LOT 84 1AJ ' �k s FND MON I; !FOOD q 2 N / ENCLOSED sTEF�s bra 16— / ?vHcN y 000 1 `�`� PAC. DE CX S TIO FAS SURVEY OF LOT 85 ,p „o �� MAP OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION � SEC TION B o ti NA SA U P O N T CL Ufa i ROPER INC. FILED OCT. 40 1919 FILE 745 -9 AT NASSAU POINT TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOL K COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 119 - 01 - 18 Scale 1" = 40' March 20, 1989 CERTIFIED TO: TITLE USA INSURANCE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK LAURENCE NIEBLING DIANE NIEBLING ,n LANDSG �5 ?N A. IN 'Q Prepared In accordance with the minimum �+ o standards for title surveys as established by the L.I.A.L.S. and approved and adopted for such use by The New York State Land N� ' S. LIC. NO. 496,- Title Association. E F(516) RA P.C. / P. O. BO f MAIN ROAD Tow Or) ?.4.16-4(2/87�)—Text 12 PROJECT I.D.NUMBER 617.21 SEOR Appendix C State Environmental Quality Review SHORT ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM For UNLISTED ACTIONS Only PART I—PROJECT INFORMATION (To be completed by Applicant or Project sponsor) 1. APPLICANT/SPONSOR 2. PROJECT NAME G 10200 3. PROJECT LOCATION: Municipality CUTCHOGUE County SOU HFOLK 4. PRECISE LOCATION(Street address and road intersections, prominent landmarks,etc.,or provide map) 10020 NASSAU POINT RD CUTCHOGUE NY 11935 5. IS PROPOSED ACTION: 1Z New ❑Expansion ❑Mod If lost[onialteration 6. DESCRIBE PROJECT BRIEFLY: CONSTRUCT A 3-1/2 FT HIGH BULKEAD AT TOE OF BANK TO PREVENT BANK ERROSION DURING TIMES OF STORM TIDES 7. AMOUNT OF LAND AFFECTED: Initially 1/20 acres Ultimately acres 8. WILL PROPOSED ACTION COMPLY WITH EXISTING ZONING OR OTHER EXISTING LAND USE RESTRICTIONS? ®Yes ❑No If No,describe briefly 9. WHAT IS PRESENT LAND USE IN VICINITY OF PROJECT? KI Residential ❑Industrial ❑Commercial ❑Agriculture ❑Park/Forest/Open space ❑Other Describe: 10. DOES ACTION INVOLVE A PERMIT APPROVAL,OR FUNDING, NOW OR ULTIMATELY FROM ANY OTHER GOVERNMENTAL AGENCY(FEDERAL, STATE OR LOCAL)? LJ Yes ❑No If yes, list agency(s)and permit/approvals NE6,T STATE DEPT OF ENVIRONMENTAL CONSERVATION 11. DOES ANY ASPECT OF THE ACTION HAVE A CURRENTLY VALID PERMIT OR APPROVAL? ❑Yes No If yes, list agency name and permitlapproval 12. AS A RESULT OF PROPOSED ACTION WILL EXISTING PERMIT/APPROVAL REQUIRE MODIFICATION? ❑Yes No I CERTIFY THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED ABOVE IS TRUE TO THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE Applicant1sponsor name: LOLIkr %.CP .yGb Date: 12 31 Z Signature: /r If the action is in t Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this assessment OVER 1 . PART II—ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT (To be completed by Agency) A. DOES ACTION EX ED ANY TYPE I TF IOLD IN 6 NYCRR, PART 617.12?, If yes,coordin ie review process and'use the FULL EAF. ❑Yes No B. WILL ACTION RECEIVE COORDINATED REVIEW AS PROVIDED FOR UNLISTED ACTIONS IN 6 NYCRR,PART 617.6? If.No,a negative declaration may be superseded by another involved agency. Yes ❑No C. COULD ACTION RESULT IN ANY ADVERSE EFFECTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE FOLLOWING:(Answers may be handwritten, if legible) C1. Existing air quality, surface or groundwater quality or quantity, noise levels, existing traffic patterns, solid waste production or disposal, potential for erosion,drainage or flooding problems? Explain briefly: C2. Aesthetic,agricultural,archaeological,historic,or other natural or cultural resources;or community or neighborhood character?Explain briefly: 04 0 C3. Vegetation or fauna,fish,shellfish.or wildlife species,significant habitats,or threatened or endangered species?Explain briefly: C4. A community's existing plans or goals as officially adopted,or a change in use or Intensity of use of land or other natural resources?Explain briefly C5. Growth,subsequent development,or related activities likely to be induced by the proposed action?Explain briefly. C6. Long term,short term,cumulative,or other effects not identified in C1-05?Explain briefly. C7. Other Impacts(including changes In use of either quantity or type of energy)?Explain briefly. D. IS THERE,OR I THERE LIKELY TO BE,CONTROVERSY RELATED TO POTENTIAL ADVERSE ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS? ❑Yes No If Yes,explain briefly PART III—DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE (ro be completed by Agency) INSTRUCTIONS: For each adverse effect identified above,determine whether It is substantial,large,important or otherwise significant. Each effect should be assessed in connection with its (a) setting (i.e. urban or rural); (b) probability of occurring; (c) duration; (d) Irreversibility; (e)geographic scope;and (f) magnitude. If necessary,add attachments or reference supporting materials. Ensure that explanations contain sufficient detail to show that all relevant adverse impacts have been Identified and adequately addressed. ❑ Check this box if you have identified one or more potentially large or significant adverse impacts which MAY occur. Then proceed directly to the FULL EAF and/or prepare a positive declaration. l Check this box if you have determined, based on the information and analysis above and any supporting documentation, that the proposed action WILL NOT result in any significant adverse environmental impacts AND provide on attachments as necessary, the reasons supporting-this determination: Tool o'F Sd ce x4j ig Name of Lead Agency nl+�S- �� . o� Tie us rem 6Vrint or T e Name of Responsible Officer in Lead ency Title of Responsible Officer Signature o Responsibl cer in Lead Tgency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Date 2 Part ^ -PROJECT IMPACTS AND TH1' MAGNITUDE Responsibility of Lead Agency" General Information (Read Carefully) • In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst. e Identifying that an impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it be.looked at further. • The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3. • The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question. • The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question. • In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumlative effects. Instructions (Read carefully) a. Answer each of the 19 questions in FART 2.' Answer Yes if there will be any impact. ' b. Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers. c. If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box (column 1 or 2) to indicate the potential size of the impact. If impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than example, check column 1. d. If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3. e. If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be explained in,Part 3. - 1 2 3 Small to Potential Can Impact Be IMPACT ON LAND Moderate Large Mitigated By 1 . Will the proposed action result in a physical change to the project site? Impact Impact Project Change ONO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot rise per 100 ❑ foot of length), or where the general slopes in the project area exceed ❑ Yes ❑No' 10%. • Construction on land where the depth to the water table is less than ❑ 3 feet. ❑ Dyes ❑No • Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more vehicles. El L] ❑Yes ❑No • Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or generally within ❑ ❑ 3 feet of existing ground surface. Dyes ❑No • Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or involve more ❑ ❑ than one phase or stage. ❑Yes ❑No • Excavation for mining purposes that would remove more than 1,000 ❑ ❑ tons of natural material (i.e., rock or soil) per year. ❑Yes ❑No • Construction or expansion of a sanitary landfill. ❑ ❑ • Construction in a designated floodway. ' El Yes ❑No ❑ es ❑No • Other impacts ❑ ❑1' ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 2. Will there be an effect tr. _..iy ur:.que or unusual land forms found on _ the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)DNO DYES f` • Specific land forms: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 6 25. Approvals Required: Submittal Z`YPe Date City, Town, Village Board \ ®Yes ❑No SOUTHOLD TOWN TRUSTEES 01/11/93 City,,Town, Village Planning Board Oyes ❑No City, Town Zoning Board Oyes ❑No City, County-Health Department Oyes ONo -Other Local Agencies ❑Yes ❑No Other Regional Agencies Oyes ❑N.o State Agencies lYes ❑No NY DEC:. 01/15/93 Federal Agencies []Yes ❑No C. Zoning and Planning Information 1. Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision? Dyes KINo If Yes, indicate decision required: Ozoning amendment ❑zoning variance Ospecial use permit Osubdivision Osite plan ❑new/revision of master plan Oresource management plan ❑other 2. What is the zoning classification(s)of the site? 3.. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning? 4. What is the proposed zoning of the site? 5. What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning? 6_ Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans? TlYes ONo 7. What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a IA mile radius of proposed action? 8. Is the proposed action compatible with adjoining/surrounding land uses within a '/4 mile? M)Yes ❑No 9. If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, how many lots are proposed? a. What is the minimum lot size proposed? 10. Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of sewer or water districts? Dyes '®No 11 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection)? Oyes MNo a. If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand? Dyes ❑No 12. Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels? Dyes )]No a. If yes, is the existing road network adequate to handle the additional traffic? Dyes ❑No D. Informational Details Attach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures which you propose to mitigate or avoid them. E. Verification certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my knowledge. Applicant/Spons Name A CE NIEBLING Date 02/22/93 d . Signature Title OWNER If the io is in the Coastal Area d you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with his ssessment. 5 2. How much natural mater e., rock,'earth, etc.) will be removed fii� 'the site? tons/cubip+yards 3. Will disturbed areas be reclaimed? ]Yes ONo ❑N/A a. If yes, for what intended purpose is the site being reclaimed? RESTORE NATURAL VtGATATION b. Will topsoil be stockpiled for'reclamation? OYes )7No / C. Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation? ❑Yes UNo `. 4. How many acres-of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site? .05 acres. 5. Will any mature-forest (over 100 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project? OYes _ ®No 6. If single phase project: Anticipated period of construction 2 months, (including demolition). 7. If multi-phased: a. Total number of phases anticipated (number). b. Anticipated date of commencement phase 1 month year, (including demolition). c. Approximate completion date of final phase month year. d. Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases? ❑Yes ONo 8. Will blasting occur during construction? OYes I]No 9. Number of jobs generated: during construction 2 after project is complete 10. Number of jobs eliminated by this project 11. Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities? OYes tRo If yes, explain 12. Is surface liquid waste disposal involved? OYes IENo a. If yes, indicate type of waste (sewage, industrial, etc.) and amount b. Name'of water body into which effluent will be discharged 13. Is subsurface liquid waste disposal involved? ❑Yes Z7No Type 14. Will surface area of an existing water body increase or decrease by proposal? ❑Yes �DNo Explain 15. Is project or any portion of project located in a 100 year flood plain? ]Yes ONo 16. Will the project generate solid waste? Dyes tNo - a. If yes, what is the amount per month tons b. If yes, will an existing solid waste facility be used? ❑Yes ❑No c. If yes,.give name location d. Will any wastes not go into a.sewage disposal system or into a sanitary landfill? OYes ONo e. If Yes, explain 17. Will the project involve the disposal of solid waste? Oyes KINo a. If yes, what is the anticipated rate of disposal? tons/month. b. If yes, what is the anticipated site life? years. 18. Will project use herbicides or pesticides? ❑Yes MNo 19. Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)? OYes )ONo 20. Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels? ❑Yes E]No 21. Will project result in an increase in energy use? Dyes KINo If yes , indicate type(s) 22. If water supply is from wells, indicate pumping capacity gallons/minute. 23. Total anticipated-water usage per day gallons/day. F 24. Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding? OYes nNo If Yes, explain 4 Z. Approximate percentage of prof, d project site with slopes: NO-10% _'.- °� Ell 0 15`;'0 015%. or greater % 6. Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or the National Registers of Historic Places? ❑Yes 17No '. Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks? ❑Yes ~I�JNo 8. What is the depth of the water table? — (in feet) 9. Is;site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes- ]No' 10. Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area?. ❑Yes TINo 11. Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered? ❑Yes ENo According to Identify each species 12. Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations) K]Yes ❑No Describe SAND PEA A k S 13. Is the project- sit-2 presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area? ❑Yes nNo If yes, explain 14. Does the present site include scenic views known to be important to the community? ❑Yes K]NO 15. Streams within or contiguous to project area: NONE a. Name of Stream and name of River to which it is tributary 16. Lakes, ponds; wetland areas within or contiguous to project area: a. Name NONE b. Size (In acres) 17. Is the site served by existing public utilities? ]Yes ❑No a) If Yes,'does sufficient capacity exist to allow connection? :JYes ❑No b) If Yes, will improvements be necessary to allow connection? ❑Yes ❑No 18. Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to Agriculture and Markets Law, Article 25-AA, Section 303 and 304? ❑Yes Z]No 19. Is the site located_in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated.-pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL, and 6 NYCRR 617? ❑Yes ❑No 20. Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous wastes? []Yes )]No B. Project Description 1. Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate) a. Total contiguous acreage owned or controlled by project sponsor 1 acres. b. Project acreage to be developed: acres initially; acres ultimately. c. Project acreage to remain undeveloped acres. d. Length of project, in miles: (If appropriate) e. If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed %; f. Number of off-street parking spaces existing proposed g. Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour (upon completion of project)? h. If residential: Number and type of housing units: One Family Two Family Multiple Family Condominium Initially 1 Ultimately l i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure 20 height; 48 width; 38 length. j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?_ ft. 3 PART 1—PROJECT INFOR MON Prepared by Project Sponsor NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be'considere as part of the application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any addition information you believe will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3. . It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies, research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance. NAME OF ACTION LOCATION OF ACTION(Include Street Address, Municipality and County) 10020 NASSAU POINT RD. , CUTCHOGUE NY NAME OF APPLICANT/SPONSOR BUSINESS TELEPHONE LAURENCE & DIANE NIEBLING (201 ) 256-3422 ADDRESS 24 MARGARETTA ROAD CITY/PO - _ STATE ZIP CODE BOONTON NJ 107005 NAME OF OWNER(If different) BUSINESS TELEPHONE ADDRESS CITYIPO STATE ZIP CODE DESCRIPTION OF ACTION CONSTRUCT A 3.5' HIGH TO 7.0' HIGH BULKHEAD TO PREVENT EROSION DURING STORM TIDES. CONSTRUCT A GAZEBO. (SEE ATTACHED DRAWINGS) Please Complete Each Question—Indicate N.A. if not applicable A. Site Description Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas. 1. Present land use: ❑Urban , ❑Industrial ❑Commercial El Residential (suburban) ❑Rural (non-farm) ❑Forest ❑Agriculture ❑Other 2. Total acreage of project area: acres. APPROXIMATE ACREAGE PRESENTLY AFTER COMPLETION Meadow or Brushland (Non-agricultural) acres acres Forested acres acres Agricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture,-,etc.) acres acres Wetland (Freshwater or tidal as per Articles 24, 25 of ECL) LESS THAN 1 acres LESS 'THAN 1 acres Water Surface Area acres acres Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill) acres acres Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces acres acres Other (Indicate type) acres acres 3. What is predominant soil type(s) on project site? a. Soil drainage: ❑Well drained 100 % of site ❑Moderately well drained °o of site ❑Poorly drained % of site b. If any agricultural land is involved, how many acres of soil are classified within soil group 1 through 4 of the NY Land Classification System? acres. (See 1 NYCRR 370). 4. Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site ❑Yes ®No a. What is depth to bedrock? (in feet) 2 y a 14-16-2 (2/87)-7c • 617.21 SEaR f' Appendix A State Environmental Quality Review FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM Purpose: The full EAF is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, whether a project or action may be significant. The question of whether an action may be significant is not always easy to answer. Frequent- ly, there are aspects of a project that are subjective or unmeasureable. It is also understood that those who determine significance may have little or no formal knowledge of the environment or may be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many who have knowledge in one particular area may not be aware of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance. The full EAF is intended to provide a method whereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process has been orderly, comprehensive in nature,yet flexible to allow introduction of information to fit a project or action. Full EAF Components: The full EAF is comprised of three parts: Part 1: Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists a reviewer in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3. ?art 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance as to whether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or whether it is a potentially- large impact. The form also identifies whether an impact can be mitiga Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is us eL�vh4thWr e impact is actually important. FEB 2 6 1993 DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE—Type 1 and Unl 0L1 HnF Identify the Portions of EAF completed-for this project: [ Part 1 ❑ Part 2- El Part 3 Upon review of the information recorded on this EAF(Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and considering both the magitude'and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that: A. The project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one which will not have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared. ❑ B. Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect for this Unlisted Action because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.* - - ❑ C. The project may result-in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared. * A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted Actions Name of Action o ��S CAM) Sd cc e od Name of Lead Agency r 2 Prin or Ty e Name of Responsible Officer in Leaa Agency Title of Responsible Officer kl^, Signature of Responsible Officer in Le Agency Signature of Preparer(If different from responsible officer) Of Date 1 ' • 1 2 3 Small.to Potential., Can Impact Be IMPACT ON WATER Moderate Large.'' Mitigated By 3. Will proposed action affect any water body designated as protected? Impact Impact Project Change (Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law, ECL) ENO EYES Examples-that would apply to column 2 • Developable area of site contains a protected wafer body. ❑. ` ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material.from,channel of a ❑., ❑ ` - ❑Yes " ❑No protected stream'. • Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water body.- ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 4. Will proposed action affect any non-protected existing or new body of water? ONO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 . • A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of water ❑ ❑ L-1Yes ❑No or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease. • Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface area.. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No 5. .Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or quantity? . ENO EYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action will require a discharge permit. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No C •.Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not El El ❑Yes ❑No have approval to serve proposed (project) action. • Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater than 45 ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No gallons per minute pumping capacity. • Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water ❑ ❑ E]Yes El No supply system. • Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater. El ❑Yes ❑No • Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which presently ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No do not exist or have inadequate capacity. • Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons per ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No day. • Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into an . ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No existing body of water to the extent that there will be an obvious visual contrast to naturai conditions. • Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or chemical ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No products greater than 1,100 gallons. • Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without water ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No and/or sewer services. • Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses which may ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No require new or expansion of existing waste treatment and/or storage facilities. o Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No { 6. Will proposed action alter drainage flow or patterns', or surface water runoff? ENO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action would change flood water flows. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No 7 1. 2 3 Smail to .Potential Can Impact'Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact Impact Project Change, • .Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion. �. Proposed-Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO ❑ ❑ ❑Yes .. . ❑No Proposed Action will allow development in a designated floodway. ❑ • Other impacts: ❑Yes . ONO . ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AIR 7. Will proposed action affect air quality? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO DYES • Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any given hour. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes : ❑No • Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton of refuse per hour. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour or a ❑ a; heat source producing more than 10 million BTU's per hour. ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Proposed action will allow-an increase in the amount of land committed I to industrial use. ❑ ❑. ❑Yes ❑No r • Proposed action will allow an increase in the density of industrial development within existing industrial areas. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO IMPACT ON-PLANTS AND ANIMALS �. Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species? ONO. DYES �.Examples that would apply to column 2 Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or Federal list, using the site, over or near site or found on the site. ❑ El ❑Yes ONO Removal of any portion of 'a critical or significant wildlife habitat. Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year, other ❑ ❑ Yes ❑No than for agricultural purposes. ❑ ❑ Oyes ONO ' Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or non-endangered species? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO AYES Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident or ❑migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important ❑ ❑Yes ❑No ❑ Vegetation. IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES Will the Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?_ Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO AYES the proposed action would sever, cross or limit access to agricultural :and (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard, orchard,.etc.) ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No . i 8 T. 2 3 Small"fo Potential''' Can Impact Be Moderate Large Mitigated By Impact. Impact Project Change • Construction activity would excavate or compact-the soil profile of ❑ ❑ ❑.Yes []No agricultural land. _ . The proposed action would irreversibly convert more than 10 acres-,- - ❑- •❑ ❑Yes ❑No of .agricultural land or; if located in an Agricultutal District, more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land. • The proposed action.would disrupt or prevent installation of agricultural ❑ ❑ ❑Yes [I No land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to increased runoff) • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No IMPACT ON AESTHE=TIC RESOURCES 11 . Will proposed action affect aesthetic resources? ONO DYES (If necessary, use the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.21, Appendix B.) Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different from ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use patterns, whether - man-made or natural. •. Proposed 'land uses, or project components visible to users of ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce. their., enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource. • Project components that will result in the elimination or significant ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No' screening of scenic views known to be important to-the area. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES 12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic, pre- historic or paleontological importance? ❑NO DYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or substantially ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State or National Register of historic places. • Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within the ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No project site. • Proposed-Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive for ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory. • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION 13. Will Proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future open spaces or recreational opportunities? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO ❑YES The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity. ❑Yes ❑No ❑ ❑ .: • A major reduction of an open space important to the community. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No 9 IMPACT ON TRi-,__.�PORTATION _ 2 3 14. Will there be an effect to existing`transportation systems? Small to Moderate Potential Can' Impact Be Large Mitigated By Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO AYES Impact Impact Project Change ..*_Alteration of present-patterns of movement of people and/or goods. ❑ • Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems. ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • O.ther impacts: ❑ ❑ 0 Yes, . .❑No ❑ ❑ ❑Yes_ ONO IMPACT ON ENERGY 15. Will proposed action affect the community's' sources of fuel or energy supply? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO DYES • Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the use of any form of energy in the municipality. ❑ D ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an energy transmission or supply system to serve more tha ❑ ri 50 single or two family ❑ Dyes residences or to serve a major commercial or - ONO industrial rise. 3. Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ONO - NOISE AND ODOR IMPACTS - 16. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of the Proposed Action? Examples that would apply to column 2 ENO AYES • Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive facility. ❑ ❑ Dyes []No • Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day), Ic • Proposed Action will produce operating noise ex El ❑ Dyes [:]Noambient noise levels for noise outside of structuresceeding the local ❑ ❑ []Yes ❑No Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a noise screen. ❑ ❑ Dyes ONO Other impacts: ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No - IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH 7. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety? Examples that would apply to column 2 ONO DYES Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of hazardous substances(i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation, etc.)in the event of ❑ El Dyes ONO accident or upset conditions, or there may be a chronic low level discharge or emission. Proposed Action may result in the burial of "hazardous.wastes" in any ❑ El form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive, irritating, ❑yes ONO infectious, etc.) Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquified natural I%as or other flammable liquids. ❑ ❑ Dyes ❑No Proposed action may result in the excavation or other'disturbance I .vithin 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of solid or hazardous ❑ ❑ Dyes .vaste. ❑IVO Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No I 10 l 2 3 IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER Small'to Potential?- Can Impact Be OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD Moderate Large Mitigated By 18. Will proposed action affect the character of the existing community? Impact Impact Project Change ONO OYES Examples that would apply to column 2 • The perm anent population of the city, town or village in which the ❑ ❑ ❑Yes. El No project is -located is likely to grow--by more than 5%. • The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No will increase by more than,5% per year as a result of this project. • Proposed action will conflict with officially adopted plans or goals. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Proposed action will cause a change in the density of land use. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No • Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities, structures ❑ ❑ El Yes ❑No or areas of historic importance to the community. • Development will create a demand for additional community services ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.) • Proposed Action will set an important ;precedent for future projects. . El- ❑ ❑Yes" ❑No • Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment. ❑ ❑ ❑Yes ❑No • Other impacts: ❑ ❑ ❑Yes El No 19. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential adverse environmental impacts? ONO OYES If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a-Potential Large Impact or If You Cannot Determine. the Magnitude of Impact,. Proceed to Part ,3 Part .3—EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS Responsibility of Lead Agency Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may be mitigated. Instructions Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of. Part 2: 1 . Briefly describe the impact. 2. Describe(if applicable)how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by project change(s). 3. Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important. To answer the question of importance, consider: • The probability of the impact occurring • The duration of the impact • Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value •-Whether the impact can or will be controlled • The regional consequence of the impact • Its potential divergence from local needs and goals • Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact. (Conti,nue,on attachments) 11 14.14.11 (_37)-9c 617.21 SEAR • Appendix B State Environmental Quality Review Visual EAF Addendum This form may be used to provide additional information relating to Question 11 of Part 2 of the Full EAF. (To be completed by Lead Agency) Distance Between Visibility Project and Resource (in Miles) 1. Would the project be visible from: 0-1/4 1/4-1/2 1/2-3 3-5 5+ • A parcel of land which is dedicated to and available ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ to the public for the use, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • An overlook or parcel of land dedicated to public ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ observation, enjoyment and appreciation of natural or man-made scenic qualities? • A site or structure listed on the National or State ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Registers of Historic Places? • .State Parks? ❑ In ❑ ❑ ❑ • The State Forest Preserve? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Wildlife Refuges and state game refuges? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • National Natural Landmarks and other outstanding ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ natural features? • National Park Service lands? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Rivers designated as National or State Wild, Scenic ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or Recreational? • Any transportation corridor of high exposure, such El ❑ El ❑ as part of the Interstate System, or Amtrak? • A governmentally established or designated interstate ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ or inter-county foot trail, or one formally proposed for establishment or designation? • A site, area, lake, reservoir or highway designated as ❑_ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ scenic? • Municipal park, or designated open space? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • County road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • State? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ • Local road? ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ 2. Is the visibility of the project seasonal? (i.e., screened by summer foliage, but visible during other seasons) ❑Yes ❑No 3. Are any of the resources checked in question 1 used by the public during the time of year during which the project will be visible? ❑Yes ❑No 1 DESCRIPTION OF"tRISTING VISUAL ENVIRONMENT �•. 4. From each item checked in question 1, check those which generally describe the surrounding environment. Within *'/a mile *1 mile Essentially undeveloped ❑ ❑ Forested ❑ ❑ Agricultural ❑ ❑ Suburban residential ❑ ❑ Industrial ❑ ❑ Commercial ❑ ❑ Urban ❑ ❑ River, Lake, Pond ❑ ❑ Cliffs, Overlooks ❑ ❑ Designated Open Space ❑ ❑ Flat ❑ ❑ Hilly ❑ ❑ Mountainous ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ NOTE: add attachments as needed 5. Are there visually similar projects within: - *'/z mile ❑Yes El No *1 miles ❑Yes ❑No *2 miles El Yes El No *3 miles ❑Yes ❑No * Distance from project site are provided for assistance. Substitute other distances as appropriate. EXPOSURE 6. The annual number of viewers likely to observe the proposed project is NOTE: When user data is unavailable or unknown, use best estimate. CONTEXT 7. The situation or activity in which the viewers are engaged while viewing the proposed action is FREQUENCY Holidays/ Activity Daily Weekly Weekends Seasonally Travel to and from work El ❑ El ❑ Involved in recreational activities ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Routine travel by residents ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At a residence ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ At worksite _ ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ Other ❑ ❑ ❑ ❑ E 2 �s s-� 0 FE �� fra9• 0.4'w Sri O 00,, r' uT21Tr' R� POLE k \ / FND B / F MON \ / / ' 0.2'N\ LOT 86 CONC. / CONC. BLOCK PATIO 0 Jw RETAININ6 WALL O.8Nrill \ �, t 6.5'N I— \ c Q \ uTKlfY G 1 \ 1 \\ POLE J 1 ` Rz I W LOT 85 �fo� - AREA = 40,687'. sq.f t. i it (0.934acres) 1 To TIE Laub // ` , LOT 84 1! B.!'S ! - 8 7 I I I I r FND , 1 11 \ ,- 3_ o ` M2Nt ` I ` l ! \ 1 z STEP�)S W000 WOOD \ \ 0?°\ \\\ �` DECK F Ze I.8N \ �`\ \ \ \ \ \ a Q•i__� � �' � 22- SURVEY OF LOT 85 '0<0 40-wo \ f , MAP OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION Arj99 \� 6 SEC TION o NASSAU POINT CLUB PRIOPERTIES INC. FILED OCT. 4, 1919 FILE 130. 745 AT NA SSA U POINT ��- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 119 - 01 - 18 Scale 1" = 40' March 20, 1989 April 7, 1994 (revisions) CERTIFIED TO: TITLE USA INSURANCE CORPORATION OF NEW YORK LAURENCE NIEBL/NG DIANE N/EBLING LA w�i NN T. '9 ti Prepared in accordance with the minimum ��'49618 ,Standards for title surveys as established NE�NY� by the L.I.A.L.S. and approved and adopted for such use by The Kew York State Land f'� N.Y.S. LIC. NO. 49618 Title Association. X�z ECON/C SURVEYORS, P.C. (516) 765 - 5020 P. O. BOX 909 MAIN ROAD SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 89 - 174 L New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 _..__.i. M (516) 444-0365 _ Iq _U FAX (516) 444-0373 }^'Y JUL � � l-Q�j3 homas C. Jorling TOWN OF ,`- t &-SOLD ommissioner July 19, 1993 Mr. John M. Bredemeyer, III President of Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Rd. , P. O. Box 1179 Southold, NY 11971 RE: 1-4738-00648/00001-0 Laurence & Diane Niebling, 10020 Nassau Pt. Road Dear Mr. Bredemeyer: Enclosed is a copy of our comments regarding the above referenced application. These comments are based on a field inspection conducted by the Bureau of Marine Habitat protection staff. If you have any questions, please contact me at 444-0365. Very truly yours, Carol Amara Program Aide CA/rw enc. cc: file n �,printed on recycled paper New York State Department of Environmental Conservation Building 40—SUNY, Stony Brook, New York 11790-2356 (516) 444-0365 FAX (516) 444-0373 , 2 , T 4V homas C. Joriing Commissioner 1 July 19, 1993 Mr. & Mrs. L. Niebling 24 Margaretta Rd. Boonton, NJ 07005 RE: 1-4738-00648/00001-0 Niebling Property Dear Mr. & Mrs. Niebling: The Department of Environmental Conservation has completed a field review of your proposed project and has the following comments: 1. Pursuant to Part 661.9 (c) (3) of the Tidal Wetlands Regulations, the proposed construction of the bulkhead will have an undue adverse impact on the existing and potential values of tidal wetlands.. Placement of the proposed bulkhead will lead to the eventual scour of the beach seaward of the structure, lessening bird feeding habitat and eventual loss of riparian access. In addition, placement -of this bulkhead will- also cause scouring. during storm events to the adjacent neighbors who are unbulkheaded, and it will also prevent normal movement of sand in the littoral system by inhibiting any movement of sediments behind the proposed structure. There is no erosion problem documented at this site and bulkheads are erosion control structures. The Department objects to the proposed bulkhead construction. 2 . As per Part 661.9 (c) (3) of the Tidal Wetlands Regulations, the proposed gazebo will cause undue adverse impact. Construction of the proposed gazebo* will cover approximately 170 square feet in area on the bluff face, limiting the capacity for vegetation to grow beneath the structure. This will ultimately cause erosion of the bluff. 3 . In response to your letter dated February 23, 1993, where you state you spread- leaves on the bank to slow surface erosion; leaves down -the -bluff will n fact .-smother existing vegetation, allowing- -for more erosion to take place. , They don't help prevent erosion. �,printed on recycled paper y r 2. 4. This proposed project is also not consistent with the area. The three bulkheads down the beach were pre- existing the law. However, there are- no bulkheads in the immediate vicinity. 5. The Department recommends the proposed project be modified to include placing fill on the bluff and planting with beach grass, rosa rugosa, etc. (low. lying salt tolerant vegetation) . Fill can be placed to the seaward edge of the stairs. Upon receipt of plans reflecting our recommended modifications, a permit can be issued. Very truly yours, v Carol Amara Program Aide CA/rw cc: Br-edemeyer, I IN Town of-S-outhol-d s file Albert J. Krupski, President �SVFF tit�CO Town Hall G John Holzapfel, Vice President _� �� 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson y = P.O. Box 1179 Martin H. Garrell O Southold, New York 11971 Peter Wenczel y�0 a0� Telephone (516) 765-1892 1 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD April 11, 1994 Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Chairman, Transmitted herewith are the following applications for a wetland permit: NIEBLING, LAURENCE SCTM #119-1-18 Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to these applications. Very truly yours,- . Albert J. Krupski, Jr. President, Board of Trustees AJK/djh GOLDSMITHS' INLET PARK o° a (COUNTY) g.n ry(r ry Duck Pond Pt Jar, ri RMSY rr'J ��s! + y �• P. ,�v• P E C O N I C ' �p 1 ! otiG 11958 61 °o CV TCHOGUE P�• IJ ��//^� / STA \ T RD A °fjED PS Bay P � s a� pp EAST NDI•H' 'HECM \,\ „Y GLEN CUTCHOGUE .a � cumnoa 119 3 5 C $i C,UST C N O 'UE ). < � °r ,(�� +.} g i�e� ° c f�,o U ml.� FFNHI d !�'r Ir, a m_a r • .�- � NECK DYP n u DP yE ��pvD°� - Efrue -\' cove \ ' Al�p.„J�s ��° Xag WPtQr 'Ni ZSEifi pO EaS`� a Po° b L NESt P° Y y „ LI"f"I'LE MarshPt HOG . W ' E rYr9 .. h U Q =r �' Dn NECK P//// 1 / a�0� t C[• r E sr 1l No�eshoo �`.lo DDr Vq a e5 .ore -r1{ forme P�;°�ola p z ? f� Qo�� y ; �.V C aDPiGlD/r FFH.ISQQ NASSAU a CUTCHOGUE o= _ bq[q HARBOR �� IC °\. P°g POINT a w Pa0- <RDs !)Id Cove 7)MarratookaPt Y ' . ° - E, �O„p ' �i'' YC. RZ,nogenel �/��D � CIO 0 76 i. r [F OU pZ _ �Q/�� ) Wunneweta Qo ``/�T7��//� ! 1 and NEW SUFFOLK, ; E t I AfM0kl MAC NOR TN ,• ,R � ICE .• 1 SIM, L-0CAT16N ! A } r 39 40 FOR ADJOINING AREA ss -9� a F£ ,p I.9 or E 00 O F' uMip CA r" / / F NN O.Ew LOT 86 cotim / cO PATIO O.3w ry,/ �•/ / Nc. BLOCK PA WALL RET�NWe 'L �t i / tin,,, rote LOT 85 AREA = 40,686.74sq.ff. (0.934acres) / ++ / ot; TO T1E Lm 1 V / PEA 7'FORd LOT 84 NO j N (�P'N j ENCLOSED ?J• ... _. sOE/ 4 D WOOD l i. PORCH _. '1 /ECK, l000 - . CONC. " DECK l.�S G ,ii. A r/O F DO /srspsN SURVEY OF LOT 85 MAP OF PROPOSED SUBDIVISION SECTION - B 02 NA SSA U POIN T. CL UB PROPERTIES. - INC. FILED OCT. 4, 1919 FILE d0. 743 .q AT NA SSA U . POINT �- TOWN OF SOUTHOLD SUFFOLK COUNTY, N. Y. 1000 - 119 - 01 - 18 March 20, 1989 fTP�CGNi.G MiA°f If 7T I it f i I i 1 Tb a6 I f + it 11 b ( 1 TRUSTES SUPERVISOR John M. B edemeyerEIII, President �o��SUFFO(,�coG SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry R Smith y Z Town Hall John B. Tuthill • 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 �a0 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 - BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD August 5, 1993 Laurence & Diane Niebling 24 Margaretta Road Boonton, NJ 07005 Re: SCTM #119-1-18 Dear Mr. & Mrs. Niebling: The following action was taken by the Board of Town Trustees during its regular meeting held on Thursday, July 29, 1993 regarding the above matter: WHEREAS, Laurence & Diane Niebling applied to the Southold Town Trustees for a permit under the provisions of the Wetland Ordinance of the Town of Southold, application dated January 11, 1992 and, WHEREAS said application was referred to the Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council for their findings and recommendations, and, WHEREAS, a public hearing was held by the Town Trustees with respect to said application on Thursday 29, 1993 at which time all interested persons were given an opportunity to be heard, and, WHEREAS, the Board members have personally viewed and are familiar with the premises in question and the surrounding area, and, WHEREAS, the Board has considered all the testimony and documentation submitted concerning this application, and, WHEREAS, the Board has determined that the project as proposed will not affect the health, safety and general welfare of the people of the town, NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Board of Trustees approves the application of Laurence & Diane Niebling to construct a 3 1/2 foot high bulkhead at the toe of the bank to prevent erosion during periods of storm tides. Land disturbed during construction will be reclaimed with the planting of native vegetation. . c - af Permit will expire two years from the date it is signed. Fees must be paid, if applicable, and permit- issued within six months of the date of this notification. Two inspections are required and the Trustees are to be notified upon completion of said project. Permit will be issued upon payment of the following fees for work to be done below Mean High Water Mark: No Fees. Very truly yours, John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustee JMB: jd cc. C.A.C. SOUTHOLD TRUSTEES No* (o Issued T oalb . M&aLI&E Dade '�f1fj Address L0646 &8MM P. L. 12 e . c- u Te ff. THIS NOTIC@ MUST BE DISPLAYED DURING CONSTRUCTION TOWN TRUSTEES OFFICE TOWN OF SOUTHOL6 SOUTHOLD, N.Y. 11971 TE L.: 765-1892 117- - �r � •/� �YP.��'�i+'-�i T6'f�__.____-.-_-.-. ,._!_�J—.4�d!��i ..:,1��y,Y ��'L.��-'�.'.�I�••d�A4� ' , Board Of Southold ' Town Trustees ► -�; SOUTHOLD, NEW YORK ..,. ., it PERMIT NO. y 1 L.............. DATE: .....A../.5./93.............. .77 !„ �i ISSUED TO .....LAURENCE...&...DIA1V.E...NI.EBLING....................................... Pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 615 of the Laws of I' / the State of New York, 1893; and Chapter 404 of the Laws of the y. 3' State of New York 1952; and the Southold Town Ordinance en- ` titled "REGULATING AND THE PLACING OF OBSTRUCTIONS IN AND ON TOWN WATERS AND PUBLIC LANDS and they ' REMOVAL OF SAND, GRAVEL OR OTHER MATERIALS FROM f �` ri LANDS UNDER TOWN WATERS;" and in accordance with the _ Resolution of The Board adopted at a meeting held on ...7/.29/.9.3...... .19.......93 and in consideration of the sum of $......15.Q....00..... paid by t c .. .....Laurence Diane...Niebla g .................................................................................L 'n r � - \ -»ai of .......Cuts.hog.u.e..................................................... subject to the N. Y. and � `i Terms and Conditions listed on the reverse side hereof, sy ai of Southold Town Trustees authorizes and permits the following: TID construct a 3 1/2' high bulkhead at toe of the bank to �k prevent erosion, land disturbed will be reclaimed with the plantig° 1 of native vegetation. Located 10020 Nassau Point Road, Cutcho ,' #`1 all in accordance with the detailed specifications as presented in the originating application. 3, t IN WITNESS WHEREOF The said Board of Trustees here- b causes its Corporate Seal to be affixed and these resents to y P p E'= k. be subscribed by a majority o the said Board as of this date. I K ' ............... .. .. .... .... ......./...... ............ ! t� y� o� ... .......... ..................�.. :......... Trustees �: r [Fa �"� "./ ♦ � A d-r.�Y:�!:.-;aC'� T Tt ris'�d l �t� 0"V.�A!�T e+td �:a se{.'tw J / �:..� 11 + ,✓ryYWw��. � � Nn�.• �� ! ��Fw"C�� G r wY1Pni� � !6( ��' � � TRUSTEES -�SMFFOtIr SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President hy� �Gy SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith ca = Town Hall John B. Tuthill 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson 'j�J �a0�� P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD S.E.Q.R.A. NEGATIVE DECLARATION NOTICE OF NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT APPLICATION NO. 1000-119-1-18 Chapt. 97 - Wetlands NAME: Laurence & Diane Neibling Chapt. 37 - Coastal Erosion DATE: June 24, 1993 RESOLVED that pursuant to Article 8 of the Environmental Conservation Law, State Environmental Quality Review and 6NYCRR Part 617, Section 617.10 and Chapter 44 of the Code of the Town of Southold, notice is hereby given that the Southold Town Trustees, as Lead Agency for the action described below, has determined that the project will not have a significant effect on the environment. Please take further notice that this declaration should not be considered a determination made for any other department or agency , which may also have an application pending for the same or similar project. TYPE OF ACTION: Type Unlisted in CEA DESCRIPTION OF ACTION: Applicant proposes to construct a 3 1/2 foot high retaining wall at the toe of the bank in a straight line as per amended drawing dated 6/3/93 . Located 10020 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue. LOCATION: SCTM #1000-119-1-18 REASONS SUPPORTING THIS DETERMINATION: 1. An on site inspection has been conducted by the Board of Trustees. 2. An environmental assessment, submitted by the applicant and reviewed and completed by the Board of Trustees, has indicated that no significant adverse effects to the environment are likely to occur should the following mitigation measures be implemented. cc: CAC June 3, 1993 T Laurence and Diane Niebling uTHpLD 24 Margaretta Road of SD Boonton, NJ 07005 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold " Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Reference: Permit Application to construct a bulkhead at 10020 Nassau Point Road CutchoQue. NY 11935 Lot #1000-19-01-18j. Attu.. Jill Dear Jill: As your letter dated May 20, 1993 suggested, I would like to amend my permit application to eliminate the indented area and move the location of the retaining wall landward approximately 10 feet. I have included these revisions the enclosed drawings. Please add these drawings to my current application. If you require further information or documentation please call me at 201-256-3422 (daytime). Sm ly yours, , Laurence Niebling 10" p, I- n ?I �o ' ovt CP.nIe�- ��re� fed 1.0 ccA) 3" )cc," Cigwtp ( Trea-�Cc\ 40 D 2< lop F Q-o4--�om S4 -', Y1CleC-S w'4j blk+-4 a IocK S ( �'' x b' X �i') a e a c 1^, 1. 5 G C A) 2" X/Z" Co.p -fiMbPr ( 4r-ea4-ed 4o a cc q} - .g� h eo,+VN,l r%3 ( +r e a,+ e4 { (._0. ulr a%A ��EO1ihA i i o oZ 0 /�o,.S S CA uA. PD I V%+ Sc�v.q CAA 0j LAB. r N center-Vr�e o-li loco - in - of - t8 Gin r � i } 1 - - s4-eT 7, CD s �. --- - Q` i'1'ti EL �.n W esker Mgr'r C.. TRUSTEES �SVfFO(�C SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President ��. pG SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President c� Henry P. Smith y Town Hall John B. Tuthill 1_� 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson y o�� P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 '( Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD May 20, 1993 Laurence Niebling 24 Margaretta Road Boonton, NJ 07005 RE: SCTM #1000-119-1-18j Dear Mr. Niebling: After a field inspection by our Board we determined that your proposed project, as described in your application and as staked on the site does not conform to. our usual policy of retaining walls placed adjacent to the toe of the bluff. We estimate that this would move your retaining wall landward approximately 10 ' and make it a straight wall, eliminating the indented area. The plan as submitted would result in a great deal of beach filling. If you have any questions, please do not hesitate to call. Thank you. Sincerely, Albert J. Krupski, Jr. Vice-President, Board of Trustees AJK:j and - -• - SAP TRUSTEES OHO C� SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President h`1` Gym SCOTT L. HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President cz Henry P. Smith _* Town Hall �' • 53095 Main Road John B. Tuthill P.O. Box 1179 William G. Albertson, �� ' ", . �'' -'''�0 �a _ -s , 1 .r-- Southold, New York 11971. Telephone (516) 765-A§9 Fax (516) 765-1823, .''\'� 1' l APB BARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES OWNiOF SOUTHOLD LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: DATE: "`73 Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Form. Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny' s comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: NAME: Lc�a C271� ,(1;ebl:n LOCATION: •►LoaD f10.55r�v ow•+ (�� TAX MAP: I I 'I-1-1g PERMIT DESCRPTN: 25�e- A�� °- PERMIT REQUIRED: (P-j—TOWN WETLAND ( ) OTHER SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: ( ) Type I ( ) Type II ( L—UNLISTED ( L)--- CEA Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President, 0 days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees (WANT to assume lead agency. SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BLD ( ) Please complete, detach and return this form to expedite processing. Involved Agency: jl/l�S OJL Project Name: L Location: /6628 SCTM: .ro6o- // j-o ! We at h t�7(o (Have/No) objection to Southold Town AGENCY Trustees assuming Lead Agency. Comments/Reasons: d4A Signature of Authorized Representative TRUSTEES O`�SVFFO��CCG SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President �`1` y� SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President o Henry R Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthill �,j, �� 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson O,( �a0 P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-18.92 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD March 25 . 1993 Mr. John Holzaphel, Chairman Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Southold Town Hall Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Dear Mr. Holzaphel: Transmitted herewith are the following applications for a wetland permits: Varujan Arslanyan SCTM 52-1-8 ✓Laurence Niebling SCTM 119-1-18 Anthony Vitale SCTM 92-1-8 Arthur Torell SCTM 33-2-10 &11 Katie Nickolaus SCTM 51-1-2 Robert Hamilton SCTM 76-3-31 & 12.1 Town of Southold-Rocky Pt Road Part of block 21 John Burns SCTM 70-6-31 Please prepare a written report of findings and recommendations with respect to this application. Ver truly yours, �7 -7 John M. Bredemeyer, III President, Board of Trustees f .� �g�FFO(�c TRUSTEES ��, pG SUPERVISOR John M. Bredemeyer, III, President h�` y� SCOTT L.HARRIS Albert J. Krupski, Jr., Vice President Henry P. Smith Town Hall John B. Tuthill y �� 53095 Main Road William G. Albertson O,( �`a� P.O. Box 1179 Telephone (516) 765-1892 Southold, New York 11971 Fax (516) 765-1823 BOARD OF TOWN TRUSTEES TOWN OF SOUTHOLD LEAD AGENCY COORDINATION REQUEST TO: DATE: Enclosed is a permit application and a completed part I of the Environmental Assessment Form. Southold Town Trustees are interested in your ageny' s comments in acting as SEQRA Lead Agency for: NAME: L4L C2 rl(2 'n�ebl�n LOCATION: 'ICoaa f10.5S,-v-V o V4 RA. TAX MAP: I 1 cl-1-11 PERMIT # DESCRPTN: 25ue- PERMIT REQUIRED: (PI—TOWN WETLAND ( ) OTHER SEQRA CLASSIFICATION: ( ) Type I ( ) Type II ( �JNLI STED ( l,Y CEA Please contact John M. Bredemeyer, III, President,days and be advised that the Southold Town Trustees�gy4oe- NeEP=itld49�4 to assume lead agency. SENT TO: DOS ( ) DEC ( DOH ( ) PB ( ) ZBA ( ) BLD ( ) Please complete', detach and return this form to expedite processing. Involved Agency: Project Name: Location: SCTM: We at (Have/No) objection to Southold Town AGENCY Trustees assuming Lead Agency. Comments/Reasons: Signature of Authorized Representative Consultant " �rNd✓�/ ;: Lre�^� Project Name44u&<C- , D14?4� SCTm #10oo- Date The Southold Town Trustee office has determined that your application for a is please consider the following information in this regard for any required return :submission: /VGCZ�S ,�_ A!� T �C_ �n�G C>vV1AOOt�+ ,i, .l rsc�fl ,► !-VC- CA✓y MOT Tl• e.✓yJ12-0+-,r�.9-,, art ! �'r�c�L,- "y ,�i!//G1zs✓ AL 7 'e c.,A -4? Z-!Z - Cw I//arm n^�rr�'rs/ �f� Syh— ,'-t atee Representative cc: - als g3 - . This notice makes no claim with respect to other jurisdictions within or outside the Town of Southold with respect to permits, permission required. 4/92 4 Town Hall, 53095 Main Road Telephone P.O. Box 1179 � • (516) ?65-1801 �;', Qt' Southold, New York 11971 SOUTHOLD TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COUNCIL To: Southold Town Board of Trustees From: Southold Town Conservation Advisory Council Dated: February 23, 1993 Re: Recommendation of Wetland Applications The following recommendations were passed by the Conservation Advisory Council at-pits February meeting: On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Stephen Angell, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 119-1-18 of-Laurence and Diane Niebling to construct a bulkhead and gazebo. The CAC recommends disapproval of .the bulkhead because no need is shown. The house and bluff are not endangered, the bluff is following the natural process. The Council suggests the gazebo be located in a more landward site or on pilings. ---_. 10020 Nassau Point Road, Cutchogue Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval Of Wetland Application NO. 44-22-11 of Susan Tasker. to construct a house. The Council recommends disapproval because: 1 : The project is too close to the. wetlands. 2. The project is too close to the beach. 3., The property is too small for a house, cesspools, etc. 4. The bulkhead- is too high. - 5. The plan is not accurate. (As shown on the plan, at present the retaining wall Would be in the water at high tide. 6. The CAC does not feel that bulkheads should be on the Sound. County Route 48, Greenport Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried: ` _• �- Recommendations Page 2 On a motion by John Holzapfel, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with stipulations of Wetland Application No. 35-5-17 of Joseph and Dorothea Geraci to construct a 6' x 6' cantilever platform attached to existing bulkhead with a 3' x 15' ramp leading to a new 6' x 50' floating dock, and to install three (3) 25' long pilings to secure float. The Council recommends approval provided the applicant leaves a third (1 /3) of the waterway reserved as "open water", that is, the float and boat must not take up more than one-third (1 /3) of the waterway. This would leave the waterway open for navigation. 685 Dawn Drive, Greenport. Vote of Council : Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Robert Keith, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval with conditions of Wetland Application No. 114-7-13 of Leonard and Donna Schlegal to construct a 6' x 95' fixed dock elevated a minimum of 3.5' over grade, a 3' x 20' ramp and. a 6' x 60' float. The Council recommends approval provided the catwalk (not fixed dock) is reduced to 4' width. Westphalia Road, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John Holzapfel, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees approval of Wetland Application No. 37-5-6 of Charles and Rosemary Luscher to construct a 45' x 3' pier from a point 4' over high water mark on property to a point 30' into lagoon. Bayview Drive, East Marion. Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Stephen Angell, seconded by Bruce Loucka, it was RESOVLED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 56-5.-28 of Robert Cockerill to install a 6' x 15' float with a 3' x 10' ramp. The Council recommends disapproval of the project because of the policy of only 4 boats to property, otherwise it creates a "marina". :The property is zoned "R" which does not permit marinas. Willow Point Road, Southold Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried. On a motion by Bruce Loucka, seconded by John Haggerty, it was RESOLVED to recommend to the Southold Town Trustees disapproval of Wetland Application No. 99-3-9.3 to construct a retaining; regrade bluff; and replace or repair stairs: The Council recommends disapproval of the- retaining wall because no need is shown, the property is not in danger. The Council has no objection to the stairs being rebuilt or the bluff restored. 1000 Bailie Beach Road, Mattituck Vote of Council: Ayes: All Motion carried January 14, 1993 OF Laurence and Diane Niebling 24 Margaretta Road Boonton, NJ 07005 Board of Town Trustees Town of Southold Town Hall 53095 Main Road Southold, NY 11971 Reference: Permit Application to construct a bulkhead at 10020 Nassau Point Road Cutchogue, NY 11935 Lot #1000-19-01-18. Attn: Jill Dear Jill: I would like to amend my permit application to include the construction of a gazebo, wood walk and wood steps. I have included these revisions the enclosed drawings. Please add these drawings to my current application . If you require further information or documentation please call me at 201-256-3422(daytime). Sincer ly yours, urence Niebling